????....roadblock/shakedown/policemen killed
????....roadblock/shakedown/soldier killed
????/roadblock
"Disgruntled tribesmen have frequently targeted the pipeline in the past few years to try to force the government to improve services to remote and impoverished areas"
"the government to declare Nepal a republic immediately"
"to protect planet Earth from loggers"
313 Brigade (Syria) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted Hezbollah headquarters because of their participation in the ongoing conflict in neighboring Syria.
A Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) spokesperson claimed that the attacks were in response to the killings of Nawab Akbar Bugti's granddaughter and great-granddaughter.
A Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) spokesperson claimed responsibility for the attack and asserted that they had previously warned the construction company against investing in Balochistan because the province was in a state of war and the roads being built were intended for military transportation. Furthermore, he warned that similar attacks would be carried out against private companies who engaged in construction work or oil and gas exploration projects in Balochistan.
A Baloch Liberation Tigers (BLT) spokesperson, Meeran Baloch, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the identity cards of the victims were checked before they were killed in order to target only ethnic Punjabs.
A Baloch Mussalah Diffah Tanzim spokesman, Mir Jang Baloch, calling from an unspecified location, said that his organization had carried out the attack and vowed to continue such attacks in the future against those who are involved in targeted killings and torching government offices. He threatened the Baloch people against participating in the activities of the Baloch Student Organization, Baloch Republican Party, Balochistan National Party and Baloch National Movement, otherwise they would meet the same fate.
A banner attached to the explosive device urged ETA members to kill police officers.
A BLA spokesman, Jiaind Baloch, calling journalists from unidentified location, said: "BLA conducted the attack in response to killing of missing people in government custody."
A Boko Haram spokesman claimed responsibility for the attack, saying the students were targeted for assisting the army.
A Boko Haram spokesperson, in claiming the attack, stated, "We want to prove to the federal government of Nigeria that we can always change our tactics."
A brief statement said the blast was an attempt to assassinate a senior IRA commander from South Antrim who drank in the bar.
A Caucasus Emirate spokesperson stated that Akhmet Kotiyev was targeted because he was the head of an organization which was waging a war against Islam. Additionally, a colleague of Kotiyev stated that he was targeted because of his rehabilitation work with former terrorists.
A FARC broadcast has stated that the mayor will be released when the government accepts his resignation.
A GAM spokesman said, "We planted bombs at various corners of the city for three days, starting on Thursday, so that people will stay home and reflect on what Indonesia has done to them. "By staying home and mourning instead of going out to celebrate, they also won't be targeted by the authorities retaliating against us, like in the past.
A government authority reported the presumed objective of the raiders was to cut the Uvira-Bukavu road.
A government official stated that this was done to 'incite unrest.'
A group claiming to be affiliated with the Janatantrik Tarai Mukti Morcha - Rajan Mukti claimed action was taken against Rana because of his support for the rulers of the hills.
A group, allegedly Kata'ib al-Imam Ali, claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr from Saudi custody in exchange for the release of the victims.
A HAMAS spokesman claimed that the attack was a response to Israel’s military barricade of Yasser Arafat’s compound in Ramallah, West Bank.
A hand written note left at the incident site stated that the bus was targeted because it had run during a 24 hour shutdown.
A handwritten note left at the incident site said that the outfit had given a 12 hour call for shut down in Jharkhand to protest the arrest of its leader Uday Ji at Gomia in Bermo on 05/05/2011.
A Hezbal Islam leader, Sheik Mohamed Abu Abdalla, said the men violated the Islamic law and Football descended from the old Christian cultures and our Islamic administration will never allow watching what they call the FIFA World Cup.
A Hizb-ul-Mujahidin (HM) spokesman said that the attack was in retaliation of the killing of the group's district commander, Amanullah, and three other fighters by the Indian army.
A Hizb-ul-Mujahidin (HM) spokesperson said that the attack was to warn Indian security forces in the Jammu and Kashmir state to stop committing atrocities against common Kashmiris.
A KLA spokesman said that the group abducted Wolfgang because there was discrimination against the Kukis in the implementation of the German NGO-funded development program that would provide relief and rehabilitation work for refugees displaced by the ethnic conflict between the Nagas and the Kukis.
A leaflet disseminated by the group said that the attack was in response to the ongoing siege on Yassir Arafat in Ramallah. It also said that the attack marked the 40th day of Ra'id al-Karmi's liquidation.
A leaflet said that the attack was in retaliation for the assassination of HAMAS leader Ibrahim Al Maqadma.
A letter claiming responsibility said that the group would "block Japan's dispatch of the Self-Defense Forces abroad and a U.S.-led war against Iraq."
A letter left at the incident site accused Panda as being a supporter of 'Shanti Committee' which is opposed to CPI-Maoist and Chasi Mulia Adivasi Sangh (CMAS) being sponsored by the Maoists and that he was exploiting the poor people.
A letter left at the incident site by Maoists claimed Meleka was killed for being a suspected police informer.
A letter left by Maoists near the corpse of slain tribal leader Ganggadhar Chalana stated that the victim was killed after being identified as a police informant.
A letter left by Maoists on the body of Budra Dhangada Majhi claimed that he was killed because the group believed that he was a police informant and had been exploiting his employees.
A letter left near the body described the victim as a police informer.
A letter left on the bodies of the two female victims accused them of prostitution and threatened violence against others engaged in "immoral activities."
A letter left on the body of Balaram Naik by Maoists claimed that he was murdered because he was working as a police informant.
A letter left on the body of the victim by Maoists claimed that the victim was murdered because he was believed to be a police informant.
A letter left on the body of the victim by Maoists claimed that the victim was murdered because he was helping to set up police camps in the area.
A letter that urged the government to push for the establishment of a federal system of government in the Philippines was found.
A letter was discovered in one of the explosive packages, which read, "We respond to the screams of Rohingya." Police believe that the assailants carried out the attack in revenge for anti-Muslim Rohingya violence in neighboring Myanmar.
A Maoist letter recovered from the incident site claimed that Sirika was punished at a ‘Kangaroo court’ for being a police informer.
A Maoist note was recovered from the incident site claiming that the victim was a police informer.
A member of a pro-Russia militia claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "You are all spies. You do not have to walk near our positions. You have nothing to do here at all. Get out of here."
A member of the Christian State-Holy Rus, Yury Kalinin, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "My feelings as a believer had been insulted." Sources noted that the attack was related to a film about an affair between Tsar Nicholas II and Mathilde Kschessinska. Moreover, sources also noted that a note was left at the scene, which stated "Burn for Matilda."
A member of the Free Syrian Army claimed responsibility for the bombing, stating that the car wash was targeted because it was used by members of a pro-Assad militia.
A member of Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the killing of right-wing workers allegedly by the Communist Party of India- Marxist.
A message left at the scene by the Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-M) claimed that the attack was part of their efforts to preserve the forests.
A message was found on the schools wall stating that soldiers be withdrawn from the area,
A message written in red ink said: "This is revenge for people in the mosque in Nong Chik (district) who were cruelly killed by the soldiers".
A military commander said the attacks were aimed "at terrorizing the population" and preventing independence day celebrations at the schools.
A Muslim extremist, identified as Hicham Diop, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack in retaliation for police running him over in 2011.
A neo-Nazi supporter, identified as Tommy Mair, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "put Britain first" as he attacked Jo Cox, who supported Britain remaining in the European Union. Moreover, in court Mair identified himself as "Death to traitors, freedom for Britain."
A note attached to the victim's body warned that anyone "found spying against the mujahedeen would face the same fate."
A note found near the bodies said that they were spying for the United States and warned that all traitors would meet the same fate.
A note found near the body said the man was a "US spy" and had been punished because he was spying on "mujahedin" activities in the area.
A note found with the body stated she was killed for allegedly being a spy for US-led coalition forces in Afghanistan.
A note left at the incident site asked the Bihar government to stop the “undeclared execution of the Operation Green Hunt” and “killing innocent Dalits” by naming them as Maoists.
A note left at the scene by the Garo National Liberation Army (GNLA) stated the victims had been posing as members and committing crimes in the group's name.
A note left at the scene claimed that the attack was protesting actions against immigration centers.
A note left at the scene indicated that the man was killed because he worked as a government-backed soldier.
A note left at the scene said the attack was in protest against the Iraq war.
A note left at the scene stated that the victim was a police informer and was guilty of exploiting women.
A note left at the scene stated that the victims' had not heeded warnings to quit working for a private security company
A note left by the Garo National Liberation Army on the victim claimed responsibility and stated that the victim had been killed because he was a dacoit leader and a police informer.
A note left by the perpetrators said that the attack was on behalf of Allah to convert all non-believers to Islam.
A note left on his body said, "This man has met his fate because he was spying for the American and Afghan forces and giving them help. Whoever helps American forces will meet the same fate."
A note left with the body stated he was killed for being a spy for the United States.
A note was attached to the suicide bomber's leg stating that anyone helping the United States would meet a similar fate
A note was found at the scene of the blast stating that Abedin and his family would be killed if he did not stop publicizing criticisms about pseudo-Islam followers
A note was found on the man's body that said he was an informant for American and Pakistani authorities.
A note was left accusing the victim of spying for the United States and threatened similar punishment for others who also spied for the United States.
A note was left at the scene implying that the attackers believed the victim was informing on them to the police.
A note was left at the scene stating that the attack was in response to "government attempts to deregulate the labor market"
A note was left stating that the attack was in retaliation for an explosion at a football pitch in Ban Bue Su village several days before.
A note was pinned to the victims' bodies stating they were traitors.
A Palestinian extremist claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack in order to "protest." Sources also noted that the assailant was carrying a Palestinian flag and removed the Israeli flag from the restaurant.
A Palestinian extremist claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that she "wanted to attack Jews."
A Palestinian extremist claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for events at Al-Aqsa mosque.
A Palestinian extremist, identified as Ahmed Mansara, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for alleged violations at Temple Mount.
A Palestinian extremist, identified as Ali Abu Hassan, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation "for visits by tourists and Israeli Jews to the Temple Mount."
A Palestinian extremist, identified as Hamam Mesalmeh, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to Israel's military operations in summer 2014.
A Palestinian extremist, identified as Hatem Saleh, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to seek revenge on security guards who assaulted him.
A Palestinian extremist, identified as Muhammad Jamal Al-Kaluti, claimed responsibility for the incident in a will and encouraged "Islamic armies" to "liberate Al-Aqsa Mosque."
A Palestinian extremist, identified as Omar Abd al-Jalil, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated, "I love life and I love to make others happy, but what is my life when women and children are being murdered and when our Al-Aqsa (Mosque) is being stained?"
A Palestinian extremist, identified as Samer Mahmoud Daoud Alhaliba, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the alleged defilement of Al-Aqsa and aggression towards Palestinian children.
A pamphlet found at the site of the attack claimed that it was in response to the reopening the previous week of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) supply routes through Pakistan into Afghanistan. The supply routes had been closed for several months by Pakistan's government in protest over an airstrike, which had killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in November. The group pledged more attacks unless the supply routes were closed.
A pamphlet left at the scene criticized the presence of politics on campus
A police official believed that it was a sectarian killing as the victim belonged to the Shi i minority.
A police spokesman said the woman was killed because a soldier had visited her home.
A press secretary for the Luhansk People's Republic claimed responsibility for the kidnapping and stated that the victims were being held on suspicion of espionage.
A pro-Tamil Tiger organization called for protests over a newly constructed Buddha statue installed by the Sinhala majority.  Sources claim that Trincomalee, home to an equal number of Buddhists, Hindus, and Muslims, was the site of unrest and discontent from protesters unhappy with  Sinhalese businesses that opened despite the planned protests.  Also, the attack occurred shortly before the Vesak festival celebrating the birth of Buddha.
A representative from the ML- Janajuddha faction of the Purba Banglar Communist Party (PBCP) claimed responsibility shortly after the attack, stating that Mouhiuddin was a social exploiter and an enemy of the state. Despite this claim, some officials still suspected BNP intra-party rivalry and conflict as the reason for the attack.
A resident of Hajji Sultan village was hung because he was accused of spying for German troops.
A senior commander of the al Shabaab, Mukhtar Ali Robow, said the four victims were killed accidentally in crossfire.
A seven-member coordination committee (CorCom ) consisting of the Kangleipak Communist Party, Kanglei Yawol Kanna Lup, People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak, People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak (Progressive), Revolutionary People's Front (RPF), United National Liberation Front (UNLF), and United People's Party of Kangleipak, had called for an 18 hour strike. This strike, which was given the moniker of National Black Day, was meant to protest the annexation of Manipur by India in 1949. These seven organizations believed that the annexation accord was signed without the approval of the people. The People's Liberation Army (PLA), speaking on behalf of the Revolutionary People's Front (RPF), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that Assam Rifles were targeted because they did not heed the call to strike.
A spokesman for Lashkar-e Taiba said it had carried out the attacks in revenge for the gunning down of its Kashmir field commander, Salaudin Ayubi, one week prior.
A spokesman for the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade stated that the attack was in retaliation for the deaths of two Palestinian men (Abu Halawa, 23, and Samer Oueiss, 25), whom the IDF killed in Ramallah on March 5, 2002.
A spokesman for the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Ehsanullah Ehsan, claimed responsibility for the bombing, stating in a phone call to Reuters that it was in retaliation for the killing of one of their commanders in the city in 2010.
A spokesman for the terrorist organization claimed that the attack was a response to Israel’s military barricade of Yasser Arafat’s compound in Ramallah, West Bank.
A spokesperson for Devrimici Halk Kurtulus Cephesi (DHKP/C) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the assailants were motivated by the memory of Engin Ceber, a prisoner tortured to death in 2008.
A spokesperson for Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) stated that the attacks were in retaliation for the execution of Sunni prisoners on August 19, 2013.
A spokesperson for Lashkar-e-Balochistan claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was in response to the targeted killing of Baloch elders and women. The groups pledged more attacks unless the targeting of Baloch citizens stopped.
A spokesperson for Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the bombing was carried out because Algeria was encouraging Tuareg insurgents to fight against MUJAO.
A spokesperson for Mujahideen Ansar claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was in retaliation for the Pakistani Army's complicity in American drone strikes.
A spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the shooting of Malik Waris Khan, stating that Khan was attacked because he had been actively working against TTP.
A spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) stated that Deputy Speaker Khushdil Khan was attacked because he had been organizing the tribes in his area against the group.
A spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Shahidullah Shahid, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that groups that failed to support their ideology and fought against the TTP would be targeted.
A spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), Gohram Baloch, claimed responsibility and stated that Muhammad Gul Mengal was targeted because of his continued participation in the local government elections.
A spokesperson for the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) stated that the attack was in response to an earlier attack on their forces by members of the Citizen Armed Force Geographical Unit (CAFGU).
A spokesperson for the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM), Abu Misry Mama, claimed responsibility and stated that the assault on the school was retaliation for the recent arrest and subsequent death of one of their members.
A spokesperson for the Donetsk People's Republic claimed that the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) members were kidnapped because it was believed they were involved in espionage.
A spokesperson for the National Democratic Front-Bicol (NDF-Bicol), Greg Benares, claimed responsibility and stated that the incident was retaliation against foreign mining firms that abuse the environment and put civilian lives at risk.
A spokesperson for the New People's Army (NPA) stated the group targeted the Shennalyne Corporation because it was engaging in logging activities which were deemed illegal and were destroying the environment. Furthermore, the spokesperson stated that the workers were killed because they were identified as being members of the Wild Dog anti-communist group and had engaged in human rights violations.
A spokesperson for the New People's Army (NPA), Dencio Madrigal, claimed responsibility and stated that the police officers were targeted because of their involvement in the illegal drug trade.
A spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the jail was targeted because it was an institution designed to be used against the groups members.
A spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the joint Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) and Tehreek-e-Minhajul Quarn (TMQ) rally was targeted because they are secular political parties.  A source notes that in December, another spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) had issued a statement warning people not to attending secular political gatherings.
A spokesperson from Janatantrik Terai Mukti Morcha-Rajan Mukti (JTMM-R), stated the explosive device was meant to serve as a warning to the victim, Suresh Raut, for his involvement wide spread corruption within the District Development Committee (DDC).
A spokesperson of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) stated that the organization targeted the Frontier Constabulary (FC) because they held them responsible for attacks against tribal communities and the Taliban.
A spokesperson of the Communist Party of Nepal- Maoist (CPN-M) stated that the kidnappings were perpetrated in order to delay the voter registration progress of the Election Commission.
A statement from the All Coppers Are Bastards (ACAB) and Angry Foxes Cell stated that the attack was meant to protest the planned killing of animals and because they considered the police to be a symbol of oppression.
A statement of responsibility, the Manipur Naga People's Army (MNPA) claimed that the bomb attack was carried out as a warning that demonstrated MNPF's disapproval of the Tangkhul Naga Long (TNL) president.
A Taliban spokesman claimed responsibility and said that the people of local Salarzai tribe were targeted as they "support the army" against the Taliban. Taliban spokesman Azam Tariq said that the Salarzai tribe had formed "Lashkar" or private army against the Taliban and that is why they were targeted. "We will also target those in future who support the government against us," Tariq said.
A Taliban spokesman claimed that the target was kidnapped to force his company out of Afghanistan.
A Taliban spokesperson claimed that the woman had been spying for US forces in the region.
A Taliban spokesperson claimed the attack was was done as a reaction to the continuing military operations in North Waziristan Agency. He said more attacks would occur until the operations ceased.
A Taliban spokesperson stated that the incident was in response to unfair verdicts given by Afghani judges and intimidations perpetrated by the Afghan government.
A teacher, Abdol Hadi, was killed for speaking out against bombing attacks and suicide attacks.
A Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson claimed responsibility and said that the attack was revenge for a search operation, during which several of their members were detained.
A Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was in response to an operation that Pakistani security forces had launched against training camps run by TTP in Peshawar.
A Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson stated that the attack was retaliation for a United States (US) drone strike that killed the organization's second in command, Wali-ur-Rehman.
A Turkish dance group was scheduled to perform and Armenians were protesting U.S. aid to Turkey
A U.S. military official believed that the bombings can be retaliation for the joint U.S.-Iraqi sweep through the northern city of Tal Afar to evict insurgents from their stronghold in this area. On the other hand, the blasts coincided with  Iraqi lawmakers announcing Iraq’s draft constitution was in its final form and would be sent to the United Nations shortly.
A video was released of the captive pleading to have American troops leave Afghanistan
A'chik Tiger Force claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out as a message to those paying an extortion to other militant groups to also respond to their demands as well.
Abdiaziz Abu Musab, an Al-Shabaab spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it would continue to target legislators who support President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud.
Abdiaziz Abu Musab, an Al-Shabaab spokesperson, claimed responsibly for the attack and stated that the bombing was part of a campaign to target Western backed government officials and intended to demonstrate that they group can strike anywhere in Mogadishu.
Abductors suspected US ties of Iraqi athletes
Abductors suspected victims of spying for US
Abdul Haq, a spokesperson for Al-Shabaab, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were executed because they were spies for both the French and Somali governments.
Abdul Latif Hakimi claimed the attack on behalf of the Taliban insurgents and said it was carried out because Zarif was a government-backed figure.
Abdul Latif Hakimi, who claims being the spokesman of the Taliban, said that they murdered the Islamic cleric for he was a pro-government candidate.
Abdul Qader Husseini Battalions of the Free Palestine movement claimed responsibility for the incident in an online statement and said that the attack was done to mark Nakba Day, the date on which Israel achieved statehood in 1948.
Abdul Qaqa, a Boko Haram spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack on Lamisla Primary School, stating that it was in response to attacks against Islamic schools by members of security forces.
Abdulaziz Abu Musab, an Al-Shabaab spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that victim was targeted because of his crimes against Muslims.
Abdulaziz Abu Musab, spokesperson for Al-Shabaab, claimed responsibility for the incident, charging the targeted security officials with "corruption and extortion".
Abdullah al-Nashri, an unaffiliated individual, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted the nuns "because they were preaching Christianity."
Abdullah Azzam Brigades claimed responsibility and asserted that the attack was in revenge for a drone strike that killed  Al-Qa'ida leader Badr Munir on February 9, 2012.
Abdullah Azzam Brigades claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for events taking place at Al-Aqsa mosque.
Abdullah Azzam Brigades claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to Hezbollah and Iran's involvement in the Syrian conflict and demanded that the group's members be released from Lebanese prisons.
Abid Hussain was abducted and attacked for accusedly being an informer for the security forces.
Abu Abeer, a spokesperson for an armed wing of the Popular Resistance Committee stated, "The attacks are to reiterate what the group had declared a few days ago: the group is not committed to the Cairo agreement of ceasefire with Israel reached among the thirteen Palestinian factions."
Abu al-Noor, a spokesperson for the Free Syrian Army, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the attack targeted the central security command headquartered in the hotel in response to murders perpetrated by security forces throughout Syria.
Abu al-Noor, spokesperson for the Ahfad Al Rasoul Brigade, a wing of the Free Syrian Army (FSA), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that they were retaliating for the "murders perpetrated by the security forces nationwide."
Abu Bakar Sadiq Jhangvi, a spokesperson for Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, claimed responsibility for the killing of the counterterrorism police officer, stating that the officer was targeted because he had killed members of the group.
Abu bakar Siddiq, a spokesperson for Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in retaliation for the bombing of a Tablighi Jamaat center and a madrassa in Quetta.
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of Al-Qa ida in Iraq, claimed responsibility in a released audio recording, stating that the violence was part of a larger campaign, known as "breaking the walls," aimed at freeing Muslim prisoners, targeting judges and prosecutors, and recapturing territory once held by the group.
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of Al-Qa ida in Iraq, claimed responsibility in a released audio recording, stating that the violence was part of a larger campaign, known as "breaking the walls" aimed at freeing Muslim prisoners, targeting judges and prosecutors, and recapturing territory once held by the group.
Abu Baseer, spokesperson for Mujahideen Ansar, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retaliation for a drone strike, which killed four members of the Turkistan Islamic Party the previous day.
Abu Baseer, spokesperson for the Ansarul Mujahideen sub-group of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted the Shiite community in order to seek revenge "for the brutalities on Sunni Muslims in Syria and Iraq."
Abu Baseer, the spokesperson for Mujahideen Ansar, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was staged to avenge individuals who have been victims of drone strikes.
Abu Bassir, a spokesperson for Mujahideen Ansar, stated that the group carried out the attack to avenge the death of Haqqani Network commander Sangin Zadran, who was killed in a United States (US) drone strike.
Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades said that the attack was retribution for Spain's cooperation with the United States in the Iraq War.
Abu Misry Mama, a spokesperson for the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM), claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the recent abduction of two civilians, who the BIFM believed were detained by the military.
Abu Misry Mama, spokesperson for the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the assault was in retaliation for militia attacks against BIFM-held areas.
Abu Misry Mama, spokesperson for the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retaliation for the torture and killing of a fellow BIFM member by Filipino soldiers.
Abu Misry, a spokesperson for the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM), stated that the attack was in retaliation for the killing of a group member by the military.  However, a government source speculated that the attack was an attempt to derail scheduled peace talks between the government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).
Abu Misry, spokesperson for the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM), claimed responsibility for the incident, pledging further attacks against the Filipino military "until they leave Maguindanao." Moreover, a Filipino military official posits that the BIFM executed the attack in an effort to disrupt the ongoing peace negotiations between the government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).
Abu Mohammed al-Adnani, a spokesperson for Al-Qa'ida in Iraq (AQI), stated in an audio recording posted to a website that the attack was in response to Shiite campaigns which targeted Sunni people in their homes. Furthermore, AQI was targeting security and government forces in "revenge for the elimination and torture campaigns that Sunni men and women face in the prisons of Baghdad and other cities."
Abu Qaqa, a Boko Haram spokesperson, claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was designed to free one of the group's members who had been imprisoned in the police station.  Abu Qaqa also further stated that the attack was carried out because police and security forces are always considered targets by the group.
Abu Qaqa, a spokesperson for Boko Haram, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the group targeted the newspapers because it objected to how Boko Haram was being represented in media reports.
Abu Qaqa, a spokesperson for Boko Haram, claimed responsibility for the attack on the fish market, stating that traders at the market were targeted because they had arrested some of the group's members and handed them over to the Joint Task Force (JTF) of the Nigerian Army.
Abu Qaqa, a spokesperson for Boko Haram, claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was carried out in direct response to claims by the Nigerian government that recent military action had weakened the group.
Abu Qaqa, a spokesperson for Boko Haram, claimed the attack in an email sent to journalists, stating that Sokoto was targeted because many Boko Haram members are imprisoned there.
Abu Qusay, a Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade leader in Gaza, said that the attack was meant to show that the group could "reach any place in Israel, even the heavily protected places, such as a port or airport."
Abu Rasheed Lashkari, a Lashkar-e-Islam (Pakistan) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victim, a leader of an anti-Taliban militia, was targeted in revenge for the killing of eight of the group's members.  In a competing claim, Ehsanullah Ehsan, a spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victim was targeted because he had raised an anti-Taliban militia and was actively working against the group.
Abu Safian, spokesperson for Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted Matanat Ali Khan because he and the prison management system were responsible for torturing some of their imprisoned members.
Abu Walid Sahroui, spokesperson for the Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the group was creating "a new combat zone".
Abu-Abdalla, a spokesperson for Al-Shabaab, claimed responsibility and stated that the three individuals were executed because they were spies that worked for the Somali government.
Abubakar Shekau, a Boko Haram spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the women and children were kidnapped in retaliation for the detention of wives and children of Boko Haram members by the Nigerian military.
Abubakar Shekau, the leader of Boko Haram, claimed responsibility for the blast, stating that the attack was in retaliation for Nigeria's cooperation with the United States in killing Muslims.
Abubakar Siddiq, spokesperson for Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they were targeting the Shiite Muslim community and avenging the death of Matiullah Samiullah.
According to a claim of responsibility purportedly made by the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND), the attack was the first in a campaign to make themselves known, end oil production in Nigeria, and drive out oil companies. The asserted goal was the realization of a more equitable distribution of national oil wealth, particularly for citizens living in the Niger Delta region. The claim maintained that they had been warning citizens about Nigerian leadership, especially President Goodluck Jonathan, whom they accused of wasting public funds and failing to address the nation's and citizens' hardships. Furthermore, South African interests were threatened due to allegations that President Jacob Zuma interfered with efforts to achieve more equitable distribution of wealth and because an alleged MEND leader was imprisoned in the country.
According to a leaflet found at the scene of the attack, an unidentified anarchist group claimed responsibility for the incident, stating simply, "Free the Jailed Anarchists."
According to a letter discovered at the scene, Kiran, the district secretary of the Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the CPI-Maoist targeted Bhagat because he was working as a police informant. Moreover, the CPI-Maoist accused Bhagat of being responsible for an incident that resulted in the death of nine Maoists on April 16, 2013.
According to a letter found on the victim's person, the People's Liberation Front of India, a Maoist faction, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they punished Jitender Singh for disobeying their ordinances regarding welfare work.
According to a media source, the victim was a former member of the Garo National Liberation Army and was killed in retaliation for leaving the group.  However, Sohan Shira, a leader in the Garo National Liberation Army, stated in a note that the victim was killed because he failed to reimburse the group for the cost of an AK-47, which he instead handed over to police.
According to a note left on the corpse of the victim, the Zetas killed the victim because he had betrayed the group.  Sources speculated that the victim, a newspaper journalist, may have been killed because of his reporting on drug crime.
According to a pamphlet found at the scene of the attack, Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted the victim because he was a police informant.
According to a source, immediately prior to the attack, Maoists asked local village women if the presence of a liquor manufacturor was a disturbance. When women stated it was, the Maoists burned the liquor manufacturing unit down.  Maoists also left pamphlets at the scene warning against bringing liquor back to the village.
According to a spokesperson for Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the attack was carried out in revenge for an army offensive against the group in southern Yemen and the targeting of the group's senior members in air strikes.  The spokesperson also noted that the target was the military leader of the offensive in southern Yemen.
According to a statement by the group, the attack was in response to Algeria allowing France to use its airspace to launch air strikes on armed groups in northern Mali.  The attackers demanded the release of 100 Algerian prisoners to northern Mali and an end to French attacks in the region.  Sources note France had begun military operations against armed groups in northern Mali five days earlier.
According to a statement issued by the group claiming responsibility for the attack, the bombing was intended "to avenge the innocent blood of the martyrs of Islam."
According to a statement posted online, Al-Qa ida in the Lands of the Islamic Maghreb (AQLIM) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack in retaliation for France's recent intervention in Mali.
According to a statement published on the Internet, Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was "in revenge for the Muslim children of the Sunni community who suffered from the crimes of the Alawites and their collaborators."
According to a statement published on the Internet, the anarchist group, Mateo Morral Insurrectionist Commandos, claimed responsibility, stating that it wanted to attack places that the Spanish Borbon monarchy considers sacred.
According to a string of Twitter messages, Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was part of their "Ramadan offensive" campaign.
According to a Syrian rebel operative, the UN Peacekeepers were taken hostage in order to secure the removal of Bashar al-Assad's forces from Jamlah.
According to a Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson, the victim was targeted in retaliation for the killing of Sheikh Naseeb Khan, a senior member of TTP.
According to a tribal source, the pipeline was targeted because tribesmen in conflict with the Yemeni government are demanding the reinstatement of soldiers discharged after the civil war and better government services, as well as compensation from a special government Grievance Committee.  However, a government source stated that attacks are not being carried out by tribesmen, but instead by Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) in an attempt to harm the government.
According to an emailed statement, Ansaru (Jama'atu Ansarul Muslimina Fi Biladis Sudan) claimed responsibility for the abduction, stating that it was carried out in response to French military intervention in Mali.
According to an online statement, Combative Minority claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted Giannis Papantoniou because he was a former member of the government and corrupt.
According to an online statement, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retaliation for the Iraqi government's alleged "crimes" against the minority Sunni community. Moreover, the armed Islamist outfit claims that the incident was part of its newly launched offensive campaign called "Harvesting the Soldiers".
According to an online statement, the Informal Anarchist Federation claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that they targeted the Golden Dawn party offices because they wanted to attack them first before Golden Dawn attacked them.
According to an online statement, Unsubordinated Desires, also known as Rebellious Desires, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack in order to support imprisoned anarchist Costas Sakkas.
According to authorities, the communiqué left at the scene stated to get out of El Salvador and Nicaragua and called for support for locked up freedom fighters and grand jury resisters.
According to banners hung by the Knights Templar (Caballeros Templarios), the trucks were burned because the group believed they were helping transport government intelligence agents.
According to district police, the explosives were planted to target school buses on G.T. Road.
According to fliers passed out in surrounding localities, Maoist insurgents blew up the railway tracks in response to what they said is a campaign of violence by local police against villagers.
According to graffiti messages such as "For the independence of the Pattani State," the aim was to further the independence movement in Pattani.
According to information obtained, young boys abducted have been enrolled by force into the rebel army, while the girls serve as sex slaves for the soldiers.
According to letters found at the scene of the killing, Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they attacked Gumpha Kadraka because they believed that he was a police informant.
According to local officials, the Taliban kidnapped the parliament member in order to exchange her for both a ransom and the freedom of four Taliban commanders being held in prison.
According to military officials, Al-Nusrah Front kidnapped the Fijian peacekeepers so that specific demands could be met. Among those demands, it was requested that the group be removed from the UN list of terrorist groups. Additionally, Al-Nusrah Front requested that humanitarian aid be sent to specific areas within Damascus. Finally, the group requested monetary compensation for the deaths of three members recently killed by UN officers.
According to news sources, the perpetrator posted videos on YouTube shortly before the shooting outlining his intentions, which included the elimination of "disgraces of human race and failures of natural selection."  However, many believe that the specific goal was to carry out a copy-cat shooting of the Virginia Tech Shooting in April 2007.
According to official sources, Borbabu was killed for not paying the extortion demanded by the militants.
According to one source, the bombers targeted Kurdish demonstrators who were protesting a provincial elections measure blocked in parliament because of disagreement over a power-sharing formula in the disputed city of Kirkuk, an oil-rich area.
According to pamphlets discovered at the scene of the incident, Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted Sumat Usendi because he was a police informant.
According to pamphlets left at the scene of the attack, the assailants claimed that the attack was in retaliation for police action against local small-scale mining activities.
According to police, based on the materials used in the packages, the assailants aimed to instill fear and cause injuries, not cause deaths.
According to police, Routh was targeted for being a CPM supporter.
According to police, the attack was aimed at protesting and obstructing the proposed steel project of TATA in Bastar.
According to police, the attack was aimed at targeting the family members of military personnel.
According to police, the attack was carried out because the construction company refused to pay extortion money demanded by militants.
According to police, the Limbuwan cadres abducted Dahal when he refused to provide $1,668.97 (RS 75,000) demanded as donation from the budget allocated to local canal construction consumers.
According to police, the Maoists left some literature citing the company's failure to pay 'levy' to the local CPI-M as the reason behind the attack.
According to police, the militants were in search of the People's Liberation Front of India squad leader Mangal Nagesia but upon failing to find him, the militants killed five of his supporters.
According to posters and leaflets left behind at the scene of the attack, Maoists demanded an end to Operation Green Hunt and that the government vacate all school buildings that had been converted into police camps.  The group also stated that police forces had been attacking local tribal women.
According to posters left at the scene of the attack, the Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-M) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the closure of all liquor-manufacturing establishments.
According to posters left by Maoists, the victim was killed because he was a police informer.
According to Radio Mindanao Network, Soliman claimed the attack was in revenge for alleged incidents of violence in Mindanao and the rapes of some Muslim women by soldiers.
According to reports, officials claimed that this bombing was part of a growing conspiracy to destabilize President Hugo Chavez's government.
According to Shiv Sena district President Anandrao Powar, the attack was to protest the lack of action taken by the government during a drought.
According to some police sources, Munda wanted to leave the group following a dispute over distribution of extortion money among the ranks. However, other police sources said that pamphlets recovered from the incident sight claimed that Munda was a police informer.
According to sources, a paper left by the People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak-Progressive (PREPAK-P) with the grenade demanded an end to the construction of a building for the psychiatry department of the hospital.
According to sources, Hussain Nazari and the eight other civilians were killed by the Taliban in retaliation for a recent security operations that killed a number of their members. Additionally, sources noted that the Taliban have vowed to disrupt the upcoming presidential elections, which are scheduled to take place on April 5th, 2014.
According to sources, pamphlets were left at the scene of the attack that demanded the return of Mapuche lands and denounced police violence.  Sources also note that the attack occurred on the 5th anniversary of the death of Mapuche student organizer Matias Catrileo at the hands of police.
According to sources, the attack occurred on the eve of presidential election night and that the LTTE had made a concerted effort to keep the Muslim community from voting.
According to sources, the LTTE targeted Kamaladasan because he was a member of EPDP and had been an informant for the police and army.  Sources also connected this attack to several other LTTE killings in the north and eastern provinces that occurred after the third anniversary of the cease-fire.
According to sources, the New People's Army (NPA) kidnapped the soldier in order to exchange him for a tribal chieftain who was detained on charges of arson.
According to the announced claim, they were targeting US CIA agents who they claimed were meeting in the Slovak Embassy.
According to the claim of responsibility posted to the BiteBack website, the arson attack was carried out "in defense and retaliation for all the innocent animals that have died cruelly at the hands of human oppressors."
According to the fax claiming responsibility, the lumberyard was targeted because it allegedly ignored warnings to repair forklifts that emit "far more pollutants than average diesel engines."
According to the pamphlet, the group's aim was to fight for freedom from "imperialist control," thus the targeting of the American-based Blockbuster.
According to the pamphlet, the group's aim was to fight for freedom from "imperialist control," thus the targeting of the American-based Citibank.
According to the pamphlet, the group's aim was to fight for freedom from "imperialist control," thus the targeting of the American-based McDonalds.
According to the Senator's bodyguards, the kidnappers said that taking Cordoba hostage was meant to send a "peace message" to the government of Colombian President Andres Pastrana.
According to the source, the AUC members had a list of villagers they believed to be working for the ELN, and those were the men they killed.
According to the source, the perpetrators committed this act to protest against the Asian Development Bank's move to extend a loan to India's Kerala State, which was undergoing a financial crisis.
According to writing discovered on the explosive device, Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident, stating, "May Bashar Fall. Death to Hezbollah."
Accusations of spying motivated the attack.
Accused Haideri of negatively portraying the mujahedin.
Achik National Volunteer Council-B (ANVC-B) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they carried out the attack because they suspected that the police officers were rivals disguised as police, since they had refused to produce any documents.
Acted as part of general mobilization effort in support of the Iraqi people.
Actual motive for attack not stated.  However, it occurred in an area referred to as the "triangle of death."
Afghan military said the attack was to disrupt celebrations for Afghanistan's March 21 new year.
African American opposition to the police
African American opposition to the policies of the Palm Beach County school district
African American opposition to the school integration plan instituted by the federal government.  The government plan closed two Black schools.
Afridi had been promoting tolerance working with local leaders against pro-Taliban forces
Aftab was shot dead by suspected militants for allegedly being anti-Islam and anti-jihad.
After receiving information of ten militants holding a meeting in the area; a police party reached the area and asked them to surrender.
After the attack, the police arrested Chroek Mao, a former soldier who claimed he was working with a group of four other people who had been hired to detonate explosives in Phnom Penh by a former soldier, Ouk Satya.  Satya promised Mao and his group $100,000.  Mao did not give the name of his group, but authorities say Satya was attempting to extort money and incite disorder in the area.
against the government campaign of salwa judum movement
Agustin was kidnapped for ransom.
Ahfad al-Sahaba-Aknaf Bayt al-Maqdis claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the recent detainment of five Salafists by Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement).
Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat (ASWJ-Pakistan) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was part of a series of planned attacks against members of the Shiite and Ismaili communities in Karachi city. Sources noted that the attack was part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's majority Sunni and minority Shiite communities.
Ahmad A. Alhaw, an unaffiliated individual, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that "he wanted to kill as many 'Christians and young people' as possible." Sources also noted that Alhaw followed Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) ideology.
Ahmad Marwat, a spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victims were targeted because they were "Shia infidels" and that the group would kill Shiites at every opportunity.  Sources noted that the attack is part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's majority Sunni and minority Shiite communities.
Ahmed Godane, the leader of Al-Shabaab, claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was meant as a punishment to Kenya for sending security forces into Somalia to combat the group.
Ahmed Mansoor, a spokesperson for Ahrar-ul-Hind, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that such attacks would continue until Sharia law was implemented in Pakistan.
Ahmed Mansoor, a spokesperson for Ahrar-ul-Hind, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that such attacks would continue until Sharia law was implemented in Pakistan. Murid Baloch, a spokesperson for the United Baloch Army, also claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was in retaliation to ongoing security operations in Dera Bugti and Awaran.
Ahmed Marwat, a Jundallah spokesperson, claimed responsibility stated that the attack is part of a larger effort to target Pakistan's polio vaccination campaign.
Ahmed Marwat, a spokesperson for Jundallah, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the victim was targeted for his pro-democracy stance.
Ahmed Marwat, a spokesperson for Jundullah, a sub-group of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility and stated that non-Muslims will continue to be targeted so long as drone strikes persist. Additionally, the spokesperson stated that they attacked the Christian church because they were enemies of Islam and any non-Muslims in Pakistan would be targeted in the future.
Ahmed Marwat, spokesperson for the Jundullah faction of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retaliation for the recent killing of Waliur Rehman, a fellow TTP operative, and drone strikes in the region.
Ahnsanullah Ahsan, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that Mullah Nabi was targeted because he had turned against the group. Sources noted that Mullah Nabi is now said to be associated with pro-government militant groups.
Ajnad Misr claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of the group's leader.
Ajnad Misr claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to authorities detaining female students.
Ajnad Misr claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the recent deaths and arrests of demonstrators.
Ajnad Misr claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in retaliation for operations carried out by security forces.
Ajnad Misr claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in retaliation for police mistreatment of women and girls. Sources noted that the devices were planted at a location where riot police frequently gathered to respond to daily protests.
Ajnad Misr claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was retribution for the deaths, detention and torture of Egyptian youth at the hands of security forces under the leadership of Brigadier General Ahmed Zaki.
Ajnad Misr claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they had targeted police officers at Cairo University for the crimes that they had committed against the student population during a crackdown on protesters the previous week.
Akhil Terai Mukti Morcha (ATMM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group targeted the survey office as a warning against corruption.
Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade militants claimed responsibility for firing at an Israeli bus at the Israeli Atara checkpoint in Bir Zeit, West Bank, Palestine. The group said the shooting was in retaliation for Israeli attacks against the Palestinian people.
Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade militants claimed responsibility for opening fire at a car containing a number of Israeli rabbis near Emanuel, West Bank, Palestine. The group said in a statement that they used machine guns to fire on the car.
Al Qaida insurgents might have targeted Al-Jubouri as he was the leader of an anti-Qaida group.
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was in retaliation for Palestinian deaths that had occurred the day before.
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protection of al-Aqsa Mosque.
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the boys would only be returned in exchange for the release of thousands of prisoners. Separately, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) had a pamphlet distributed in its name stating that ISIL kidnapped the boys to support Palestinian detainees as well as to avenge its dead comrades.  Alternatively, Dawlat al-Islam, a sub-group of ISIL, stated that the group had kidnapped the boys in retribution for Israel killing three group members several months prior.
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade claimed responsibility for the incident and stated, "This is to inform the world that the voice of the martyrs is the strongest voice." The assailant also indicated that he carried out the attack in hopes of trading the body of the victim in exchange for his imprisoned brother.
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retaliation for the Israeli government's mistreatment of Palestinian prisoners.
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade issued a statement claiming responsibility and stating that the rocket attack was in response to the death of Arafat Jaradat, who died two days earlier in Israeli prison.
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade states that the incident was in retaliation for the killing of one of its leaders several months earlier
Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades stated that the attacks were in ‘retaliation of the Israeli assassination of Al-Quds Brigades members in Nabulus on May 17, and in response to the siege laid on the Palestinian people.’
Al-Ashtar Brigades claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the executions of its members a day prior.
Al-Fatah Army (Syria) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the government's offensive on Zabadani.
Al-Fateh Al-Jadid claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in creation of the new group
Al-Intiqamu al-Pakistani said that the attack was to avenge the deaths of Kashmiri, Palestinian and Afghani Muslims.
Al-Jihad (Pakistan) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the school was targeted because it provided Pakistani children with a Western education.
Al-Madani Brigade claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the abduction was carried out in retaliation to recent events in Tripoli city.
Al-Mua'qi'oon Biddam Brigade (Those who Sign with Blood) and Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was aimed at Niger nationals for their President's participation in a pro-Charlie Hebdo rally, and for allowing American and French troops to enter Mali.
Al-Mua'qi'oon Biddam Brigade (Those who Sign with Blood) and Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for alleged "government aggression" in North Mali and demanded the release of detainees being held in France.
Al-Mua'qi'oon Biddam Brigade (Those who Sign with Blood) and Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for disrespect against the Prophet and to avenge Ahmed Telemsi, an Al-Mua'qi'oon Biddam Brigade (Those who Sign with Blood) killed by French forces.
Al-Nusra Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that it was carried out in response to the government's constant shelling of residential districts in Syria.
Al-Nusra Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in response to the  government's constant shelling of residential districts in Syria.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it targeted the mausoleum because such shrines promote polytheism.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the attack on the checkpoint, stating that it was a message to Defence Minister Fahd Al-Freij, letting him know that he cannot protect his relatives, even in his ancestral home. The Ajnad Al-Sham faction of the Greater Damascus Operations Room also claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that Rahjan town was targeted because of its status as a base for pro-Assad militias.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out as part of a campaign against Hezbollah.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for a chlorine attack earlier that week.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Hezbollah's involvement in Syria.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent military operations.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to Hezbollah's involvement in Syria.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to Hezbollah's military involvement in Yabrud city, Syria. Liwa Ahrar al-Sunna also claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was in retaliation to Hezbollah's military involvement in Yabrud city, Syria.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in response to attacks carried out by Hezbollah in Syria and Arsal.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Radio Fresh employees were targeted for playing music.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the rocket attack was carried out in retaliation to Hezbollah's military involvement in Syria.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted in revenge for the deaths of members of the Sunni community in Lebanon and Syria. Sources suspected that the attack was part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Lebanon's Sunni and Shiite communities.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident and warned that similar attacks would continue until Hezbollah halted its intervention in Syria's civil war and Sunni prisoners were released in Lebanon.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident, alleging that Syrian government forces were fighting alongside "elements of the so-called Hezbollah."
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they had targeted the base to avenge the government's repression of Muslims.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted the base to avenge the government's repression of Muslims.
Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility for the suicide bombing, stating that the attack was in response to Hezbollah's involvement in Syria.
Al-Nusrah Front in Lebanon claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that attacks would continue until Hezbollah left Syria and Sunni youths in Lebanese prisons were released.
Al-Nusrah Front in Lebanon claimed responsibility in a note and stated that a similar punishment would be meted to people that cursed God.
Al-Qa ida in Iraq claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was part of a wave of violence launched by the group in response to the torture of Sunni Muslim prisoners, including females, by the Shiite dominated Iraqi government.  Sources speculate that the attack was part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Iraq's minority Sunni and majority Shiite communities.
Al-Qa ida in Iraq claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was in retaliation for the Shiite-led government's torture and detention of Sunni Muslims.
Al-Qa ida in Iraq claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that it was in retaliation for the Shiite-led government's torture and detention of Sunni Muslims.
Al-Qa ida in Iraq claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for violent acts committed against Sunnis in the country.
Al-Qa ida in Iraq stated that this string of attacks were in revenge for violent acts committed against Sunnis in the country.
Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the attack and alleged that the victim was working as a spy for the Political Security Organization (PSO).
Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in retaliation for a Yemeni army offensive.
Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that a number of prisoners be released in exchange for Colonel Muhammad Al-Kulaybi.
Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Salim Ghufaina was targeted because he allowed the Huthis to expand into the Jedaan tribal region.
Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to United States (US) air strikes..
Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was part of a larger campaign to target United States (US) drone operations in Yemen.
Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the United States embassy was attacked in retaliation to a recent United States airstrike.
Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because they provided the locations of members of armed groups to the United States.
Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the intelligence headquarters was attacked because it had been receiving support from the United States and had targeted AQAP fighters.
Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they believed that the three victims had worked in collaboration with United States (US) and Yemeni intelligence agencies to plant electronic trackers on AQAP vehicles. AQAP suspected that this tracking capability enabled US drone strikes to target their comrades.
Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) demanded the release of a prisoner, Abdel Basset Al-Qa'idah, in return for the release of the two kidnapped Egyptian engineers.
Al-Qa ida in the Lands of the Islamic Maghreb (AQLIM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the deaths were in retaliation for French missions conducted against Malians and operations by African and international authorities targeting Muslims in the Azawad region.
Al-Qa'ida in Iraq (AQI) claimed responsibility for the attack on the police academy in an online jihadist forum posting.  The group stated that the police graduates were targeted because they would be used by the government to control Sunni areas and "impose the reality of the situation in strengthening the rule of the (Shiites) in the land."
Al-Qa'ida in Iraq claimed responsibility in an online statement, saying that the attack was part of a "blessed Wednesday invasion," targeting Shiites and "traitors of the Sunnis." Sources also noted that the attack occurred two days before an important Shiite religious ritual.
Al-Qa'ida in Iraq claimed responsibility in an online statement, saying that the attack was part of a "blessed Wednesday invasion" targeting Shiites and "traitors of the Sunnis." Sources also noted that the attack occurred two days before an important Shiite religious ritual.
Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility and asserted that the attack was intended to warn the United States (US) against interfering in Yemeni affairs. Further, the attack was in response to the US fighting against Yemen's Islamist forces.
Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the government had failed to honor their side of an agreement to create an Islamic law council in exchange for the assailants vacating a town.
Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the attack on the checkpoint, stating that it was done in retaliation for United States (US) air strikes in the provinces of al-Bayda and Abyan.
Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the attack on the gas pipeline, stating that it was in retaliation for the death of five of the group's members in a drone strike the previous week.
Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it had targeted the Shia Houthis because they were "apostates."
Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Defense Ministry was targeted because it was being used as a staging area for United States (US) drone operations in Yemen.
Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the shooting and killing of Joel Shrum, stating that they did so because he was spreading Christianity among Muslims.
Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) representatives claimed responsibility for the bombing on the Republican Guard camp and stated that it was in response to "crimes" committed by troops.
Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) stated that the officer was targeted because they had determined that he was cooperating with the Sanaa government.
Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) stated that the plane was targeted because it was responsible for transporting weapons and soldiers to Aden to attack Al-Qa'ida fighters.
Al-Qaida in Iraq claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that it was designed to expose the weakness and incompetence of the current Iraqi government.
Al-Qaida in Iraq claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to free members from Tasfirat prison.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victim of adultery.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the victims.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to efforts to rescue Luke Somers, a United States (US) hostage.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Huthis targeting Muslim protesters.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the United Arab Emirates' "role in fighting Islam and Muslims."
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Charlie Hebdo's continuous publication of images of the Prophet Muhammad.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for coalition operations in Lahij.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Saudi military operations.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the military's cooperation with Huthis.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for those killed in security operations.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Central Bank was targeted in order to prevent Huthis from seizing the bank's funds.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the civilians were targeted because AQAP believed they were spies for the United States (US).
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group believed the owner of the targeted building was working with former President Ali Abdullah Saleh.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted for committing adultery.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted for his association with Huthis.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim, Fakri al-Barawi, was targeted for allegedly complying with Huthis.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted military and government buildings in response to an agreement between Huthis and security forces that would involve giving Huthis control of a military base and weapons.
Al-Qaida in the Indian Subcontinent claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Nazimuddin Samad was targeted because the group believed he was an "enemy of Allah."
Al-Qaida in the Indian Subcontinent claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to published books that criticized and mocked Islam.
Al-Qaida in the Indian Subcontinent claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the explosive device was planted in revenge for the deaths of Al-Qaida in the Indian Subcontinent members.
Al-Qaida in the Indian Subcontinent claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Xulhaz Mannan and Tanay Majumder were targeted for promoting LGBT rights.
Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Beatrice Stockly was targeted because she "has succeeded in driving large numbers of Muslim sons from Islam."
Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mohammed Ag Abdellah was targeted because AQLIM believed he was a spy.
Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the government allowing non-Muslims into the country.
Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Mali's collaboration with France.
Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Western operations in Muslim countries.
Al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) claimed responsibility for the incident and vowed to preserve the environment.
Al-Sadr hoped to pressure the Iraqi police to release some of his men from prison.
Al-Shabaab accused the victim of being a spy for the government.
Al-Shabaab accused the victims of having links to the Transitional Federal government and of supporting Kenyan air strikes.  They warned other residents that they would face the same punishment if they provided support to the government
Al-Shabaab attacked the Jazeera hotel, where Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud was hosting a press conference, because they believe that the Somali government is illegitimate.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility and stated that anyone violating Sharia law would face punishment.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility and stated that Hussein Dafor was targeted because he participated in selecting members of Somalia's federal parliament.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility and stated that they had previously warned the restaurant that it would be targeted if it continued to open and serve customers during Ramadan.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for incident and stated that the victims were accused of working with security personnel.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that Colonel Abdullahi Mo'alin was targeted for collaborating with foreign security personnel.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out because of the target's opposition to Sharia law.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in retaliation for Abdikafi Hilowle's cooperation with foreign intelligence services.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the assassination would be a "lesson'' for other journalists.  Al-Shabaab viewed Shabelle Radio as an anti-Islamist station.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the hostages were kidnapped because the group believed that they were spys for the Ethiopian and Somali governments.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it targeted members of the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) and the Somali Prime Minister because the TFG is serving and supporting the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM).  Al-Shabaab claimed AMISOM are invaders and that its forces are massacring innocent Muslims in Somalia.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that they tried to assassinate the President because he was "the head of the enemy."
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the execution and stated that the group believed that Bashar Ahmad was an apostate.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Abdullahi Hussein of mistreating civilians and killing innocent people.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Issa James Mwaisige of being a spy.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Jimale Gobale of orchestrating military operations against the group.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the military of using the targeted positions to extort money from civilians.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of being spies.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of committing sexual assault and murder.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of murder.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of spying for the Africa Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) and the Kenyan and Somali governments.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of stealing.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of working with security personnel.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Abdi Samad was targeted because they believed he was an informant for foreign intelligence agencies.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Abdikarin Hasan Firdhiye was targeted because he prosecuted members of the group.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Abdulahi Qayad Barre was targeted for allowing the involvement of foreign forces in Somalia.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ali Salad Majin was targeted because Al-Shabaab believed he was a spy.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that attacks would continue until Kenya withdrew from the African Union (AU) peacekeeping mission in Somalia.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Awil Abdi Dhiblawe was targeted because the group believed he was working for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Hussein Mo'alim was targeted for committing rape.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that it was part of their larger war against the Somali government.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Kaambooni was targeted for his ill treatment of Muslims in Kismaayo.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ma'alin Abdiqadir Shaykh Adan had been convicted of practicing witchcraft.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mahmud Mursal Muse had committed blasphemy.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Members of Parliament were targeted for allowing the involvement of foreign forces in Somalia.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mohamed Dahir Ali Elmi was targeted because he represented people who were connected to "infidels."
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mohamed Yare was targeted because they believed he was an informant for foreign intelligence agencies.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Osman Dini was killed because he participated in Somalia's parliamentary election, which took place in December 2016.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that police officers were targeted because they were providing security for Somalia's parliamentary elections.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sheikh Ahmed Mohamed Madobe was targeted for "bringing the enemy into the Muslim land." Sources also speculated that the attack was carried out in order to disrupt the peace process between Jubba and the Somali government.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because they believed the victims were spies.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to convey that Al-Shabaab was still strong in the Bakool and Bay regions.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to demonstrate the incompetency of the government in providing security for Somalia.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to re-take control of Kudhaa Island. Sources noted that the island had previously been used by Al-Shabaab to export charcoal, which was an important source of income.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to an airstrike conducted by Somali and American security forces in the area on August 25, 2017.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the presence of Christians in Muslim lands.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to what the group termed as the Kenyan troops' invasion of Islamic regions. Al-Shabaab also indicated that the group would begin targeting Kenyan troops' supply routes in order to disrupt their military presence.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for alleged military operations on mosques in Mombasa.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Kenya's military involvement in Somalia.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations in Somalia.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent military operations.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of seven civilians by Ugandan military forces at a wedding in Merca town in July 2015.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the deaths of Al-Shabaab members.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the deaths of Muslims in Kenyan military operations.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the discovery of a mass grave of civilians that the group blamed on the military.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Uganda's military involvement in Somalia.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to an airstrike that killed a former Al-Shabaab leader.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to Kenya's military involvement in Somalia.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to recent military operations on mosques in Mombasa city.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the death of the former leader of Al-Shabaab, Ahmed Godane, in a United States airstrike.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the police officers' treatment of Somali civilians.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out to avenge the Prophet Muhammad.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was meant to punish the lawmaker for having voted to accept financial support from the African Union and foreign governments.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the elders were abducted after refusing to give Al-Shabaab 100 children to be trained by the group.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the elders were targeted because they were electoral delegates who selected members of the federal parliament to represent Jubbaland in the Somali federal election, which occurred on August 8, 2017.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the engineers were targeted because they worked with Kenyan military personnel.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group believed the victims had robbed vehicles and sexually assaulted female passengers.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group intended to implement Sharia law in Puntland.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA) complex was attacked because they believed it was being used to detain innocent members of the Muslim community. Sources also speculated that the complex was targeted because it included a prison believed to contain Al-Shabaab members that the group was attempting to free.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Peace Hotel was targeted because many African leaders previously met there to collaborate on the current situation in Somalia.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the police personnel were targeted because they were preparing to engage in security operations against the group.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Sahafi hotel was targeted because "apostates and invading Christians" were residing at the hotel.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the soldiers were targeted for their alleged harassment of Muslim civilians. Sources also posited that the attack was carried out in relation to an extortion demand.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the tribal elders were abducted because they participated in Somali's lower house elections.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was accused of spying.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted because the group believed he was a spy.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted because they believed she was a spy.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because the group believed they were spies.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because the group believed they were working with intelligence officials.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because they believed that Members of Parliament rejected Islam because "God is the only true legislator."
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because they were accused of spying for the Somali, Ethiopian, and United States governments.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted for allegedly mistreating civilians.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted for mistreating members of the Muslim community.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the women were kidnapped because they were married to men with ties to the federal government, which invalidates their marriages under Al-Shabaab doctrine.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they were targeting government officials and security forces.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they will continue to fight military forces who steal from Somali citizens.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident in leaflets left at the scene, stating  "We won't retreat. Our target is the government."
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that Heyd was targeted because  he, as a member of Parliament, was responsible for bringing Christian forces into Somalia.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the civilian was killed because he had raped a woman three days earlier. The group also stated that this act demonstrated their ability to enforce Islamic law in areas it controlled.
Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the victims had been members of the Somali National Security Agency and had been spying on Al-Shabaab.
Al-Shabaab declared a "jihad" on Kenya for waging war against Somalia.  The attack on the police camp was a manifestation of Al-Shabaab's campaign.
Al-Shabaab spokesperson Sheikh Abdiasis Abu Musab claimed responsibility for the attack, saying that government officials like the murdered Mohamud Ibrahim Garweyne and those who work for the government were infidels.
Al-Shabaab spokesperson Sheikh Abdulaziz Abu Musab claimed responsibility for the incidents, stating that they were part of a campaign that would continue "until Islam becomes the only principle that rules the country."
Al-Tawhid Brigade claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retaliation for the Syrian Army's violence against civilians and for its use of barrel bombs.
Al-Zawiya Syndicates Council claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that 90 people, who were recently abducted be released.
Alexander's motive was unclear, however he stated that he admired Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and Theodore Kaczynski the Unabomber.
Alexandr Kalyussky, a Donetsk People's Republic official, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Anton Skiba was targeted because he had encouraged killing Pro-Russia militia members for monetary gain on his Facebook page.
ALF claimed the firm "breeds animals for a fate of torture and death in the vivisection industry."
ALF said that anyone connected with Huntingdon Life Sciences would be a target.
ALF stated the fire was set as another strike in their campaign "against an industry that slaughters billions of animals and poisons the people of the world with deadly chemicals and bad nutrition."
Algerian extremists set up fake roadblocks to terrorize Algerian citizens and weaken the Algerian government.
Ali Mahmud Rage, a spokesperson for Al-Shabaab, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Colonel Jama Afgadud was targeted due to his role in combating terrorism.
Ali Muhammad Brown claimed responsibility for the incident and stated later, at his trial, that the attacks were in response to the foreign policy decisions made by the United States.
All Nepal National Free Student Union-Revolutionary claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in opposition to schools with foreign connections.
All Nepal National Free Student Union-Revolutionary claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group carried out the attack because Golden Gate College was preventing its students from forming a student wing of the group at the college.
Alleged retribution for Donaldson's alleged role in republic spy ring at assembly offices
Allegedly a 'rite of passage' into a militia group
Allegedly disturb peace before local and national elections
Allegedly due to being oppressed as a Muslim in America
Allegedly in opposition of housing sprawl in the Phoenix Desert Mountain Preserve
Allegedly in opposition of housing sprawl in the Phoenix Desert Mountain Preserve and the McDowell Sonoran Preserve
Allegedly in retaliation for Russia's involvement in Chechnya.
Allegedly retribution for street protest in the last week
Allegedly to attack Russian citizens in retaliation for Russia's involvement in Chechnya.
Allegedly to curtail leftist parties by government-supported crackdown
Allegedly to influence 2007 election in Guatemala
Allegedly to kill the regional director of the Anti-Defamation League , A.I. Botnick
Allegedly, in protest of animal cruelty and "the slaughter of cattle, chickens and fish."
Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations against the group.
Although no group claimed responsibility for the attack, reports on the incident stated that the People's Liberation Organization of Tamil Eelam (PLOTE) had a long-standing dispute with the Tamil Eelam Liberation Organization (TELO), of which two of the three victims belonged, over the collection of ransom from the town of Vavuniya.
Although no group claimed responsibility for this attack, the perpetrators are suspected of being involved in the rampant drug trafficking that occurs in this area.
Although no specific motive seemed to be given with the phone call warning of the bomb, ETA had recently said they would be targeting British tourists in the area, who often used Malaga airport to visit the Costa del Sol.
Although no specific motive was provided for this incident, sources note that the Red Crescent Organization had undergone some scrutiny in relation to its business practices and decisions.
Although sources suspected that the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) was involved in the attack, an unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out to avenge martyred members of a volunteer corps.
Although the bombing happened at a civilian residence, officials state that foreign forces were the intended target.
Although the precise motive is uncertain, sources cite the LTTE goal for a separate state, along with recent increased demands for self-rule in areas under their control.
Although the precise motive is unclear, sources attributed the incident to ongoing internecine conflicts.
Although the precise motive is unclear, sources speculated that this incident was an attempt by the LTTE to incite the military to retaliate and break the truce agreement.
Although the precise motive is unclear, Wardharaja was a member of the EPRLF, a group which opposed the LTTE.
Although the precise motive is unknown, sources discussing similar incidents speculated that the LTTE was trying to incite the military.
Although the specific motive and perpetrators were unknown, sources commented on the ongoing battle by the LTTE for a separate state.
Although the specific motive for the assassination attempt was not known, sources speculated that the strict stance the presidential candidate that Cifuentes worked for took on guerrillas in the area could have incited rebel violence.
Although the specific motive for the attack was not known, sources suggested that rebels unhappy with the current government regime were behind the bombing.
Although the specific motive for the attack was not known, sources suggested that the bombing could have been related to the election of Yoweri Museveni as President earlier that day.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, authorities blamed the Pattani United Liberation Organisation (PULO).  The source notes that the PULO has been behind previous bombings in the area.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, authorities claimed that the attack was carried out by Maoist separatists who had been extremely active in the area recently in their continued campaign to overthrow the current government.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, authorities claimed that the bombing was carried out by Maoist separatists who were beginning a campaign against the ruling Prime Minister's policies.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, authorities thought that Chinese individuals who had previously been traders in the market but had been thrown out might be responsible.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, one of the sources notes that rebels known to be Hutus were trying to infiltrate the area.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, sources cite the ongoing violence between Israelis and Palestinians in the West Bank area.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, sources note ongoing violence in the area by rebel groups.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, sources note that several other bombings had taken place in the area recently.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, sources note that the Forces for the Defense of Democracy (FDD) had carried out many attacks in the region.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, sources note that the United States and other countries were in the process of forming a coalition to target terrorists in the Middle East who were seen as responsible for the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center attacks.  Sources also note that violence had been ongoing in the area.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, sources note that violence in the area had been increasing between Madurese and Dayaks.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, sources note that violence, and particularly bombings, had increased recently in the area.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, sources noted that officials in the area had been targeted recently due to Haitian government elections that were thought to have been tampered with.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, sources speculated that it was related to the other anthrax letters sent out across the United States, as well as to the World Trade Center attacks on September 11, 2001.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, sources suggested that rebels unhappy with the current government regime were behind the attack.
Although the specific motive for the attack was unknown, the ETA was active in the area.
Although the specific motive for the bombing was unknown, sources speculated that it could have been a response to the election of Yoweri Museveni as President, which occurred shortly before the bombing.
Although the specific motive for the kidnapping was unknown, sources thought the attack could have been related to ongoing peace talks between FARC and the Colombian government.
Although the specific motive for this assassination was unknown, it was thought that Rajimov was killed due to his central involvement in the planning of the upcoming independence day celebrations.  Also, sources note that government officials in the area had been targeted and killed recently.
Although the specific motive for this attack was not known, one source notes that the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT) has targeted politicians in the area recently, engaging in killings and kidnappings.
Although the specific motive for this attack was not known, sources detailed the many attacks the AUC had been involved in right around the time of this attack.
Although the specific motive for this attack was not known, sources noted that violence in the area by rebel groups had been increasing, and was specifically targeting government officials, as well as citizens.
Although the specific motive for this attack was not known, sources speculated that this was a continuation of the violence between Israelis and Palestinians, and that this attack would disrupt ongoing peace talks between the two parties.
Although the specific motive for this attack was not known, sources suggested this was one more act of violence in the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, authorities believed that this attack was related to the other anthrax attacks that occurred around this time across the United States.  It was unclear whether these anthrax attacks were related to the September 11, 2001 attacks in New York City and Washington, DC.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, FARC was active in the area in their continued conflict with the government.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, it was thought that the perpetrators were protesting police behavior at the G-8 summit in Italy.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources believed this was a continuation of the violence between Israelis and Palestinians over the disputed territory.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources note Islamic militants were active in the area, especially the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat, who had disagreements with the government.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources note that Aydamirov had recently left his position as chief of the Gekhi government.  Sources also note that violence in the area had been high recently.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources note that FARC and the Colombian government had signed a peace deal just days before this incident.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources note that the AUC was responsible for similar attacks that occurred only shortly before this one.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources note that the country has been in the midst of conflict for years, with many civilians being targeted by rebels.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources note that violence in the area, especially violence perpetrated by the United Self Defense Units of Colombia (AUC), was increasing.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources noted that paramilitary groups were active in the area and responsible for the killing of many citizens.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources noted that the Taliban blamed members of the opposition and claimed they were trying to destroy the way of life in Kabul.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources noted that this was possibly a continuation of the violence between Israelis and Palestinians in the area.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources speculated that this incident was yet one more in a series of violent attacks perpetrated by that NDFB to gain the attention of the Indian government.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, sources suggested that this incident might have been related to a previous assassination attempt made on the man's life two years previously.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, the letter left next to Placido threatened workers at her old place of employment, the Miguel Agustin Pro Juarez human rights center.  Sources and authorities noted that Placido had previously been threatened numerous times and had survived several kidnapping attempts.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, the source notes that rebels have targeted officials in the area recently and in the past.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, the source notes that the Basque Fatherland and Freedom (ETA) was active in the area.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, the source notes that the FLNC has been trying to gain autonomy in the area for years.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, there was ongoing conflict in the area between Palestinians and Israelis.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, this was thought to be a continuation of the violence between nationalists and loyalists in the area.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, UNICEF noted that many children in the area are kidnapped for to be used as labor, sex, or war slaves.
Although the specific motive for this attack was unknown, violence between Palestinians and Israelis was ongoing.  Despite the fact that the two governments were attempting to come to a peace deal, violence was increasing.  Palestinians were continuing targeting Israeli military members and civilians in their uprising.
Although the specific motive for this incident was unknown, authorities suggested that the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) or another group from the Kanpur area could be responsible, as there had been violence in that area.  Authorities also noted that, as the bomb did not detonate due to a weak battery, it seemed as if inexperienced individuals built and planted the bomb.
Although the specific motive for this incident was unknown, sources note that elections were upcoming.  The sources also mention that former President Estrada, now jailed, was currently on trial and that his supporters were protesting.
Although the specific motive for this incident was unknown, sources note that the ELN and other rebel organizations were continuing their acts of violence in the area.
Although the specific motive is unclear, sources cite ongoing attacks by the LTTE against those organizations, including the EPDP and the military, working against them in their fight for an independent state.
Although the specific motive is unclear, sources noted that this attack was a continuation of previous attacks by the LTTE on police.  Also, the attack occurred near the annual feast of the Panama kovil.
Although the specific motive is unclear, sources reference the violence that has occurred in the area since the split between the Karuna faction and the LTTE.
Although the specific motive is unclear, sources speculate that the LTTE wanted to obtain a ransom from the families of those abducted.
Although the specific motive is unknown, the victim was the brother of a member of the Eelam People's Democratic Party
Although the specific motive was not known, it was thought that aid workers were being targeted as they were helping rid Colombia of drugs.
Although the specific motive was not known, sources noted that Khasru had recently reported on corruption in the area, and that journalists had been targeted in the area recently due to reports such as these.
Although the specific motive was not known, sources suggested that rebels displeased with the current government regime were responsible.
Although the specific motive was unclear, it was thought that this attack was targeting ongoing elections in the area.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources cite a rise in violence in the previous weeks as the LTTE continues their campaign for a separate state for Tamils.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources cite ongoing violence between LTTE and the Karuna faction.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources cite recent fighting between the LTTE and the Sri Lankan government, as well as peace talks that were recently scheduled in the area.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources cite the increased violence perpetrated by the LTTE in recent weeks over foreign government intervention.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources cite the ongoing battle between the LTTE and government forces as a possible motive.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources cite the ongoing battle between the LTTE and the government in Sri Lanka due to the desire of the LTTE to have a separate state for the Tamil minority.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources cite the recent increase in fighting between the LTTE and Sri Lankan forces.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources cite violence in the area stemming from the civil war that began in Algeria in 1992 in an attempt to quell the election of a democratic government.  Sources note that at least 28 people, including six security force individuals, have been killed in a month-long series of clashes.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources cited the ongoing conflict between the LTTE and the Karuna faction.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources describe ongoing violence between religious groups in the area.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources note a recent increase in the fighting between the LTTE and Sri Lankan forces.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources note that armed groups in the area have been responsible for increasing violence in this area recently.  Sources note that clashes between rebels and military have occurred since 1992, when the military prevented rebels from winning a government election.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources note that the attack followed a visit to Sri Lanka by a US State Department Official and the Archbishop of Canterbury.  Sources also note the ongoing fighting between the LTTE and government forces.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources note that the military had recently increased its campaign against the LTTE.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources note that the police often change their transportation at the last minute to decrease the chance that the LTTE will attack them.  On this day, the police had switched from a police jeep to a civilian van, but sources note that word must have gotten back to the LTTE about this.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources note that the Tanzim members mistook Haim and his friends for members of the military.  This was seen as a continuation of the violence stemming from the uprising by Palestinians in the face of occupation by Israel.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources note that the Tigers, the Sri Lankan government and a Norwegian peace envoy had their first meeting to discuss a peace treaty, but that the next meeting was cancelled when both sides accused each other of violence.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources note that there was ongoing violence in the area, with rebels trying to take over local villages.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources note that Vavuniya, the site of the attack, is in the control of the government but is near rebel areas, and that soldiers are often in the area of the attack.  Sources also cite recent attacks by the LTTE on government forces.  Sources also speculated that the actual target of the attack was a military motorcycle in the vicinity of the attack, but that the thrown grenade missed its target and hit the fruit stand instead.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources note the increased fighting between the LTTE and government forces in the past year in a bid by the LTTE for a separate state.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources note the ongoing targeting of Sinhalese individuals who work for the Sri Lankan government (a category which home guards fall into), as well as Sinhalese civilians.
Although the specific motive was unclear, sources suggested that this could have been a targeted attack by the Israeli government to kill el-Khadi, a known Fatah member.  The sources also suggest that a bomb could have detonated prematurely as it was being made in the residence.
Although the specific motive was unclear, the fighting between the LTTE and government forces had been increasing.
Although the specific motive was unclear, the LTTE have targeted members of the government and military in their campaign for a separate state for Tamils.
Although the specific motive was unclear, this event occurred during an ongoing battle between the LTTE and Sri Lankan forces in the LTTE's ongoing drive for a separate state.
Although the specific motive was unknown, a debate arose as to whether this incident was perpetrated by the LTTE, or by government troops targeting the LTTE in a rebel-held area in the ongoing battle for a separate state by the LTTE.  The government forces were not supposed to be in this area as it would violate the ceasefire agreement.
Although the specific motive was unknown, a prominent Hamas leader said that the increasing violence and attacks against Israelis in the area was due to Israeli occupation of disputed areas such as the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Although the specific motive was unknown, a similar incident occurred a week before and UNITA claimed responsibility for the attack.  The country was in the midst of civil war.
Although the specific motive was unknown, authorities blamed the attack on rival gangs in the area who had been active recently.  Sources also note the ongoing ethnic conflicts in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, authorities blamed the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), claiming they were trying to destabilize the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, authorities speculated that this kidnapping and killing was a response to ongoing peace talks between the rebel group and the Colombian government.
Although the specific motive was unknown, authorities suggested that the bomb could have been a warning to Palestinian workers in Isreal.
Although the specific motive was unknown, authorities suggested the bombing could be related to organized crime in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, death squads were known to be active in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, Exxon Mobil company had been repeatedly targeted in the area due to possible human rights infractions they were involved in in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, government officials claimed this was an attempt to destabilize the government.
Although the specific motive was unknown, it was believed that those killed were spying for the government.  The main goal of the People's War Group was to create a separate state and split from the government.
Although the specific motive was unknown, it was thought that aid workers who were working to fulfill the goals of the United States to rid Colombia of drugs were being targeted.
Although the specific motive was unknown, it was thought this attack was related to ongoing village elections.
Although the specific motive was unknown, Lokpobiri was facing impeachment before the incident over questionable political practices including embezzlement and intimidation.
Although the specific motive was unknown, loyalists continued to commit violence against Catholics in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, Makeyan had received death threats before the attempt due to his political views and accusations he had made against the government in power.
Although the specific motive was unknown, many soldiers and pilgrims from Amarnath and Vaishno Devi use the station.  It was thought that the bomb was meant to target these individuals, as the bomb was detonated before the train arrived and all the passengers were in the waiting area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, one of the sources describes how the government squashed an oppositional rally the previous week and arrested hundreds of people planning to take part.  The source also describes the ongoing sectarian violence in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, one of the sources mentions that at the time of the explosion, the mayor of Cherkessk was on the bridge, although was not injured.  There had been several other attempts on the lives of officials in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, one source notes that the National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) was active in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, one source speculated that if the ELN was responsible, it was due to frustration over the inability to declare peace with the government because of the actions of militias in the area.  Other sources speculate that as Cali was the site of a big soccer tournament and the Once Caldas were currently guests of the hotel, the bombing was meant to target them.  Sources also speculated that the target might have been the police station across the street from the hotel.
Although the specific motive was unknown, Pakistan blamed India for the attack, noting the outstanding tension between the two countries.  India denied the allegation and blamed Pakistan for committing terrorist acts in Kashmir.  The source also notes recent violence against Pakistani civilians in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, Palestinian authorities blamed Israeli forces for this incident, claiming it was an attempt to quash the uprising against Israel.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources believed this attack was a continuation of the violence occurring in the disputed area between Israelis and Palestinians.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources cite a recent claim by the government that things in the area had returned to normal, and a backlash response to this statement by rebels.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources cite ongoing violence in the area, known to be an inhabited by rebels who have carried out attacks on civilians over the past decade due to the government's interference with elections and prevention of a government transition to Muslim fundamentalism.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources cite the ongoing battle for the Sem Dnei publishing company, noting that Biryukov recently took over the company in a hostile takeover, ousting the former president and threatening the independent nature of the the company's publishings.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources cite the ongoing ETA battle for an independent state.  Sources note that this decades-long battle had led to the deaths of hundreds of people.  Many of these incidents have either been claimed by or blamed on ETA.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources claim that dissident republicans were behind the attack.  The incident, and several similar incidents before this one, led to disruption of transportation services over an extended period and across a wide area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources claim that those responsible could have connections to "Zionists and Americans", and were trying to spy on and undermine Iraq.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources claimed that this was a planned attack, possibly due to Deniyev's installment as deputy chief because of his support of the government's opposition.  A Peace Treaty signed several years back required that 30% of the government's employees be comprised of oppositional proponents.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources describe an ongoing campaign of violence directed against the government in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources describe how Filho was supposed to testify the next day about government fraud perpetrated by the local mayor.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources describe the ongoing battle between Palestinians and Israelis over the disputed areas of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.  Civilians were often targeted in this battle.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources describe the ongoing violence perpetrated by rebels against civilians and others in Colombia.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources described how the National Liberation Army (ELN) had been active in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources described ongoing violence in the area and noted that the railways were often targeted.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources detail the ongoing violence in the area due to ongoing political upheaval and the transportation of drugs and weapons into Tajikistan from Afghanistan.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources discussed other incidents of violence in the area, thought to be conducted by Georgian militants.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note ongoing tension between the groups and efforts by Jamaat-Shibir to disrupt the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Albanian extremists were active in the area, especially with abductions, as they were displeased with the Macedonian government.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that an increase in violence in the area may be due to sectarian loyalists targeting Catholics and nationalists in an attempt to disrupt the Good Friday Agreement.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that at least two other suspected anthrax attacks had occurred in Kenya at the same time, and they were possibly related to the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Drummond Ltd. had been targeted by FARC, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, in the past to get money by extortion methods.  The company oversaw the Loma mine, which is the second most productive coal mine in Colombia.  Over 116 executives in the labor industry had been killed in 2000.  Sources also note that both paramilitary groups and guerrillas were in the area at the time of the attack.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Exxon Mobil has been targeted numerous times by militants who are active in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that government leaders in the area had been targed recently.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Israeli and Palestinian officials were attempting to meet for peace talks when the attack occurred, and that Israel was considering cancelling the peace talks because of the attack.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Malik had recently resigned from his position as block president in a newspaper advertisement, but was possibly killed because of his association with the National Conference anyway.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Moorehouse was probably mistaken as someone else the gang was looking for.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Ndilinge had reported people were following him and he felt he was in danger before the attack.  The sources also discuss how politicians in the area had been targeted and killed before.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that oil and gas surveyers are often targeted by local tribes.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that ongoing violence between tribes has killed hundreds, and that this was a possible attempt by the National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) to expel Adivasi tribal members from a region the NDFB considered theirs.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Orozco was being targeted by members of a death squad with paramilitary connections due to his status as an activist.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Pakistan has been the site of increased violence recently, and that many Afghans blame Pakistan for their purported support of the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Pala was outspoken in both of his positions as city councilman and journalist.  He co-founded the Alsa Masa group in an attempt to repel hit squads associated with communists.  He was also vocal against communism in his broadcaster job, a trait that the Reporters Without Borders group said made him a target.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Perez often reported on well-known people in the area who were involved in questionable dealings.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that previous bombings in the country have also targeted foreigners, particularly Britons.  Three foreign nationals were arrested for those bombings and claimed responsibility for the attacks, although the veracity of their claims were in question.  Sources suggest that at least some of the bombings may have been related to alcohol trading and other illicit activities, though they are unsure if the incident in question was connected to the other bombings.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Saengsopit reported on political corruption in the area and had received several death threats recently.  He had been under supervision by authorities in case someone made any attempts on his life, but that supervision was lifted shortly before he was killed.  One of the men arrested in this case was a local politician's aide.  Sources also note that in his position as chairman of the local cooperative, he had engaged in restructuring which had left many people without jobs and angry.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that sectarian violence in the area has been rampant, and many attacks have been carried out by Lashkar-e-Jhangvi.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that sectarian violence targeting Shiites in the area had risen dramatically after an extremist belonging to the Sunni religion was put to death recently for a murder committed in the early 1990s.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that several letter bomb attacks had occurred recently, possibly in response to the elections which appointed Prime Minister Berlusconi and the upcoming G8 summit.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that several other bombs had been detonated in the area recently, killing and injuring many.  One of the sources also notes that the head of the Voz newspaper had been elected to head a group tasked with ending violence in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that suspected militants had been involved in several violent incidents with members of the government over the past several days.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that the attack occurred on the anniversary of the day when the Shining Path began their war against the government of Peru twenty-one years earlier.  Sources also note that the area was due to have elections soon.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that the brothers had recently spoken out publically against the goals and practices of the Croat Democratic Union, which was thought to be responsible for other violence in the area recently in their quest for a separate government.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that the bus terminal had been targeted previously.  Sources speculated that the bombing might have been related to extortionists in the area who attack businesses that do not pay them money.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that the couple's police officer son was kidnapped two months before and had not yet been recovered.  Sources also note the ongoing violence in the province of Aceh since the 1970s, when rebels began fighting for an independent Muslim state.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that the current government regime in Kenya was possibly trying to tamper with the elections, and the Democratic opposition party was trying to unite the area, win the election, and take over the government.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that the newly-appointed Argentinian Economic Minister used to work at the headquarters office that was targeted in this bombing.  According the sources, the pamphlets strewn about in the explosion protested the austerity plan being implemented by the Minister, which included cuts of eight billion dollars in federal assistance, health and education programs.  This plan was an attempt to pull the country out of its current state of recession.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that the people of Pakistan were celebrating Pakistan Day, a national holiday.  A Pakistani official claimed that the attack was an attempt to make the government look bad globally.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that the rebels and government have been engaged in ongoing conflict as the Hutu rebels will not agree to a ceasefire.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that the suspects accused in the rape were police officers in the area.  The Human Rights Watch group claimed that the local police had killed these three men to prevent the religious figure from testifying.  The women who accused the police officers of rape were also taken into custody for questioning and, when released, changed their stories and claimed that rebels raped them.  The group also points to recent violence against human rights workers and claims the violence was perpetrated by police and military officials.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that this attack was a continuation in the attacks perpetrated by Palestinians against Israelis due to Israeli occupation in the disputed areas of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that this was possibly a continuation of the violence between Shiites and Sunnis in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that this was the second time the family had been attacked, presumably because they were Catholic and sectarians were continuing their campaign in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that this was thought to be a continuation of the violence in the area between Palestinians and Israelis.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that two mayors of Tolu, including Romero, had been killed and that over 20 Colombian mayors had been killed in the past year.  Sources note that the area is heavily populated with paramilitaries and insurgents.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that Vasquez was the second official from the radio station to be killed in less than a year.  Furthermore, the killing of journalists in the area was common.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that violence against vulnerable locations in the area such as churches and the homes of those who work in churches had recently occurred.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that violence in the area had been escalating since the Palestinians began protesting Israeli occupation of the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that violence in the area has targeted civilians.  Also, one source notes that it was almost time for a religious pilgrimage in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that violence is escalating between Palestinians and Israelis in the West Bank area, and that several other sniper attacks by Palestinians had occurred recently.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources note that violent attacks in the area have occurred more frequently recently, and that the NLFT was a known presence in the area.  According to sources, the NLFT's goal was to achieve independence for their homeland.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources noted that elections in the area were upcoming, and that it was the intention of the Real IRA to disrupt these elections.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources noted that the attack occurred less than one day before the leader of the People's National Congress/Reform oppositional party was to meet with Guyana's President to discuss ending widespread violence in the area after recent elections took place.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources noted that the letter might be related to the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center attacks and subsequent anthrax attacks on the United States.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources noted that there was an ongoing war between a local drug gang and a group of paramilitary members.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources noted that two extremist organizations were active in the area, and had recently committed violence against civilians.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources speculated that the attack could have been related to Markarian's business dealings, as he was involved in importing oil.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources speculated that this abduction was related to other kidnappings that had occurred recently in Manila, supposedly to create chaos for the government.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources speculated that this attack was related to the killings and kidnappings of the ELN leader's other siblings.  Sources also speculated that a rival terrorist organization could be behind the attack.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources state the attackers specifically targeted that place and those workers.  Sources also note that agencies and organizations in the area have been attacked previously.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources suggest that the stock of explosive material previously stolen by ETA from the same store was ruined by age and they needed to obtain more explosives and detonators.  Sources also note that this incident illustrates the desire of ETA to continue operating in France.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources suggested that this assassination could have been due to the Deputy Minister's political stance on organized crime.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources suggested that this attack could have been related to the ongoing conflict in the region.  Massqauoi was taking supplies to a village affected by this fighting, as it was near the border region with Guinea where the fighting was heaviest.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources suggested that this attack was related to the killing of Haitov's son a year before (possibly due to some questionable business dealings by Haitov), and a possible subsequent private investigation led by Haitov.  Sources also suggest that rival gangs may be responsible as several other deaths in the area had been blamed upon them as well.
Although the specific motive was unknown, sources suggested that this incident could have been related to two other anthrax letters sent in Nairobi, as well as the World Trade Center attacks in September, 2001 in the United States.
Although the specific motive was unknown, Taliban officials claimed that opposition forces were attempting to ruin the way of life in Kabul.
Although the specific motive was unknown, Tehrik-e-Jafria, a Shiite group, blamed Sunni Muslims.  The source mentions the ongoing clashes between Sunnis and Shiites in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the bombing followed clashes between Pakistani and Afghanistan's Taliban forces along the disputed border regions.  The leader of the Taliban forces then issued a warning to Pakistan's head officials to remove themselves from the border region.  It was unclear whether the incident in question was related to these other events.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the bombing was the third to occur that week after the presidential elections, which had lasted about two months and been marked by violence.  Sources note that in previous attempts over the years, rebels who were displeased with the election outcomes due to probable election rigging were possibly responsible.  Sources were unsure if this bombing was related to that week's election.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the father at the residence was a convicted member of the Orange Volunteers.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the LTTE have been known to attack police, military and government entities in their campaign for a separate state for Tamils.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the source notes that militants are thought to be responsible for several acts of violence in the area recently.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the source notes that sectarian violence between Shiites and Sunnis has been increasing and that security in the area has been increased due to the beginning of Moharram, a holy month in Islam when rituals are performed.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the source notes that the Great Eastern Islamic Raiders Front has claimed to be behind other violent acts against various groups.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the source notes that the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) were responsible for violence in the area, including a previous assassination of a congressman.  The source also notes that Polania had escaped a previous kidnapping attempt two years previously.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the source notes that the suspected paramilitary members had been displaced from their base of operations due to American-supported spraying of cocoa fields in the area.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the source notes that UNITA is active in the area due to the ongoing civil war, and prefers to attack convoys in the manner they did in this incident.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the source notes that violence between militants and the government has been high as the militants do not acknowledge the peace treaty established by the government over the disputed Kashmir region.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the source notes that violence in the area of Aceh province had been increasing due to civil unrest with the government.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the sources describe the ongoing violence between Palestinians and Israelis, and note that at the time of the shooting international officials were meeting in nearby Ramallah in an attempt to establish a peace treaty.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the sources note that some individuals blamed India for the incident due to the ongoing conflict between Pakistan and India.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the sources note that the father, Hamsa Hajra, was thought to be involved with the Serbian Secret Service during the war in Kosovo, alienating the people in his village due to the violence he engaged in.  Threats and attempts on his life were made previously.
Although the specific motive was unknown, the sources proposed that this attack against a policeman's store could have been a response to the police crackdown on ETA activities.
Although the specific motive was unknown, this attack was thought by sources to be an ongoing campaign to target tourists in the area, as well as a possible response to the arrest of a top ETA leader.  Sources also note that shortly before the bombing, a Spanish official publicly declared he would end ETA terrorism.
Although the specific motive was unknown, this incident was thought to be related to recent violence in the area meant to disrupt the ongoing polling process.
Alwan was killed for working with westerners in Iraq.
Am Dam is the second town to be taken by the National Alliance rebels in their advance on the Chadian capital, Ndjamena.
Amanullah was kidnapped by the Taliban in order to carry out Jihad against security forces.
Amrozi and Samudra admitted that the explosion targeted Westerners to avenge perceived injustice against Muslims worldwide.
An "anti-regime group" claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they were targeting supporters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
An Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) spokesperson stated that the attack was in response to statements made by Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, Yemen's president, which supported drone strikes launched by the United States (US) and continuation of the Yemeni government's counter-terrorism strategy.
An Al-Qa'ida in Iraq spokesperson claimed responsibility for the attack on a police patrol, stating it was designed to expose the weakness and incompetence of the current Iraqi government.
An Al-Qaida internet claim of responsibility noted that the attack was made in the name of slain leader, Abu Annas al-Shami.  He was a top lieutenant for Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.  The message went on the indicate that the attack was a response to the US military offensive in Fallujah, Iraq, approximately a month prior to the attack.  Moreover, the claim noted the needs to overthrow the House of Saud in Saudi Arabia and remove Jewish and Western influence in the Muslim holy lands.
An Al-Shabaab spokesperson claimed the attack and said that this was part of a campaign targeting security officials and legislators.
An anarchist group called Anarchist Struggle said it had carried out the attack to protest against the detention of Symeon Ceisitis, who was being held by Greek authorities for various criminal acts.
An anonymous message was sent by opponents of the World Trade Organization and globalization.
An anti-white extremist, identified as Kori Ali Muhammad, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted Carl Williams because he felt disrespected by him.
An anti-white extremist, identified as Kori Ali Muhammad, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted the victims because he wanted to kill "as many white males as possible," who he believed "were responsible for keeping the black people down."
An arrested accomplice, Saw Myint Lwin, confessed after interrogation that the bombing was meant to deter foreign investments.
An arrested accomplice, Saw Myint Lwin, confessed after interrogation that the bombing was part of a string of attacks meant to deter foreign investments.
An assassination attempt on Foreign Minister Mahmoud Zahar by Fatah gunmen motivated the attack on Abass's residence.
An attempt to assassinate the state minister.
An attempt to disrupt the local elections on January 3, 2000.
An attempt to stop women from going to schools and joining seminaries
An ELF communiqué claiming credit for the attack stated the attack was a protest of school-sponsored research on genetically modified crops.
An individual, identified as Amedy Coulibaly, claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in a video posted online.
An individual, identified as Amedy Coulibaly, claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in a video posted online. Sources also suspected that Coulibaly carried out the attack in order to negotiate the release of Cherif Kouachi and Said Kouachi.
An individual, identified as Anton Lundin-Pettersson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he was opposed to immigration policies in Sweden.
An individual, identified as Bobby Joe Rogers, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack due to his anti-abortion beliefs.
An individual, identified as E.Y., claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Fazil Say Classical Music Concert attendees of "disrespecting the mourning" of those who were killed in the December 10 Istanbul attacks.
An individual, identified as Eric Frein, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack with the intention of bringing about a "revolution" in the United States.
An individual, identified as Eric King, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack in retaliation to deaths throughout the Middle East and Chile as well as events in Ferguson, Missouri.
An individual, identified as Ismaaiyl Brinsley, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the death of Michael Brown and Eric Garner by authorities.
An individual, identified as Izaya Noda, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted East Japan Railway Company because the company used excessive electricity.
An individual, identified as Jac Souza dos Santos, claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the application of the Clean Record law, which prevents politicians with corruption accusations from running for office. Dos Santos also demanded the extradition of Cesare Battisti, a former member of the Armed Proletarians for Communism.
An individual, identified as Jean-Claude Bridges, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted New Holy Deliverance Outreach Ministry because the church's congregation was predominantly African American.
An individual, identified as Jedediah Stout, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted the mosque because he disliked Islam.
An individual, identified as John Russell Houser, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack with the intention that it would harm the United States (US) economy.
An individual, identified as Justin Bourque, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to urge others to fight against military personnel, who protect government institutions, as well as the rich.
An individual, identified as KC Tard Jr., claimed responsibility for the incident and described Balwinder Jit Singh as a "terrorist" and a "suicide bomber."
An individual, identified as Larossi Abballa, claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An individual, identified as Michael Conrade Sibley, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he planted the devices in order to demonstrate that incidents of terrorism can occur anywhere.
An individual, identified as Mitchell Hapner, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he was attempting to "eradicate porn."
An individual, identified as Muhaydin Mire, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Western operations targeting the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in Syria.
An individual, identified as Murat Sahin, claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victim of being a "traitor;" however, sources suspected that the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) may have been involved in the attack.
An individual, identified as Nassir, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the treatment of children in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
An individual, identified as Pavlo Lapshyn, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out due to his white supremacist ideology.
An individual, identified as Rasheed Abdul Aziz, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he had been sent by Allah to "slay infidels."
An individual, identified as Robert Lewis Dear, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he was a "warrior for the babies."
An individual, identified as Zaur Dadaev, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Boris Nemtsov was targeted in retaliation for his alleged negative comments against members of the Muslim community. Sources also suspected that Dadaev may have carried out the attack in retaliation for Nemtsov's criticism of the Charlie Hebdo attack in January 2015.
An NPA statement found at the scene said that the buses were burned because the company refused to pay revolutionary taxes.
An unaffiliated individidual, identified as James Anthony Mitchell, claimed responsibiliy for the incident and stated that he targeted the clinic because 'lives are being lost much as they were in Nazi death camps.'
An unaffiliated individual claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack in retaliation for the United States' "recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital" and attacks against members of the Muslim community.
An unaffiliated individual claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he had "won heaven" through carrying out the attack.
An unaffiliated individual left notes at the scene of the attack in order to make it look like the attack had been perpetrated by jihadists. He did this in order to "provoke a backlash against Muslims" and immigration.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as  Elliot Rodger, claimed responsibility for the incident and posted videos on the internet and wrote a lengthy manifesto detailing his plans and motivations for the attack. His ideology reflected a misogynist and white supremacist narrative seen in online message forums where participants self-identify as "involuntarily celibate."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Aaron Driver, claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Abdallah El-Hamahmy, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for those in Syria. He also wrote about the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) on his Twitter account prior to the attack.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Abderrahmane Amara, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he was "sick of France."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Abdul Razak Ali Artan, claimed responsibility for the incident and wrote on his Facebook page prior to the attack, "If you want us Muslims to stop carrying lone wolf attacks, then make peace with the Islamic State group." Sources also noted that Artan indicated that he felt uncomfortable when praying at Ohio State University.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Adam Dzaziri, claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Adam W. Purinton, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he had killed "two Middle Eastern persons." Moreover, prior to the attack Purinton screamed "get out of my country" to the victims.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Adrian Brown, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "Who is a Muslim? I want to kill a Muslim."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Akayed Ullah, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "They've been bombing in my country and I wanted to do damage here," and "I did it for the Islamic State."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Amor Ftouhi, claimed responsibility for the incident and made statements about deaths in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan while carrying out the attack. Sources also noted that Ftouhi opposed the United States.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Anis Amri, claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Artem Hozlov, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that President Viktor Yanukovych's "hands are drenched in blood."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Ayanle Hassan Ali, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Allah told him to carry out the attack.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Baek, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated in a note left at the scene that "Park Geun-hye must kill herself, before disgracing her father."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Chen Ping-sung, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he was attempting to voice his concerns about the medical system in Taiwan.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Christopher Harper-Mercer, claimed responsibility for the incident and wrote a manifesto and posted statements online reflecting a fixation on mass shootings, as well as a misogynist and white supremacist narrative seen in message forums where participants self-identify as "involuntarily celibate."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Curtis Flournoy, claimed responsibility for the incident in a note left at the scene and stated that he was opposed to businesses owned by refugees and immigrants. The note was signed "White America."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Dana Ericson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted Zhang Yue because she was Asian and that he intended to carry out "ethnic cleansing."
An unaffiliated Individual, identified as Daniel Perez Berlanga, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack against the entire political institution.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Danny M. Kelly, claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded change within the court system.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Darren Osborne, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that "I'm going to kill Muslims...you deserve it...I did my bit."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Dawud Abdulwali, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack in response to the death of Michael Brown by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri in August 2014.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Devon Arthurs, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted his roommates because they had "disrespected" his conversion to Islam. He also stated that he was frustrated about global anti-Muslim sentiment and United States (US) airstrikes within the Muslim world.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Devon Arthurs, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he was frustrated about global anti-Muslim sentiment and United States (US) airstrikes within the Muslim world.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Dmitry Lukyanenko, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack due to "hatred towards the organizers and followers of the psychological training sessions."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Edgar M. Welch, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted Comet Ping Pong restaurant because he wanted to look into an inaccurate Internet article, which stated that human trafficking of children was occurring at the restaurant.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Edward Archer, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack "in the name of Islam." Archer also pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Emanuel Kidega Samson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the June 18, 2015 attack on a church in Charleston, South Carolina by Dylann Roof.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Esteban Santiago, admitted that he had discussed his plans for the attack in various jihadi online chat rooms. Moreover, Santiago stated that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was forcing him to view Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) videos.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Farid Ikken, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out on behalf of Syria and that he was a "solider of the caliphate." Sources also noted that an Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) "lone wolves' manual" was found at his apartment.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Frazier Glenn Cross, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he intended to target members of the Jewish community in the attack.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Gulchekhra Bobokulova, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the deaths of Muslim civilians in Russian airstrikes in Syria. Sources also noted that the assailant stated "I hate democracy. I'm a terrorist" during the attack.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Ibrahim Sulaiman, claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Jeremy Joseph Christian, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that "Muslims should die" during the attack.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Jessica Reznicek, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "We are speaking publicly to empower others to act boldly, with purity of heart, to dismantle the infrastructures which deny us our rights to water, land and liberty."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Joshua Andrew Cummings, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "On the night in question, what I did do, I didn't do that for the Islamic State. I did that purely and solely for the pleasure of Allah." Sources also noted that Cummings had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Lakeem Keon Scott, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack because he was upset with the deaths of African Americans by authorities in Louisiana and Minnesota. Sources also noted that Scott yelled "Police suck! Black lives matter!" during the attack.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Lei Mingyue, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out as "revenge on society" following his arrest for stealing.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Lu Chun-yi, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he wanted to display his "political position."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Luis Ibarra-Hernandez, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack in order to "draw attention to Islam."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Maarouf Hamieh, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Hussein Mohammed al-Hujeiri was targeted in revenge for the death of his son, who was killed in 2014.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Mamaye D., claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he was in communication with the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Marek Zakrocki, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "I'm going to kill a Muslim."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Matthew Scott Jones, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack in order to "make a statement."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Matthew Scott Jones, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack in order to "make a statement." Sources also noted that prior to the attack, Jones allegedly shouted racial slurs at the building's residents, who were African American.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Micah Xavier Johnson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he "wanted to kill white people, especially white officers."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Michael Christopher Estes, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he wanted to "fight a war on U.S. soil."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Michael Steven Sandford, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted Donald Trump because he believed "somebody had to stand up for America."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Mitchell Adkins, claimed responsibility for the incident, asking individuals if they were a Democrat or a Republican, targeting those who answered Democrat.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Muhammad Daleel, claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Murat Jashari, claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victim of harming and oppressing the youth during his tenure as a leader in the ruling League of Communists of Kosovo in the 1980s.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Nicholas Glenn, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated in a note left at the scene that he disliked authorities.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Omar Mateen, claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). Additionally, Mateen stated that he carried out the attack in retaliation for United States (US) airstrikes in Iraq and Syria.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Ornella G., claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Osman Nuri Caliskan, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted the Israeli embassy "to stop the bloodshed in the Middle East."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Paul H., claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he wanted to target "non-believers."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Rakhmat Akilov, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack in retaliation for airstrikes in Syria. He also stated that he supported the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Raouf El Ayeb, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted soldiers because "troops killed people." Sources also noted that "jihadist propaganda material" was found on El Ayeb's computer.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Rehab Dughmosh, claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Riaz Khan Ahmadzai, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended as revenge for members of the Muslim community. Sources also noted that a painted flag of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) was found in the room of Ahmadzai.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Richard Leslie Lloyd, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he wanted to "run the Arabs out of our country."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Saeed Noori, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the "mistreatment of Muslims."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Sallah Ali, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for French military operations in Syria. Ali also pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Satoshi Uematsu, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that "It is better that disabled people disappear."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Sayfullo Habibullaevic Saipov, claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Werner S., claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "You're letting me die of thirst, but you bring 200 refugees to Altena."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as William Atchison, claimed responsibility for the incident and made statements reflecting a fixation on mass shootings, as well as a misogynist and white supremacist narrative referenced in message forums where participants self-identify as "involuntarily celibate."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Xu, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated in his manifesto, "Crime equals giving birth, two people commit a crime, two people die, group commits a crime, group dies, country commits a crime, country dies, ethnic group commits a crimes, ethnic group dies, India, China and Bangladesh, none will meet a good end."
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Yacqub Khayre, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack on behalf of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and Al-Qaida.
An unaffiliated individual, identified as Ziyed Ben Belgacem, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "I'm here to die in the name of Allah."
An unafiliated individual, identified as David Patterson, claimed repsonsibility for the incident and stated that he was unhappy with the government and "wanted a shootout with the FBI."
An unidentified individual claimed responsibility for the incident and sated that he carried out the attack in order to stop Iraqi refugees from moving into the targeted refugee hostel.
An unidentified individual claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "We are fed up with your writing about authorities."
An unidentified individual claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he believed France did not respect Islam and protected Jewish civilians. He also asserted that he carried out the attack on behalf of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unidentified individual claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he carried out the attack "because of anti-foreigner motives."
An unidentified individual claimed responsibility for the incident and yelled "These PTB guys are idiots."
An unidentified man called the police emergency line and stated that "he held the party members responsible for the fact that his younger sister had joined the party and that this is the reason he planted the bomb."
An unidentified Neo-Nazi extremist claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he did not think that the targeted Iraqi refugees should be in Sweden.
An unidentified Palestinian extremist claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he intended to kill his Jewish co-workers.
An unidentified splinter group of Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for United States (US) airstrikes.
An unidentified unaffiliated individual claimed responsibility for the incident and pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unidentified unaffiliated individual claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted the Austrian couple for political reasons and that he opposed the Freedom Party of Austria. Sources also stated that he had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
An unidentified unaffiliated individual claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) attacks.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Al-Nabaa Channel of inciting violence
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Rommel Oliveros of being an extortionist.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for Raymond Koh Keng Joo.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the victim.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the victims.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that Joseph Mabirizi cease his candidacy for president.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that Rashmi Verma not challenge the election results.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that Roger Palme retract a recent petition he had submitted.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the construction company respond to an extortion demand.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the police constable resign from his job.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the police officer resign from his job.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the targeted political worker apologize and leave "mainstream politics."
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the victim publicly apologize for being a member of the People's Democratic Party (PDP).
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of a Libyan detainee in Tunisia in exchange for the victims.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of Basque Fatherland and Freedom (ETA) prisoners.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of the "Captain," likely referring to Hannibal Gadhafi, in exchange for Hussein Hobeish.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and issued a warning to the targeted political worker's family.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and left a note at the scene stating that the attack was a "price tag" attack.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "As long as Siamese people are killing Melayu people, the Siamese people will be removed from the Melayu land soon."
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "The Basque country is not for sale."
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "We must keep our spirits high for jihad."
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "You are selling the motherland to Navalny."
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated in a note left at the scene to stop supporting corrupt candidates.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated in a video that the victim, a Shiite Muslim professor, would be killed in revenge for the Iraqi government's execution of a Sunni Muslim.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Betinah Okunwa Benson was abducted because they were angry that the House Assembly had passed an anti-cultism bill, that the Speaker was interfering in the affairs of the Community Development Committee (CDC), and that the House wasn't "operating in unity and love."  A source also noted that the assailants demanded a ransom.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Frank Mirina was targeted because he was a candidate for the Kisii Central Ward seat. Sources also noted that Mirina was on his way to report electoral misconduct at the time of the abduction.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Haci Telli owed the group $430,000 from an oil sale.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Salma Said was targeted for her reports on elections in Zanzibar.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the abduction was carried out in retaliation for European interference in Syria.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the abduction was carried out in retaliation for the detainment of a General National Congress (GNC) politician by Tunisian security forces.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because the offices disregarded the group's strike.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in honor of Lambros Fountas, a Revolutionary Struggle member.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest to police involvement in southern Thailand.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to forest officials' refusal to give the group food.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the killing of Malay people.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for a recent attack on a mosque.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Judge Fatehy Bayoumy's acquittal of former Interior Minister Habib El-Adly, who served as Interior Minister during the Mubarak regime.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent airstrikes.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the alleged oppression by the government and the government's support for capitalism.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the death of innocent civilians by authorities.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retribution for the extrajudicial killings and executions of their Pakistani counterparts.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the family of Faraj Dardur was targeted because the group believed that he supported Operation Dignity.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group was "waging war" against the military.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted for pursuing an education.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they carried out the attack in order to "intimidate" the participants of the Muthuramalinga Thevar Guru Pooja.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they did not approve of "mixing" between genders.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they targeted Sabeen Mahmud due to her opposition to Maulana Abdul Aziz, a cleric.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they were frustrated by the Paraguayan People's Army (EPP)'s violent behavior toward innocent civilians.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated, "Stop SMI, justice for those who died because of SMI."
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and threatened a political candidate.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and threatened continued abductions if Pakistan did not cease its military operations.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and threatened Paul Odhiambo Okwiri not to run for re-election or he would be killed.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and warned civilian truck drivers against working with the Egyptian armed forces.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident and wrote "Libertad 350" on the wall.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident in a note left at the scene labeling Miroslava Breach Velducea a "tattletale."
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident in a note left at the scene stating "Do not be fooled, the best choice is not to vote, organize the rage against the capitalist system, day of protest against the primary elections."
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident in a note left at the scene stating, "The War Continues against the Rich, Corrupt and Lackeys" and "Comrade Alejo, present," referencing Jose Alejandro Munoz, who was killed a week prior.
An unknown group claimed responsibility for the incident in a note left at the scene, urging the targeted Polish family to return to Poland. Sources also noted that the attack was related to the recent results of the referendum for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union (EU).
An unknown group or individual claimed responsibility for the incident in a note left at the scene and stated "Black Lives Matter" and mentioned Alton Sterling and Philando Castile.
An unnamed source claimed that the attack was retribution for deaths of three AQI members the previous week that al-Jorani was said to be directly responsible for.
Anarchist arsonists frequently target government property, as well as banks and foreign diplomatic cars in Athens and Greece's second-largest city of Thessaloniki.
Anarchist Attack Consortium claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out as an act of solidarity with jailed anarchist, Nikos Romanos.
Anarchists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out as a warning against the construction of prisons in the area.
Anarchists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because of the unfair treatment by police personnel in the area.
Anarchists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to demonstrate solidarity with Nikos Romanos, an anarchist being held in Greece, who went on a hunger strike.
Anarchists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in reaction to the arrests of anarchists in Chile and other countries.
Anarchists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the arrest of two Chileans in Spain.
Anarchists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for authorities allegedly attempting to suppress anarchist activity against drug dealers.
Anarchists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the development of a new Porsche center and increased police presence in the area.
Anarchists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for various operations by authorities.
Anarchists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in support of detainees.
Anarchists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out on behalf of anarchist detainees.
Anarchists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to honor the two-year anniversary of the death of Lambros Fountas, who was a member of the group Revolutionary Struggle.
Ansar al-Dine (Mali) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the Chadian soldiers were targeted because they were working for the French.
Ansar al-Dine (Mali) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of one of their members, who was detained by French forces in exchange for the victims.
Ansar al-Dine (Mali) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that a number of people being held prisoner were freed as a result of the attack. Sources also suspected that the attack was carried out in opposition to recent peace negotiations.
Ansar al-Dine (Mali) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because they believed those working at the United Nations Multidimensional Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) camp were enemies of Islam.
Ansar al-Dine follows a strict interpretation of Sharia and considers the shrines of Sufi saints to be idolatrous.
Ansar al-Islam (Burkina Faso) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Amidou Tamboura was targeted for working with "enemies of Islam."
Ansar al-Islam (Burkina Faso) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mamadou Dicko was targeted for working with "enemies of Islam."
Ansar al-Sharia (Pakistan) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of demanding an extortion from civilians.
Ansar al-Sharia (Pakistan) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the alleged torture of detained armed group members by the military.
Ansar al-Sharia (Pakistan) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims had falsely used the name of Ansar al-Sharia (Pakistan) to claim the killing of several Pakistani security officials.
Ansar al-Sharia Operations Room (Syria) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the deaths of innocent families.
Ansar al-Sharia, a subgroup of Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the bombing was carried out in revenge for the United States-backed war on the organization in southern Yemen.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) attacked Israeli security forces in retaliation for an anti-Islam video produced in the United States.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility and stated that the rockets were in response to a recent drone strike that killed four of their members.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the attack on the military checkpoint, stating that they were protecting residents from the Egyptian Army. Jund al-Islam also claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the group was responding to the military's targeting of "unarmed Muslims."
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the attack on the military intelligence building, stating that they were protecting residents from the Egyptian Army. Jund al-Islam also claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the group was responding to the military's targeting of "unarmed Muslims."
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating they carried out the bombing in order to clean Egypt of criminals and collaborators.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Israel was the main enemy of the Muslim world and accused Israel of waging a war on Muslims in Egypt.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because they believed the victim was a spy for Israel.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because they believed the victim was a spy.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to negatively impact economic interests related to the military.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to sabotage the economic interests of the government.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to commentary made by a military spokesperson regarding military operations against armed groups.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the deaths of supporters of former president Mohamed Morsi.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted because they believed he was a military informant.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because the group believed they were spies for Israel.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they carried out the attack because they believed the victims were spies for Israel.
Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was meant to avenge Muslims who had been injured or killed by the Egyptian government.
Ansar E-Din wanted the release of Muslim prisoners in Iraq who were detained by US led coalition.
Ansaru (Jama'atu Ansarul Muslimina Fi Biladis Sudan) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was in response to Nigeria's military intervention in Mali.
Ansaru ash-Sharia (Russia) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the store was targeted because it sold alcoholic beverages. However, sources also speculated that the attack may have been carried out because the owner refused to pay extortionists for protection.
Ansarullah Bangla Team claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Avijit Roy was targeted for his alleged acts against Islam. Sources also noted that Roy was critical of religious extremism.
Ansarullah Bangla Team claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Shafiul Islam was targeted for not allowing women to wear a veil in his classes.
Ansarullah Bangla Team claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group targeted Washikur Rahman because he had disrespected Islam.
Anti-development and anti-destruction of land.
Anti-gentrification
Anti-globalization
Anti-globalization; to draw attention to or get revenge for the 100 year old massacre of striking saltpeter miners by army soldiers.
Anti-Government extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they were in opposition to President Nicolas Maduro.
Anti-Government extremists claimed responsibility for the incident in a note left at the scene and stated "The real terrorists are in Congress, La Moneda and the institutions that govern the State" and "Take note, because we have returned. Neither Chileans nor Argentinians. Internationalists."
Anti-land development; anti-construction
Anti-LGBT extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and spray-painted homophobic slurs on the victim's vehicle.
Anti-Muslim extremists claimed responsibility for the incident in a note left at the scene making threats.
Anti-Semitism was cited as the motive the attack.
Anti-Serbian Kosovars wanted to kill Serbians living in Kosovo.
Anti-terrorist sources said that the factory was targeted for refusing to pay a "revolutionary tax" to ETA.
Anti-urban sprawl and new home development for the wealthy
anti-US sentiments
Anwar Raja, spokesperson for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-GC), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they wanted to "'cleanse' the camp of 'terrorist gangs.'"
Appeared to be in retaliation for three airstrikes by Turkish warplanes against Kurdish rebel shelters in northern Iraq last month
Appeared to be part of the tit-for-tat reprisal killings by Sunni and Shi i extremists
AQIM reportedly killed Verdon in retaliation for France's intervention in Mali.
Arauco Malleco Coordinating Group (CAM) - Chile claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in support of the Mapuche people.
Aris Francisco, a New People's Army (NPA) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the abduction and stated that Rosales was kidnapped for aiding illegal logging operations in the area.
Aris Francisco, a New People's Army (NPA) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Jose Mervin Coquilla was abducted for his alleged involvement in drug trafficking.
Armando Silva, a spokesperson for the New People's Army (NPA), claimed responsibility and stated the victims were targeted because of the soldiers' human rights abuses and subservience to large scale mining corporations.
Armando Silva, the spokesperson of the Alfredo Cesar Command of the New People's Army (NPA), claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was punishment for the company's destructive activities.
Armed rebels tried to disrupt the voting process in an area located between the villages of Samboulandiang, Wangara and Diouloulou.
Arno Londi, a spokesperson for the Sudan People's Liberation Movement - North, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was in response to Sudanese Army airstrikes that targeted civilians in rebel held areas.
As a protest against the use of herbicides, which the perpetrators believed were "poison"; as a message to companies who profit from spraying poisons indiscriminately, without regard to human and animal life.
As punishment for joining the Army
Ashley had argued that accounts of Nazi genocide against Jews during World War II are exaggerated, and he worked the Institute for Historical Review, an organization that believed that the Holocaust never occurred.
Assailants targeted Jimale because he supported the Transitional Federal Government of Somalia and openly condemned the groups opposed to the government.
Assassinate Malik Mir Sharaf
Assassinate member of government of Afghanistan
Assassinate prominent Shi i cleric in Pakistan
Assassination of ideological rival.
Assassination of political candidates and intimidation of potential voters for the parliamentary election.
Assassination of security personnel and intimidation of potential voters for the parliamentary election.
Assault government forces in the town
Attack a facility of the government of Nepal
Attack against the Tz'utujil leaders and direct attack against CONIC
Attack and intimidate foreign students and presence in Russia
Attack British presence in Iraq
Attack business in Iraq
Attack carried out to avenge the death of al-Qaida leader Abu Laith al-Libi.
Attack clients engaged in extortion in the area giving their identity as police informers to local people; target Nasima Begum
Attack Congress Party of India
Attack education system in Sudan
Attack electricity infrastructure in Iraq
Attack foreign presence in Russian Federation
Attack government leadership in Thai southern provinces
Attack government of Afghanistan
Attack Government of Afghanistan
Attack Government of India
Attack government of Thailand and create panic before political rally
Attack humanitarian action and community in CAR
Attack Indian security forces and demonstrate ability to cause unrest in the region
Attack Indonesian presence
Attack international aid organizations in Afghanistan
Attack Iraqi citizens
Attack Iraqi police force in Baghdad
Attack Israeli residential areas
Attack LTTE's breakaway faction and Sri Lankan forces allegedly supporting it
Attack members who are part of the Sinhalese community
Attack Muslims in Delhi and create communal panic in the city
Attack Muslims who are sympathetic to Thai government
Attack NATO reconstruction effort in Afghanistan
Attack of Garhwa District soldiers
Attack oil industry to hinder U.S.-baked political process
Attack oil production in Basra
Attack oil utility service in Afghanistan
Attack on Afghan security forces
Attack on judges and prosecutors of the Turkish government
Attack on police camp
Attack on stores that sell liquor
Attack on those serving the Afghan government
Attack on those who serve Iraqi Police
Attack on truck drivers working for US forces
Attack people at the bazaar
Attack Police Force in Srinagar
Attack population in Israel
Attack population of Israel
Attack population of Israel in South (District)
Attack railway transportation in Pakistan
Attack reconstruction in Afghanistan
Attack religious leaders cracking down on militants
Attack Republican regime of Yemen
Attack security and government departments in Iraq
Attack Shi i citizens
Attack Shi i citizens of Iraq
Attack Shi i Islam; Imam of the mosque, Sheik Jalaluddin al-Saghir, was a member of Parliament with the United Iraqi Alliance
Attack Shi i population in Baghdad
Attack Shi i shrine
Attack Shi'a Islam in Iraq
Attack soldiers in the military of Thailand
Attack Sri Lanka forces in north of Sri Lanka
Attack Sunni citizens
Attack the school in the area
Attack those Iraqi political and parliamentary systems
Attack those who serve the Iraqi government
Attack those who work for Iraqi judicial system
Attack those who work for the government of Iraq
Attack those who work with government agencies of Iraq
Attack those working with the Coalition forces in Iraq
Attack U.S. military presence
Attack U.S. military presence and transport businesses that supply U.S. forces in Iraq
Attack was suspected to be an attempt to draw military resources away from fighting on Mindano Island.
Attack Western style music Iraq
Attack workers in reconstruction companies in Afghanistan and private security business serving them
Attacked bus for defying a transport strike called by the group.
Attacks on the Shi i holy day of Ashura
Attempt to scuttle upcoming peace talks between southern Sudanese factions and the central government of Sudan.
Attempted coup against President Jose Ramos Horta
AUC took action to exert their influence over the Antioquia Department
Authorities accused ethnic insurgents of trying to disrupt Buddhist New Year celebrations.
Authorities alleged that the gunmen were students at the same university who supported Venezuela's proposed constitutional amendments, which, according to protesters, limits civil liberties.
Authorities believe extortion is a possible motive
Authorities believe that the attack was in response to the owners' failure to pay revolutionary taxes
Authorities believe that the perpetrators wanted to dampen the public's confidence in their safety.
Authorities believe that this official was targeted by local drug cartels as a form of retaliation for drug raids that occurred in previous weeks.
Authorities believe that this threat may have been a retaliatory tactic used by Hezbollah for the lawsuit that was filed against rally participants memorializing Imad Muganiyeh.
Authorities believe the attack was carried out to block clues of the CPI militants’ movements.
Authorities believe the attack was carried out to coerce the payments of extortion demands.
Authorities believe the attack was motivated by the pro-governmental perspective utilized by the television network
Authorities believe the communist insurgent New People's Army (NPA) is carrying out the attacks to force the power company to pay their extortion demands.
Authorities believe the communist insurgent New People's Army (NPA) was carrying out the attacks to force the power company to pay their extortion demands.
Authorities believe the goal was to derail the upcoming elections in Colombia.
Authorities believe this attack may have been politically motivated rather than another instance of Muslim insurgency that has plagued this area as well as two other provinces in Thailand.
Authorities believed possible motivation for the kidnapping might had stemmed from frustration over government relocation or underdevelopment of Ijaw land.
Authorities believed that this was part of a bigger plan aimed at causing insecurity and threatening the Yugoslav state border with Albania along the entire border line.
Authorities believed the attacks were carried out because the town of Benoi-Vedeno has always opposed the extremists and openly supported the legitimate Russian government.
Authorities believed the pipeline was attacked because of its economic importance to the region.
Authorities claimed that the rebels hoped to disrupt the ceremony.
Authorities report the attack was carried out because the telecommunications firm has consistently refused to pay so-called revolutionary taxes to NPA rebels.
Authorities said Taliban and other anti-American rebels had promised to increase attacks in response to a U.S. led invasion of Iraq.
Authorities said that the peasants were shot because they were suspected of working with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).  Sources also described the ongoing violence perpetrated by rebel groups in the area, despite attempts at peace talks between the Colombian government and rebel leaders.
Authorities said there was a possibility the killings were linked to posters erected by the small group Lashkar Jabbar which advised women to wear veils.
Authorities speculated that the Nigerian militants may have wanted to provoke a Cameroonian response against the Nigerian government.
Authorities stated  that the perpetrators were aiming to discredit national security forces.
Authorities stated that  Anthony represented the rival Tamil Eelam Liberation Organization (TELO) whose members were working with security forces in their drive against the LTTE, which was fighting for independence in Sri Lanka's northeast.; LTTE was fighting for a separate homeland for minority Tamils
Authorities stated that the Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-M) perpetrated the attack to steal the weapons from the police officers who were aboard the train. However, a CPI-M spokesperson stated that the attack was committed to protest the arrest of their comrades.
Authorities suspect a possible motive is retaliation for the sentencing to ten years in prison of Corsican nationalist leader, Charles Pieri.
Authorities suspect that a possible motive is retaliation for the sentencing to ten years in prison of Corsican nationalist leader, Charles Pieri.
Authorities suspect that the motive of the attack may have been either to obtain a ransom or to prevent outside intrusion into their jungle stronghold.
Authorities suspect the attack was carried out in an attempt to retaliate against recent government and military seizures.
Authorities suspect the motive of the attack was extortion related.
Authorities suspect the motive was to disrupt upcoming presidential elections in Iran.
Authorities suspect the motive was to disrupt upcoming presidential elections.
Authorities suspected Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) rebels were behind this and several other attempted bombings in retaliation for the military's successful offensive to drive them from 15 villages they had occupied in North Cotabato.
Authorities suspected that the man's killing had something to do with his brother-in-law's status as presiding judge over the Saddam Hussein case.
Authorities suspected the al-Khobar extortion gang as the bus company had been targeted for extortion in the past.
Authorities suspected the attack was in retaliation for a recent crackdown on the militants.
Authorities suspected the attack was motivated by Downey's failure to pay "protection money", as well as the IRA's efforts to garner local support by playing on the public's abhorrence of drug dealers.
Authorities suspected the motive behind the attack to be extortion.
Authorities thought the attack could be the result of rivalry between cellular phone operators.
Autonomy or independent homelands for the region's indigenous peoples, most of them ethnically closer to Burma and China than to the rest of India.
Avenge Killings of Baloch Citizens
Avenge their "Palestinian sisters" who were raped and whose residences and families in Al-Baladiyat in eastern Baghdad were attacked by the Al-Dajal (Al-Mahdi) Army
Azad made seven social demands that he insisted on the Prime Minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina Wajed, immediately address.
Azam Tariq, spokesman for the Pakistani Taliban, said the attack was in response to U.S. aggression against Muslims around the world.
Baleeg-u-Deen, spokesperson for Hizbul Mujahideen (HM), claimed responsibility for the incident, warning police officers "to mend their ways and don't indulge in 'anti-movement activities.'"
Baleeguddin, a spokesperson for Hizbul Mujahideen (HM), claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was in retaliation for recent killings in Shopian.
Baloch Ghaeratmand Group warned women and girls against stepping out of their houses with their faces uncovered, or even going to a doctor unaccompanied by a man. "Acid will be thrown on the faces of women and girls who step out of their houses without covering their faces."
Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for carrying out remote-controlled attack on vehicle of Ramdil and said he was spying for security forces.
Bangladesh Tiger Force claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the alleged ill treatment of Bangla citizens.
Bank of America was perceived to symbolize the "capitalist exploitation of the little man."
Banta was believed to have been targeted because he allegedly refused to pay ‘taxes’ to the militant group. Other sources reported that the motive for the attack was because Banta was a military informant.
Barqa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the victims.
Barqa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Bodiam, a Salafist imam, was targeted because the group believed he was an apostate.
Barqa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Colonel Ataya Al-Arabi was targeted because the group believed he was an apostate.
Barqa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for airstrikes near Derna.
Barqa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they believed the targeted civilian was un-Islamic.
Basque separatists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in remembrance of the "Day of the Basque Soldier" and in solidarity with Basque Fatherland and Freedom (ETA) prisoners.
Bedouin Israeli extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in support of Palestinians and in retaliation for Israel Defense Forces (IDF) operations.
Before shooting the airmen, Uka asked if they were bound for Afghanistan and was told that they were. He reportedly shouted 'Allahu akbar' during the attack and claimed afterward that he was contributing to holy war. Uka was reportedly radicalized to use violence after watching jihadist propaganda videos online in the days before the attack, though he has since expressed regret for his actions.
Beli Orlovi claimed to have conducted the attack because the Serb National Council was unable to protect Kosovo-Serb citizens.
Believed to be an action of Islamophobia
Believed to be that the perpetrator was aware of the large crowds including many officers of the CDF that would be patrolling the area during the festival, and especially because  the officers are stationed there to patrol the road leading to the airport.
Believed to have been a response to strikes by the Nigerian military on the headquarters of the Niger Delta Vigilante in the town of Okrika.
Benjamin Onwuka, the leader of the Biafra Zionist Movement (BZM), claimed responsibility and stated that the Enugu Government House was attacked so that the group could raise the Republic of Biafra flag and other banners. Onwuka also explained that the location was targeted because it was originally the headquarters of the Biafran Republic.
Berg was known for his largely liberal opinions on a variety of controversial issues, and was a stark opponent of racism and anti-Semitism.  He had a slightly combative and blunt style that insulted many conservatives as well as the callers and guests on his show.   On one of his shows, Berg humiliated Klansman and member of The Aryan Nation, David Lane, who was eventually one of his murderers, by calling him a "sick and pathetic human being." Berg also berated other media figures on his show, such as the publisher of a paper which ran an anti-Jewish series, the writer of which, shared an apartment with Lane for a short time.  Also, Berg was Jewish, and the group wanted to eliminate Jews.
Biagi was working on controversial changes to loosen Italy’s labor laws. The Red Brigades classified the shooting as a success against what they saw as “imperialism” on the part of Biagi.
Bilal Beg, who claimed to have been the Islamic Front's leader, stated that the attack was in retaliation to the violence against Muslims in India.
Biltine is the third town to be taken by the National Alliance rebels in their advance on the Chadian capital, Ndjamena.
Binggan had aided soldiers in the past in anti-insurgency campaign in his village and police believed this to be the motive behind the attack.
Biswabhumi Sena Bishal-Nepal left pamphlets at the scene, stating that the government must take action against corruption and traitors. Moreover, the group condemned the government practice of dividing the country in the name of democracy.
Black Star claimed responsibility, stating the attack was to support an imprisoned Black Star member.
Boko Haram asserted that the attack was in response to raids on Koranic schools and security forces arresting local clerics.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was carried out to avenge Muslims who were killed and dehumanized in Jos city over the past decade.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility and stated that the victims were government informants and had leaked information about Boko Haram.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility and stated that they attacked the cell phone towers because they suspected that telecom providers were helping authorities investigate Boko Haram's organization.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for all attacks, stating that more attacks were coming in their campaign to impose sharia law across Nigeria
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for burning down Success Private Secondary School, indicating that it was because of recent attacks against local Islamic schools.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for burning Sunshine Private School, indicating that it was revenge for recent attacks against local Islamic schools.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the attack in a video, stating that more violence would follow to avenge the death and arrests of its members.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was carried out because the victims did not heed their warning for Christians to leave northern areas of Nigeria.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the group targeted Christians because they were destroying mosques and turning others into beer parlors and prostitution joints.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the attacks, stating that they were in revenge for police arrests and murders of Boko Haram members.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of Boko Haram detainees in exchange for the hostages.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because the government failed to release Boko Haram detainees.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was part of a larger campaign targeting members of the Shiite community.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group would not allow democracy to thrive. Sources also speculated that the attack may have been carried out in revenge against residents in the area who had formed vigilante groups to assist the military with operations against Boko Haram.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they were planning to sell the captives.
Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the incident and warned civilians against participating in Nigeria's general election. Sources noted that the attack was part of a larger trend of violence related to Nigeria's general election, scheduled for March 28 and April 11, 2015.
Boko Haram claimed that the attack was in response to soldiers raiding an Islamic seminary, Koranic school students being indiscriminately arrested, and desecration of the Koran.
Boko Haram claimed that this attack was part of a response to security forces arresting local clerics and attacks on Quranic schools.
Boko Haram demanded that imprisoned Islamic militants be released from Nigeria and Cameroon in return for the safe release of the hostages.
Bookstore was selling communist literature.
Bora was suspected of being a police informer.
Borderless Solidarity Cell (BSC) claimed responsibility for the incident in an online statement, saying that the group targeted the United Kingdom (UK) Border Agency vehicles because of the vehicles were used in dawn raids on immigrant families and because of the agency's role in restricting free movement.
Both Jundallah and Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the victim working as a lawyer for the man who helped the United States Central Intelligence Agency locate Osama bin Laden's compound.
Both the groups who claimed responsibility for the attack asserted that it was in response to a recently-announced increase in gas prices. Furthermore, authorities explained that ethnic groups from the southern part of the country, some of whom have threatened violence, have demanded more autonomy in their respective regions.
Both the Informal Anarchist Federation and Earth Liberation Front (ELF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the death of Remi Fraisse, an environmentalist, as well as continuous industrialization.
Both the Informal Anarchist Federation and the International Revolutionary Front-Intact Revolutionary Cell claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was punishing the courier firm's employees for helping the Greek government capture their members.
Boydston used to raise minks and be a spokesman for mink ranchers.
Brkic was sent a letter demanding he contribute money to the Croatian nationalist cause, similar to the assassination case of Anthony Cikoja and the bombing of the shop of an American of Croatian descent.
Buddhist Educators have often been targets of militants in the South of Thailand
Burning down religious institutions.
Burundian rebel groups stepped up ambushes along main roads as part of a "psychological warfare" strategy in a bid to disrupt trade between the capital and the provinces.
Burundian rebel groups stepped up ambushes along main roads as part of a "psychological warfare" strategy meant to disrupt trade between the capital and the provinces.
Callers to local media said Singhaniya, had been killed for defaming the Madhes protest through his media.
Carlos Castano, commander of the United Self Defense Units of Colombia (AUC), accused Borja of being a member of the National Liberation Army (ELN).  As such, Castano sees Borja as an "actor in the conflict" and a "military objective".
Carlos Peralta, an unaffiliated individual, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that "Allah told him to find a Jew and kill him."
Caucasus Emirate claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was a warning ahead of the Winter Olympics in Sochi and in retaliation for the killing of Muslims around the world.
Caucasus Emirate claimed responsibility for the attack in an online statement, stating that the bomber was targeting Malgobek municipal police chief Mukhazhir Yeloyev.  However, Yeloyev was not present at the funeral.
Caucasus Emirate claimed responsibility in an online video and stated that they attack was in response to "lawlessness" by non-Muslims in Dagestan.
Cells of Direct Attack - Living Waste Group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in opposition to "police brutality" and to bring about "solidarity with French youths."
Chama Pueblo en Rebelion claimed responsibility for the incident and alleged that El National newspaper opposed the government.
Chaudhary was allegedly killed for acting as an informant against JTMM-G
Chechen militants accused the victims of collaboration.
Chechen rebel fighters wanted to disrupt the elections.
Chechen rebels were reportedly taking reprisal measures for an anti-rebel operation with strikes on administrative buildings.
Chen Yi-Hsun blamed Chen for financial difficulties as he was unemployed.
Citizens for Constitutional Freedom claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that federal grounds be returned to the ranchers of Harney County. The group also stated that the occupation was carried out in protest to the five year sentence of Dwight and Steven Hammond, two ranchers convicted of arson of federal land.
Claimed to be setting-off bombs to get the attention of the government to investigate the alleged anomalies at the Office of Muslim Affairs (OMA).
Cleric Wathiq al-Batat, leader of the Mukhtar Army, claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the inhabitants of Camp Liberty, members of the group Mujahedeen-e Khalq (MEK), leave Iraq within ten days or face further attacks.
Close down music stores that are 'Un-Islamic'
Colombian daily El Tiempo reported in its online edition that FARC recently circulated news saying attacks were to escalate in retaliation to increasing military operations and Operation Jaque, which in July led to the liberation of top FARC hostage Ingrid Betancourt and 15 others.
Colombian President Alvaro Uribe said the attack was retaliation for a government spraying campaign to eradicate coca fields in areas under rebel control.
Colonel Leoncio Cirunay, commander of the 22nd Infantry Battalion, which administers the militiamen in the Bicol region, received information that the rebels burned the construction equipment of Sunwest Development Corporation simply because it was owned by Zaldy Co, a businessman who is identified with the Ako Bicol partylist.
Comite d'Action Viticole claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in opposition to imported cheap wine.
Commerce disruption/terror
Communist Party of India- Maoist (CPI-M) cadres claimed that they destroyed the school building because it was to be used by security forces during the anti-Maoist operations.
Communist Party of India- Maoist Nexal militants dragged a Janata Dal (United) political party member from his house and killed him for being a police informer.
Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) banners left by the bodies accused the victims of being CPM supporters.
Communist Party of India-Maoists (CPI-M) posters left at the scene claimed responsibility for the attack because the building was being used by security personnel as camps for anti-Maoist operations.
Conspiracy of Cells of Fire stated that they had carried out the attack in support of their imprisoned comrades. Additionally, sources speculated that the attacks may have been in response to the prison conditions of the Conspiracy of Cells of Fire members.
Convince people to boycott Republic Day
Cossack Separatists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the Greenpeace team members of being pro-Western.
Create unrest to avenge the Sindhi government's policy against religious extremism
Croatian nationalists were seeking independence of Croatia from Yugoslavia, and wanted the U.S. and West Germany to stop providing economic aid and to break all political and economic ties with Yugoslavia.
Crypteia claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "We will fight until the last immigrant leaves. And to that end, we will use force and violence, mercilessly."
Curtail those soliciting Western-style services
Cut off water from Warni area
Cyba claimed that he wanted to kill Jaroslaw Kaczynski, leader of the party, in Warsaw. However, he was unable to do so because of security and instead targeted the Lodz office.
Daniel Ibarra, a spokesperson for the New People's Army (NPA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the ambush was related to attacks on April 7 and 10, 2014, which targeted mining companies accused of destroying the environment.
Daniel Ibarra, spokesperson for the New People's Army (NPA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the NPA detained Jesus Tomas, a member of the Filipino army, in an effort to enforce "revolutionary justice" for the death of Roque Antivo, an eight-year old boy who was allegedly killed by Filipino soldiers on April 3, 2013.
Daniele Genco was forced to testify against the head of "Lupi Grigi" in 1993 and has been terrorized ever since.
Darya Khan, the "chief commander" of the Sindhu Desh Liberation Army (SDLA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack in retaliation for the recent killing of two activists of  Jeay Sindh Muttahida Mahaz (JSMM), a Sindhi nationalist group.
Daud was targeted for supporting US forces in Afghanistan.
Death Squad claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded border security against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), a halt to oil extraction in the Kurdistan region, and a stop to military operations in Syrian Shiite villages.
Defense of Palestinians.
Demand more political rights and greater share of profits from the region's natural resources
Demand Release of Political Prisoners and Corrupt Governor
Demand that salaries get paid and promotions be given and demand the Hamas government not to issue taxi license to Fatah activists
Demanding the Local Population Gain More in the Oil Wealth of Nigeria
Demands included the cessation of all business activity in Iraq by the captives' employer
Demands included the release of fighters loyal to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and the withdrawal of U.S. soldiers from the town of Qaim, Iraq.
Derail U.S.-led reconstruction efforts
Destabilize Chad before May 3 election
Destroy video shops in stores in Bannu
Detonate bomb outside of Labor Ministry
Detonators of Social Uprisings claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was executed in solidarity with imprisoned anarchist Costas Sakkas.
Devrimici Halk Kurtulus Cephesi (DHKP/C) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of a teenager during anti-government protests, as well as the decision that four Justice and Development Party (AKP) ministers accused of corruption would not go to trial.
Devrimici Halk Kurtulus Cephesi (DHKP/C) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of Berkin Elvan, who was killed by the authorities in 2013.
Devrimici Halk Kurtulus Cephesi (DHKP/C) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the killing of a teenager by authorities in 2013.
Devrimici Halk Kurtulus Cephesi (DHKP/C) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted Turkey's Justice Ministry because it is the symbol of injustice in Ankara.
Discontent with Australian position regarding East Timor
Discouraging Afghans from assisting US and NATO troops
Disrupt a peaceful settlement between Georgia and South Ossetia.
Disrupt activities in Laghman Province
Disrupt business activities in Iraq
Disrupt Croatia's efforts to join the EU.
Disrupt effort against Taliban operations
Disrupt election process in Assam and intimidate electorate
Disrupt Kashmir region talks
Disrupt political collaboration in Iraq
Disrupt telecommunications in Thailand
Disrupt the ability of the Iraqi government to provide utility to its people
Disrupt the upcoming parliamentary elections.
Disrupt the voting and polling
Disrupt those providing services to Iraqi or US forces
Disrupt village defense in South Thailand
Disrupt water supply to security forces of Pakistan
Disrupting anti-al-Qaida planning in Iraq.
Disrupting electricity transmission to neighboring towns
Disrupting the anti-rebel operations in Northeast India
Djindjic was a reform-minded, pro-Westerner.  Lukovic Legija insisted on the murder of the premier in order to stop the indictment of individuals responsible for war crimes at the tribunal in The Hague.
Doka Umarov and the Riyadus-Salikhin Battalion of Shakhids claimed responsibility for the attack, via message to the Kavkazcenter website that said the bombing was a “planned diversionary act” directed against the FSB Academy in Moscow in response to “the crimes of the FSB” on the territory of the North Caucasus.
Douglas Leguin, who identified as a member of Sovereign Citizen, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to get citizens to vote.
During the bank robbery, the perpetrators shouted that the attack was in retaliation for poor treatment of members of the Freemen Organization.
During the height of its separatist war with the government troops though, the LTTE targeted EPDP members, alleging that they worked hand in glove with the security forces. The EPDP was a rival political group with the LTTE.
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, an unaffiliated individual, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to his belief that the United Sttaes (US) was allegedly killing innocent members of the Muslim community.
Earth Liberation Front (ELF) included anti-development slogans in the letter they sent claiming responsibility.
Ebersole was "punished for his long list of crimes against the revolutionary movement and the people of Occidental Mindoro."
Effort to prepare to take control of Ndjamena
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a Jamaat-ul-Ahrar spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the recent detention and deaths of TTP members in Karachi city.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a Jamaat-ul-Ahrar spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the CD shops were targeted because they sold profane goods.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a Jamaat-ul-Ahrar spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the polio vaccination workers were targeted because they believed the polio vaccine was unhealthy and un-Islamic.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that TTP targeted the Awami National Party (ANP) because of the political organization's secular views.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that TTP targeted the Muttahida Quami Movement (MQM) as part of their violent campaign to attack Pakistan's secular political parties in the run-up to the general elections.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that Sadiq Zaman Khattak, an Awami National Party (ANP) candidate in upcoming elections, was targeted as part of a larger campaign of violence against secular political parties by the TTP.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) elections office was targeted because they are a secular political party.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) office was targeted as part of a larger campaign of violence against secular parties by the TTP.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) office was targeted as part of a larger campaign of violence against secular political parties by the TTP.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in revenge for the death of commander Baitullah Mehsud in a United States (US) drone strike in 2009 and for the 2011 raid, which killed Al-Qa ida leader Osama bin Laden.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was in response to an earlier government operation.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that Express News employees were attacked because the news organization was spreading "venomous propaganda" against the TTP.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the group targeted Munir Khan Orakzai because he had committed crimes against Islam by handing over Arab Mujahedeen to the United States (US) and had worked with secular political parties to kill innocent tribesmen.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, a Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the judiciary was targeted because it has failed to protect innocents including Dr. Aafia Siddqui.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was revenge for the Pakistan security forces' cooperation with the United States' (US) drone killings of fellow militants.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the police were targeted because they were killing TTP members.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it was carried out in response to an anti-TTP military operation in the area.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it was carried out to avenge the death of Baitullah Mehsud's, the former TTP leader, nephew who had been killed by police.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack as part of their campaign against Pakistan's secular political parties.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack because it was part of their violent campaign against secular political parties in Pakistan.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack because of the Awami National Party's (ANP) secular political views.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted the Awami National Party (ANP) because of the organization's secular political agenda.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted the Karachi Rangers because of their anti-TTP activities and support of the secular government.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they wanted to harm Pakistani security forces. In addition, sources also suspect that TTP was targeting members of the Ferozkhel tribes because of their formation of anti-Taliban militias.
Ehsanullah Ehsan, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that TTP would execute further attacks until local residents disavowed their support for the Pakistani government.
Election related
ELF was against logging of private lands, and the incident was in retaliation for the wild forest lands and animals that were lost to feed "greedy" people.
Elmars Sprogis was a former police chief in Nazi occupied Latvia during WWII and was accused of war crimes against Jews; the FBI brought a deportation case against him years prior, but all charges were dismissed due to lack of evidence.  Members of the JDL and other militant Jewish organizations were critical of the decision.
ELN indicated that the attack was an accident.
ELN was protesting the nationalization of one of the power companies and hoped to pressure the government to establish a demilitarized zone for negotiations.
ELN was reaffirming its power and influence in Columbia after authorities doubted its relevance.
Enforce the 24-hour Magadh bandh (strike) in Bihar to protest against arrest of their cadres Guddu Sharma and Vrinda Singh
Enforcing Islamic Law
Equilibrio Nacional claimed responsibility for the incident in a video and stated that the group intended to overthrow the government.
Essex claimed that he was avenging the death of two African American students killed during a confrontation with police at Southern University.
ETA was trying to turn public opinion against the government's hard-line stance towards the separatists.
ETA's stated motive was to attack the club for dealing with drugs, but the Regional Police argue that ETA meant to target the disco's owner, whose brother was killed in an ETA car bombing in August.
Ethno-nationalist ideology.
Even though the perpetrators wanted to test their homemade explosive device, they chose a synagogue because they were anti-Semitic, and wanted to eliminate Jews; additionally, they considered this a progression in their race and anti-US government war.
Extortion is thought to be the motive of the attack.
Extortion was the motive for the attack.
Extortion was the suspected motive for the attack.
Ezatolla was kidnapped and killed for burning a Koran.
Failure to close liquor store.
FALN members claimed they were protesting the presence of Puerto Rican delegation at the Democratic National Convention.
FALN members were protesting the appearance of Puerto Rican Governor, Rafael Hernandez Colon, at a political fund-raising dinner at the Hilton Hotel, to raise money for his re-election.
FARC aimed to interrupt coal production and exports from the country with the attack.
FARC asked for a monetary amount for the safe release of the captive.
FARC forces were attempting to gain an advantage just days ahead of a new round of peace negotiations.
FARC forces were attempting to gain an advantage just days before of a new round of peace negotiations.
FARC forces were attempting to gain an advantage just nine days ahead of a new round of peace negotiations.
FARC guerrillas aimed to obtain weapons cache at incident site.
FARC guerrillas wanted to steal weapons from the police, rob a bank, and frighten the townspeople.
FARC issued statements threatening to target Colombian mayors if they did not resign
FARC rebels attacked the Florencia Prison to free FARC prisoners.
FARC rebels kidnapped the civilians for ransom.
FARC rebels kidnapped the woman for ransom.
FARC rebels murdered the ranch worker to intimidate workers in the region not to work for two ranches in the region.
FARC reportedly carried out the attack against the village for its alleged collaboration with rightist paramilitary forces.
FARP wanted to cause the evacuation of hundreds of families from their homes, specifically the family of the Secretary of Housing in retaliation for Villa Sin Miedo, where families were forcibly removed by police, resulting in one death and twelve injuries
Fatoni Warriors claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion.
Feminist extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to "fight sexism" and "gender" and was perpetrated as a "desire for revenge."
Fighting between the government and the Tamil rebels
Fire was possibly motivated by the assassination of Sheik Ahmed Yassin.
Foment strife between Iraq's minority Sunni Arabs and majority Shi i Muslims and to push the country toward civil war.
For collaborating with the U.S.
For cooperating with the FSB against the Chechen Republic.
For ransom.
For speaking out against the punishment squads.
For the release of 15 of their extremist comrades
For the release of Amado Payot, a guerrilla leader.
For the release of suspected terrorist, Nikos Matziotis.
For the soldiers decision to collaborate with US forces inside Iraq
Former Justice Minister Turk claimed that the reason of the attack was the "Operation Return to Life" that was carried out at prisons in 2000.
Free 22 Maoists from (District) Prison and assault  and government and security installations
French investigators speculated that the attack may have been a form of extortion or part of a vendetta.
Fritz Dor was a supporter of Jean-Bertrand Aristide's presidency and a vocal critic of Haitian organizations that were against democracy.  Specifically, it was suspected that he was assassinated for urging a boycott of a concert sponsored by Louis Thermitus.  Thermitus, a suspected one time member of the Macoutes, was a supporter of the Military junta that would oust Aristide.
Frustration with the city's closure and as a protest against peace talks.
Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) claimed responsibility for the blast as retribution for an article published by El Tiempo earlier that week that defied the terrorist group.
Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC)wanted to end aerial sprayings of chemicals on Indian and peasant plots in Cauca Department.
Fulani extremist herdsmen claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that they wanted to extract ransom payments out of the victim's family.
Fulani militants claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for Father Emmanuel Dim.
Garih may have been murdered by IBDA-C for acting for Iran.
Garo National Liberation Army (GNLA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating the events were in retaliation for a raid conducted on the GNLA commander-in-chief several days earlier.
Gavin Long, an anti-police extremist, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that "he needed to bring destruction 'upon bad cops as well as good cops' because of what he saw as the justice system's failure to prosecute bad police officers who commit crimes against 'my people.'"
Gay and human rights organizations were being targeted in the lead up to Brazil's independence day (September 7th), when skinheads had threatened to begin "cleansing" the country.
Ghazi Haq Nawaz, spokesperson for Jaish-e-Islam, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack in retaliation for Ameer Muhammad Dashti's killing of several of their fighters.
Ghazi Haq Nawaz, spokesperson for Jaishul Islam, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the group targeted the victims because they were Shiite Muslims.
Gilaman Mehsud, a Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ziauddin was targeted because the Awami National Party (ANP) supported operations to arrest TTP members.
Gohram Baloch, a spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the construction workers were targeted because their company had been previously warned to halt work on their government sponsored construction projects.
Gohram Baloch, a spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Front (BLF), stated that the group targeted Alam because he was a state agent.
Golovlvov’s involvement in the Liberal Russia party, one in opposition to Putin’s rule may have been the motivation for the contract killing. Other reports link the murder to business dealings made while he was head of the State Property Fund’s office in the early 1990s.  Golovlvov was accused privatization Freud in the metals industry in the early 1990s.
Good Vision Party (India) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Rauleshwor Secondary School was targeted for not concentrating on the education of its students.
Gou Vaiphei, spokesperson for the Kuki National Front (KNF), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that KNF executed the attack in response to Ngamthang Haokip's, the victim and Irrigation and Flood Control Department (IFCD) minister, refusal to accede to the armed outfit's demand for "some party fund[s]."
Government officials believe that the attack was specifically meant to attack the Kashmir Government as it was changing from its winter to its summer post.
Goz Beida is the first town to be taken by the National Alliance rebels in their advance on the Chadian capital, Ndjamena.
Greater European unity
Group claims to hate wealth and accumulation believing that property is theft
Group was demanding the release of jailed comrades.
GSPC's declared motive was revenge for the arrest of 50 Muslim militants in Mauritania who were accused of having links to the Al-Qaeda network.
Guharam Baloch, a Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in retaliation for the killing of two BLF members by security forces.
Haji Mohammad Jan was killed because ISAF forces had recently discovered and defused a bomb allegedly planted by Taliban near his house.
Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was a reaction to Israeli troops moving into Gaza after a ceasefire agreement was announced.
Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because they believed the victims were spies for Israel.
Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of the Dawabsheh family, who were killed in an arson attack in July 2015.
Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to alleged abuses at Al-Aqsa Mosque.
Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to recent military operations and the demolition of houses.
Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the recent Israeli military operations in the Gaza Strip.
Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out to commemorate the Hamas members involved in the death of three Israeli teens in the West Bank last year.
Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) stated that the blast was in retaliation for the death of a young boy that occurred a few hours earlier.
Hamas acted in revenge for the storming of al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem on June 6th.
Hamas claimed Israel broke a truce
HAMAS claimed that the attack was in response to Israel's bombing of a Syrian radar site in Lebanon.
HAMAS claimed that the attack was to kill Zionists, avenge all the martyrs and defend the al-Aqsa mosque.
HAMAS claimed that the attacks were "revenge for the continuation of the Israeli attacks on Gaza."
HAMAS claimed the attack was in retaliation for an Israeli dawn raid on Beit Hanun, which killed two Palestinians.
Hamas claimed the attack was in retaliation for Israeli crimes against Palestinians and has held Shalit captive to negotiate for the release of Palestinian prisoners
Hamas Politburo chief Khaled Mashaal stated the attacks were resistance against Israelis.
HAMAS reported that Mohamed Younis carried out the shooting in retaliation for the killing of Sado Al Arabeed, a top HAMAS militant who was killed on April 8, 2003, by an Israeli air strike.
HAMAS said that the attack was to avenge an Israeli air strike in Gaza that killed its leader.
Hanson indicated that he supports abortion rights, but that he does not think the federal government should protect clinics.
Haq Nawaz, spokesperson for Jaish-e-Islam, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was executed in response to assaults on Ahle Sunnat, a Sunni religious organization. Sources also speculated that the victims, who were Shiite, may have been targeted as part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's majority Sunni and minority Shiite communities.
Hassan Nasrallah, a spokesperson for Hezbollah, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to an Israeli Air Force (IAF) airstrike that occurred a week prior to the attack, halting the shipment of sophisticated weapons to the group.
Hassan Nasrallah, a spokesperson for Hezbollah, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to an Israeli military operation on one of its positions.
Hatred of homosexuals.
Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack on Shia Pilgrims was intended to send a message to Iran and its allied groups.
Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for a recent agreement between the governments of Syria, Russia, Iran, and Turkey on several de-escalation zones in Syria.
Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations in Western Ghouta. The group also stated that the attack was an attempt to end a blockade of local villages by the Syrian military.
Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the humanitarian aid supplies were seized from Ihsan Relief and Development Organization because it was funded by Turkish donors.
Haydar demanded compensation for Iraqi victims of UN sanctions, resumption of flights between Baghdad and Amman, Jordan, an end to the U.S.-UK air strikes and a statue outside UN headquarters in memory of Iraqi children who have died because of the sanctions.
Haynid Baloch, a Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the targeted elder was a member of a death squad, and was involved in an attack against a BLA camp in 2012.
Haynid Baloch, spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Naseer Ahmed was targeted because he collaborated with Pakistani intelligence agencies.
Haynid Baloch, spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), claimed responsibility for the incident, denouncing the Pakistani election process and pledging to target anyone participating in the upcoming general elections.
Haynid Baloch, spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the BLA will target "any Balochi candidate participating in [the] election under the state agenda."
Hazrat Bilal was kidnapped by the Taliban in order to commit Jihad against security forces.
he attack could have been sectarian motivated.
He demanded to be given a job in the Palestinian security forces and medication for a shooting injury sustained last year, in exchange for releasing the hostages.
He met his fate because he was spying for the Americans
He wanted to provoke other Americans into killing Jewish individuals.
He was shot dead on the suspicion of being an informer of the security forces and blamed for killing of militants in an encounter in nearby Watsar village over a month ago.
Hezbollah claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried in retaliation for a recent Israeli air strike that killed six Hezbollah members and an Iranian general.
Hezbollah claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the killing of Samir Kantar, a commander of an armed group, who was killed in an airstrike.
Higom Maragang, a spokesman for the rebel New People's Army in Mindoro Occidental province, said that Sato had refused to pay revolutionary taxes and had not been permitted by the rebels to campaign in the area.  Maragang said that if Sato had not brought armed men with her, the guerrillas would have merely talked to her.
Hijaz Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group targeted security personnel at the mosque because they supported the status quo in Saudi Arabia and have targeted Islamic State of the Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) supporters.
Hindu Illaignar Sena claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the assault was carried out in protest to the Pathankot and Indian consulate in Pakistan attacks.
Hizb-l-Islami claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they attacked the bus in retaliation for an anti-Islam film insulting the Prophet Muhammad that was produced in the United States.
Hizballah said the attack was a reprisal for the killing of two Lebanese civilians on the previous day by an Israeli-fired rocket, which landed near the UNIFIL Security Zone in Southern Lebanon.
Hizballah stated that the attack was a response to Israel’s demolition of Lebanese civilians' houses and expulsion of civilians from their village on January 7, 1999.
Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to disrupt the Jammu and Kashmir legislative assembly elections, which were held from November 25, 2014 to December 20, 2014.
Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "Revenge for Zahid Bhai, Irfan Bhai and Asif Bhai."
Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ishtiyaq Ahmad Wagay was an informant.
Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Indian Prime Minister Narenda Modi's visit to Jammu and Kashmir, which was scheduled for April 2, 2017.
Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to military chief, Gen Bipin Rawat's statement urging citizens to stop facilitating the escape of armed group members during military operations.
Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of Burhan Wani, an HM leader.
Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the government was spreading immorality and undermining the Islamic nature of the country through the establishment of liquor stores.
Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the blast was meant to serve as a warning to those who were determined "to sell the 'sacrifices of our martyrs'." Sources also noted that the attack targeted a political rally ahead of Lok Sabha elections scheduled on April 30, 2014 for Jammu and Kashmir state.
Hostages taken for ransom
Houthi extremists (Ansar Allah) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that former Yemeni president Ali Abdullah Saleh was targeted following his decision to work with the Saudi-led military coalition.
Houthi extremists (Ansar Allah) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for a Saudi coalition airstrike.
Houthi extremists (Ansar Allah) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the killing of civilians by Saudi military personnel.
Houthi extremists (Ansar Allah) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the hostages were targeted for collaborating with the Saudi-led coalition.
Houthi extremists (Ansar Allah) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the individual was accused of collaborating with the Saudi-led coalition.
Houthi extremists (Ansar Allah) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were abducted because they were too close in proximity to conflict areas.
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victim was targeted in retaliation for sheltering and importing foreign fighters into the region.
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Peter Willems of being a Saudi spy.
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the company cease oil exportation until a new government was created.
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Abd-al-Hamid Shahit was targeted because they believed he was affiliated with Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Casey Coombs was targeted because his visa had been expired. Sources also posited that Coombs was accused of espionage.
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to recent Saudi airstrikes.
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Saudi-led coalition airstrikes in Yemen.
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for airstrikes in Saudi Arabia.
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations in which Huthis were killed.
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Embassy was targeted because the Huthis believed the embassy was being used by Supporters of Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi.
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the United States (US) citizens were targeted because the Huthis believed they were spies.
Huthi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because they believed the victims were working with Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).
If the Taliban was behind the attack, it follows the pattern of assassinations of people in senior positions in government, with added significance because of the Taliban's repressive stance on women.
Igor Bezler, a Donetsk People's Republic leader, claimed responsibility for the abduction and stated that the victim, who was a Swedish citizen, was targeted because the group believed that there were Swedish citizens serving within the Ukrainian military.
Ihsanullah Ihsan, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility and stated that the group would continue to attack the government until Sharia law was implemented.
Ihsanullah Ihsan, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack on the checkpoint, stating that it was in retaliation for the death of a group member several days before.
Ihsanullah Ihsan, a spokesperson for the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victim was a government servant and others like him should quit their positions or face the same consequences.
Ihsanullah Ihsan, a Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group targeted the committee members because of their involvement in the anti-Taliban activities.
Iit is believed that the attack is part of an attempt of Taliban to disrupt the election.
Ijaw youths demanded USD $35,000 as they claimed Ekpebide allegedly collected from one of the area oil companies for relief help.
Immediate motive stated to be to cause harm to civilians and property; greater motive probably related to the long-standing ethnic conflict between the LTTE and the Sri Lankan government.
Impede assistance to police and intimidate those who serve them
Impose Islamic Law
Imtiaz Ansari, an arrested suspect and member of Indian Muhajedeen, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the goal was to create a stampede in retaliation for the Muzaffarnagar riot in August 2013.
In a call to the Agence France Presse, a PIJ spokesman said that the rockets were fired to "defend the Prophet" after newspapers across Europe published controversial cartoons depicting Prophet Mohammed negatively.
In a communique they sent out, the AUC claimed that their recent spate of killings of politicians was motivated by the fact that the politicians they targeted were involved with rebel groups such as FARC and the ELN.
In a flier that was distributed at the scene, Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility and stated that the man had assisted the United States in targeting people for drone strikes.
In a four page letter and audio tape sent to Indian media outlets, the Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-M) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group was targeting several Indian political leaders as a reprisal, particularly Mahendra Karma, the founder of the anti-naxal movement Salwa Judum.
In a guilty plea entered in court as part of a plea agreement, Floyd Corkins stated that he targeted the Family Research Council because of the organization's opposition to gay marriage and gay rights.
In a leaflet left at the scene, Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the officer was attacked in retaliation for recent drone strikes carried out by the United States (US).
In a letter left at the scene, the Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility and stated that Madan Hantal was killed because he was an informant for the local police.
In a letter left at the scene, the National Liberation Force of Bengalis claimed responsibility for the bombing and stated that the attack was in protest to the Bodo community's torture of Bengali citizens.
In a letter left on the body of the victim, the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) stated that he was killed because he was an Afghan spy who was responsible for the killing of Taliban commander Mullah Nazir.  The letter stated that the victim had given Mullah Nazir and others digital Korans which allowed them to be targeted in drone strikes.
In a letter posted online, Anarchists claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the constructions site was targeted in protest of sustainable development.
In a letter Sayfien left at his home, he claimed that the attack was a response to the killing of Mahboud Abu Hanoud, a Hamas leader, by Israel.
In a letter to the press, the Informal Anarchist Federation (FAI) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it targeted the agency because it supported the police in spying on members of the FAI and gathering evidence to be used against them.
In a letter to the press, the Informal Anarchist Federation claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it targeted La Stampa Newspaper headquarters because it is "one of the many newspapers of the regime, therefore every hack is a potential target of our war against the state and the society which supports and legitimizes it every day."
In a message broadcast by the pro-Al-Shabaab station Radio Andalus, suicide bomber Abdirahman Qobey claimed responsibility, stating that he carried out the attack against interim government forces and African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) troops because he considered them enemies of Allah and Islamic Sharia.
In a note left at the scene, an unaffiliated individual, identified as Lin Ta-chou, claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) return all land and property to Taiwan.
In a note left at the scene, assailants identified themselves as members of the Ku Klux Klan and stated, "You Took my Flag, Pay Back."
In a note left at the scene, assailants spray-painted "KKK" on the targeted business.
In a note left at the scene, assailants spray-painted "KKK" on the targeted vehicle.
In a note left at the scene, Damoine A. Wilcoxson claimed responsibility for the incident and announced a "war on white people."
In a note left at the scene, separatists stated that the attack was provoked by the military's arrest of innocent people.
In a note left at the scene, the German Resistance Movement claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that a "multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, multi-religious and multi historical population" will destroy Germany.
In a pamphlet left at the scene, Maoists stated that individuals involved in atrocities and corruption would receive a similar fate.
In a pamphlet left at the scene, the Paraguayan People's Army (EPP) claimed responsibility for the incident and warned residents against planting soybeans.
In a pamphlet left at the scene, the People's Liberation Front of India claimed responsibility and stated that the individuals were targeted because they were working against the organization and assisting the police.
In a poster left at the scene, the Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the tourism lobby of exploiting land.
In a statement claiming responsibility a spokesperson for Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) stated that the attack was intent on disrupting the power supply to the national grid.
In a statement claiming responsibility for the attack, Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) stated that their motive is to liberate the Muslim people from the slavery of the oppressive apostate regimes implementing proper Shariah.
In a statement claiming responsibility for the attack, the Abdullah Azzam Brigades, stated attacks would continue unless Iran withdraws its forces from Syria.
In a statement claiming responsibility, a spokesperson for Jaishul Adl stated that the attack was retribution for the Iran Revolutionary Guard's involvement in Syria.
In a statement claiming responsibility, a spokesperson for the Unification Army Sons Brigade, stated the attack was retribution for crimes and military operations by Hezbollah and its allies.
In a statement claiming responsibility, a Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson stated the attack was carried out to avenge the death of TTP chief, Hakimullah Mehsud, in a drone strike.
In a statement claiming responsibility, Abdullah Azzam Brigades stated the attack was retribution for Hezbollah's involvement in Syria and the continued killing and detention of Sunni youths in Lebanon.
In a statement claiming responsibility, Abhijit Das, of the National Liberation Front of Bengalis (NLFB), stated the attack was in protest of the central government's failure to curb extortion and abduction of Bengalis living in Bodoland Territorial Area District (BTAD).
In a statement claiming responsibility, Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) stated the attack was retribution for the detention of female members of the Muslim Brotherhood.
In a statement claiming responsibility, Arnu Ngutulu Lodi, spokesperson for the Sudan People's Liberation Movement - North stated the attack was retribution for an air raid two days earlier that killed two children.
In a statement claiming responsibility, Jaish al-Adl stated the attack was retribution for the hanging of 16 people in November.
In a statement claiming responsibility, Mujahideen Ansar stated the attack was retribution for a drone strike in Hangu.
In a statement claiming responsibility, Tehrik-e-Taliban stated that the attack was retribution for the death of Hakimullah Mehsud in a US drone strike.
In a statement claiming responsibility, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) stated Allama Nasir Abbas was targeted for his alleged involvement in a November attack in Rawalpindi in which eight Sunnis were killed.
In a statement claiming responsibility, the Baloch Republican Army (BRA) stated the workers were targeted because they had been working with government intelligence agencies.
In a statement claiming responsibility, the Furqan Brigade stated that the attack was retribution towards non-believers intent on uprooting Islam in Egypt.
In a statement claiming responsibility, the New Irish Republican Army stated that the victim was killed in retribution for the earlier murder of prison officer David Black.
In a statement claiming responsibility, the People's Liberation Army, a subset of the Revolutionary People's Front, noted that the central Indian government had been sending agents into the interior contributing to attacks and deaths of its members and that the attack was part of their "Freedom Movement".
In a statement claiming responsibility, the spokesperson of the National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB), B. Ferengga, stated that the action was taken against the Indian Army because of their involvement in the killing Bodo people.
In a statement claiming responsibility, Wathiq al-Batat, commander of Iraq's al-Mukhtar Army militia, stated the attack was a warning to Saudi Arabia to stop interfering in Iraqi affairs.
In a statement emailed to media houses, Arunudoy Asom, a spokesperson for the United Liberation front of Assam (ULFA), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was part of a regular protest against Indian security forces.
In a statement of responsibility Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) spokesperson, Abou Walid Sahraoui, stated that the attack was to deter non-believers in Gao.
In a statement of responsibility Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) spokesperson, Abou Walid Sahraoui, stated that the attack was to stop the flow of enemies into the land of Islam.
In a statement of responsibility, Abu Baseer, a spokesperson for Mujahideen Ansar, stated the attack was revenge for the death of Pakistani Taliban leader Hakimullah Mehsud, who was killed in a drone strike in November.
In a statement on the Internet, the Informal Anarchist Federation stated that the attack was designed to disrupt the travel of workers for the 'military-industrial complex,' the Ministry of Defense, and corporations in Bristol.
In a statement on the internet, the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was in response to recent Turkish military attacks.
In a statement on Twitter, Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out as an attempt to release female prisoners who were being held in jails in Saudi Arabia.
In a statement on Twitter, Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was carried out in retaliation for Kenyan military intervention in Somalia and Kenyan troops persecuting innocent Muslims.
In a statement on Twitter, Liwa Ahrar al-Sunna claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was in response to the recent death of Sami al-Atrash.
In a statement online, Random Anarchists claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was meant to shed light on the ways in which "militarism works its way into the fabric of daily life." The group also claimed that the incident was a protest of the "powermongering disguised as benevolent international peacekeeping."
In a statement posted on a website, Al-Qa ida in Iraq claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the attack targeted Efan Sadoun al-Essawi, a prominent Sunni politician, because of his connections to the United States and Shiite.  The group further described al-Essawi as an apostate and criminal.  Sources note that al-Issawi was one of the founders of the Sahwa militia, a Sunni group that allied with the US military in 2006 against Al-Qa ida.
In a statement posted on a website, two groups, Militant Minority and Circle of Violators/Nucleus Lovers of Anomy, jointly claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that media coverage of the ongoing Greek financial crisis was sympathetic to the government.
In a statement posted on an anarchist Internet forum, the Mateo Morral Insurrectionist Commandos claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the cathedral was targeted due to its alleged ties with the fascist past of Spain. The group also indicated that it was targeting locations that were regarded as sacred to the Spanish monarchy.
In a statement posted on an Islamic Web site, the group said that the restaurant was targeted because it was frequented by "apostate policemen."
In a statement posted on its website, ALF claimed that Fairbanks and her team were "breeding monkeys for painful addiction experiments".
In a statement posted on the internet, Al-Nusra Front claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the suicide bombing targeted security forces near the mosque because they were aggressors who were preparing to attack individuals after a prayer service.
In a statement posted online, Al-Qa ida in Iraq claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they carried it out in retaliation for the Shiite-led government's alleged actions of persecuting and interning Sunni women for the purpose of pressuring "their wanted relatives [into] turning themselves [in] to Iraqi security forces."
In a statement posted online, Al-Qa ida in Iraq claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they carried it out the attack in retaliation for the Shiite-led government's alleged actions of persecuting and interning Sunni women for the purpose of pressuring "their wanted relatives [into] turning themselves [in] to Iraqi security forces."
In a statement posted online, an unknown claimed responsibility for the bombing and stated that Ivan Glasenberg, the head of the commodities trading company Glencore, was targeted in protest of the World Economic Forum (WEF) that was being held in Davos, Switzerland.  Activists also cited poor working conditions at Glencore as a motivation behind the attack.
In a statement posted online, an unknown group claimed responsibility for the bombing and stated that the Credit Suisse Bank was targeted due to its support for the World Economic Forum (WEF) that was being held in Davos, Switzerland.  Activists also cited a rise in unemployment, food price speculations, and actions against the Greek people as motivations behind the attack.
In a statement posted online, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility and stated that the attacks were in response to Iraqi security forces arresting hundreds of Muslims.
In a statement posted online, Overall Deniers of Joining the Existing stated that their goal was to "spread chaos and anarchy."
In a statement posted online, Overall Deniers of Joining the Existing stated that their goal was to "spread chaos and anarchy."  The group also criticized Stavros Kalafatis, whose office was attacked, for his support for a mining site in Halkidiki.
In a statement posted online, the Informal Anarchist Federation claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Failos Kranidiotis was targeted because of his connections to both New Democracy and Golden Dawn.
In a statement posted online, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility and stated that the rocket attack, which targeted Hezbollah positions, was in retaliation for the group's involvement in the recent battles in Yabrud city, Syria.
In a statement posted online, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the mortar attack was in retaliation for Hezbollah's involvement in the Syrian Civil War.
In a statement published on the internet, Ingush Rebels claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was in response to an alleged attack by Russian and pro-Russian troops on Muslims in the village of Galgayche several weeks earlier.
In a statement published on the internet, the group International Revolutionary Front claimed that the attack, stating that their goal was to show solidarity with anarchist groups and leaders across the world, particularly those imprisoned in Greece and Italy, and that they targeted Microsoft to strike a blow against capitalism.
In a statement released on the internet, Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility, stating that the radio station al-Ikhbaria was attacked because of its pro-Assad regime stance.
In a statement the Taliban claimed responsibility and stated they targeted the compound because it is used as a refuge by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
In a statement to a radio station, the Red Hand Defenders claimed that this attack was one in an ongoing campaign of attacks in the region.  The country was in the midst of peace talks with loyalists.
In a statement, Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they had attempted to abduct the German security guard and when he resisted, they killed him.
In a statement, Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) claimed responsibility and stated that the rockets were fired in response to Israeli aggression.
In a statement, Mujahideen Ansar claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in retaliation to drone strikes.
In a statement, Mujahideen Ansar claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in retaliation to United States (US) drone strikes.
In a statement, the Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the army is involved in killing members of the BLF and that they are interested in making financial gains from the disaster relief.
In a statement, the Free Syrian Army claimed responsibility for the attack, which killed the defense minister and the President's brother-in-law, two top Syrian regime figures. The FSA stated that the officials were targeted because they were responsible for massacres. The FSA further elaborated that the ultimate aim of the attack was to bring down the Assad regime in Syria. In a competing claim of responsibility, Liwa al-Islam claimed ownership of the attack and, in a statement on their Facebook page, said that they had targeted the crisis management cell because it contained several key regime figures. Sources noted that the crisis management cell had been charged by President Assad with suppressing the rebellion in Syria.
In a statement, the Libya Revolutionaries Operations Room (LROR) claimed responsibility for the incident and said that it was carried out in response to a United States Special Forces operation leading to the capture of suspected Al-Qa'ida leader Abu Anas al-Libi. LROR further stated that they were upset that the Libyan government had known about the operation beforehand and not stopped it.
In a statement, the National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) claimed responsibility for the abductions, saying that the group was upset over mining rights, which through a corrupt political process, had been taken from traditional local miners and instead given to foreign corporations.  Sources note that the kidnapping victims were employees of the Braeval Mining Corporation, a Canadian company which has mining interests and options to acquire mineral rights in four additional areas in the San Lucas mountains, a traditional National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) stronghold.  After the release of five of the six hostages, the National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) offered to exchange the remain hostage, a Canadian citizen, for the return of mining titles.
In a statement, the United Baloch Army (UBA) claimed responsibility for the attack and said that it was carried out in response to Pakistan's refusal to allow international aid agencies to work in areas of the country that had been affected by an earthquake.
In a suicide note written by Charles Bishop, he states: "First of all, Osama bin Laden is absolutely justified in the terror he has caused on 9-11. He has brought a mighty nation to its knees! God blesses him and the others who helped make September 11 happen," "The U.S. will have to face the consequences for its horrific actions against the Palestinian people and Iraqis by its allegiance with the monstrous Israelis who want nothing short of world domination. You will pay God help you and I will (underlined) make you pay.  There will be more coming! Al Qaeda and other organizations have met with me several times to discuss the option of me joining. I didn't.  This is an operation done by me only. I had no other help, although I am acting on their behalf.  Osama bin Laden is planning on blowing up the Super Bowl with an antiquated nuclear bomb left over from the 1967 Israeli-Syrian war."
In a text message to media sources, Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the pipeline was targeted in retaliation for a United States (US) drone strike, which killed five of the group's members.
In a video posted on YouTube, the group Liwa al-Sham claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they were targeting senior officers who were  for crimes committed under Assad's government.
In a video posted online, Abubakar Shekau, leader of Boko Haram, claimed responsibility for the incident, pledging further attacks against teachers and educational institutions that do not adhere to the teachings of the Qur'an and utilize a Western education model.
In a video posted online, an unidentified group claimed that the woman was executed for the crime of adultery and shot by her husband.  However, various government sources put forward different motives, stating that the woman was killed because she was the wife of a local militia leader, she was passing information on her Taliban lover to the government, or she was having affairs with multiple Taliban fighters.
In a video recorded by a bystander, the individual claimed responsibility and stated that he killed a British soldier because of the killing of Muslims in Afghanistan and other countries and demanded the British government return troops home.
In a video released to Al-Jazeera television, three masked men held the Somali captive and demanded that his Kuwaiti employer leave Iraq within 48 hours.
In a video statement, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the two men were apprehended because they were believed to be pro-government gunmen. Additionally, they were executed due to failed attempts to trade them for rebel prisoners.
In a video, the group demanded that the Turkish company withdrawal its services in Iraq or the two hostages would be executed.
In a video, the Mujahedeen Corps in Iraq demanded the Jordanian company Daoud & Partners, owned by Rami al-Ouweiss, to stop all business with the U.S. Military within 72 hours.
In a website statement, Zabihollah Mojahed, a Taliban spokesperson claimed responsibility for the attack and stated the attack targeted the provincial chief of the counterterrorism police because he was a killer and cruel person "who was punished for his sinister actions."
In an anonymous statement, a Maoist commander claimed that the two police officers and a villager were abducted and killed because the officers were asking the villager to help in the conflict against Maoists.
In an e-mail message, the Taliban claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was part of their campaign against the government and coalition forces.
In an email, the Kurdistan Freedom Falcons (TAK) said that the attack was in response to Turkey's policies toward the Kurdish people.
In an emailed statement, an individual that claimed to be a member of ELF wrote that the goal of these attacks was  "to strike at the bottom line" of Ryan Homes, which was the developer of many of the houses in the plan.
In an online statement, Al-Qa ida in Iraq claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the bombing was carried out in revenge for Sunni women being held in prison by Iraq's Shiite led government.  Sources speculate that that the attack is part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Iraq's Sunni minority and Shiite majority communities.
In an online statement, Al-Qa ida in Iraq claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it executed the attack because "the presence of Syrian government forces in Iraq proved collusion between the Shia-led government in Baghdad and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad."
In an online statement, Individuals Tending Toward Savagery claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that attacks will continue unless nanotechnology is stopped.
In an online video, Al-Nusrah Front claimed responsibility, stating that the bombing was in response to the shelling of civilian areas by the Assad government.  However, in a statement released three days later, Al-Nusrah denied involvement in the attack and stated that the previous claim of responsibility was a lie.
In an online video, the Free Syrian Army claimed responsibility for the kidnapping, stating that the 48 kidnapped pilgrims were actually members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and were targeted because of Iranian support for the Syrian government.  However, Iran claimed that the kidnapping victims were Shiite pilgrims, though it admitted that some were retired or former members of the military and Revolutionary Guard.
In anger over the government's "failure" to implement Islamic law.
In celebration of "Black Tiger's Day," the anniversary of first suicide bomb attack in 1987.
In efforts to protest tuition increases and fight police repression and American imperialism
In his claim of the attack, one of the assailants noted that he was attempting to wage a holy war and attacked the chess hall because he thought the people inside would not put up a resistance.
In his confession, Ali Muhammad Brown stated that the attack was in revenge for the United States' foreign policy actions.
In his telephoned claim of responsibility, Karen National Union (KNU) spokesman Pado Mahn Sha stated, "We did it, we are responding with guerrilla operations to our enemy [the junta] which has launched an offensive against the Karen people in that area."
In its claim of responsibility, Ajnad Misr stated that the attack was a method of demonstrating the vulnerability of less important government installations and personnel.
In its claim of responsibility, Ajnad Misr stated that the attack was a method of demonstrating the vulnerability of less important government installations and personnel.  (added AP claim article)
In its statement, the Mujahedeen Shura Council said that Ayham al-Samarraie was targeted because he was involved and supported the U.S.-backed government.
In leaflets, the group claimed it was attempting to free the Palestinian land from the Israeli occupation.
In opposition of Gap and the World Trade Organization.
In order to free comrades that were arrested in connection with Sri Lankan bus bombing (cf: 199803060002)
In order to give attention to Earth Day and protest
In pamphlets recovered from the site of the incident, the SJMM issued a warning to the government. They also claimed that their attack had the support of the local people.
In protest of pro-Israel articles in the Egyptian newspaper edited by Mr. Sebai.
In protest of the Bait-and-shoot program at Durand-Eastman Park in Rochester, NY
In protest of the Popular Party's policies.
In protest of the use of meat.
In reaction to a nationwide strike effecting the oil industry in this region.
In reaction to what the group believed to be western influences communicated through advertising, which threatened to repress Estonia's national culture.
In reprisal for the deaths of 11 peasants, killed June 7, 1998 when soldiers attacked a school in Guerrero. 
In reprisal for the organization of an Identity Rock concert by the town's National Front (FN) council.
In response to Britain's involvement in Cyprus.
In response to Israeli crimes against Palestinians
In response to Pakistani President General Pervez Musharraf's banning of two Shiite groups, Sipah-e-Muhammad and Lashkar-e-Jangvi.
In response to Spanish politicians encouragement for ETA to stop attacks like the IRA.
In response to the Israel war force policy, arrests and continued witch hunt of Mujahedeen in the West Bank and an assurance of the option of Jihad until liberation of the Palestinian soil
In response to the killings of two Palestinian Activists.
In response to the occupation's crimes in the West Bank and Gaza Strip
In retaliation for Israeli assassinations of Islamic Jihad leaders.
In retaliation for killing a Hizballah commander.
In retaliation for Ms. Zarkova's investigative reporting and to intimidate like-minded journalists.
In retaliation for NATO airstrikes in the Mohammad district.
In retaliation for previous Israeli Security Forces attacks.
In retaliation for Taliban land and air attacks on residential areas in the north of the country.
In retaliation for the death of the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) leader, Wahid Saylani.
In retaliation for the killing of Karim Atwi and Mohammed Hammoud
In retaliation for the shooting of four Phalangists earlier that day.
In retaliation for the slaying of eight members of the group in a clash with Iranian security forces in November 1997.
In the claim of responsibility, the PLFP stated that this attack was carried out due to their leader being killed recently by Israel.
In the claim, the PLFP said that this attack was in retalition for the slaying of one of its leaders by Israeli troops.
In the name of animal rights; the perpetrators believed meat was "murder"
In the note left by FALN at a telephone booth by the FBI building, members demanded that officials cease the federal investigation of two women lay ministers of the Episcopal Church, who worked for the National Commission on Hispanic Affairs.  FBI officials believed the women had information about the only known member of FALN, Carlos Albert Torres, and were thus imprisoned on charges of contempt, despite their denials of any knowledge of FALN or the activities of FALN members.
In the phone call the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) placed to the Agence France-Presse news agency following the explosion, the group claimed that the attack was directed towards the Israeli governments war against Palestine.
In the weeks prior to the attack, Burundian rebel groups stepped up ambushes along main roads as part of a "psychological warfare" strategy in an effort to disrupt trade between the capital and the provinces.
In their claim of responsibility, Al Shabaab stated that the attack was meant to impede African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) and government progress in central areas of Somalia.
In their claim of responsibility, Al-Nasir Salah al-Din Brigades stated that the attack was in response to Israeli persecution of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip as well as Israeli mistreatment of Palestinian prisoners.
In their claim of responsibility, Al-Nasir Salah al-Din Brigades stated that the attack was in response to the recent killing of two group commanders by Israeli forces.
In their claim of responsibility, Al-Shabaab stated that they killed the police officers and would continue to kill anyone who refused to repent for their sins.
In their claim of responsibility, Al-Shabaab stated that they killed the soldiers and would continue to kill anyone who refused to repent for their sins.
In their claim of responsibility, Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis (Ansar Jerusalem) stated that the attack was an act of revenge and that all soldiers serving the president would be similarly killed.
In their claim of responsibility, Conspiracy of the Cells of Fire-Nihilists Sect stated that the attack was in response to perceived police and prison brutality as well as the death of a high-profile prison inmate.
In their claim of responsibility, Jaish al-Muhajireen wal-Ansar (Muhajireen Army) demanded the release of Khaled Suleiman, an imprisoned Saudi Arabian national.
In their claim of responsibility, Jaish-e-Islam stated that they targeted known Shiite locations because many Shiite Muslims from Pakistan were engaging in war against Sunni Muslims in Syria.
In their claim of responsibility, Mujahideen Ansar stated that the attack was in retaliation for Pakistan Air Force drone strikes in North Waziristan.
In their claim of responsibility, one of the suspects stated that the attack was in revenge for the kidnap and murder of three Israeli teenagers in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
In their claim of responsibility, the February 14th Movement stated that the attack was in revenge for the failure to release the corpse of Abdulaziz Moussa Al Abba for burial.
In their claim of responsibility, the New People's Army (NPA) stated that Okinlay was targeted because he had made laws that were biased against local farmers and had helped the military fight the NPA since 2006.
In their claim of responsibility, the perpetrators called for the "immediate release of all political prisoners including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi" and demanded the military government "hand over the state power to National League for Democracy" (NLD) which won a landslide victory in a 1990 general election.
In their claim of responsibility, the PLFP stated that the attack was in response to its leader being killed by Israel's military.
In their claim of responsibility, the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) stated that the attack was in revenge for the Air Force's attacks in the Tirah Valley and other villages in the tribal areas.
In their claim, the Islamic Jihad said the attack was in response to violence against Palestinians, saying they would continue to commit violent acts until Israel exited their lands.
In their claims of responsibility, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) stated that the attacks were a response to Pakistani airstrikes on villages in Northwestern Pakistan as well as a response to the November drone strike by the United States that killed the former TTP leader Hakimullah Mehsud.
Increased constraints on drug trafficking, which the Shining Path taxes, is provoking a response.
Independence for Thailand's southern regions
Individuals Tending Toward Savagery claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Oscar Landerretche was targeted "for his offenses against Earth."
Individuals, identified as Ramla Abdulrahman Hussein; Maimuna Abdulrahman Hussein; Tasnim Yakub Abdullahi Farah, claimed responsibility for the incident and allegedly pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
Indonesia's Vice President said that the attacks were an attempt to foil the peace process.
Initiative de Resistance Internationaliste stated that they were publicizing the pillaging of Canadian resources by the United States.
Inspector General Neelmani claimed that the attack was an attempted raid to loot arms.
Insurgency Action
Insurgents fired rockets to sabotage the Iraqi oil-producing infrastructure.
Insurgents wanted to disturb the president's departure to Djibouti for talks with the opposition.
Intended to injure police.
Intent to cause bodily harm to the deputy commander.
Internal feud is suspected to be the reason behind the attack.
International Solidarity called for the release of anarchist prisoners from Spanish jails.
Intimidate Arabs who sell land to Jews in Arab east Jerusalem
Intimidate foreign presence in Russia
Intimidate former members of the Algerian military
Intimidate newspaper vendors and distribution stations in Iraq
Intimidate people who promote racial harmony
Intimidate Playboy to stop publishing in Indonesia
Intimidate pro-Castro sympathizers and protest Fidel Castro's government.
Intimidate remaining Serbian population in the area
Intimidate telecommunications business working with Coalition Forces in Afghanistan
Intimidate the African American community of New Bedford Massachusetts.
Intimidate the Black Panther Party.
Intimidate those militant members who renounce the terrorists group's cause
Intimidate those who have political ties to government of Iraq
Intimidate those who send their children to school
Intimidate those who support the Iraqi government and reconstruction
Intimidate those who work U.S. forces in Iraq
Intimidate those who work with Coalition Forces in Iraq
Intimidate/hurt the Thai military
Intimidating the Ethiopian Armed forces into leaving Somalia
Intimidating/preventing KFPT from allowing Communists a network to share their views.
Intimidation
Intimidation of target and those who decide to go against the KKK or help the government; an issue of inner-party conflict.
Investigators believe that the former military servicemen were motivated by extremist views and a violent dislike of Chubais, who spearheaded economic reforms in the 1990s, impoverishing millions, and leaving the economy in the hands of a few powerful and connected businessmen.
Investigators believed that these attacks were politically motivated.
Investigators consider this to be a well-organized hate crime against Kurds by racist people.
Investigators suggest  the murder was related to Tsvetkov's distribution of fishing quotas among competing companies in the region, and also from Tsvetkov's attempts to force gold-mining companies in the region to repay a multimillion-dollar loan provided by the federal government in 1995.
Investigators suspected that the attack was motivated by extortion.
Investigators suspected that this bombing is the result of an internal feud involving former associates of the Ulster Defense Association (UDA).
Irma Krat, a Ukrainian nationalist, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest to the detention of Nadiya Savchenko, a Ukrainian pilot, in Russia.
Irrintzi claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the vacation home was targeted because the home was "only used a few weeks of the year."
Isabel Fermiza, a New People's Army (NPA) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the attack was meant to refute the Philippine Army's claim that the NPA was becoming less effective.
Islamic insurgents attacked a hotel where the Bay region governor Abdufatah Mohammad Ibrahim and other government officials were staying in Qasahdere.
Islamic Jihad claimed the attack was in response to Israeli actions against Palestinians
Islamic Jihad stated the attack was a message of Israeli leaders. "We carried out this attack in order to disrupt the Israeli elections," said Abu Bara, a spokesman for Islamic Jihad. "We strike (Israel) to show the world that this state is illegal and we will carry on."
Islamic Jihad was one of three groups to claim responsibility for the border raid. The other two groups were not identified.
Islamic militants in the lawless tribal region have launched a campaign against crimes in the deeply conservative region.
Islamic separatist organizations had earlier promised to step up their violent campaign following the collapse of the July 2001 summit between India and Pakistan.
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was in retribution for Kurdish arrests of Muslim women.
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility and stated that this and other coordinated bombings in Baghdad were in retaliation for intensified security  operations against insurgents in Sunni areas.
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the kidnapping, stating it was in retribution for United States drone strikes in Syria.
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for this and the other coordinated incidents in Baghdad on this day, stating that the attacks were in retaliation for security campaigns that "target Sunni areas."
Israeli political and security elements believed that the perpetrators wanted to prevent progress in the political negotiations, specifically he meeting between Defense Minister Yitzhaq Mordekhay and Abu-Mazin (Mahmud 'Abbas), scheduled for that day.
Israeli settlers claimed responsibility for the incident and stated in a note left at the scene that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the arrest of right-wing Jewish activists.
Israeli settlers claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to a recent attack in Halamish and called for the killing of Palestinians.
It can be assumed that the Adhemiyah Shawa council was targeted because of their role as a Sunni government-supported paramilitary unit; tasked with fighting insurgent members.
It can be assumed that the kidnapping and assault were the result of upcoming elections on April 10.
It has been suspected that the assailants were attempting to disrupt upcoming legislative elections.
It is alleged that some cadres belonging to the Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) and Khatm-e-Nabuwat (KeN) were carrying on a hate campaign against the Ahmedis and they had even placed a board outside a local graveyard, reading, “Ahmedis are not allowed to bury their dead in this graveyard."
It is believed target was selected because it provides reproductive health services.
It is believed that Al Shabaab kidnapped the two journalists because they were reporting without the groups consent.
It is believed that Gautam was abducted for his association with Chure Bhawar Ekta Samaj, a political party representing the hill people living in the Terai region.
It is believed that the aim of the explosions, which took place within frew hundred meters of each other, was to create panic.
It is believed that the attack is part of an effort of Taliban to disrupt the election.
It is believed that the attack was in response to recent security force operations in the area.
It is believed that the attack was in retaliation for the murder of eight Naxals by villagers.
It is believed that the attacks were used to provoke social unrest.
It is believed that the bomber exploded in order to allow other members of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) to escape.
It is believed that the boy was taken hostage for ransom money
It is believed that the FARC rebels were trying to extort the store and after several failed attempts employed the use of the grenade as "punishment" for not giving in to their demands.
It is believed that the motive behind these murders was that the Bankston brothers were disobeying orders of their own group, New World sect.
It is believed that the motive is to force the government to give more revenues to its poor regions.
It is believed that the New People's Army is responsible for the attack and blew the bus up in response to the company's refusal to pay a "revolutionary tax"
It is believed that the New Peoples Army were hired to snatch the election ballots for a local politician
It is believed that the plane and hostages were captured in retaliation for the capture of several militia commanders the month before the incident
It is believed that the victim was a former rebel who was targeted for leaving.
It is believed the attacks were carried out to delay upcoming scheduled elections.
It is claimed that the bombings were in retaliation for the government killing nine of their fighters.
It is suspected that the assailants attempted to intimidate former members of the Algerian security forces.
It is suspected that the assailants were attempting to sabotage the upcoming municipal elections.
It is suspected that the assailants were protesting the president of Algeria who visited Bouira on the same day.
It is suspected that the attack occurred because insurgents who oppose the education of girls have bombed and destroyed hundreds of northwestern schools in recent years.
It is suspected that the attack was "launched by the LTTE in retaliation for the recent operations of the Sri Lankan Navy against the transport ships of the LTTE and the air strikes of the SLAF over LTTE positions in the Northern Province."
It is suspected that the attack was carried out targeting the families of soldiers who were present in the shopping center at the time of the blast.
It is suspected that the attack was committed by the LTTE as a diversionary measure to direct security forces away from the battles in the north between the LTTE and the government as the Tigers were fighting for an independent Tamil state.
It is suspected that the bombing took place to protest the recent European Union mission to Algiers which discussed with the Algerian government ways in which to end the ongoing violence in the region.
It is suspected that the farmer was targeted because he did not pay a tithe demanded by the perpetrators
It is suspected that the mine had been brought to the area by the LTTE with the intention of using it against the Security Forces. The Tigers have been fighting the majority government for a separate state for ethnic Tamils since 1983.
It is suspected that the motive for this attack was that Khaalis denounced Elijah Muhammad, the Black Muslim leader, for teaching false doctrines of Islam.
It is suspected that the victim was targeted because he was a supporter of a rival organization.
It is suspected that this attack is part of a calculated campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random.
It is suspected that this attack is part of a calculated GIA campaign to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random.
It is suspected that this attack is part of a campaign of violence following the instillation of Abou Tourab as the head of the GIA.
It is suspected that this attack was carried out as part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to sabotage upcoming parliamentary elections.
It is suspected that this attack was carried out as part of a campaign the GIA to sabotage upcoming parliamentary elections.
It is suspected that this attack was carried out to raise funds and to divert Algerian forces that were targeting AQLIM in the mountains.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated AQLIM campaign to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Algerian Islamic extremists to destabilize the country by sabotaging utilities.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Algerian Islamic extremists to increase the frequency of violent attacks during both Ramadan and the one year anniversary of the passage of the act for national reconciliation.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Algerian Islamic extremists to increase the frequency of violent attacks during Ramadan.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by setting up fake roadblocks to terrorize citizens and murder individuals identified as belonging to the Algerian security forces.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by setting up fake roadblocks to terrorize citizens and raise funds.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces defending the 'apostate' Algerian government.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated GIA campaign to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces defending the 'apostate' Algerian government.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated GIA campaign to protest the presence of foreigners influences within Algeria.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces defending the 'apostate' Algerian government.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a calculated GSPC campaign to increase the frequency of violent attacks during both Ramadan and the one year anniversary of the passage of the act for national reconciliation.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to intimidate Algerian politicians.
It is suspected that this attack was part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to target former members of the Algerian security forces.
It is suspected the attack was carried out due to the refusal by the establishment to pay extortion money to the guerrillas.
It is thought that the attack was carried out for non-payment of extortion demands.
It is unclear if the assailants specifically targeted the workers because they were employed by a national company that specialized in mines or if the Islamic extremists were targeting Algerian civilians at random.
It is unclear if the victim was targeted for a specific reason or if this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Islamic extremists to kill Algerian civilians at random.
It is unclear if the victim was targeted for a specific reason or if this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Islamic extremists to terrorize Algerian civilians at random.
It is unclear if the victim was targeted for a specific reason or if this attack was part of a calculated GIA campaign to kill Algerian civilians at random.
It is unclear if the victim was targeted for a specific reason or if this attack was part of a calculated GSPC campaign to kill Algerian civilians at random.
It is unclear if the victims were targeted for a specific reason or if the assailants intended to kill Algerian civilians at random.
It is unclear if the victims were targeted for a specific reason or if this attack was part of a calculated AQLIM campaign  to kill Algerian civilians at random.
It is unclear if the victims were targeted for a specific reason or if this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Islamic extremists to kill Algerian civilians at random.
It is unclear if the victims were targeted for a specific reason or if this attack was part of a calculated campaign by Islamic extremists to terrorize Algerian civilians at random.
It is unknown if the victim was targeted for a specific reason or if the assailants intended to kill Algerian civilians at random.
It is unknown if the victims were killed for a specific reason or if the assailants intended to target Algerian civilians at random.
It may have been in retaliation for the Senator returning to active politics.
It said that the kidnapping was in response to the company's policy of employing people from the capital rather than locals, according to the Chinese embassy.
It was alleged the victim had been supplying news and other information to the EPDP-run radio program "Ithayaveenai," from Colombo.
It was assumed that the bombing, having occurred on market day during the busiest hours, was meant to undermine improving relationships between Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo.
It was believed that Justice Upadhyaya was one of the main targets of insurgents due to his verdicts against some Maoist supporters and workers in several recent cases. He had also been a vocal proponent of special courts set up to try Maoists.
It was believed that the attack was a protest to election results that occurred on December 15, 1997.
It was believed that the attack was carried out as a rejection of President Jose Eduardo dos Santos' amnesty offer.
It was believed that the attack was carried out because Mr. Kopanja had published articles detailing war-time atrocities committed against non-Serbs by Serbian and Bosnian Serb forces.
It was believed that the attack was carried out because of an on-going land dispute.
It was believed that the attack was carried out in protest of an upcoming oil conference in Riyadh.
It was believed that the attack was carried out in retaliation for a military operation the day before (on 06/13/2008 on Friday) in Bukidnon that killed three NPA guerrillas.
It was believed that the attack was carried out to mark the first anniversary of the arrest in London of former dictator Augusto Pinochet and in protest of the extradition of Pinochet to Spain.
It was believed that the attack was racially motivated.
It was believed that the killings were revenge for previous sectarian violence in the Pakistani town of Parachinar.
It was believed that this attack was one of a series of retribution killings that occurred following the death of the attackers' leader, Billy Wright.
It was believed that UNITA attacked Caxito to destroy the bridge over the Dange River to disrupt the flow of goods between the Zaire and Uige provinces.
It was believed the attack was carried out to divert police from a car bomb attack that took place minutes after the grenade attack.
It was believed the boy was targeted because his father was a supporter of the Shiite political party Tehrik-i-Jafria Pakistan (TJP).
It was believed this attack was meant to intimidate UN inspectors and halt weapons inspections.
It was possible the attack was a form of clan-based revenge.
It was speculated that the assassination was the result of a grudge killing.
It was suspected that armed Islamist groups, which are opposed to any form of recreation carried out the attack.
It was suspected that civilians at the Marando Hotel were targeted due to the likelihood that they would be able to pay high ransoms.
It was suspected that the attack was a reprisal for the continued operations against the AUC.
It was suspected that the attack was in response to a meeting of Palestinian officials to agree on deploying a joint force of Palestinian factions responsible for the camp's security.
It was suspected that the attack was perpetrated to intimidate Serbs into leaving Kosovo.
It was suspected that the attack was to sabotage the upcoming state polls on September 16, 2002.
It was suspected that the bombing was in response to the U.S.-led bombing campaign in Afghanistan.
It was suspected that the bombing was in retaliation for the death of an ETA suspect during a car chase the day before.
It was suspected that the bus was attacked because it was heading out of Katmandu toward the southern border town of Birgunj, defying a rebel call for a nationwide general strike.
It was suspected that the motive of the attack was in response to the anti-illegal logging campaign in Leyte.
It was suspected that the newspaper was attacked due to straight-forward reporting regarding political parties.
Jainad Baloch, spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack because of the Balochistan National Party's (BNP) participation in the Pakistani general elections.
Jaish Al-Adl claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the assassination was in retaliation for the hanging of 16 prisoners in October 2013. However, Iranian officials posited that the attack was carried out due to the prosecutor's "fairness" in executing justice.
Jaish al-Adl claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was in retaliation for Iran's involvement in an alleged 'massacre' in Syria, as well as the poor treatment of Sunnis in Iran.
Jaish Al-Adl claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the abduction was carried out in retaliation for the executions of fifteen Balochi citizens in Iran. Sources also posited that Jaish al-Adl had demanded the release of 300 Sunni prisoners in Iran and Syria in exchange for the victims.
Jaish al-Adl claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the regime's repression and demanded that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) resign by 2016.
Jaish al-Adl claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in retaliation to the execution of 16 Baluchis and for Syrians killed by Iranian Guards.
Jaish al-Fatah (Syria) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the military not adhering to the truce.
Jaish al-Umar (JaU) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was responsible for the arrest of a member of JaU.
Jaish as-Saiyouf (Army of Swords) claimed responsibility for the incident and warned women to wear a headscarf when traveling in the city.
Jaish-e-Islam claimed responsibility for the attack and said that it was sectarian in nature.
Jaish-e-Islam claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that it was in retaliation for security operations targeting the group and attacks against Ahl-e Sunnat Wal Jammat (ASWJ) workers in Mastung. However, sources also speculated that the victims, who were Hazara Shiite, may have been targeted as part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's majority Sunni and minority Shiite communities.
Jaish-e-Islam claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the torture of those being held by security personnel.
Jaish-e-Islam claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the incident was carried out in revenge for an attack that occurred in Rawalpindi and for an incident in which the Quran was desecrated in Quetta. Sources also speculated that the attack, which targeted Shiite pilgrims, may be part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's  majority Sunni and minority Shiite communities.
Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of Afzal Guru, who was hanged on February 9, 2013.
Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the execution of Afzal Guru.
Jama'at al-Tawhid wa al-Jihad wanted the U.S. government to release all Iraqi detainees.
Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in an attempt to discredit the government and to gain attention in the West.
Jamaa Al-Islamiya Al-Alamiya (World Islamist Group) stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the deaths of Arabs and Palestinians in Iraq and West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Jamaat Nusrat al-Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM) claimed responsibility for the incident and denounced Western education at the scene of the attack, threatening to burn down other schools teaching the French language.
Jamaat Nusrat al-Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations by Niger in Mali and Niger's cooperation with France and an anti-terrorism coalition in the Sahel.
Jamaat Nusrat al-Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the Malian army's alleged aggression against members of the Muslim community.
Jamaat-al-Fuqra was an Islamic fundamentalist sect that  was against the oppression of Muslims and sought Islamic purity; the group often targeted Hare Krishna temples, and Islamic and Hindu places of worship.
Jamaat-ul-Ahrar claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Asghar Ali Shah Khilji was targeted because the court in which he worked for represented secularism.
Jamaat-ul-Ahrar claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sarfaraz Khan was targeted because they believed he was working with Pakistani intelligence.
Jamaat-ul-Ahrar claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack carried out in retaliation to a recent military operation that killed one of its members.
Jamaat-ul-Ahrar claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for government executions of Jamaat-ul-Ahrar members.
Jamaat-ul-Ahrar claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the alleged oppressive treatment of members of the Muslim community by security personnel.
Jameel Ahmad, spokesperson for Jamiat ul-Mujahedin (JuM), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they were avenging the killings of Tahir and Altaf Ahmad.
Jameel Ahmad, spokesperson for Jamiat ul-Mujahedin (JuM), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they were retaliating for the Jammu and Kashmir police's harrassment of Kashmiri youth.
James Harris Jackson, a white extremist, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted Caughman in order to persuade white women against interracial relationships.
Janatantrik Terai Mukti Morcha (JTMM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that "All the Tarai people should be united to end the colonial rule for the freedom of Tarai."
Janatantrik Terai Mukti Morcha (JTMM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in honor of its members who have been killed.
Janatantrik Terai Mukti Morcha- Goit (JTMM-G) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because the school had disobeyed the Tarai bandh.
Jaysh al-Islam (Syria) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to free female prisoners.
Jean Claude Olivier was a supporter of Jean-Bertrand Aristide's presidency and a vocal critic of Haitian organizations that were against democracy.  Specifically, it was suspected that he was assassinated for urging a boycott of a concert sponsored by Louis Thermitus.  Thermitus, a suspected one time member of the Macoutes, was a supporter of the Military junta that would oust Aristide.
Jedediah Stout, an unaffiliated individual, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted the mosque because he was opposed to abortion.
Jedediah Stout, an unaffiliated individual, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted the mosque because he was opposed to Islam.
Jeiand Baloch, a spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the school principal was killed because he worked for a state agency.
Jharkhand Liberation Tigers militants claimed the construction company was continuing work despite the shutdown call given by the outfit in protest against the killing of one of its leaders.
Jharkhand Sangharsh Jan Mukti Morcha claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was related to an extortion demand.
Johnson was attacked for defending militant victims and supporting foreign industry in the Niger Delta area.
Jomo Gbomo, a Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the resignation of Nigeria's Minister of Petroleum Diezani Alison-Madeuke.  Gbomo also stated that oil tanker vehicles would continue to be targeted until group member Henry Okah, held in South Africa on terrorism charges, was released.
Jomo Gbomo, spokesperson for the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack because the Nigerian security forces dismissed their previous warning that violence would continue under the Hurricane Exodus campaign.
Jones’ murder conspiracy was carried out in order to keep Ryan and those traveling with him from reporting the truth about conditions at Jonestown.
Jorge Madlos, spokesperson for the National Democratic Front (NDF), an affiliate of the New People's Army (NPA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the NPA executed the attack because the targeted companies failed to pay their revolutionary tax.
Jorge Madlos, spokesperson for the National Democratic Front-Mindanao (NDF-Mindanao), an affiliate of the New People's Army (NPA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the NPA executed the attack because they believed that the members of the Civilian Armed Force Geographical Unit (CAFGU) had committed offenses against the Filipino people and the revolution.
Jorge Madlos, spokesperson for the New People's Army (NPA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they were enforcing their revolutionary policy of politicians securing permission to campaign in NPA strongholds.
Jose Zacarandai, a Tolima Indian who sells perishable goods, was the target of the guerrilla action.
Joseph Paul Franklin, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan and the American Nazi Party, believed that he was upholding the honor of the White race by attacking interracial couples, Jews, and Blacks.  He hoped that other Whites would follow the examples of his racist attacks.  He aspired to incite a race war.
Journalists believed that the attack was carried out by individuals who do not like their editorial policy.
Journalists interpret the incident as being a warning to journalists: "Any journalist who dares to talk about human rights will become the subject of a story even more horrific than the one he or she may be investigating"
Joy Asom, a spokesperson for the United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was part of a larger campaign to protest the Indian government's exploitation of Assam.  Sources also noted that April 7, the date of the attack, is the same as the United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA) founding day and that the group usually marks the date with attacks.
JTMM-G accused Sah of spying for the Maoists.
JTMM-G claimed that Sah was spying on them.
JTMM-J accused Mandal of spying on them.
JTMM-J cadres allegedly threatened to kill the entire family if they did not stop being Maoist members.
JTMM-J claimed Bhagat was spying on them.
JTMM-J claimed that Danuwar was working as an informant against JTMM-J.
JTMM-J district commander said the attack was retaliatory.
JTMM-J said the group was discriminating against the poor and dalits (bandits), and they had also failed to make a donation to JTMM-J
JTMM-J stated that the CPN-UML is against the Terai movement.
JTMM-J stated that Yadav was spying on them.
JTMM-R accused Mahato of being a spy.
JTMM-R claimed Niraula was working against the party's policy.
Judges were killed because they worked for the government
Junaid Baloch, a spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), claimed responsibility for the attack in a phone call to media sources, stating that the victims were targeted because they were non-Balochi.  He further stated that non-Balochi did not have a right to live in Balochistan and that the killings of members of the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) gave the group the moral right to target any non-Balochi.
Junaid Baloch, spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they killed Mehmood Afridi because he was "working against the Baloch freedom movement under the cover of journalism."
Jund Al-Islam claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they believed the victims were spies.
Jund al-Khilafa claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to French airstrikes against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
Jund al-Khilafah (Tunisia) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Khalifa Al-Sultani was targeted because the group believed he was a spy.
Jund al-Khilafah (Tunisia) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of the group's leader, Abu Seif Jammali.
Jund al-Khilafah (Tunisia) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the shepherd was targeted because the group believed he was a military informant.
Jund Ansar Allah claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the French Cultural Center was targeted due to France's participation in the alliance against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
Jundallah and Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) separately claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the execution of Dr. Usman, who was involved in an attack on a Pakistani military headquarters in 2009.
Jundallah claimed responsibility and stated that the bombing was in retaliation for the death of a group member, identified as Ahmed Bengali in a drone strike.
Jundallah claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent military operations.
Jundallah claimed responsibility for the incident and warned Muslims against visiting cinemas.
Ka Allan Juanito, a New People's Army (NPA) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to Cecilio Abuhan's suspected involvement in illegal activities.
Ka Magno Udyaw, spokesperson of the NPA's Leonardo Pacsi Command, said government troops must suffer and pay for abuses committed against residents of the Province.
Kaczynski was responsible for a 17-year bombing campaign of universities, airlines and computer-related targets, as he was against modern technology and large-scale organizations because he believed they diminished human freedom.
Kakata was a strategic town to control, given its location on a main geographic artery in Liberia.  The attackers were on a campaign to oust the President and gaining control of Kakata was a strategic move.
Kamei was believed to have bribed the Health Minister and was called to meet at the National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Isak-Muivah (NSCM-IM) Central Administrative Office (CAO).  He was forceibly taken to the office, blindfolded and beaten.
Karim Cheurfi, an unaffiliated individual, claimed responsibility for the incident in a note left at the scene and defended the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
Karki was accused of spying against JTMM-J
Kashmir Islamic militants are trying to separate from Hindu India
Keith Frederick, an anti-Muslim extremist, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he was carrying out his own "jihad."
Keke claimed to have shot the minister, alleging that Geve was dishonest and had misused money that was meant for people in his constituency.
Khalid ibn Walid wanted the Philippine government to remove its peacekeeping force from Iraq.
Khalid Masood, an unaffiliated individual, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Western military offensives in the Middle East.
Khalifa believed in Islam based on numerology and put forth interpretations of the Quran, which were opposed by fundamentalists
Khwaga Jani was kidnapped after he was warned to cease his involvement in the narcotics business but did not comply.
Kidnap government troops for ransom
Kidnapped captives would be killed if 16 of Jundallah's colleagues were not freed from Iranian jails
Kidnappers demanded that British forces withdraw from Iraq
Kilafah Islamic Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted for their involvement in drugs.
Kill local political party leader
Kill military personnel
Kill police
Killed because of his refusal to join the LTTE.
Killing informants
Klebnikov had a reputation at Forbes for investigating post-soviet business dealings and corruption. Investigators link his murder to his journalistic activity. Specific links were made to his his May, 2004, publication of a list of the 100 wealthiest Russians, which upset many of the country’s business elite, his investigations into exiled oligarch Boris Berezovsky, on whom he was said to be writing a second book, or to investigations into the connections between Russian oil company Surgutneftegaz and oil trader Kinex.
Krishna Madhesi, district commander of the Terai Communist Party, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted Suresh Raut because of his involvement in corruption at the District Development Committee (DDC).
Kuki tribal militants claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the victims.
La Razon reported that the attack was part of ETA's campaign against companies which did not pay "revolutionary tax."
Lashkar-e Taiba was protesting the government production of power in Kashmir that wasn't being distributed to Kashmiris.
Lashkar-e-Islam (India) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they would attack mobile companies that refused to cease operations.
Lashkar-e-Islam (Pakistan) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the two children of working for the government.
Lashkar-e-Islam (Pakistan) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for death sentences given to members of an armed group. Separately, Majlis-e-Lashkari claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for recent military operations.
Lashkar-e-Islam (Pakistan) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the detainment of tribal members following the recent death of a health worker.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for authorities' recent killing of Asif Chuto, a Lashkar-e-Jhangvi leader. Halqa-e-Mehsud also separately claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the deaths of its members and to punish members of the Shia Muslim community for supporting Bashar al-Assad.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the chief warden was targeted because he had tortured imprisoned members of the group.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Amjad Sabri was targeted for partaking in Shiite gatherings. Sources also noted that Amjad Sabri had been accused of blasphemy.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Malik Saleem Latif was targeted for promoting Ahmadiyya beliefs.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Shiite involvement in the Syrian war.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the deaths of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi members.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for hangings of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi members.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of four Lashkar-e-Jhangvi members.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of three of the group's members.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the deaths of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi members.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attacks were carried out in retaliation for the recent killing of Sunni traders in Quetta city.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims, who were members of the Shiite community, were targeted as part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's majority Sunni and minority Shiite communities.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that he intended "to spill blood and cause sectarian violence" against Pakistan's Shiite population.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi spokesperson, Abu Bakar, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that Yasin Hazara was the primary target and had been killed because he had been acting as a witness in court and testifying against the group's activities.
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi stated that the attack was in retaliation for a similar incident targeting a mosque in Mach town.  They claimed they were "aveng(ing) attacks on God's home".
Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Indian Army Chief General Bipin Rawat's statement that "it would have been better if people in Kashmir use weapons than stones."
Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the death of two civilians during a military operation.
Lashkar-e-Taiba militants said that the two policemen were involved in anti-militant activities.
Launching a large offensive against new President Uribe.
Leader of criminal gang had threatened widespread violence after the disappearance of his pregnant wife, which he blamed on police
Leaflets appeared following the explosion stating that women would be killed if they returned to school.
Leaflets left at the incident site asked people to stay away from voting on 11/20/2010, the sixth and final phase of Assembly elections.
Lee opposed the programming of the Discovery channel, which he felt promoted overpopulation. Instead, he felt that the program should showcase more shows on infertility and sterilization to curb the growth of the human population. Additionally, he felt that shows did little in the way of promoting ways to save the planet.
Left wing activists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Bettina Kudla was responsible for conservative policies on asylum and the deterioration of health insurance for the unemployed.
Left-Wing extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to draw attention to the treatment of illegal immigrants in Germany.
Left-Wing extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group did not approve of the meetings that were held at the targeted exhibition center.
Left-Wing extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated, "8-11, let's sabotage a world of racists and of frontiers." Sources also noted that a Northern League Party rally was scheduled to take place in the area prior to the attack.
Leftist Movement
Lepine stated during the attack that the women he killed were feminists, and that he hated feminists. The suicide note left at the scene reflected both personal and ideological misogyny.
Les Casseurs claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group supported demonstrators against French labor reforms.
Licea claimed he was fighting against American imperialism.
Liwa Ahrar al-Sunna claimed responsibility and stated that the rocket attack was in retaliation for Hezbollah's involvement in the Syrian Civil War.
Liwa Ahrar al-Sunna claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to Hezbollah's military involvement in Syria.
Liwa Ahrar al-Sunna claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retaliation for Hezbollah's mistreatment of people in Tripoli city, Lebanon. Sources also noted that Syrian opposition forces frequently target the predominantly Shiite Beqaa Valley because of the support it lends to Hizballah.
Liwa Ahrar al-Sunna claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retaliation for the mistreatment of people in Tripoli city, Lebanon at the hands of Hizballah. Sources also noted that Syrian opposition forces frequently target the predominantly Shiite Beqaa Valley because of the support it lends to Hezbollah.
Local law enforcement suspected that the perpetrators sought revenge for Shakhidov's service with the police.
Local press freedom groups told CPJ that they believe his murder was related to his work.
Local radio stations reported that witnesses stated that the perpetrators described the victims as collaborators of the left-wing guerrillas and warned other that they would face the same fate if they supported the leftists.
Local Taliban leader Habibur Rehman claimed responsibility for the attack. He accused NGOs of propagating obscenity and vulgarity and threatened further attacks.
Lounès Matoub was a defiant critic of Islamic extremism within Algeria and was declared to be an "enemy of God" by the GIA.  Moreover, this incident took place one week before a law was set to pass to declare Arabic to be the only language of Algeria.  Matoub, a Berber by decent, strongly opposed this measure.
LTTE believed the targets to be secret informers against the group and possibly other organizations.
LTTE believed to have targeted Galle, "a Sinhala majority town in order to create an angry backlash from the Sinhala majority"
LTTE r rebels had vowed to hit nationwide military and economic targets in revenge for the army's routing of guerrillas from the country's east.
LTTE was trying to escape the Sri Lankan Navy
Luigi Preiti confessed to the shooting following his arrest, stating that he carried out the attack because he was angry with Italy's politicians.
Luna was being held and investigated for the 2007 murders of Suazo siblings who were Barangay Union residents in Lingig town, and his involvement in the murder of Mayor Amerosin Onsing in 2001.
Lutfi al-Barbari said he tried to kill the soldiers to keep them from "killing innocent people in Iraq."
Macario Dilaab, a New People’s Army (NPA) spokesperson, said they had "long targeted Sal for his active role in the government’s anti-communist campaign. "He has always been a target of our comrades because of his active affiliation to the military,” Dilaab said in a text message.
Madhesh Rastra Janatantrik claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was meant as a warning to Maoist Chair Pushpa Kamal Dahal that he had insulted the Madhesi people.
Magno Udyaw, a New People's Army (NPA) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it was punishment for activities by state security forces in the area.
Mahood states that the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF) is responsible for the attack; he believes that he was targeted because he fell out of favor with the Progressive Unionist Party (PUP) and now UVF is attacking him and his family due to the disagreement.
Make statement about Turkish troops killed in clashes with Kurdish militants
Malik Sher Afzal was killed for siding with the government and forming legions against the Taliban in Mohmand Agency.
Manipur Naga People's Army (MNPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the group would continue its attacks until all communities in Manipur obtained freedom. The group further stated that the people have faced continuous discrimination by the Indian government.
Many Al Qaeda fighters have been carrying out vicious attacks against anyone they believed had worked with the anti-extremist Sunni groups.
Maoist pamphlets left at the scene claimed that the building was targeted because it was being used by security personnel.
Maoists blew up the bridges over alleged non-payment of the extortion amount by the contractors constructing them in the District.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the attack and accused Anit Kumar Sori of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in retaliation for intensified police operations in the area.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was in retaliation for an incident on September 13, 2013 in Silakota, which left 13 Maoists dead, as well as for police operations more broadly.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that Kunjami Singh and Lacha Padiami were kidnapped because they had sent workers on job contracts and did not pay them after the projects were completed.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victim was targeted because he was suspected of being a police informer. Police disputed this and speculated that the victim was targeted for supporting development work in the area.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victims were targeted because they were suspected of being police informers.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that they targeted police to protest against "colonial forces."
Maoists claimed responsibility for the attack on the government building, stating that it was meant to protest "the anti-people policies of the government" as well as constant raids conducted by police.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Amrat Hurra of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Anil Sharma of making extortion demands under the name of the group. Sources also suspected that Sharma was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Awadesh Singh Bhokta of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Budhram Mudma of killing innocent people and being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Budra Hantal of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Dinesh Hembram of being a police informant and gaining extortions utilizing the Maoist name.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Kandru Patel of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Kartik Dhurve of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Khejan Sonwani of being a police informant and embezzling money from tendu leaf deals.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Mahadeb Sisa of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Muinan Kabasi of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Rajendra Rai of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Rakesh Mahto of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Rasool Ansari of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Sudesh Paswan of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Sukku Nareti of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the government of mistreating tribesmen in the area.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victim of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Uike Marayya of being a police informant. Sources also noted that Marayya was performing religious conversions at the time of the attack.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a halt to the construction project because it would not be advantageous for tribal members residing in the area.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for Suresh Rajak.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded better wages for workers.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded liquor stores to close.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that Aadhar suspend its enrollment process.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and left anti-American posters at the scene of the attack and demanded a "revolution."
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and said that they killed Satar Khan because he was a police informer.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated in a note left at the scene, "Award death sentence to the chief of Shanti Sabha after organizing a Jan Adalat."
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Arjun Khara was targeted because they believed he was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Bele Ram Dhruv was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Brujlal Tulavi and Anil Kalko were targeted for operating a police informant network.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Dambaru Nayak was targeted because he was a police informant. Sources also noted that Nayak was a former Maoist and that Maoists had previously threatened him not to provide information about the group to military personnel.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Dambaru Sagadia was targeted because Maoists believed he was a police informant and had supported anti-Maoist operations.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Deba Sodi was targeted because they believed the victim was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Elaya Narayan was targeted for failing to leave the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Erma Banjarni was targeted because they believed the victim was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Gopal Chetty Gandhi was targeted due to his alleged extortion activities.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Kursenga Ballar Sha was targeted because they believed he was a police informant and involved in a 1995 encounter.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Laxminarayan Pattnaik was targeted because they believed he was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mangel Usendi was targeted because they believed he was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mukkali Gundu was targeted because they believed he was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Pandu Madkami was targeted because they believed he was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Patra Mutyam was targeted because they believed the victim was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ravi Shankar Sunkari was targeted because they believed he was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Rohini Nachika was targeted because they believed he was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Samuel Bhadra was targeted because they believed he was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sodi Prasad was a police informant
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sona Muchaki was targeted because they believed he was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sujit Modiyami was targeted because they believed he was collaborating with police personnel.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Suresh Tofa was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Thakur Das Mahto was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because they believed Jeetu Madavi was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because they believed that the victim was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because they believed the victim was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because they believed the victims were police informants.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out due to the targeted sawmill owner's refusal to respond to an extortion demand.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of government policies.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of highway construction.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of United States President Barack Obama's upcoming trip to India for Republic Day and the government's promotion of tourism.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of a civilian on September 4, 2017.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of a Maoist by authorities.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of a Maoist leader.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the police allegedly carrying out fake operations and unlawfully imprisoning civilians.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the recent death of a Maoist leader.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to recent security operations against Maoists in the area.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in support of "martyrdom week."
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was part of their "martyr's week" festivities.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group was opposed to Republic Day celebrations, which took place on January 26, 2017.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Maoists were critical of the development of telecommunications towers in the area. Sources suspected that Maoists opposed such construction because it enabled security personnel to monitor the group's movement.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was accused of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because Maoists believed they were police informants and had assisted with anti-Maoist operations.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted for allegedly being police informants.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they believed Alekh Majhi was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they believed Chandra Singh was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they believed Raiman Singh was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they believed Surendra Dhurve and Rajkumar Dhurve were police informants.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they carried out the attack because the company was involved in road construction work, which Maoists oppose.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they carried out the attack because they believed the victims were police informants.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they opposed the anti-Maoist military operations in the state.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they targeted Shankar Wadde because they believed he was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and threatened local officials involved in corruption in construction projects.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and warned against the development of telecommunications towers.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident and warned people not to become police informants. Sources also noted that Sitaram Khela was suspected of being a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident in a pamphlet left at the scene denouncing police brutality.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that Bhagaban Nayak was a police informant and worked with authorities to conduct anti-Maoist operations. Additionally, authorities stated that the Maoists targeted local village guards as a means of creating a reputation for themselves.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that Raju Hantala was targeted because he was a police informant.
Maoists claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the victims were targeted for being police informants and were being punished for having tried to organize against the Maoists. The posters left at the scene further explained that the victims were also targeted for having taken part in the April 10, 2014 Lok Sabha parliamentary elections after Maoists had called for a boycott.
Maoists claimed that the victim was involved in spying against the Maoist rebels.
Maoists left a pamphlet saying that the community building was blown up as it was used by the security forces during the polls.
Maoists left behind a handwritten poster stating that victim was killed because he was a police informer and had falsely used the Maoists name in extortion attempts.
Maoists left behind a letter on the body of the victim stating that he was killed because he was a police informer and involved in the liquor trade.
Maoists left behind a number of leaflets and posters at the site of the attack, which claimed that a recent alleged tribal massacre by police in the Dantewada district of the state of Chhattisgarh was the specific motive behind the incident.  The group also cited a lack of government spending on basic amenities in the tribal areas and issued a number of demands, including an end to Operation Green Hunt, the total withdrawal of central government forces, and an end to construction of the Ranchi-Vijayawada corridor, among others.
Maoists left behind a poster after killing Sashiram Bhoi, the son of a ruling BJD leader, which accused him of "exploiting naxals and misusing their name for his own benefit."
Maoists left behind leaflets stating that victims were suspected of being police informers.
Maoists left behind pamphlets at the scene of the attack which claimed that the contractor building the road was a police informer and that road construction, which cuts down trees, is prohibited by the group.
Maoists left behind pamphlets listing eight demands of the government, including a raise in the price of kendu leaves and higher compensation for leaf harvesters.
Maoists left behind pamphlets listing eight demands of the government, including an increase in the price of kendu leaves and higher compensation for leaf harvesters.
Maoists left behind posters at the scene of the attack on the construction camp indicating the group's opposition to the road construction work. Police sources speculated that the Maoists opposed the road construction because it would lead to easier movement of security forces.
Maoists left pamphlets at the scene of the attack which claimed that the attack was in response to the seizure of 40 acres of land by the government from villagers in Paparwatand for the Rs 33-crore project, a police construction project.
Maoists left pamphlets on the body of the victim claiming that he was killed because he was a police informer.
Maoists left posters at the scene demanding power be restored to cut off villages on the Orissa-Andhra Pradesh border.
Maoists were attacking a police camp.
Maouloud Moctar, a Seleka spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the targeted officials were in Kaga Bandoro after the Seleka had warned the Central African Republic government against sending officials to the town.
Mapuche activists claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of two imprisoned members of the Mapuche community.
Mapuche activists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "Fire to the churches. Pope Francis: You're not welcome to Araucania."
Mapuche activists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated in a note left at the scene "Get out forestry companies, freedom for the Mapuche political prisoners."
Mapuche activists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in support of Mapuche detainees.
Mapuche activists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they would not negotiate with the government.
Mapuche activists claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in response to the death of a Mapuche individual the previous week. The individual had been killed near the company's property during a protest.
Mathew and Tyler Williams were both affiliated with the Christian Identity movement and shared views that Blacks, Homosexuals, and Jews were subhuman and needed to be eliminated for the survival of the White race.  Mathew Williams further claimed that he hoped that other Whites would be motivated by this incident to kill gay people.
Maulvi Omar, spokesman for the TTP, claimed responsibility and threatened that their fighters would destroy all educational institutions in the Bajaur if security forces did not stop the ongoing operations against them.
McIntosh was against the destruction of the earth and the harm of animals,  which he believed McDonald's was promoting through their work.
McMenemy mistakenly thought that this facility performed abortions.
Media freedom in Sri Lanka Is being curtailed, and violently suppressed through threats, abductions, and attacks. The suspected goal is to instill a climate of fear in media workers through threats and intimidation.
Meerak Baloch, spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), claimed responsibility for the abduction, stating that the victims were targeted because they were government employees who helped implement anti-Baloch policies.
Mehmed Abed al-Halim Abed al-Hamid Salem, a member of Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement), claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Israeli intentions for Temple Mount and military operations.
Mehran Baloch, a spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Tigers (BLT), stated that the BLT carried out the attack to "avenge the military operation in Balochistan."
Members Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades perpetrated the attack as revenge for the assassination of commander Jihad Hasanayn.
Members of Besi Merah Putih believed that aid was being distributed unfairly.
Members of the Loyalist Action Forces attacked the man in retaliation for an alleged attack against a Protestant owned bar.
Members of the Tunu Community were angry at the SPDC for not allocating jobs to their community.
MEND says it is fighting to force the government to give more oil industry revenue it controls to its region.
Messages against the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE), the Popular Party (PP), and the Basque regional government's interior minister, Javier Balza, were sprayed on the walls.
MILF militants wanted to sabotage the economic activity in Kalamansig and nearby towns of Sultan Kudarat.
MILF rebels wanted to get back at their former Comrades who did not want to return to the movement
MILF spokesman Eid Kabalu stated that the attack was carried out because the rebels were frustrated after the Supreme Court blocked a preliminary agreement with the rebels calling for an expanded autonomous region.
Militant group Ansar al Sunna claimed responsibility for Thursday's attack, saying in a statement that it was retaliating for the "Judaization of holy sites" in Jerusalem.
militants attacked the teacher in order to get him to leave the school.
Militants in the area are known to target individuals who support the US-backed Afghan government
Militants in the area are known to threaten CD shops for promoting anti-Islamic cultural ideas.
Militants kidnapped the workers in order to procure social services that Royal Dutch/Shell and its sub-contractor B and B promised but failed to deliver.
Militants left a pamphlet at the scene saying that the building was destroyed to prevent security forces from using it in the future.
Militants said that they were stepping up attacks to show that they were forcing Israel out of the Gaza Strip.
Militants shot dead Qasim Jan for allegedly being a spy for the United States led military in Afghanistan.
Militants were opposed to moderate Sufism
Mir Khan Muhammad Zehri, a spokesperson for the Zehri Youth Force, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that a Balochistan National Party - Mengal (BNP-M) candidate was targeted because they represents the United States (US), Russia, and India, all of which are nations who are responsible for the killing of Muslims.
Mirak Baloch, spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the BLA will target anyone who is facilitating the Pakistani election process.
Miran Baloch, spokesperson for the Baloch Liberation Tigers (BLT), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted Chiragh Buledi because he "was involved in drug selling and anti-Baloch activities including espionage of the Baloch resistance fighters in the area."
Mishaal Mohammed Rasheed Al-Shodoukhi, a member of  Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), called the Saudi Embassy and demanded the release of prisoners in Saudi Arabia and payment of a ransom in return for the release of the kidnapped diplomat.
Miyan was allegedly spying on JTMM
MNJ rebels stated that they wanted "to pass on the message to the Nigerian government that it's impossible to do anything concerning prospection and exploitation of minerals in Nigeria before problems are resolved in the north of the country."
Mohamed Ahmed Yagoub, a Liberation and Justice Movement (LJM) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to actions of the Sudanese military as well as the mass rape of women in Tabit.
Mohammadyar told an Agence France Presse reporter in May that the Taliban were threatening to kill him because of his work. The specific motive for the hostage taking attack is unknown.
Mohammed Afridi, a Tehriki-i-Taliban spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that Shiite passengers were targeted because they are enemies who conspire against Sunnis.
Mohammed Mansoor, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) stated that District Superintendent of Police Abdul Ghafoor was targeted because of his involvement in the Shah Hassan Khel operation.
Mohammed Merah claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that it was meant to avenge the deaths of Palestinian children and retaliate against the French army's involvement in Afghanistan.
Mohammed Merah, when claiming responsibility for the shooting and killing of three French soldiers in Montauban, stated that he acted in order to "avenge Palestinian children."
Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar wanted to hurt people in order to "avenge the deaths of Muslims around the world."
Money and to have members, such as Abu Qatada al-Filistine, released from prison
Moore disliked white people and wanted them to evacuate the earth; additionally, he demanded that President Carter apologize to black Americans for the injustices against blacks since 1619.
Motive for this attack is unknown, however, there are similar attacks that had recently taken place in the same area.
Motive is unknown, however a number of attacks have occurred in this area and it is known as the headquarters for AQIM.
Motive is unknown; however, the campus had been involved in ongoing disputes between university administration and student advocates for Puerto Rico's independence from the U.S.
Motive unknown.  However, terrorist activity is common in this area
Motra Chaki, a suspected Maoist who was arrested during the incident, stated that he kidnapped the 11 girls to incoporate them into the group. He also said that they are taught to cook and care for the male group members.
Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) stated that the French government was guilty of leading military action against the Muslim people; however, their explicit demands are not known.
Mr. Juhayyid's motive was to reach Saudi Arabia where he believed he could obtain asylum from the UN.  He insisted on not going to Amman for he feared the Jordanian authorities would return him to Iraq.
Mr. Majid also said the violence could have been avoided had the government troops, who had entered the area in search of a kidnapped Roman Catholic priest from Italy, consulted with his group.
Muawiya Alqam, a Palestinian extremist, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Israeli security forces killing his relative.
Muhammad Khan, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the attack on Lashkar-e-Islam (LI), stating that it was aimed at avenging the killing of 11 TTP members by LI members.
Mujahideen Ansar claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was retaliation for the death of Mujahideen Ansar members during a jail break in July.
Mujahideen Ansar claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to recent military operations in North Waziristan.
Mujahideen Ansar claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to recent military operations.
Mujahideen Ansar claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was the beginning of a counteroffensive against the Pakistani military.
Muktar Keela was mostly likely targeted because of his political activity.
Murid Baloch, a spokesperson for the United Baloch Army (UBA), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was in response to aggressive actions by security forces against the civilian Baloch population.
Murid Baloch, a spokesperson of the United Baloch Army (UBA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retaliation to the deaths of three Baloch individuals whose bodies had recently been found.
Murid Baloch, a United Baloch Army (UBA) spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Pakistani military operations.
Murid Baloch, spokesperson for the United Baloch Army (UBA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating the UBA was avenging recent operations in Awaran, Mashkay, and Mastung areas.
Musa Sudi Yalahow was a member of a group of Somali warlords opposed to the Transitional National Government set up in Mogadishu last year.
Muslim extremists claimed responsibility for the attack and stated the building lacked the necessary building permits.  Other sources speculated that the victims, who were Christian, may have been targeted as part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Indonesia's majority Muslim and minority Christian communities.
Muslim extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mostafizur Rahman was targeted because "he was preaching wrong Islam."
Muslim extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to take control of the area.
Muslim extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to urge Tunisian authorities to release Libyan leaders being held in Tunisia.
Muslim extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted because he persecuted Muslims during his service in the police force.
Muslim extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted for his alleged role as a military informant.
Muslim extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and threatened Faraj Alajeeli not to engage in human rights rhetoric.
Muslim extremists claimed responsibility for the incident in a video and demanded a ransom in exchange for Craig Bruce McAllister.
Muslim insurgents had been waging a guerilla war against Somali government troops and Ethiopian soldiers deployed in the African Horn region.
Muslim Separatist Movement
Mutassim Billah Gaddafi Battalion claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were abducted in order to exchange them for Hannibal Gaddafi, Moammar Gadhafi's son.
N
N.E. Esara, a spokesperson for the National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the harassment and arrests of Boro civilians.
National security adviser Mouwafak al-Rubaie said that the attack was staged to ignite sectarian strife among the Iraqi people.
Nationalist tribesmen are demanding jobs and more royalties for the natural resources extracted from their region.
Nationalist/seperatist movement.
Neo-Fascists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "Grab him because he's a Chavista."
Neo-Nazi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and spray-painted "Out" on the wall of the business.
Neo-Nazi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and spray-painted "white power," "666," and a swastika on the targeted vehicle.
Neo-Nazi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and wrote "Death to Muslims" on the targeted building.
Neo-Nazi extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and wrote "Lenta, you are lying" on the targeted building.
New People's Army (NPA) spokesperson Rigoberto Sanchez claimed responsibility for the killing of the soldiers. Sanchez stated that the attack was in retaliation for the killing of civilian Ramon Batoy, the alleged torture and incarceration of two other farmers, and the forced evacuation of civilians in Kabalantian.
New People's Army (NPA) tried to collect "revolutionary taxes" from the owner of Yellow Bus Lines (YBL), Richie Yap, who reportedly refused to give into numerous NPA demands for money.
News reports suggested that the bombing was made as an act of objection to the release of the movie "The Siege," which depicts Islamic groups bombing New York City.
Nikolic was sent a letter demanding he contribute money to the Croatian nationalist cause, similar to the assassination case of Anthony Cikoja.
No
No group claimed responsibility for the incident; however, sources noted that near the location of the incident, police officers found a message on a pole reading" Sovereign State of Pattani."
No motive for the attack was reported; however, the Awami National Party is opposed to Islamist militancy. The ruling Awami National Party (ANP) in Pakistan's Northwest Frontier Province is a secular party that has been an outspoken critic of the Taliban and the Taliban has targeted several members of the ANP, including Aurangzeb Khan's brother.
No motive for this event was states, however there was a clash with military forces in the area later the same day.
No motive is explicitly stated; however, the hostages were released after the governor resigned from his post and apologized for working with the Americans.
No motive is stated.  However, clashes between the National People's Army and armed militants is common in this area.
No motive stated.  However, there were a number of violent clashes in the area around this time.
No motive stated.  The area around Beni Ksila is known to be used by the GSPC.
No motive was stated.  However, there have been numerous kidnappings in this area.
No motive was stated.  However, there have been numerous similar attacks in the area.
No specific motive for this attack was stated, however, this is not the first time security forces have been targeted in this area.
No specific motive was stated.  However, this was the second bomb found in a short period of time in the same area.
Norway's support for the peace process in Nepal could have been a motive.
Note: "At least eleven" should be "At least 11" in the incident summary.
Note: "Attached" is spelled "attacked" in the incident summary.
Note: "Border" is spelled incorrectly in the incident summary.
Note: "Dissident republicans" shouldn't be capitalized in the incident summary.
Note: "Fourteen" shouldn't be spelled out in the incident summary.
Note: "Molotov" needs to be capitalized in the incident summary.
Note: "Sheikh" shouldn't be capitalized in the incident summary.
Note: Inconsistent spelling of "Mariquit" within the incident summary.
Note: Multiple typos in the incident summary; "polio" is capitalized, and a date is written November 26th, 2013 (should be November 26).
Note: Possible DTP situation. Multiple sources suspect that the attack was fabricated to draw attention away from scandals in which the victim, the Minister of Transportation, was involved.
Note: Possible DTP situation. One of the UNI articles makes mention of extortion as a motive.
Note: Possible DTP situation. Sources stated that the assailants were targeting a construction site over extortion demands; the girl injured in the attack was not the intended target.
Note: The incident summary makes mention of tacks that were laid on the road. The articles mention nails and spikes, but I didn't see the word "tacks" used anywhere. Seems like a significant difference. (Also, "spikes" is used for the related incident, 201309270033).
Note: The incident summary reads "The blast killed people." I count three casualties.
Note: The Incident summary reads "two bomber." It should be "two bombers."
Note: The summary lists the outcome as unknown, but, while casualty numbers do conflict across articles, there are casualty numbers.
NPA burned the bus because JAC Liner failed to pay the tax demanded by the rebels.
Obstruct the anti-poppy effort in Afghanistan
Obstruct water supply to U.S. military forces and the industry that supplies it
Obtain the freedom for 21 comrades in Dutch jails at the time of the attacks
Offensive against police
Officials believe the bombs and hoaxes were retaliation for the death of one of the militants' bomb experts, Suhaime Sutae.
Officials believe this attack took place in response to the death of a Shiite doctor and three of his patients.
Officials believed it was the work of ethnic Albanian separatists opposed to Yugoslav rule.
Officials believed that the bomb was planted by extremists opposed to the expansion of Narita airport.
Officials believed that the perpetrators attacked the plane because of an argument of the proceeds from khat.
Officials believed that the several bomb incidents on this day were part of a plot to destabilize the government.
Officials said that the attacks were intended to hurt Spain's tourism industry.
Officials said the militants killed the man because he had spoken out in favor of the government.
Officials stated the motive may have been and old election rivalry.
Officials suspected that the attack was related to the arrival of Indonesian Islamic Leader, Abdurrahman "Gus Dur" Wahid.
Officials suspected that the bombing was intended to target foreigners.
Officials suspected that the bombing was motivated by inter-fraternity rivalry.
Oglaigh na hEireann claimed responsibility for the attack on the discount store, stating that the store was exploiting staff members.
Oglaigh na hEireann claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Noel Donnelly was targeted because he was using the group's name in order to gain financial resources.
Oglaigh na hEireann claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in retaliation for the victim having compromised organizational equipment and members' security.
Oglaigh na hEireann claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted due to his involvement in dealing drugs.
Oglaigh na hEireann claimed responsibility for the incident and threatened those who utilize the group's name in order to gain an extortion.
Okba Ibn Nafaa Brigade claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because the group believed one of the victims was assisting the police.
Omar Mukhtar, a spokesperson for the Islamic Movement of Kashmir, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victim, a former police officer, was targeted because he was involved in anti-militant operations in 2010 and was responsible for the killing of a group member.
Omer Khalid, a local Taliban leader, claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that Pakistan People's Party-Sherpo's chief was targeted because he had cooperated with the government against militants in the tribal areas.
On its website, the outlawed group, Devrimici Halk Kurtulus Cephesi (DHKP/C), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was retaliating for the United States' (US) activities in Iraq, Syria, Egypt, and Libya.
On posters left at the damaged construction site, the Communist Party of India (Maoist) protested workers' low wages.
One of the groups to claim responsibility for the attack, the February 12 Movement, stated that they targeted the train to protest increasing transportation costs and other austerity measures.
One of the perpetrator's complaints was with the government's inability to pass pending federal trucking legislation.
One of the perpetrators stated that the victims were killed as punishment for promoting elections.
One of the sources details that the attack is against military operations that the police had launched against Maoists in this area.
One perpetrator claimed to have sought revenge for rigged elections.
One report states that the LTTE cadre was attempting to distract attention away from the schoolchildren's protest against their kidnapping methods. The report says that the suspected LTTE members were trying to rile up the crowd and wanted the road between Batticaloa and Valaichchenai closed and all transport stopped, and when they failed to do so, went and set the buses on fire.
One statement claimed that the attack was in response to massacres happening in the city.
One suspected motive was that the coordinated attacks were carried out to divert the Algerian government's counterterrorism efforts targeting AQLIM members.
One victim was killed because he tried to escape from an attempted kidnapping.
Opposed state-run schools that teach non-Islamic subjects, particularly to girls.
Osama bin Laden called Awakening Council members ''infidels'' and ''traitors'' for siding with the Americans.  The attack was believed to be against them.
Osama Bin Ladin stated that the attack was "reminding the enemy of the heavy cost of blood and the gravity of losses they will pay as a price for their continued aggression on our community and looting of our wealth".
Outrage over presidential election results
Overtake the capital of Chad
Pagan Sect of the Mountain claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a halt to the destruction of nature.
Pahadi Cheetah claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted the three contractors because the contractors refused to pay the armed outfit their "share" of Mahatama Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) road-building contracts that were recently awarded to the three victims.
Pakistani police accused arch-rival India of seeking retaliation for last weekend's attack on India's historic Red Fort in the heart of its capital, New Delhi.
Palestinian fighters fired home-made rockets on occupied territories in response to the Israeli ground and air attacks against the Palestinians.
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Israeli operations.
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to military operations in Kufar Kana town.
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in response to the current conditions in Jerusalem. Sources noted that the victim was attacked shortly after speaking about plans to build a Jewish temple on Temple Mount.
Palestinian Islamic Jihad stated, "We claim responsibility for the heroic rockets attacks carried out on Monday afternoon. The attacks are part of our ongoing retaliation to the Zionist crimes against our people in the West Bank and Gaza,"
Palestinians attacked the station to protest the arrest of a leader of the military branch of Islamic Jihad.
Pamphlets found near the incident site claimed that Kureti was killed because he was seeking people’s support to restart an iron ore mine.
Pamphlets found with the bomb indicated that the attackers wanted to punish police for torturing prisoners being held inside various prisons.  The pamphlets also went on to add that the government of India would be attacked if it allowed Salman Rushdie, a novelist, to enter the country.
Pamphlets left at the scene accused the BJP leader of extorting money in the name of the organization.
Pamphlets recovered from the site said that the explosion was carried out to alert those who are against the peace and constitution. It has also urged all to make a progressive constitution by forging national consensus.
Pamphlets stated that the right to work was protected by the constitution and FAIRE would protect that right with "blood and fire"
Pamphlets were discovered on site that called for the restoration of the monarchy in order to save the country.
Pamphlets were found at the scene of the kidnapping, which stated that "The EPL has not died."
Part of a AQLIM campaign to increase the frequency of violent attacks during Ramadan.
Part of a campaign by Algerian extremists to sabotage the charter for peace and national reconciliation in Algeria.
Part of a campaign by Algerian extremists to undermine the act for national reconciliation.
Part of a campaign by Algerian Islamic extremists to destabilize the country by killing civilians at random.
Part of a campaign by Algerian Islamic extremists to destabilize the country by setting up fake roadblocks to terrorize Algerian citizens
Part of a campaign by Algerian Islamic extremists to increase attacks during Ramadan.
Part of a campaign by Algerian Islamic extremists to increase the frequency of violent attacks during Ramadan.
Part of a campaign by Algerian Islamic to intimidate members of the Algerian government.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by attacking both civilians and state security forces.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by disrupting the country's television/radio stations.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by kidnapping civilians.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random and weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random and/or target religious institutions.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by killing individuals identified as belonging to the Algerian military.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging energy resources which were vital to the nation's economy.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging energy resources which were vital to the nation’s economy.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging the country’s transportation system and killing civilians.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging the country’s transportation system.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging the nation’s energy sector.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging the nation’s transportation system.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging transportation and killing civilians at random.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by setting up fake roadblocks to terrorize Algerian citizens.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by setting up fake roadblocks to terrorize citizens and murder individuals identified as belonging to the Algerian security forces.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by targeting farmers at random.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by targeting institutions affiliated with the government.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by targeting representatives of the 'apostate' security forces.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by targeting shepherds at random.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by terrorizing citizens and murdering individuals identified as belonging to the Algerian security forces.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by terrorizing civilians.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces defending the 'apostate' Algerian government.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government and targeting civilians at random.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government and to prove that the radicals remained a threat.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to intimidate Algerian civilians from joining a government militia.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to intimidate Algerian civilians from joining local militias.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to intimidate Algerian civilians from joining the municipal guard by targeting their relatives.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to intimidate Algerian civilians from participating in secular activities.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to protest and sabotage a recent deployment of Algerian security forces in the Boumerdès region.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to punish and intimidate members of the Algerian militia and their families.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to punish and intimidate members of the Algerian militia.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to sabotage Algeria's energy resources which were vital to the country's economy.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to sabotage the act for national reconciliation.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to sabotage the passage of the act for national reconciliation.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to show that attacks against Algerian civilians would continue even following the passage of the act for national reconciliation.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to show that attacks against the Algerian security forces would continue even following the passage of the act for national reconciliation.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to strike foreign influences within Algeria.
Part of a campaign by Islamic extremists to target former members of the Algerian security forces.
Part of a campaign by the GIA to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random.
Part of a campaign by the GIA to destabilize Algeria by taking Algerian civilians hostage.
Part of a campaign of attacks by Islamic extremists during the expiration of the amnesty provisions under the act for national reconciliation.
Part of a campaign of attacks by Islamic extremists in the lead up to the expiration of the amnesty provisions under the act for national reconciliation.
Part of a campaign of attacks by Islamic extremists to sabotage the act for national reconciliation.
Part of a campaign to intimidate Algerian civilians from joining the militia by targeting their relatives.
Part of a campaign to intimidate and punish former Islamic extremists who gave up the cause.
Part of a campaign to intimidate AQLIM members from both leaving and criticizing the organization.
Part of a campaign to kidnap wealthy Algerians to raise funds for AQLIM and to protest the presence of foreigners in Algeria.
Part of a GIA campaign to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging transportation and killing civilians at random.
Part of a GIA campaign to destabilize Algeria by setting up fake roadblocks to terrorize Algerian citizens.
Part of a GIA campaign to destabilize Algeria by targeting farmers at random.
Part of a GIA campaign to destabilize Algeria by targeting shepherds at random.
Part of a GIA campaign to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces defending the 'apostate' Algerian government.
Part of a GIA campaign to increase the frequency of violent attacks during Ramadan
Part of a GIA campaign to increase the frequency of violent attacks during Ramadan.
Part of a GSL campaign to target former members of the Algerian security forces.
Part of a GSPC bombing campaign to destabilize Algeria.
Part of a GSPC campaign against security forces in the lead up to Algerian elections scheduled two months later.
Part of a GSPC campaign of attacks during the expiration of the amnesty provisions under the act for national reconciliation.
Part of a GSPC campaign of attacks in the lead up to the expiration of the amnesty provisions under the act for national reconciliation.
Part of a GSPC campaign of violence in the months preceding Algerian presidential elections.
Part of a GSPC campaign to adbuct wealthy Algerian civilians to intimidate the local population and raise funds for the organization.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by kidnapping Algerian civilians.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random and weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging energy resources which were vital to the nation’s economy.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging the nation’s transportation system.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by setting up fake roadblocks to terrorize Algerian citizens.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by setting up fake roadblocks to terrorize citizens and murder individuals identified as belonging to the Algerian security forces.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by targeting farmers at random.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by targeting members of the government.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by targeting shepherds at random.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces defending the 'apostate' Algerian government.
Part of a GSPC campaign to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government.
Part of a GSPC campaign to disrupt the upcoming Algerian elections.
Part of a GSPC campaign to increase attacks during Ramadan
Part of a GSPC campaign to increase the frequency of violent attacks during Ramadan.
Part of a GSPC campaign to intimidate Algerian civilians from joining local militias.
Part of a GSPC campaign to protest foreigner influences within Algeria.
Part of a GSPC campaign to protest increased reconnaissance operations carried out by Algerian forces as well as to remonstrate against the charter for peace and reconciliation.
Part of a GSPC campaign to sabotage Algeria's energy resources which were vital to the country's economy.
Part of a GSPC campaign to sabotage the passage of the act for national reconciliation.
Part of a GSPC campaign to secure open roads for Algerian smugglers
Part of an AQLIM campaign to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random, targeting religious institutions, and weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government.
Part of an AQLIM campaign to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random.
Part of an AQLIM campaign to destabilize Algeria by killing individuals identified as belonging to local militias.
Part of an AQLIM campaign to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging energy resources which were vital to the nation’s economy.
Part of an AQLIM campaign to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging the nation’s transportation system and killing civilians at random.
Part of an AQLIM campaign to destabilize Algeria by targeting government institutions.
Part of an AQLIM campaign to destabilize Algeria by targeting members of the government.
Part of an AQLIM campaign to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government and killing civilians at random.
Part of an AQLIM campaign to destabilize Algeria by weakening security forces protecting the 'apostate' Algerian government.
Part of an AQLIM campaign to disrupt legislative elections scheduled for the next day
Part of an AQLIM campaign to increase the frequency of violent attacks during Ramadan.
Part of an AQLIM campaign to strike foreign interests in Algeria.
Part of an AQLIM to destabilize Algeria by sabotaging the nation’s energy sector.
Part of campaign by Islamic extremists to destabilize Algeria by killing civilians at random.  It is also suspected that the attack was perpetrated to divert the  government's counterterrorism efforts targeting Jihadist groups.
Part of campaign by Islamic extremists to intimidate members of the Socialist Forces' Front.
Part of campaign to protest the charter for peace and national reconciliation in Algeria and to dissuade individuals from turning themselves in to Algerian authorities.
Part of the ongoing insurgency in Afghanistan
Paul Ciancia claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he wanted to instill fear on Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officers.
Peace committees were formed with the purpose of reporting any suspected militant activity.  The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) stated that they were attacking peace committee members to demonstrate that the committees were not deterring the TTP from their mission.
Per an issued statement, "...In response to the people's demands to stop the unbridled rapacious and destructive operations of big foreign mining companies."
Perpetrators believed JDL were the real terrorists and supported the Palestinians
Perpetrators claim the bomb material left behind was an accident
Personal economic gain and to influence how oil spill compensation funds would be dispersed to local communities.
Peter Huang Wen-hsiung Taiwan, a  member of WUFI, a pro-independence group, was opposed to the political views of the KMT, Chiang's party,  who favored the re-unification of Taiwan with mainland China.
PIJ said that the attack was a "gift for the embattled people of Iraq" and to mark the Arab Israeli Land Day, an annual protest against discrimination aimed at the Arab minority in Israel.
PIJ said that the attack was in response to intensified IDF activities.
PIJ said that the attack was in retaliation for the killing of commanders Eng Adnan Bustan and Jihad al-Sawafiri by Israeli troops.
Pokhrel was allegedly killed for not paying taxes to the "Terai government" established by JTMM-J; the motive behind the abduction of the teachers is unknown.
Police are unsure if the attack was politically motivated or carried out randomly by insurgents.
Police authorities claim the attack was carried out to create panic among local administrative officials and villagers.
Police believe that the attack was an act of vengeance for an air raid on September 15, 1999, which killed 21 Tamils and wounded another 35.
Police believe that the attack was an attempt to disrupt the peace initiative in the state.
Police believe the victim had been forced to join the LTTE several times but had refused to 'fall In line.' As a result, he was killed.
Police believe the victim was targeted for his involvement in the military
Police believed the bombing was in retaliation for clashes between security forces and a local insurgent group in Bannang Sata district on 06/22/2008 on Sunday.
Police believed the incident may have been a plan by the National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB), which was spearheading a movement for an independent Bodoland.  The plan called for the elimination of people supporting a Bodo state within India.
Police cited non-payment of "revolutionary taxes," or extortion demands, as the motive for the attack.
Police in Ireland said the Real Irish Republican Army (RIRA)had pledged to carry out at least one major operation a month prior to the incident. They wanted to increase their visibility to aid in the recruitment of new members.
Police Official A. Doss says "the ULFA is trying to make its presence felt ahead of the general elections in Assam".
Police officials believed that the people belonging to the same ethnicity over a personal enmity killed the victim.
Police officials suspected that the incident was part of a continuing campaign by Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) to disrupt normal life in various parts of the country.
Police reported that the attack was religiously motivated.
Police reported that the immediate provocation for the attack was the formation of a village defense committee by the villagers to guard against frequent extortion by the Maoist Communist Center.
Police reported that the militants intended to create a rift between Buddhist and Muslim people in the region and that specifically they were thought to be either avenging the killing of key rebel suspect Muhamadwari Maeyu in a February clash with security forces or hitting back at government policy to win community support.
Police said Dhaneswar Moran might have been gunned down for allegedly serving as an army informer.
Police said that the attack may have been connected to the ongoing trial of a number of Jemaah Islamiyah members, including leader Abu Bakar Bashir.
Police said that the victim was targeted because the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) suspected him of being a military informant.
Police said the executions were in response to the killing two weeks ago of a Yazidi woman who had recently converted to Islam after she fell in love with a Muslim and ran off with him. Her relatives had disapproved of the match and dragged her back to Bashika, where she was stoned to death.
Police said the man was an informant.
Police said they believe the killings were in revenge for the shooting deaths of several Shiite Islamics on the previous day.
Police said Transco's refusal to pay extortion is the main reason for the attacks.
Police sources reported the action as an attempt to boycott the upcoming elections.
Police speculated that the arson attack was carried out for political reasons.
Police speculated that the United Liberation Front of Assam was celebrating its "Soldier's Day," the founding day of its military wing, and wanted to demonstrate its firepower.
Police stated the missionaries -- all Indian nationals -- had been accused of trying to convert Hindus during a religious festival on the Ganges, one of the holiest Hindu pilgrimage sites.
Police suspect extortion could be the motive behind the attack.
Police suspect that Suren Brahma was trying to defect from the Bodo Liberation Tigers.
Police suspect that the attack could be linked to some demands made by the militant outfit.
Police suspect that the motive was to protest the lack of democracy in the country.
Police suspect the attack was aimed at inciting fear and security concerns in the area.
Police suspect the Maoists perpetrated the attack to avenge their zonal commander, Sashai Bhuiyan's arrest in the Gulma District on 01/15/2009.
Police suspect the NSCN attack was in retaliation to the non-payment of "extortion money" by the truck owner.
Police suspect the separatist militants were seeking revenge for the six insurgents who were killed in gunfight with a joint military, police and civilian force on Tuesday.
Police suspected it was an act of revenge after the killings of five people on June 3.
Police suspected that it was a culturally-related attack - Russian symbols have been a target of vandalism.
Police suspected that the attack was religiously motivated.
Police suspected that the attack was retaliation.
Police suspected that the attacks had to do with non-payment of "protection" (extortion) money by lottery businessmen to criminals operating in the region.
Police suspected that the Maoist attack was linked to an extortion demand on the construction company contracted by the MLA party.
Police suspected that the Maoist attack was linked to an extortion demand on the construction company.
Police suspected that the men were acting on orders from Chechen field commanders, who had threatened to stage terrorist acts in Russia in order to avenge losses suffered in fighting with federal troops.
Police suspected that the motive was tied to the election official's work
Police suspected that this attack was meant for a police officer instead of the actual victim.
Police suspected that village-level militants carried out the attack on the direction of People's War Group leaders who were observing "Anti-repression week" in the district.
Police suspected the attack could be linked to a search for stolen weapons by the Maoists.
Police suspected the attack was in reaction to a peace deal signed between the Islamic Salvation Army, the armed wing of the Islamic Salvation Front (FIS), and the Algerian government.
Police suspected the attacks had to do with non-payment of "protection" (extortion) money by lottery businessmen to criminals operating in the region.
Police suspected the grenade attack might be intended to create disturbance.
Police suspected the household may have been targeted because the O'Neills were in a mixed marriage and/or to destabilize attempts to resolve the first crisis of the Orange Walks parade marching season.
Police suspected the motive was to force the rice farmers to pay the perpetrators protection money.
Police suspected this was a retaliatory attack for the killing of Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) leader Akiddin Abdusalam, alias Commander Kiddie.
Police were investigating whether the attack was the result of personal conflict or the work of southern separatists.
Political
Political intimidation
Political reprisal or intimidation against Congress Party in Satgaon
Political violence related to the 2007 election in Guatemala
Political/economic; gain resources
Popular Resistance said that the attack was in retaliation for the IDF killing of five Palestinian security forces.
Possible connection of the victim to a ELN militia structure
Possible political undertones
Possible racist motive
Possible reaction to the arrests of Maoists
Possible retaliation for TMVP breaking away from LTTE.
Possibly anti-Semitic; The Order II was a group that arose after The Order collapsed, and the group was started by David Dorr, a former Aryan Nation member.  The group's goal was to carry out the white supremacist mission of the first version of The Order. The Order II was also against Jews and the government, which the group believed was unrighteous.
Possibly committed by a rival religious faction intent on installing its own figure in the senior-most position of the church.
Possibly in protest of a ongoing trial against Nikos Maziotis, a suspected bomber.
Possibly in protest of the arrest of three members of the Revolutionary Cells/Red Zora group.
Possibly in reaction to recent police breakthroughs against possible perpetrators of violence on the Cape Flats.
Possibly in retaliation for the arrest of a Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) member in New Delhi.
Possibly related to an article published in the newspaper on December 31, 1999, concerning the assassination of Armenian Prime Minister Vazgen Sarkisyan on October 27, 1999.
Possibly to assassinate a leading member of the Irish Republican Army.
Possibly to assassinate Minister Anuruddha Ratwatte.
Possibly to avenge the recent death of Abdurajak Abubakar Janjalani
Possibly to destabilize relations between Angola and Zambia.
Possibly to disrupt elections.
Possibly to inflame sectarian tensions in the religiously mixed town
Possibly to intimidate the public and further degrade the April 10 Peace Accord.
Possibly to kill the chief priest of the temple.
Possibly to obstruct implementation of the Wye agreement.
Possibly to prevent the re-supplying of an area dominated by the National Liberation Army (ELN).
Posters found near the bodies claimed both were police informers.
Posters left by Maoists at the scene of the attack urged a general strike to protest police atrocities and anti-Maoist activities and demanded an end to Operation Green Hunt.
Posters strewn around the body stated that the victim had been killed for being a police informant and for involvement with an anti-Maoist vigilante group.
Powers of the Revolutionary Arc claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that it was carried out in retaliation for state action against the Golden Dawn.
Preliminary investigations revealed that the attack was carried out due to a clash between two factions of the Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland-Khaplang (NSCN-K) over “taxation”. Both factions were supposedly claiming legitimacy over illegal taxation. Other police sources suspected that the attack was may have been carried out due to extortion.
Pressure France to participate in peace process government and ETA
Presumably because the Dr. Gashi refused to help the KLA
Prevent coca eradication
Prevent food aid getting to the regional drought in Somalia
Prevent residents from entering government-controlled areas of Sri Lanka.
Prior to the incident, ex-Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officer Christopher Dorner claimed responsibility in an online manifesto, stating that he was engaging in a war on the LAPD for their alleged corruption and injustice towards racial minorities.
Pro-LGBT Rights extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and wrote "anti-gay hate group" on the targeted church.
Pro-Taliban militants have threatened CD shops in Pakistan for putting forth "anti-Islamic" materials.
Proletarian Assault Group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the tax office was targeted in response to capitalism.
Proletariat Self-defense Groups claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that Giorgos Sourlas was targeted because the assailants considered him to be a representative of the Justice Ministry which was suppressing demonstrations and union activities.
Proletariat Self-defense Groups claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it was carried out in solidarity with residents who had been against local mining practices.
Promote Puerto Rican Independence
Prosecutors said the April 2002 attack was carried out on the orders of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
Protect maximum provincial autonomy and increase in royalties
Protest "river-saving" legislation in St. Charles Missouri.
Protest against the King's February 1st seizure of power
Protest and sabotage the draft
Protest and sabotage the draft and the US Army
Protest and sabotage the US Army
Protest anti-integrationists of the Denver City Schools.
Protest barbershop owners who were not part of the union
Protest business prejudiced against Jews
Protest employees of General Electric who were not union members
Protest military research conducted at Northwestern University.
Protest non-local companies from working in East St. Louis
Protest racism and promote a leftist revolution
Protest secret government research at the University of Illinois and the R.O.T.C. program.
Protest the actions of the Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority
Protest the administration of Columbia University and the Vietnam War
Protest the desegregation of Denver City Schools.
Protest the draft
Protest the draft and the US military
Protest the draft and Vietnam War
Protest the draft.
Protest the establishment in Ames Iowa.
Protest the firing of Professor H. Bruce Franklin from Stanford University
Protest the government's presence on the University of Illinois campus.
Protest the national guard and the US military
Protest the National Guard and the US military
Protest the oppression of the masses
Protest the policies of the US government
Protest the presence of the R.O.T.C. at Stanford University.
Protest the R.O.T.C. program
Protest the R.O.T.C. program and Vietnam War
Protest the refusal of Yale Law School to cancel classes on May Day.
Protest the showing of Vanessa Redgrave's film "The Palestinian"
Protest the strike
Protest the suspension of Professor H. Bruce Franklin
Protest the treatment of African Americans in Champaign Illinois
Protest the treatment of Jews by the Soviet Union
Protest the United States government
Protest the University of Pennsylvania's policies towards minorities
Protest the Vietnam War
Protest the Vietnam War and companies profiting from the war
Protest the Vietnam War and sabotage the US Army
Protest the Vietnam War and the National Guard
Protest the Vietnam War and the R.O.T.C.
Protest the Vietnam War and US military
Protest the War in Vietnam
Protest the War in Vietnam and sabotage the draft
Protest Vietnam War and show support for Black Panthers.
Protest William G. Barr 's position on mental health legislation
Protestant groups, allegedly encouraged by the Orange Order, wanted to protest against a ban on marching through a Roman Catholic neighborhood.
Protesting a statement regarding the re-opening of movie theaters and liquor stores.
Protesting American intrusion into Puerto Rico.
Protesting Republic Day
Protesting scholarship money that was set aside for minorities but had yet to be awarded
Protesting Soviet mistreatment of Jews
Protesting the arrest of Tushar Kant Bhattacharya and his aide Brajmohan Ram
Protesting the deaths of African American revolutionaries in New York and California prisons
Protesting the multiple housing discrimination lawsuits that the Tri-Cities Human Relations Council was involved with.
Protesting the murder of a female Muslim teacher.
Punishment for speaking out about a previous IRA murder that Mr. Byrne had witnessed.
Punishment for the PFN for not participating in Maoist functions
Punishment for working with the Americans
Qari Hamza, a spokesperson for the Taliban, claimed that the subgroup Tehreek-e-Fedaee Ma'az conducted the attack and stated that Nils Horner was killed because he was a Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) spy.
Qari Mohammad Yusof Ahmadi, spokesperson for the Taliban, claimed responsibility for the incident, characterizing the targeted police officers as "mercenary police soldiers".
Qari Mohammad Yusof, spokesperson for the Taliban, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the armed Islamist outfit targeted the police commander because he was "a cruel commander of the mercenary commandos."
Qari Muhammad Yousaf Ahmadi, a spokesperson for the Taliban, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they carried out the attack as part of their new spring offensive campaign called "Khalid bin Walid".
Qari Muhammad Yousaf Ahmadi, spokesperson for the Taliban, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they were targeting a pro-government tribal militia checkpoint.
Qari Muhammad, spokesperson for the Taliban, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack because Imam Arbab was the leader of an anti-Taliban, pro-government militia.
Qari Yousuf Ahmadi, a Taliban spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the victims were kidnappers and that the attack was meant to "teach others a lesson." Authorities stated that the victims were accused of spying for the Afghan government.
Qari Yousuf Ahmadi, spokesperson for the Taliban, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they intended to punish the abducted police officers because the officers had allegedly tortured local residents.
Qari Yusof Ahmadi, a spokesperson for the Taliban, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victim, a deputy national security head, was killed because of his cooperation with foreign troops in conducting nighttime raids.
Racially motivated by the KKK; incident occurred during time of racial tensions and several attacks against black newspaper offices
Racially motivated crime; target was black and frequented a majority white tavern
Racially motivated; the Gant family was one of only a few black families in a predominantly white neighborhood
Rafiq Khan was killed for allegedly spying for the United States.
Rahim, was taken hostage on charges of working for the government.
Rahman was killed for allegedly receiving perks and facilities from the government.
Rahmatullah was kidnapped by the Taliban in order to commit Jihad against security forces.
Ramiro Ledesma Social Centre claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was the beginning of a "campaign against radical Islam." Sources also noted that the assailants hung a banner, which read "Today Brussels, tomorrow Madrid?" Sources also stated that the Ramiro Ledesma Social Centre accused the targeted mosque of providing money to the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
Ransom
Rasanayagam won in April 2004 parliamentary elections after running as a candidate for the mainstream Tamil National Alliance, a proxy party of the Tigers. He subsequently resigned his parliamentary post, largely because of pressure from the Tigers over his allegiance to a top eastern rebel leader (Karuna Amman) who broke away from the rebel's main faction in March.
Ratna Dhakal, a spokesperson for All Nepal National Free Student Union (Revolutionary), claimed responsibility, stating that the attacks were intended to pressure the government to change the 'foreign names' of colleges and reduce the fees charged by them.
Raviraj was a well-known MP and speaker for the Tamil National Alliance. Raviraj had participated in a protest earlier in the week against an artillery attack by the Sri Lankan military. The killing is seen as a result of the ongoing Sri-Lankan Civil War. It was part of a string of attacks on civilians, rebels, and prominent separatist leaders.
Reaction to the assassination of commander Abu-Yusuf al-Quqa
Rebels from the ERP faction usually perpetrated holdups in farms and carried out kidnappings in order to later negotiate the hostages with larger insurgent groups like the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).
Rebels killed the farmer because he was spying on Maoist activities in the area.
Rebels regularly attack infrastructure projects in their efforts to undermine the government and its aid donors who are struggling to develop the impoverished country.
Rebels wanted to overthrow the existing government and kill top government officials.
Red Scorpion claimed responsibility for the incident and appealed that all Nigerian oil-producing areas should maintain equal rights. The group also demanded that all workers should leave the area prior to the attack.
Religious
Religious conflict between the Malay Muslims and the Thai Buddhists
Religious/cultural
Religious/Cultural
Remove government of President Idriss Deby
Remove Shi i population from Mahmudiyah, Iraq
Reportedly to protest against the political and social situation in Vietnam.
Reports from local businesses claim that members of the FARC were attempting to extort them.
Reports indicate that the attackers were anti-independence militia members attempting to influence voters in the upcoming election that would determine East Timor's status as a part of Indonesia.
Reports of the motivations for this incident vary from bringing attention to the 'unfair' imprisonment of Charles Manson and his cohorts to trying to raise awareness of environmental issues such as the plight of the California Redwoods and the dangers of nuclear power.
Reports speculated that the hostage could have been kidnapped for money, as is typical of Abu Sayyaf kidnappings, or to treat wounded Abu Sayyaf militants.
Reports stated that the rebels believed Mr. Shafi was a police informant.
Reports stated that TVRI had been supporting the Indonesian Military and police during the violence in Aceh. A GAM spokesman said the TV crew had been kidnapped as a warning to the station.
Reprisal against defector who guiding security agencies
Reprisal and intimidate those who cooperate with U.S. forces
Reprisal for Danish involvement in the coalition occupying force in Iraq
Reprisal for Edil Baisalov's political activities
Reprisal for government's response to unrest in Kurdish area
Reprisal for mayor refusing to pay revolutionary tax
Reprisal for people aiding other local militias
Reprisal for the bus not paying 'revolutionary taxes'
Reprisal for the deaths of three ELN guerrillas killed in clashing
Resist French presence in Corsica / separatism
Responding to the arrest of a senior leader
Response to an Israeli Military Operation in Beit Hanoun which was aimed at stopping Rocket Attacks
Response to Israeli aggression against Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
Response to Israeli Assassination of Palestinian Leaders
Response to the continuous attacks by Israeli forces against the Palestinian people.
Response to the death of George Jackson
Response to the upcoming second round of Presidential Elections
Retaliate for what the group alleges are 'Zionist crimes' and retaliation for assassination of Abu-Yusuf al-Quqa, commander of the Al-Nasir Salah al-Din Brigades
Retaliation against the continuous Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people in the West Bank and Gaza Strip
retaliation for "the massacres and assassinations of Palestinians
Retaliation for a border police raid that captured a weapons cache on 10/23/2007.
retaliation for a missile strike earlier in the week that killed at least 18 suspected insurgents loyal to a pro-Taliban commander
Retaliation for a Pakistani Army assault on the madrassa of pro-Taliban cleric Maulana Fazlullah ("Mullah Radio") in Imam Dheri.
Retaliation for Algeria's support for US in Iraq
Retaliation for earlier bombings in Tal Afar
Retaliation for Israeli aggression against Palestinian people
Retaliation for Israeli atrocities against the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
Retaliation for moving members of the gang to a distant penitentiary.
Retaliation for several incidents including the death of a top PBCP (Lal Pataka) leader.
Retaliation for the continuous occupation crimes against Palestinian people in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and in retaliation for the Israeli assassinations of the brigades' commanders and resistance fighters
Retaliation for the crimes the Israeli soldiers commit against the Palestinian people
Retaliation for the death of Mubarak al-Hassanat, a PRC commander and senior official of the HAMAS Ministry of Interior.
Retaliation for the death of New York journalist Bradley Roland Will, killed one year before in Mexico while covering paramilitary activity in Mexico
Retaliation for the imprisonment of comrades by coalition forces in Iraq
Retaliation for the Israeli assassinations of Al-Quds Brigades resistance fighters in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
Retaliation for the killing of a local Taliban commander.
Retaliation for the killing of civilians by the Nigerian Navy
Retaliation for the killing of six Kukis earlier in the evening.
Retaliation for the killing of three ELN members.
Retaliation for the murder of BUPC member Kaum Kazi by CPI-M perpetrators on 10/23/2007.
retaliation for the occupation's crimes against the Palestinian people, and in confirmation of its choice in resistance and jihad for the liberation of the entire land of Palestine
Retaliation for the store owner who shot and killed an African American attempting to commit a robbery at his store.
Retaliation for U.S. attacks in Sudan and Afghanistan
Retaliatory strike
Retaliatory strike for Israeli attack of Qana
Retribution  and intimidation for persons spying for U.S.
Retribution against those not following strict brand of Shari'a law
Retribution against those who work in government agencies in Iraq
Retribution for alleged past human rights abuses
Retribution for not receiving revolutionary taxes from the bus company
Retribution for supporting anti-insurgency operations in Nepal
Retribution for the alleged rape of a Sunni woman by policemen
Retribution for the death of their commander
Retribution on those who removed Gomaa from leadership of the Party
Rev. Babo Jospeh, a spokesman for the Madya Pradesh state Catholic Christians Association, said, ''The attacks could be part of a nationwide campaign against the minorities and apparently fundamentalist organizations are behind it.'
Revenge
Revenge against peasants helpful to guerillas
Revenge against the Italian Government for the death of Maria Soledad Rosas.
Revenge for earlier Shi i Murders
Revenge for killing as al-Fatah supporter on June 10.
Revenge for Persecutions
Revenge for Sunni Murders
Revenge for suspected collaboration with government authorities
Revenge for the death of fellow Muslims in the Philippines.
Revenge for the firebombing of a Jewish Community Center in Brooklyn
Revenge for the killing of an Israeli man.
Revenge for the killing of HAMAS operative Muhammad Muhjez.
Revenge for the killing of JTMM leader Ajaya Yadhov
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) dissidents claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Ivan Torres Acosta of working with the Colombian government and providing intelligence on armed groups.
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) dissidents claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Carlos Arturo Mena Renteria was targeted "for being a toad and an informant."
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) stated that they conducted the kidnapping in order to ensure that the victim and the victim's father did not have any ties to a paramilitary group
Revolutionary movement against the financial establishment
Revolutionary Struggle claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the killing of Lambros Fountas, an anarchist, by authorities.
Right-Wing extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Alena Krempaska of belonging to the Social Democratic Party. Sources also noted that Krempaska was actively involved in confronting corruption.
Rigoberto Sanchez, a spokesperson for the New People's Army (NPA), claimed responsibility and stated that the attacks were retribution for the Philippine Army's abuse of civilians.
Rigoberto Sanchez, spokesperson of the NPA's Merardo Arce Command, reported to the media that the attack was carried out as part of its campaign to halt the exploitation of Compostela Valley and the country's resources by foreigners.
Roland Desire Aba'a Minko, a supporter of opposition leader Jean Ping, claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the Gabonese president step down.
Roshonara Choudhry indicated that she attempted to assassinate Mr. Timms in retaliation for the Iraq war.
Rubicon (Rouvikonas) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in opposition to the government and its new policies regarding taxes.
Rubicon (Rouvikonas) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent foreclosures.
Rubicon (Rouvikonas) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the doctor was targeted for accepting bribes.
Saaed Munir was killed for allegedly spying for the United States-led NATO forces.
Sabotage the Parliament of Bangladesh
Sabotage the US Army war efforts and protest the Vietnam War
Sabotage/protest the integration of Denver City Schools.
Saeed told police that he tried to burn down the church in protest against the United States for trying to force Pakistan to stop its support for Islamic militants fighting in Indian-held Kashmir.
Sah was allegedly spying on JTMM-J and using their name to extort commoners.
Saiphet was killed in revenge for the arrest of "innocent" people by the state.
Sajjad Mohmand, spokesman for the Mohmand chapter of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the assassination of the tribal elder. Talking to reporters from an undisclosed location on phone, the TTP spokesman said he was killed for his anti-Taliban stand and support to the government policy in the tribal region.
Sanaa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out as an act of retaliation against Huthis.
Sanaa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out on behalf of Muslims against Huthis.
Sanda Ould Boumama, a spokesperson for Ansar al-Dine (Mali), claimed responsibility for the destruction of the shrines, stating that they were destroyed because they were forbidden under the group's interpretation of Islam.  Boumama also stated that the group rejected the recent designation of the city of Timbuktu as a heritage site in danger by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Sanda Ould Bounama, a spokesperson for Ansar al-Dine, stated the couple was stoned to death because of an extramarital affair and that their punishment was an application of Sharia law.
Sanyukta Jatiya Mukti Morcha (SJMM) leader of the Sunsari unit, Abiral, claimed responsibility for the attack saying that the building was targeted to highlight the SJMM’s demand that the state needs to be restructured taking ethnic populations into consideration.
Sanyukta Jatiya Mukti Morcha (SJMM) leader of the Sunsari unit, Abiral, claimed responsibility for the attack saying that the building was targeted to highlight the SJMM’s demand that the State needs to be restructured taking ethnic populations into consideration.
Saraya Waad Allah claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was "out of revenge for the guiltless blood and proud souls that were sacrificed."
Saraya Waad Allah claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for alleged police oppression.
Sarbaz Baloch, a spokesperson for the Baloch Republican Army (BRA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it was carried out "because the organization's call for a wheel-jam and shutter down strike on the sixth death anniversary of Nawab Akbar Bugti was ignored."
Sarbaz Baloch, a spokesperson for the Baloch Republican Army, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the trucks, which were carrying marble stone, were targeted because they were looting the national mineral wealth of Balochistan.
Sarbaz Baloch, a spokesperson for the United Baloch Army (UBA), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the towers were destroyed because cell phone companies were helping the Pakistani government track the group.
Sasna Tsrer claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that President Serzh Sargsyan step down and for the release of Zhirayr Sefilyan, a leader of the Founding Parliament.
Sayam Lachha was accused of being a police informer, which is why he was killed.
School arson
SDLP (Social Democratic and Labor Party) assembly member Alban Maginness speculated that the attempted attack was an "opportunist attack ... to distract attention from the American visits and attract attention to themselves."
Sean Gillespie hoped that his actions would initiate a race war that would incite others to attack Jews.
Sectarian attack
Sectarian attack against Shi i in Iraq
Sectarian conflict
Secure release of a Taliban member
separatist agenda
Separatist Movement
Separatist rebels were said to be taking reprisal measures for an anti-rebel operation with strikes on administrative buildings.
Separatists claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of Nnamdi Kanu, a Radio Biafra director, in exchange for the victims. Sources also posited that the abduction was carried out in order to exchange the victims for a ransom.
Separatists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for government operations in the area.
Separatists claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retaliation for the local government militia's mistreatment of the Malay people.
Several fake bombs planted around the Taiwan Railway station had been found the previous day with notes indicating that the attackers supported an anti-Taiwan independence political stance.
Several Iraqi academics have fallen victims to Iraq's religious extremism.
Several letters demanding payment of "revolutionary taxes" were sent to the company prior to the arson attack.
Several motives for the attacks have been posed: 1) an act of revenge by the followers of alleged 14 K triad leader Wan Kuok-koi for his pre-trial detention; 2) 14 K Triad's response to the Macau government's decision to ban the release of the movie Casino; 3) a rival faction of 14K Triad flexing its muscles.
Shah Hussain was kidnapped by the Taliban in order to commit Jihad against security forces.
Shahd was targeted for cutting food supplies to local militants under pressure from the Indian army.
Shahidullah Shahid, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was meant as a rejection of the government demands of a ceasefire prior to peace talks.
Shahidullah Shahid, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility and stated that the police were targeted in retaliation for the recent killing of TTP members in an encounter.
Shahidullah Shahid, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack on the Frontier Corps (FC) compound, stating that the attack was carried out to avenge the killing of Maulana Waliur Rehman, a TTP commander, in a United States (US) drone strike on May 29, 2013.
Shahidullah Shahid, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was in response to a military operation in Rawalpindi in 2007 and the killing of a TTP deputy chief in a United States (US) drone strike.
Shahidullah Shahid, a Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson claimed responsibility, stating that the Pakistani security forces were targeted because they continue to work with the United States (US) military. A spokesperson for Jundallah also claimed responsibility, stating that the attack was in retaliation for a drone strike that killed TTP commander Wali Rehman in May 2013.
Shahidullah Shahid, spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility the incident, stating that the armed Islamist outfit liberated approximately 300 prisoners during the assault on the targeted prison. Moreover, sources indicate that the TTP assailants were calling out the names of their imprisoned comrades as they laid siege to the targeted prison.
Shaykh Ali "Dheere" Mohamud Rage, spokesperson for Al-Shabaab, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the armed Islamist outfit targeted the Turkish embassy because the Turkish government 1.) provides support to the Somali government; 2.) is a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) responsible for the "massacre" of Muslims; and 3.) destroys local people's livestock through its agencies in Mogadishu.
Shaykh Ali Dheere Mohamud Rage, a spokesperson for Al-Shabaab, claimed responsibility and stated that the attacks were in retaliation for recent offensives by the Kenyan forces in Gedo and Lower Jubba regions. Additionally, the group was upset with the recent deaths of Muslim clerics in Mombasa.
Shaykh Mahmud Ali Rage, spokesperson for Al-Shabaab, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it executed the attack against the judiciary because it is a system implemented by "infidels."
Shaykh Muhammad Hasan Umar, an Al-Shabaab spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the Somalia National Constituent Assembly was targeted because it was approving a constitution for Somalia that the group viewed as not being in accordance with Islamic Sharia law.
Sheik Ahmed Yassin, the spiritual leader of HAMAS, stated that the attack was intended to send a message to the Arab summit members that the group was resolute in its efforts to strike at Israel.
Sheik Hassan Takar, a spokesperson for Al-Shabaab, claimed responsibility and stated that the victims were targeted due to their non-Islamic religious beliefs. Sources speculated that the attacks were also in response to Kenyan military action in Somalia.
Sheikh Abdiasis Abu Musab, a spokesperson for Al-Shabaab, claimed responsibility for the coordinated attacks on the restaurant, stating that the group targeted the business because it served as a meeting place for government, military, and security workers.
Sheikh Abdiasis Abu Musab, a spokesperson for Al-Shabaab, claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted the convoy because they suspected that American officials were aboard.
Sheikh Abdullahi Irad was targeted because of his efforts to promote the Islamic Brotherhood.
Sheikh Ali Mohammed Rage, an Al-Shabaab spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victim, a South African security trainer, was targeted as part of a campaign against "crusaders" in Somalia.
Sheikh Ali Mohamud Rage, an Al-Shabaab spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in revenge for the killing of several of the group's members in previous weeks.
Sheikh Ali Mohamud Rageh, an Al-Shabaab spokesperson, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for a United States (US) airstrike that killed former Al-Shabaab leader, Ahmed Abdi Godane.
Sheikh Aziz Mohammed Faraj, head of the Obaid clan, was the leader of a local militia that was fighting al-Qaeda, which is suspected to be the motive behind the killing.
Sheikh Omar Hadid Brigade claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for clashes in Jenin city.
Sheikh Omar Hadid Brigade claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of a Palestinian woman in Hebron city, who attempted to attack a soldier at a checkpoint and the arrest of Iman Kanjou, who allegedly tried to become a member of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
Sher Gol was murdered for awarding death and jail sentences to imprisoned Taliban insurgents.
Shining Path rebels are suspected of protecting drug smugglers who use backpacks and mules to bring cocaine out of the Apurimac River valley.
Shirley's brother is a member of the Citizen Armed Forces Geographical Unit whose group clashed with ASG bandits several months ago.
Shuar extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to military operations evicting Shuar civilians in order to open up the land for mining activities.
Shutdown G20: Take Hamburg offline! claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that railway infrastructure was targeted because it represented "the central nervous system of capitalism."
Shutting down "Un-Islamic" Shops
Simon Santiago, spokesperson for the New People's Army (NPA), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was carried out in order "to give justice to the victims of the 84th Infantry Battalion and its use of Lumad vigilantes in its current intensive military operations."
Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the detention of Muslims in Egyptian prisons.
Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the school employee was targeted because they believed he was assisting security personnel.
Since elections were held earlier in the year, militants argued that elections were not a substitute for self-determination, and threatened those who participated.  Several elected officials had been targeted and killed in the recent past.
Sindhudesh Revolutionary Army (SRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a free Sindhudesh region.
Singh did not attend a meeting called by the Maoists, which is allegedly why he was shot and killed.
Sinn Fein had recently confirmed it had rejected the British government's proposals to reform the province's police force, a key issue of disagreement holding up peace talks.
Sirajuddin, a spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the group targeted the victim because he had publicly criticized them and was pro-army.
Sirajuddin, the spokesperson for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the victim, Ameer Sardar, was killed for his anti-TTP activities and his collaboration with the government.
Sivalingam was a rival Tamil politician.
Snell believed the pawnshop owner to be Jewish, and thus an "evil man" who "just needed to die"; additionally, the motive for the robbery was to finance the revolution and goals of the CSA to overthrow the government.
Some authorities suspect that the attackers hoped to destabilize the country.
Sought extradition of Christian convert Abdorrahman from Italy to Afghanistan. Also demanded withdrawal of Italian forces from Afghanistan.
Sources attributed this attack to the ongoing battle between the LTTE and government forces in a bid by the LTTE for a separate state.  Sources also noted that these battles were feared to lead to civil war.
Sources cite a military offensive launched eight days before the incident in response to an LTTE-implemented water blockade which left 15,000 families without water.  This offensive, and the violent LTTE response, were thought to possibly lead to a full-scale war.
Sources cite a recent increase in fighting between the LTTE and government forces.  Sources also note that the only people with access to the area in which the buses were attacked were LTTE members.
Sources cite existing accusations against the LTTE for forcible child recruitment through abduction and conscription into the LTTE.  Also, sources note that the LTTE has targeted Tamils suspected of working with the government or with the Karuna faction.
Sources cite ongoing fighting between the LTTE and government forces.
Sources cite Pakkiyarasa's former Razeek group membership as a cause for the crime, as the LTTE claimed they worked with the government against them in their attempt to achieve a separate state.  Sources also mention the violence that has occurred since the split between the LTTE and the Karuna faction.
Sources cite recent claims by the LTTE to make pre-emptive strikes on military targets after the Sri Lankan president vowed to rid all rebel-held areas of the LTTE and reclaim them under government control.  The LTTE also threatened to cripple Sri Lanka's $23 billion economy.
Sources cite that the owner of the rice mill had been approached several days earlier by LTTE men who wanted ransom money, which the owner refused to pay.
Sources cite the claim by Shivajilingham that there was an assassination plot against him due to his position in the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) parliament as a pro-rebel supporter.  He claimed that he was searched and interrogated by the Air Force following the incident, which made him late for a parliamentary meeting.
Sources cite the continues violence perpetrated by the LTTE against Tamil civilians as a cause of the attack.
Sources cite the discrimination Tamil minorities experienced from the Sinhalese majority in the past, and how tensions between the two groups still exist.  They note that this discrimination is a major reason for the LTTE's desire for a separate state for the Tamil minority.
Sources cite the family's involvement and cooperation with government and military forces, along with their refusal to leave Sri Lanka and return to India after the LTTE attempted to force them out.
Sources cite the former political history of Sivamaharaja, as well as his current cooperation with Sri Lankan military and security forces, as a possible motive.
Sources cite the LTTE practice of forced conscription of child soldiers, and the refusal of Sathyan to become one of these soldiers, as a possible motive for this attack.
Sources cite the ongoing artillery battle between government forces and the LTTE over land, and the increased violence being perpetrated by the LTTE.
Sources cite the ongoing battle between the LTTE and government forces in the LTTE campaign for a separate state for Tamils.
Sources cite the ongoing battle between the LTTE and the breakaway Karuna faction, along with the targeting of political rivals by the LTTE.
Sources cite the violence perpetrated by the LTTE recently, and note that this is a continuation of this violence.  Also, government and rebel officials were preparing to meet that week to discuss the ceasefire agreement in place.
Sources cite Velupillai's former membership in the LTTE, along with his refusal to rejoin the LTTE, as the cause of the attack.
Sources claim that this attack, and similar attacks that had occurred recently, were attempts by the LTTE to incite Sri Lankan forces to violence.
Sources claim this is one more attack in a string of recent violence by the LTTE targeting government forces.
Sources indicate that the Superintendent of Police, Kalam Khan, was targeted because of his successful anti-Taliban operations in rural areas.
Sources indicated that the NPA wanted to avenge the series of recent defeats by Philippines government forces.
Sources note ongoing LTTE death threats to civilians in the area if they refused to provide the LTTE with supplies.  Sources also note that Sinhalese Buddhists were celebrating Vesak, a holiday noting the birth, enlightenment, and death of Buddha.
Sources note that aid workers for NGOs have been targeted recently, and that they have generally experienced problems working in Sri Lanka.  However, sources also note that these problems have previously been blamed on the Sri Lankan government, citing such sources as the head of the Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission (SLMM) as claiming that the government or government-sponsored forces were responsible for the recent slaying of 17 aid workers.
Sources note that the LTTE has repeatedly fired on this same village for weeks.  Sources claim the LTTE were trying to destroy the lives of the villagers.
Sources note that the LTTE, and specifically the small navy that is part of the LTTE, has a history of targeting international merchant vessels.
Sources note that violence has increased in the northern regions of Sri Lanka after the Sri Lankan president vowed to eradicate LTTE from the areas, which are mainly rebel-held territories.
Sources noted that the fighting between the LTTE and government forces increased and moved north after the government claimed victory in ousting the LTTE from the Eastern province.
Sources noted that the LTTE were preparing to celebrate the 20th anniversary of their first suicide attack, and that government forces had stepped up protection due to an anticipated increase in violence by the LTTE.
Sources report that the assailants demanded that the villagers join their group and, when the villagers refused, the assailants killed them.
Sources report that the assailants were killing the villagers because they suspected them of cooperating with guerrilla forces
Sources said that the attack was in retaliation for the earlier attack on the shrine.
Sources said the shop-owners were earlier issued letters threatening them of dire consequences. They termed it an un-Islamic way of earning money and spreading obscenity in the area.
Sources say that Hamas claimed to have fired rockets at Sederot in response to Israeli military operations in northern Gaza.
Sources speculate that the kidnapping was "an attempt to thwart the Sangh's growing influence in the north-eastern states".  However, the National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT), who claimed responsibility, demanded that the Tripura State Rifles be disbanded or the hostages would be killed.
Sources speculate that the kidnapping was motivated by ransom, but there is no mention of a ransom being asked or collected
Sources speculated that HAMAS fired rockets in retaliation of an overnight Israeli army raid on the Gaza Strip in which eight Palestinians were killed.
Sources speculated that the attack may have been to recognize the 10-year anniversary of a string of bombings in Mumbai, which killed more than 250 people and injured more than 1,000 others.
Sources speculated that the attack was a retaliation for an Israeli military offensive in the Jabalya refugee camp that began after midnight on March 6, 2003.
Sources speculated that the attack was in retaliation for the assassination of HAMAS leader Ibrahim Al Maqadma.
Sources speculated that the bombing was in retaliation for the U.S. missile attack on a training camp of Ansar al-Islam in Khormal the night before.
Sources speculated that the gunmen were retaliating against the anti-GAM rally in front of Takengon's Joint Security Committee (JSC) office earlier in the month.
Sources speculated that the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) was retaliating after the Philippine military captured one of their enclaves, the Buliok complex, in a February 2003 assault that killed about 200 MILF rebels.
Sources state that the victims were shot because they refused to pay ransom to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
Sources stated that the letters contained anti-gun control rhetoric in their message and threatened future attacks if gun control legislation was pursued.
South Sudanese extremists claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that they be transported to another country rather than being sent back to South Sudan.
Spanish police chief Juan Cotino said the bomb had been intended as a "trap" for the police. Spanish authorities had been expecting a revenge attack after two ETA units were smashed in the Basque country and in Barcelona.
Specific motive behind the attack is unknown; however, Athor has been leading a rebellion against Juba since losing the 2010 election for state governor.
Specific motive behind the attack is unknown; however, the container was carrying military hardware for NATO forces.
Specific motive behind the incident is unknown; however, authorities believe that Thaisii was targeted because of his continuing role in the Ibobi Singh government.
Specific motive is uncertain, but Hezbollah wants to remove Israeli troops from South Lebanon
Specific motive is uncertain, but members state that the group is fighting for democracy and teaching Islam
Specific motive is unknown and sources provide several possible motives.  Officials believe that the attack is related to drug trafficking, while diplomats believed that the attack was perpetrated by individuals within the regime.  Others believe that the bombing (and others like it) are part of a conflict between conservatives and reformers.
Specific motive is unknown but authorities believe that the attack was a revenge attack targeting Serbians
Specific motive is unknown but authorities believe that the attack was intended to shift security focus from fighting in the north
Specific motive is unknown but authorities believe that the attack was perpetrated by the mafia in response to the victim's role in demolishing illegal buildings
Specific motive is unknown but authorities believe the attack was intended to kill the prime minister.  The incident may have been related to the presidential elections.
Specific motive is unknown but authorities perceive the attack as a show of force
Specific motive is unknown but authorities speculate that it may be related to crackdowns on criminal activity or mass arrests of members of the Baluch tribe of Marri.
Specific motive is unknown but authorities speculate that the attack was ordered by terrorists or the criminal underworld.  The victim had just published a controversial book that denounced an organization.
Specific motive is unknown but authorities speculate that the incident may have been related to turf wars
Specific motive is unknown but authorities state that the attack bore the markings of a paramilitary-style punishment shooting
Specific motive is unknown but authorities state that the rebels often attack those that they believe are working with the authorities
Specific motive is unknown but Jose Cruz Perez Lapazaran is opposed to independence for the Basque region
Specific motive is unknown but one source notes that the attacks coincide with the military's actions to retake Jaffna from the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
Specific motive is unknown but one source states that the attacker was acting suspiciously when the police officer approached him, before the shooting took place.
Specific motive is unknown but sources believe that the attack was retaliatory
Specific motive is unknown but sources note that the MCC has been organizing against wealthy landowners in the area.  In addition, some or all of the victims are believed to have connections to a private army run by the landowners.
Specific motive is unknown but sources speculate that it may have been a burglary attempt (doubt terrorism proper) or may have been politically motivated
Specific motive is unknown but sources speculate that the incident may be connected to a planned protest march in support of ex-prime minister Sharif
Specific motive is unknown but sources speculate the attackers believed the victims were collaborating with leftist guerrillas
Specific motive is unknown but the attack coincided with Guatemala calling on Belize to renegotiate borders
Specific motive is unknown but the attempted attack occurred less than a week before elections
Specific motive is unknown but the government states that the attack was intended to create tension and disrupt the elections, while the police suspect that the attack was in retaliation for the killing of tribal youth
Specific motive is unknown but the intended victim is believed to be the Hezbollah's spiritual guide
Specific motive is unknown but the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) are fighting for a separate Tamil state.
Specific motive is unknown but the military states that the incident was intended to disrupt the holiday.  The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) state that the military staged the incident in order to implicate the LTTE.
Specific motive is unknown but the Serbian Radical Party is allied with Slobodan Milosevic and his defeat had been recently reinforced through the successful election of his opponent
Specific motive is unknown but the store owner stated that he had been receiving phone calls demanding that he make "donations"
Specific motive is unknown but the victim was involved with counter-insurgency before he became a politician
Specific motive is unknown but there is speculation that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) were preparing to attack Trincomalee and were discovered early, leading the LTTE to attack the navy.
Specific motive is unknown but two of the victims were known for their actions against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.
Specific motive is unknown but UNITA attacks have escalated since Angola has been given permission to use Namibia territory to attack UNITA
Specific motive is unknown but, in addition to killing and injuring civilians, the assailants also looted homes and stole food, money and medicine
Specific motive is unknown, but a pro-rebel source stated that the "victims were 'paramilitary cadres' helping the Sri Lankan armed forces"
Specific motive is unknown, but a pro-rebel source stated that the victim was a "'paramilitary cadre' helping the Sri Lankan armed forces"
Specific motive is unknown, but a pro-Tamil source states that "a section of public and police said that the reason behind the murder was due to business rivalry and infighting".  However, the victim also had a history of conflict with Tamil groups and two sources speculate the the perpetrator was from the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
Specific motive is unknown, but Albanians had been targeting Roma people because they believed they had provided support to the Serbs
Specific motive is unknown, but attacks have been escalating as elections draw near
Specific motive is unknown, but authorities believe that the attack was due to inter-gang rivalry; there was a well-known hitman that was going before the court that day
Specific motive is unknown, but authorities believe that the attack was intended to create a media uproar and to undermine security
Specific motive is unknown, but authorities believe that the attack was intended to incite terror leading up to Independence Day.
Specific motive is unknown, but authorities believe that the bomb was intended to cause panic rather than cause harm or excessive damage.  President Clinton was scheduled to visit the neighboring area later that day; the tour was in conjunction with a U.S. aid package designed to support Colombia's fight against the drug industry.
Specific motive is unknown, but authorities believe that this was an attempt to suppress the liberation movement
Specific motive is unknown, but authorities believe the attack was in preparation of "attacks against high level officials of public institutions and organizations"
Specific motive is unknown, but authorities foretold possible violence against moderates who replaced separatist guerrillas as councilors.
Specific motive is unknown, but authorities speculate that the attack may be based upon personal differences
Specific motive is unknown, but authorities speculate that the attack was a response to the laborers refusal to pay a fee demanded by the assailants
Specific motive is unknown, but authorities speculate that the attack was intended to "create disturbances on the instructions of Pakistan's intelligence services"
Specific motive is unknown, but authorities state that the incident was intended to promote chaos and concern about security in Malaysia
Specific motive is unknown, but Batticaloa falls within the area that the LTTE considers to be Tamil homeland
Specific motive is unknown, but civilians are often targeted because they are believed to be supporting rival groups
Specific motive is unknown, but fishermen had complained to the authorities that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) were forcing them to transport guns, ammunition, and drugs.
Specific motive is unknown, but generally is for animal-rights as the slogan "Meat is murder" was painted on the building.
Specific motive is unknown, but generally is for animal-rights as the slogan "Meat is murder" was painted on the trucks.
Specific motive is unknown, but government authorities state that the incident was designed to undermine democratic reform
Specific motive is unknown, but grenade attacks began after a Tamil rebel was killed in an assault.
Specific motive is unknown, but is suspected to be environmentalist-related.
Specific motive is unknown, but it is believed that the attack was intended to influence the elections
Specific motive is unknown, but it is believed that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam planted the bomb in order to escalate fighting again.
Specific motive is unknown, but it is reported that both the military and the rebels have increased clashes as they prepare for a major offensive in the Northern province
Specific motive is unknown, but it likely that the attackers believed the victims were cooperating with their enemy.
Specific motive is unknown, but local authorities believe that the attack was not politically or ethnically motivated
Specific motive is unknown, but military officials implied this could be the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) launching a campaign to retake the stronghold of Jaffna.
Specific motive is unknown, but military sources state the assailants intended to invoke violence in schoolchildren and to disrupt normalcy.
Specific motive is unknown, but Mrema is an anti-corruption candidate and was the strongest opponent in the previous presidential election
Specific motive is unknown, but officials have said that the killing may be linked to an internal rift within the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
Specific motive is unknown, but one pro-Tamil source states it was a revenge killing because the victim had cleared the land surrounding a Tamil Tiger monument (doubt terrorism proper)
Specific motive is unknown, but one source notes that forcible child recruitment is a tactic utilized by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).  A second source notes that the victims were Tamil; Tamils who are affiliated with a breakaway faction or have cooperated with the government are often targeted by the LTTE.
Specific motive is unknown, but one source notes that the victim and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam were in a land dispute at the time of the killing.
Specific motive is unknown, but one source speculates that the failed attack was intended to cause panic among civilians.
Specific motive is unknown, but one source speculates that the victims had broken allegiance with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and were fleeing the country.  Another source states that the note left at the scene accused the victims of killing others.
Specific motive is unknown, but one victim was the brother of a United National Party (UNP) provincial politician, who had received death threats in the past
Specific motive is unknown, but Pakistan blames the Indian government for the attack
Specific motive is unknown, but parlimentary elections were scheduled for April.  Pro-Tamil Tiger groups had warned minority Tamils not to become candidates for the two main majority Sinhalese parties of Wickremesinghe and President Chandrika Kumaratunga.
Specific motive is unknown, but police believe the perpetrators thought the victim was a miliatry informant
Specific motive is unknown, but police sources state that the victim was a "suspected cadre of the Karuna group".
Specific motive is unknown, but police speculate that members of the Mari tribe are responsible for the attack in retaliation for the arrest of one of their leaders
Specific motive is unknown, but previous attacks have been prompted by the belief that archeologists were excavating Jewish graves
Specific motive is unknown, but prior to the attack, three female Tamil Tigers were shot.  It is possible that the current attack was in retaliation.
Specific motive is unknown, but pro-Tamil sources state that the victim was responsible for the abduction and killing of Tamil youths and was involved in the killing of the pro-rebel journalist, Dharmeratnam Sivaram.
Specific motive is unknown, but security forces said the killing was a result of group rivalry between the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and a breakaway rebel faction
Specific motive is unknown, but Serbians have been subjected to isolated attacks of this kind in retaliation from ethnic Albanians
Specific motive is unknown, but sources are calling the incident sectarian violence between Protestants and Catholics
Specific motive is unknown, but sources are interpreting the attack as an intimidation tactic.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources believe that it was a revenge killing
Specific motive is unknown, but sources believe that the bomber was attempting to inflitrate the Special Forces-held area.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources believe that the suicide cadre was intending to cause harm to the 55th Division troops.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources identify the incident as a paramilitary punishment shooting
Specific motive is unknown, but sources imply that it was the act of right-wing extremists and the incident occurred on the eve of the ten year anniversary of German reunification
Specific motive is unknown, but sources indicate that the attack may have been linked to the court appearance of the coup leader George Speight
Specific motive is unknown, but sources indicate that this is a battle between the military and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) for territory.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources label the event as political violence and intimidation, given that the target was the opposition party and the incident occurred leading up to the elections.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources note that "Operation Sure Victory, launched in May, aims to secure the northern highway to the Jaffna Peninsula, the former Tiger base captured by the army last year".  As a result, fighting has intensified.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources note that the explosion occurred as the vehicle was nearing the Interior Ministry building.  However, sources also note that car bombings are often used by the underworld in Bulgaria to settle scores.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources note that the few Serbians in Obilic have been targeted by Albanian extremists
Specific motive is unknown, but sources note that this is part of the fight for an independent Tamil homeland.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources note that violence has increased in Kashmir since the militant group, the Hizbul Mujahideen, called off a ceasefire
Specific motive is unknown, but sources recognize that the continued fighting is further stalling peace talks.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources say that the victims were believed to be part of the Karuna faction that had broken away from the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate about whether the incident was intended to encourage ethnic clashes
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that Basque Fatherland and Freedom (ETA) is trying to extort a "revolutionary tax" from local business owners
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the assailants were anti-Islamic terrorists
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the attack is designed to destabilize the governability of the province leading up to the June elections
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the attack may have been in response to the failing stock market
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the attack may have been orchestrated by Tutsi militiamen targeting Hutu traders days before a peace accord was to be signed.  Tutsi opposition has been concerned about what would happen when power is handed over in a country dominated by Hutu civilians.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the attack was "intended to counter losses suffered by the rebels in army operations in the north"
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the attack was an attempt to frighten away Buddhist devotees
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the attack was caste-related.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the attack was in protest of the Colombian government attempts to destroy coca crops
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the attack was intended to cause fear amongst Tamils and, thus, discourage them from leaving the area.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the attack was intended to dissuade civilians from fleeing the area.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the explosive device was intended to harm fox hunters
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the incident is related to the strike that militants have called for in order to boycott Independence day celebrations
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate that the victims had deserted the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) group
Specific motive is unknown, but sources speculate the attack was intended for the owner of the supermarket because he had seized the business from his partners
Specific motive is unknown, but sources state that it was xenophobic incident
Specific motive is unknown, but sources state that the attack was likely motivated by revenge; the rebels were targeting civilians that they believed had joined forces with paramilitaries against FARC.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources state that the victim had been warned previously by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) not to service military representatives.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources state that this incident is part of a strategy to gain control of Muttur
Specific motive is unknown, but sources state that this was another incident in escalating tribal-nontribal ethnic clashes
Specific motive is unknown, but sources suggest that this was a kidnapping for ransom
Specific motive is unknown, but sources suspect that Christians were retaliating because Hindus had demolished a Christian church prior to the attack.
Specific motive is unknown, but sources suspect that the attack was ethnically motivated
Specific motive is unknown, but Tamils, the largest minority, are mainly followers of Hinduism, while majority Sinhalese are largely Buddhists.
Specific motive is unknown, but the area has been marked by a religious war between Moslems and Christians and it is rare that they congregate in the same area at the same time, as they did in the marketplace.
Specific motive is unknown, but the area has been subjected to a series of similar attacks since Hizbul Mujahideen called off its ceasefire
Specific motive is unknown, but the assailant was fascinated with Al-Qa ida and was video-taped stating "Allahu Akbar'' (God is great) while shooting at a military facility
Specific motive is unknown, but the assailant was fascinated with Al-Qa ida and was video-taped stating "Allahu Akbar'' (God is great) while shooting at the museum
Specific motive is unknown, but the assailants succeeded in disrupting gas supply
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack came after the military took a village that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) had been using as a key point of entry for smuggled goods.  This could have been a retaliatory act.
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack followed a week of heavy fighting between the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and government forces.
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack followed a week of heavy fighting between the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam and government forces.  In addition, the Vavuniya area is the last government-held area before rebel-held areas in Northern Sri Lanka.
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack happened at a time when the military was stepping up the offensive against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in neighboring districts
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack is one of a series between Muslims and Christians
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack occurred a day after the government asked the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam to disarm and they refused.
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack occurred a week before the beginning of Ramadan, viewed as a sacred time for their Jihad
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack occurred during a period of increased violence between miscreants and tribals.  The attack may have been retaliatory.
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack occurred during increased sectarian violence.
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack occurred in government-controlled territory at a time when, according to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), the military entered no-man's land in another district.
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack occurred shortly after Sri Lankan troops gained control of the de facto political capital of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack occurred shortly after the Sri Lankan government denied having agreed to holding unconditional talks with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack occurred shortly after the Sri Lankan government reinvoked the Prevention of Terrorism Act, which pro-rebel sources view as a violation of the cease fire act.
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack was labeled a terror tactic.
Specific motive is unknown, but the attack was perpetrated by Chechen rebels on a high ranking special services officer
Specific motive is unknown, but the attacks began at the same time that the leader of the Islamic Front of Fighters for the Greater East went to trial for terrorism-related charges.
Specific motive is unknown, but the attacks occurred amongst heavy criticism directed towards the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam for boycotting the presidential poll.
Specific motive is unknown, but the authorities state that the attack "has further vitiated the atmosphere in tension-ridden South Asia"
Specific motive is unknown, but the bombing occurred within 24 hours of Israel and Palestine reinvigorating the peace process.
Specific motive is unknown, but the day before the incident, the guerrillas had urged the government to stop attacking their main training camp or they would escalate violence.  Sources state they took the hostages in order to use them as human shields.
Specific motive is unknown, but the Eelam People Democratic Party (EPDP) "co-operated with the government troops during the height of the separatist war waged by the Tigers".
Specific motive is unknown, but the Eelam People's Democratic Party is opposed to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
Specific motive is unknown, but the explosion coincided with the verdict announcement in a prominent trial
Specific motive is unknown, but the explosive-laden car was placed near a polling station
Specific motive is unknown, but the gay community had been targeted in a series of attacks in the past several years.
Specific motive is unknown, but the government has vowed to gain control of the northern stronghold of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).  The fighting has escalated as both sides battle over the northern area
Specific motive is unknown, but the government recently reclaimed control of the Eastern province and is now trying to gain control of the Northern province.  The fighting has been escalating in this area.
Specific motive is unknown, but the government recently reclaimed control of the Eastern province and is now trying to gain control of the Northern province.  The fighting has been escalating.
Specific motive is unknown, but the group left pamphlets at the scene condemning the visit of the US president, Bill Clinton
Specific motive is unknown, but the group that claimed responsibility for the attack called themselves the friends of prisoners who had anarchist ideologies.
Specific motive is unknown, but the headquarters of Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) had recently been overrun by military and, in response, the rebels had increased attacks.
Specific motive is unknown, but the incident has been labeled a sectarian attack
Specific motive is unknown, but the incident is part of escalating ethnic violence
Specific motive is unknown, but the incident occurred during a time of escalating ethnic violence
Specific motive is unknown, but the incident occurred during an upsurge in violence involving Islamic insurgency
Specific motive is unknown, but the incident occurred during increased tension amongst Jewish and Muslim people, following clashes between Israelis and Palestinians in the Middle East.
Specific motive is unknown, but the incident occurred near Trincomalee district, a site of escalating conflict.
Specific motive is unknown, but the killing occurred just a week before local elections; sources speculate that the attack was intended to destabilize the political process
Specific motive is unknown, but the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) have accused the Eelam People's Democratic Party (EPDP) of supporting a renegade faction that split with the LTTE.
Specific motive is unknown, but the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) have reloacted their headquarters to Mullaitivu and have increased activities in that area.
Specific motive is unknown, but the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam accused the government and the military of supporting a breakaway rebel faction.
Specific motive is unknown, but the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam have accused the government and military of supporting a breakaway rebel  faction
Specific motive is unknown, but the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam recently lost control of Eastern Sri Lanka and now the battle has moved to the Northern Province as the government tries to gain control of that area as well.
Specific motive is unknown, but the LTTE claims that the Sri Lankan military is engaged in a shadow war with the rebels
Specific motive is unknown, but the military are quoted as stating that "Muruges was killed because he refused to pay an unspecified amount of money to the Tamil Tigers"
Specific motive is unknown, but the mother of one victim stated that her son was involved in a dispute with a local Tamil paramilitary group.
Specific motive is unknown, but the note left at the scene warned all Muslims to vacate the area or they would be purged.
Specific motive is unknown, but the opposition fighters are seeking the overthrow of Iran's Islamic government
Specific motive is unknown, but the police believe that Pakistan's secret service facilitated the attack, with the aid of United Liberation Front of Assam, in order to target Indian soldiers on their way to Kashmir.
Specific motive is unknown, but the police state that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) had previously assualted the victim for allegedly giving information to the military.
Specific motive is unknown, but the police state that the victim was believed to be an informant for the military.
Specific motive is unknown, but the politician was a member of the right-wing Popular Party
Specific motive is unknown, but the radio station was vocally opposed to regional administration and the victim alleged that the deputy governor was politically corrupted.
Specific motive is unknown, but the rebels have been fighting for an independent homeland.
Specific motive is unknown, but the rebels stole drugs and valuables from the health center
Specific motive is unknown, but the Sri Lankan President stated the killing was a result of a "campaign to eliminate political candidates".
Specific motive is unknown, but the suicide cadre had been in the process of fleeing the area when he exploded.
Specific motive is unknown, but the suspected assailants are opposed to the President's peace offer to end civil war
Specific motive is unknown, but the suspected attackers are fighting for an independent land for the Bodo tribe
Specific motive is unknown, but the suspected intent was to abduct the soldier
Specific motive is unknown, but the target is believed to be Navy Chief Cecil Tissera
Specific motive is unknown, but the target, Koirala, stated that he believed the attack was an attempt to silence him from "speaking out against Maoists and violence"
Specific motive is unknown, but the temple chairman was identified by a pro-rebel site as being a former military intelligence informant.
Specific motive is unknown, but the the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) have accused the government of failing to disarm a breakaway rebel faction.  In addition, the incident occurred days before peace talks were scheduled to resume; sources suggest the LTTE are trying to undermine any peace talks.
Specific motive is unknown, but the train often carries military personnel; it is possible the LTTE were targeting the military
Specific motive is unknown, but the troops had just captured several bunds from the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim belonged to an organization that advocated a united Sri Lanka.
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim had been critical of the breakaway Karuna faction and supportive of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim had just finished leading an investigation of the killing of several key government officials, including the Prime Minister
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim had maintained good relations with security forces.  He was also an outspoken proponent of peaceful cooperation between different ethnic groups.
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim speculates that it was an attempt to intimidate political party members
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim speculates that it was an attempt to provoke a reaction from the loyalists and create instability
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim testified against one of the suspects.
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim was a rural assembly candidate and tensions were running high since elections had been postponed
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim was an outspoken Tamil activist
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim was in the process of suing a political party that was supported by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) at the time he was killed.
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim was known for trying to broker peace between rival political factions
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim was the security advisor for the chairman of the Serbian Radical Party and both had been known for their outspoken controversial views and practices.  In addition, the attack happened approximately two weeks after Zeljko Raznatovic (alias Arkan) was killed.  Sources speculate this might have been a revenge killing, since Arkan and the chairman were opponents.
Specific motive is unknown, but the victim, who was a high ranking official of Eastern Province, was killed just days after the Sri Lankan government announced that they were scheduling a state ceremony to celebrate gaining control of the eastern province.
Specific motive is unknown, but the victims were Hindus and the region has experienced escalated violence against Hindus since a Muslim separatist group called off a ceasefire
Specific motive is unknown, but the victims were members of a political party that was in harsh rivalry with the Muttahida Qami Movement
Specific motive is unknown, but there has been escalating violence between Russian military and Chechen rebels
Specific motive is unknown, but there have been frequent clashes between riva rebels groups since the Karuna faction broke away from the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
Specific motive is unknown, but there have been numerous attacks on aid workers since East Timor called for independence from Indonesia
Specific motive is unknown, but there is increasing speculation that the bombing, which is just one in a series of bombings, is an attempt by dissatisfied government employees to discredit the current leadership
Specific motive is unknown, but this incident occurred just before polls opened for a major provincial election, and the LTTE were fighting for an independent Tamil state.
Specific motive is unknown, but this is likely an "ethnically motivated hate crime"
Specific motive is unknown, but this is the latest in a string of attacks on aid workers.
Specific motive is unknown, but this is the latest in a string of attacks targeting aid workers and organizations
Specific motive is unknown, but this is the latest in a string of attacks targeting humanitarian groups.
Specific motive is unknown, but this was part of a larger conflict where the Tamils were fighting for an independent state.
Specific motive is unknown, but this was part of a larger conflict where the Tamils were fighting for an independent state. Additionally, the incident occurred "just a few hours before the scheduled swearing-in ceremony of the new Chief Minister of the Eastern Province and other councilors."
Specific motive is unknown, but Torres had been threatened in the past for a possible link to the National Liberation Army (ELN).  There were also rumors that the reporter had outstanding financial debts.
Specific motive is unknown, but Trincomalee falls within the area that the LTTE considers to be Tamil homeland
Specific motive is unknown, but Trincomalee has been a site of heavy fighting between rebels and the military, since the navy and military maintain bases there.
Specific motive is unknown, but Trincomalee has been a site of heavy fighting between rebels and the military.
Specific motive is unknown, however, sources note that AUC often kills civilians that they suspect are aiding leftist guerrillas.
Specific motive is unknown;  however, the attack occurred during an increase in paramilitary violence.
Specific motive is unknown; additionally, Tamil sources detected the hand of the security forces in the incident, though the government suspected LTTE was responsible.  The incident occurred the day after a second round of peace negotiations between the Tamil United Liberation Front and Sri Lankan ministers.
Specific motive is unknown; authorities speculate that the attackers were part of a group that had been targeting settlers in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however the Ashura (Shi a day of mourning) parade was scheduled to pass the store on its route.
Specific motive is unknown; however the attack occurred during Ramadan.
Specific motive is unknown; however the day was Ashura, the Shi a day of mourning.  Hangu is a contentious area of sectarian violence between Sunni and Shi a Muslims.
Specific motive is unknown; however the Deputy Prime Minister called the event "apparently politically-motivated", and the Lottery Office is near where celebrations were held for the King's 84th birthday
Specific motive is unknown; however the incident occurred in the weeks leading up to the state elections.  Authorities believe that the attack may have been designed to scare voters and politicians.
Specific motive is unknown; however the rockets were targeting the parade route taken for Ashura, a Shi'a day of mourning.  Hangu is a contentious area of sectarian violence between Sunni and Shi a Muslims.
Specific motive is unknown; however this was one of numerous assault incidents targeting Muslims in the same area at the time, and the LTTE were fighting for an independent Tamil state.
Specific motive is unknown; however, a curfew had been put into effect that some families had chosen to disregard by sending their children to school.
Specific motive is unknown; however, a grand assembly was scheduled to convene two days after the incident took place.  The assembly agenda included discussions around efforts to make peace with the Taliban.
Specific motive is unknown; however, a pro-Western government had replaced a nationalist government a year prior.  The nationalists claim the current government betrays Croatia.
Specific motive is unknown; however, a rebel spokesperson speculates that the motive was to "provoke social unrest and instability in areas under our control".
Specific motive is unknown; however, a representative from the government stated that he believed the attack was a "plot to undermine the interim government".
Specific motive is unknown; however, a spokesperson from the Islamic Salvation Front (FIS) stated it was part of a plan to undermine peace and security
Specific motive is unknown; however, aid organizations often suspend operations when aid workers are attacked.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Al-Qassam Brigades claimed responsibility for the incident and they often attack Israeli civilians and soldiers.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Al-Shabaab attacked several government officials on the same night.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Al-Shabaab had increased attacks against military targets in the area following Al-Shabaab's forced departure from Kismayo the previous month.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Al-Shabaab has been increasing attacks in Kenya since Kenyan military forces began launching attacks at Al-Shabaab within Somalia
Specific motive is unknown; however, Al-Shabaab is suspected of perpetrating the incident as part of their active campaign against the Western-supported Somali government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Al-Shabaab promised that it would attack in response to Kenyan military operations in Somalia.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Al-Shabaab stated that they were targeting the base, not a given individual, as part of their hunt for government soldiers.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Anbar officials are in the process of discussing the possibility of joining other provinces in order to break from the Shiite-majority Baghdad governance.
Specific motive is unknown; however, another group of assailants stole weapons and equipment from a nearby police station after the resident police were fired upon when they tried to respond to this attack.
Specific motive is unknown; however, anti-coalition activity is high in Ramadi
Specific motive is unknown; however, anti-US sentiment has been building over perceived US bias against Israel
Specific motive is unknown; however, Asmanov was an advocate of upholding communications with Muslim radicals.
Specific motive is unknown; however, at the time of the attack, the district chief and community elders were meeting in preparation for an upcoming loya jirga or traditional gathering of representatives.  The loya jirga was designed to address a strategy for negotiating peace with the Taliban and navigating Afghanistan's relationship with the United States.
Specific motive is unknown; however, attacks have been escalating in Kenya since Kenyan forces have become involved in hunting Al-Shabaab members in Somalia
Specific motive is unknown; however, attacks have been escalating in the region leading up to elections.
Specific motive is unknown; however, attacks have been rising since President Abdelaziz Bouteflika stated he would stand for re-election.
Specific motive is unknown; however, attacks like this one serve to underscore confidence in security in advance of the withdrawal of US troops.
Specific motive is unknown; however, attacks of these kind undermine security in advance of the departure of U.S. troops at the end of the year.
Specific motive is unknown; however, attacks such as this one serve to raise concerns about security once U.S. troops withdraw.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that Boko Haram is trying to re-establish itself in the city
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that is was a political assassination intended to send a message to the political elite.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that it is the work of animal rights activists extending their campaign into Scotland.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that it may have been politically motivated.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) is attacking the capital city.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) is responsible, given that they had tried to extort money from a hotel a few days earlier.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the assailants mistook Dades for a Jewish person, given that he was driving a vehicle with an Israeli license plate.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the assailants perpetrated the incident with the intention of demonstrating that they still have an active presence in Aceh
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the assailants were Palestinian and were intending to target Israeli motorists.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack may have been perpetrated by Maoist rebels who are currently engaged in a campaign to end the constitutional monarchy.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was an "ethnic cleansing"
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was an attempt to destabilize the republic.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was an incident of sectarian violence.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was designed simply terrorize civilians.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was in response to combing operations in the area directed at finding the Maoists.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was linked to state elections in Jammu and Kashmir.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was perpetrated by an Italian anarchist group known as CCCCC.  The group is fighting for the release of Italian prisoners held in Spain and for the abolition of FIES (Ficheros Internos de Especial Seguimento), Spain's anti-terrorism legislation.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was perpetrated by hard-line Protestants against individuals that had fallen out of favor.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was perpetrated by Karen National Union against the pro-Rangoon Democratic Karen Buddhist Army.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was perpetrated in response the refusal of the local people to support the rebels.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was sectarian and perpetrated by hard-line Protestants.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was sectarian and the intended target believes it may be due to the fact that a family member is in prison.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the attack was sectarian.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the bombing was a message to Jordanian security in light of their support of the campaign against international terrorism
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the bombing was in retaliation for the failure of small businesses to pay immunities.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the company that employed the electrician was the intended target and that they had done work previously with another company linked to animal testing.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the explosion was designed to draw first responders that would be eliminated when the mortar shells detonated.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the farmers were targeted because they were wearing shoes that had come from a shipment that the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) had hijacked.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the incident was a sectarian attack
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the incident was an expression of frustration and was intended to send the message that it was too soon to send police patrols into the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the incident was intended to promote unrest among the public.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the incident was related to an extortion attempt the week earlier.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the incident was sectarian.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the kidnapping was related to recent extortion attempts on the railway.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the perpetrators were animal rights activists and the purpose was to intimidate individuals and businesses that are involved in animal trade and testing.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the rebels were punishing the displaced war victims for not fighting alongside them.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that the target was chosen because it sold alcohol, which is forbidden by Islam.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believe that, if the incident was intentional, it is likely that the electricity dam was the target.  The explosion knocked out electricity to a portion of the city.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities believed the attack was part of the UFF's ongoing terror campaign against Catholic residents.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities had received information that suicide bombers were attempting to enter Karachi in order to disrupt the month of Muharram.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities have predicted an increase in violence leading up to Ramadan, which is viewed as a sacred time for Jihad
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities indicate that the incident was motivated by religious intolerance.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities indicate that this is an incident of separatist violence.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities interpret the explosion as a message from separatists to the French government to expedite granting greater autonomy to Corsica.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities note that Chairman Arafat left the city recently, which appears to have been interpreted as giving a "green light to attacks"
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities note that extremists have been victimizing civilians as a tactic of their campaign.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities note that the incident occurred on the same day that Jorge Eliecer Gaitan was assassinated in 1948.  They believe that the incident was a commemoration.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities see the incident as a message to anyone with animal-related practices to be warned.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that it was either politically motivated or a revenge killing, possibly linked to a land dispute.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that Petron may have failed to pay protection money to NPA
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the abduction was profit-motivated
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the assailants could have links with "Dagestani Islamic militants who did not accept the defeat of the wahhabites in Dagestan"
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the attack may have been connected to a recent closure of a route used by FARC members.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the attack was intended to make their presence known and to get the attention of the government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the attack was intended to undermine trust that Iraqi security forces will be able to maintain order once foreign forces depart.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the attack was perpetrated in order to undermine a peace-agreement reached in February between Muslims and Christians.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the attack was retaliatory
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the attack was spawned by personal enmity or Lyari warfare.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the attack was spawned by personal enmity.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the attack was tied to a business dispute.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the incident may have been designed in order to undermine the work that security personnel had been doing.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the incident may have been designed to undermine the work that security personnel had been doing.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the incident may have been motivated by business conflicts
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the incident may have been the settling of scores for the Medellin cocaine cartel or that it was perpetrated by rebels with political intentions.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the incident was intended to either destabilize the new government or was based on a personal matters.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities speculate that the planned explosion was intended to cause a panic amongst civilians
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities state that the incident was designed to destabilize the region
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities suspect that a right-wing organization perpetrated the attacks with the intention of undermining the government and replacing it with a white-led government and, ultimately, reinstate apartheid.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities suspect that the assailants were targeting a telecommunications tower in the vicinity of the explosive device.  Maoist rebels have been trying to disrupt communication by targeting telecoms facilities.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities suspect that the attack was a result of the failure on the part of the tea executive to meet a cash demand made by the militants.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities suspect that the attack was in response to the recent call for jihad from former Prime Minister Hekmatyar
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities suspect that the attack was intended as a form of discouragement to other Afghans not to cooperate with the government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities suspect that the attack was perpetrated by one of the guerrilla groups fighting for autonomy for Assam.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities suspect that the attack was sectarian.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities suspect the attack was intended to disrupt the selection of provincial delegates for the national grand council.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities suspected that the devices were designed to harm security forces in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, authorities were warned that assailants would be carrying out attacks designed to destabilize Karachi.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Baloch Republican Army (BRA) stated that they were targeting the military vehicles, not the school bus.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Bengali militants have vowed to retaliate against tribal militants for the killing of Bengali settlers.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Bodos and Adivasis are rival tribes and have a violent history.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Boko Haram has been campaigning for the formation of an Islamic state
Specific motive is unknown; however, Boko Haram has claimed responsibility for a number of violent attacks as part of their campaign to implement Shariah law.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Boko Haram is engaged in an active campaign to enforce Sharia law.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Boko Haram is fighting to impose sharia law across Nigeria.
Specific motive is unknown; however, bombings have escalated since a state of emergency was lifted in September.
Specific motive is unknown; however, border clashes and violence have been increasing during the past four months.
Specific motive is unknown; however, both men were members of the banned Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Catholic representatives blame Protestant paramilitary members for the assault.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Catholic representatives blame Protestant paramilitary members for the attack.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Chad is housing Sudanese refugees and Sudan has become hostile to humanitarian workers in the area
Specific motive is unknown; however, Colombian mayors had been targeted in escalating violence
Specific motive is unknown; however, Colombian mayors have been increasingly targeted.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Diego Turbay was deeply involved in peace negotiations that aimed to end the civil war in Colombia
Specific motive is unknown; however, ESCO is contracted out by the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)
Specific motive is unknown; however, Fabio Domic Domic was the 19th indigenous leader to be killed in Antioquia department in 2011.
Specific motive is unknown; however, FARC had escalated attacks when negotiations with the government broke off.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Fatah claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they would continue with their jihad war.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Frank Hill agents were involved in livestock auctions which the Animal Liberation Front states is animal abuse.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Geidam is the home of the Yobe state Governor, Ibrahim Gaidam
Specific motive is unknown; however, Hayer was critical of Sikh fundamentalists.  Hayer's family members believe that the assassination was designed to intimidate voters for upcoming Sikh temple elections.  The elections pitted fundamentalists against moderates.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Hema have been fleeing the area for several weeks now.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Hill Tiger Forces had been engaged in several violent attacks recently.
Specific motive is unknown; however, India extended a ceasefire the month previous and most militant groups have rejected it and increased attacks against security forces.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Indian officials state that the militants were trained by Pakistan and are motivated to prevent the Indian public from voting in the state elections.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Islamic Shashantantra Andolon (ISA) has been targeting cinema operators for showing pornography
Specific motive is unknown; however, Islamic Shashantantra Andolon (ISA) has been targeting the circus for holding "indecent shows"
Specific motive is unknown; however, Islamist militants typically target girls' schools in opposition to co-education.
Specific motive is unknown; however, it is suspected that the mayor will be forced to participate in an trial for allowing municipal elections to occur when FARC prohibited them.
Specific motive is unknown; however, it is worth noting that the school was the only girls' school in the area
Specific motive is unknown; however, Kabul has been subjected to a series of explosions in recent months.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Kazakhstan has experienced a spike in religious extremism in the past several months.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Kenya had recently sent forces into Somalia to try and stabilize the country
Specific motive is unknown; however, Kenyan security forces have begun a campaign to hunt down Al-Shabaab militants.
Specific motive is unknown; however, kidnappings in the area are commonplace, particularly targeting business people.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Kurram agency has been the site of sectarian violence for several years.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Lejanias sits just outside of the guerrilla-occupied demilitarized zone.
Specific motive is unknown; however, local business people report that they believe that traders are being targeted based on suspicions that they are working with the government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, local citizens state that the attack was a show of force to demonstrate to the local population that the state is incapable of protecting civilians who fail to pay Al-Qa ida.
Specific motive is unknown; however, local members of the Ashal tribe believe that the Al-Qa ida are targeting them because they successfully ejected Al-Qa ida from their village.
Specific motive is unknown; however, local representatives speculate that the attack may have been perpetrated by nationalists as attitudes towards Dagestani residents deteriorate.
Specific motive is unknown; however, local residents have reported that the situation in areas of Bara sub-district have been very tense and have led to an escalation in casualties.
Specific motive is unknown; however, local residents reported that the victim was opposed to militant activities
Specific motive is unknown; however, local sources believe that Al-Shabaab has been targeting people they believe are working for the government or people who are trying to leave the area.  If civilians vacate the region, Al-Shabaab is more vulnerable to attack.
Specific motive is unknown; however, local sources imply that the incident may have been due to internal rivalry in the Awami League
Specific motive is unknown; however, LRA leader Joseph Kony had recently ordered his men to resume killing civilians.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Malak Amanullah played an integral role in raising the militia against foreign militants
Specific motive is unknown; however, Malik Gul Akbar was known for taking strong actions against terror-related activities and groups.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Malik Taj is an influential tribal elder and businessman.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Maoists have been attacking military and civilian targets as part of their fight to overthrow the constitutional monarchy.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Maoists have been fighting for a communist government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, members of the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) released a statement implying that the farm was still active.
Specific motive is unknown; however, members of the Movement of Democratic Forces of Casamance are believed to have taken a more predatory stance towards communities in the area as part of their campaign for independence.
Specific motive is unknown; however, militants and the military had spent several months fighting for control of Zinjibar.
Specific motive is unknown; however, military officials believe the bombers were proving their presence at a time that the military were removing protective blast walls in the area.  They also believe the assailants were trying to hinder the removal efforts.
Specific motive is unknown; however, military officials state that the NPA are not strategic about their targets but are simply trying to "make a score".
Specific motive is unknown; however, military officials state that they believe the attack was orchestrated in order to make it look like Al-Shabaab was still a force to fear.
Specific motive is unknown; however, multiple bombings had occurred at the same site during the previous month.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Muslim extremists have targeted entertainment hot spots for being un-Islamic.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Muslims and Christians have been engaged in violence since 1999.
Specific motive is unknown; however, National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) is predominantly Christian and is generally opposed to the Hindu faith.
Specific motive is unknown; however, observers believe that the attack was targeting Western foreigners
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believe that a string of bombings against civilians is part of the a larger campaign to overthrow the government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believe that the attack was a sectarian one.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believe that the attack was in response to the company's failure to pay a "revolutionary tax"
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believe that the attack was intended to disrupt upcoming elections
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believe that the attack was perpetrated in order to destabilize the country.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believe that the attack was perpetrated in order to punish the local people for not supporting the rebels.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believe that the Maoists are trying to create a panic through escalating violence.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believe the attack was a response to a military offensive in the region.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believed that the kidnapping was in response to U.S. raids in Tripoli and Benghazi.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believed that violent groups are waging a campaign against intelligence officials.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believed the incident was designed to instill fear in the public.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials believed the Rangers were targeted because of their anti-terror work.  In addition, the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) stated that they would kill anyone who opposed them.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials interpret the attack as a warning that the journalist's life is in danger.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials note that the attack may have been related to conflict in the rubber trade or may have been related to a string of militant attacks on the same road.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials report that militants have targeted 72 schools in the region.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials speculate that it was meant to intimidate Shkriblyak's colleagues.
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials state that it might be part of a rebel-drive fear campaign
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials state that the attack was designed to threaten the stability of the country
Specific motive is unknown; however, officials state that they believe the incident is part of a campaign to shut international aid agencies down.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Omar was pro-government and supportive of the peace committee
Specific motive is unknown; however, one of the journalists had received threats in the past.  Sources indicate that the ETA may perceive journalists as manipulative agents of the government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, one of the victims was a prominent indigenous activist who had recently made a plea to the United Nations to intervene in the guerrilla war in order to protect indigenous folks who were caught in the crossfire
Specific motive is unknown; however, other fur industries have been targeted by ALF in protest or the fur trade and mistreatment of animals.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Pakistani authorities believe that Indian agents perpetrated the event in order to disrupt peace initiatives
Specific motive is unknown; however, Pakistani authorities blame the Indian government for the attack.  They state the attack was designed to "weaken the freedom struggle".
Specific motive is unknown; however, People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak (PREPAK) state that the device was prematurely detonated and was intended for a different target.  Sources suggest the Assam Rifles were the intended target.
Specific motive is unknown; however, police believe that the attack was symbolic, given that the assailants told all of the residents of the house to leave before they set their bomb
Specific motive is unknown; however, police believe that the kidnappers intended to use the captives to exert pressure on authorities to release a prisoner current being held in prison.
Specific motive is unknown; however, police believe the incident was designed to cause panic among local citizens.
Specific motive is unknown; however, police blame the attack on India.  India and Pakistan have gone to war several times over the disputed Kashmir area
Specific motive is unknown; however, police found Maoist posters in the general area where the assailants were believed to have been stationed.  The posters asked locals to boycott a Trinamool Congress rally.
Specific motive is unknown; however, police officials believe the attack was designed to "destabilize the situation" in the country.
Specific motive is unknown; however, police state that Maoists have been watching the victim for months.  His death was just the most recent addition to a growing list of CPM member fatalities.
Specific motive is unknown; however, police state that the attacks were robberies, while political officials state that the attacks were politically motivated.
Specific motive is unknown; however, police suspect a "price-tag" attack, meaning an act of vandalism perpetrated by radical Israelis in response to the Israeli government evacuating certain West Bank illegal outposts.
Specific motive is unknown; however, police suspect that the incident was in response to the company's failure to pay "protection money" to the Maoists.
Specific motive is unknown; however, polls open on May 26 and one of the candidates has promised to crack down on rebel activity.
Specific motive is unknown; however, President Castro believed that a group of exiles were going to attack him while he was visiting Panama.
Specific motive is unknown; however, prison inmates had been protesting practices at the prison for more than a year.
Specific motive is unknown; however, protests have turned violent as residents persevere in their demands to see government change
Specific motive is unknown; however, rebel attacks are common since federal troops occupied Grozny
Specific motive is unknown; however, rebels have targeted an Exxon Mobil oil refinery in the area in the past.  In addition, President Abdurrahman Wahid was scheduled to visit the province the day following the attack.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Rehman is believed to have belonged to a banned organization.
Specific motive is unknown; however, separatist Muslim militants have threatened to escalate violence in order to derail the election process.
Specific motive is unknown; however, separatist violence is common in this area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, separatists have made several attempts on Sagar's life, given that he is a senior leader in the ruling National Conference party.
Specific motive is unknown; however, several days before the kidnapping, Salazar had led a march requesting that the rebels leave Rosas town alone.
Specific motive is unknown; however, several explosive devices were found in the same area within a day or two of each other
Specific motive is unknown; however, several improvised explosive devices were found in the same area within a day or two of each other
Specific motive is unknown; however, several suspected members of Cambodian Freedom Fighters (CFF) who were charged with terrorism were receiving their verdict several days after the explosion.  Authorities speculate that the incident was designed to cause panic.
Specific motive is unknown; however, several tourists had been kidnapped in the region recently.  This has impacted tourism in Mali.
Specific motive is unknown; however, several unions have called strikes in Colombia to protest paramilitary kidnappings and violence.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Shobashobane is a stronghold of African National Congress (ANC)
Specific motive is unknown; however, similar incidents had been occurring regularly in that area.  One person said "we are like sitting ducks; it's Russian roulette out on the roads".
Specific motive is unknown; however, small bombings are a common tactic for Corsican nationalists pressing for independence.
Specific motive is unknown; however, SNC-Lavalin is one of the largest engineering and construction firms in the country
Specific motive is unknown; however, soldiers had been in the area searching for armed groups for close to two weeks.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources believe that the assailants were targeting a government official and took civilians instead.  Officials believe it was a "planned settling of scores".
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources believe that the attack indicates that FARC members will continue full stream in their activities, even though their leader died recently.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources believe that the attack is in response to a recent military victory against the rebels in the same province.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources believe that the attack was an attempt to retaliate against Kenyan security measures in Somalia
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources believe that the attack was part of an escalation perpetrated by FARC.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources do note that the explosion occurred shortly after the appointment of a new party secretary for Tibet.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources imply that the arrests occurred because Al-Shabaab leaders were not invited to Koran graduation ceremonies.  They also imply that the detainees were linked to Ahlu Sunnah wal Jama'a, a moderate Islamic group.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources imply that the attack is a message for other traders in the region.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources imply that the attack was in retalitation for the death of three of the members of the Mouhajiroune brigade in July.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources imply that the incident was designed to demonstrate that Al-Qa ida in the Lands of the Islamic Maghreb (AQLIM) had returned to the region
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources imply that the kidnapping was conducted for the purpose of receiving ransom money.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that attack may have been in retaliation for the killing of a Muslim civilian several days earlier.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the attack may be a recruitment measure
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the attack may have been sectarian.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the attack was designed to demonstrate that the group was still capable of inflicting harm.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the attack was designed to ease pressure on militants in the area, given that security forces have been increasing attempts to suppress militant activities.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the attack was likely designed to stop the victims' from testifying in court
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the attack was likely in protest of the shooting of Mallujola Koteshwar Rao, a Maoist military leader.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the attack was likely in retaliation for the recent shelling of the Gaza Strip
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the attack was likely motivated by environmental extremism.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the attack was part of an attempt by FARC to reclaim that area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the attack was targeting the construction company.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the attacks were strategically focused on scattered areas while the United States was focused on Kandahar.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the incident may have been follow-up on threats that groups directed towards the Chinese in the past.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that the operator of the tower failed to pay funds to the Maoists.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate that, given the choice of target, the assailants were seeking media attention.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources indicate the security forces were conducting a search operation of the area and had been for several days.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that Al-Shabaab has launched several attacks recently in an attempt to fight back against Kenyan security forces
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that anarchists often target "symbols of wealth and state power".
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that attacks are generally designed to cut off supplies to NATO forces in Afghanistan, including fuel for drones.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that attacks such as these generally undermine civilian confidence in security.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that Bagram Air Base is "one of the most important symbols of American power" in Afghanistan.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that FARC members have often employed kidnappings in order to get ransom money to fund their uprising.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that Hutu rebels kidnap children and force them to become fighters.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that incidents such as this one cause civilians to lose faith in the effectiveness of security forces.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that Islamic groups in the area have become allied with Al-Qa ida in an attempt to overthrow the government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that journalists are often targeted in Aceh province.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that militants have increased violence recently following a lull due to increased tension between India and Pakistan.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that Muslim fundamentalists often target secular government and security forces in the country.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that politicians are often kidnapped in order to intimidate or collect ransom
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that rebel groups in Burundi are opposed to the return of refugees
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that tax offices are visible representatives of the 'state' and are a strategic choice when targeting the 'cause' of financial hardships.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the area has been the site of violent conflict between Muslim and Christian communities
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the attack indicates that the rebels are expanding their terroritory.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the attack is a reminder of Iraq vulnerability as U.S. troops leave.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the attack occurred in an area that is contested between military, paramilitary, and guerrillas.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the attack was likely linked to the Palestinian uprising that had begun several months prior.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the bombing occurred three weeks before the inauguration of President-elect Jean Bertrand Aristide and days before the opposition government forms an alternative government.  The election process in Haiti has been riddled with conflict and violence.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the bridge was an ideal target to "bring about a real bloodbath".
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the Civil Guard is often viewed as symbolic of the occupation of Spanish forces.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the Daily News has been openly critical of the government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the hijacker may have been drunk and/or was seeking immigration status in Australia
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the rebel group National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA) is active in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that the Taliban often attacks civilians suspected of supporting military troops.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that there has been a number of bomb attacks in support of Al-Qa ida.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that there is a pattern of escalating violence before and during Ramadan.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that these kinds of attacks are often designed to destabilize the government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that this attack would signal a shift in the violence as it moves into the Syrian capital.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that Torres had been canvassing for the return of Jurado residents following an occupation by FARC in 1999.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources note that violence has been escalating since the death of five Sunni scholars, of which Tehrik-e-Jafria Pakistan denies any involvement.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources report that the gunman was Palestinian and sources imply that the victim was in an Israeli car.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that it is part of a separatist campaign for Kashmir independence
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that it may have been related to a robbery.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that targeting rail lines might be a new strategy or a diversion.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the assailants were a breakaway faction of the Tuareg rebels that are fighting more greater autonomy.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the assailants were targeting people they believed were collaborating with leftists.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the attack may have been in retaliation for crackdowns on hunger strikes in jails.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the attack may have been in retaliation for the shooting down of a Liberian helicopter a month previous
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the attack may have been related to the capture of a local AQAP leader and the death of six members earlier the same day.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the attack was directed towards Army divisional headquarters, possibly in response to an attack the previous night.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the attack was intended to provoke a reaction from farmers, thus giving the government more reason to crack down on them.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the attack was perpetrated by anarchists fuelled by increasing protests over reform issues
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the attack was related to plantation workers' support of a conservative presidential candidate
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the attack would escalate ongoing tensions, possibly leading to war.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the attackers were looking for sympathizers of leftist guerrillas.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the bomb was planted by insurgents and was intended for security forces.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the family may have been cooperating with federal forces
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the incident was a revenge attack by former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic's loyalists
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the incident was designed to capture media attention.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the intention was to foster sectarian hatred in advance of a visit by President Clinton
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the perpetrators were army defectors
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources speculate that the shepherds were killed because they were too close to the assailants' hideout
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources state that Akhmad Kadyrov has had a price placed on his head.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources state that roadblocks are a rebel strategy for toppling the government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources state that Sunni extremists often target Shiites for not being true Muslims.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources state that the attack occurred after the tribes people had refused to join the SPLA
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources state that the attack was motivated by financial incentive or by religious differences concerning alcohol.
Specific motive is unknown; however, sources state that the militiamen often attack civilians in areas controlled by rebels opposed to the Kinshasa government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, survivors report that they were targeted because they were of the same ethnic background as the attackers.
Specific motive is unknown; however, teachers in Algeria are civil servants and militants have justified targeting government employees in the past because they believe the government is "untruthful to Islam".
Specific motive is unknown; however, the abductees belonged to the same family as a former commander of Lashkar-e-Islam
Specific motive is unknown; however, the abductors did ask for a ransom at one point but did not pursue it.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Albanian guerrillas are seeking autonomy for the buffer zone where the incident took place and Covic is responsible for the peace plan for that zone.  The guerrillas deny the incident took place, though.  They state that the incident was fabricated with the purpose of undermining the guerrillas.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the area had been subjected to attacks recently
Specific motive is unknown; however, the area has been riddled with sectarian violence between Muslims and Christians.  The village that was attacked was atypical for the area, given that Christians and Muslims were living together.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the area has been subject to violence between Muslims and Christians for two years.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the area has been targeted frequently by militants.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the area is predominantly occupied by Shiite residents and sectarian violence often targets Shiites.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the army had recently stepped up efforts to flush out rebels hiding in strongholds in the mountains.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailant shouted "Allahu Akbar" (God is Greatest) as he fled.  Authorities speculate that the attack may have been in response to the U.S.-led attacks that began a few days earlier in Afghanistan
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants appeared to be agitated concerning an article that could be construed as pro-military.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants are believed to be Muslim and the villagers were predominantly Christian; this was likely a sectarian attack.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants claimed responsibility for several attacks at the same time, many targeting U.S. troops.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants did dismantle the Administration Police communications system
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants did state that the victim "talked too much" before they slashed his tongue.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants released a statement claiming responsibility for targeting American-related locations and "traitor" sites.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants released a video stating that the time of forgiveness had passed and there were only killings left
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants shouted "we have come to liberate you" before they began shooting.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants state that the attack was intended to send a "warning to the forces of repression."  The group that claimed responsibility has been fighting for greater autonomy from the French government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants stated that they were targeting people who were joining the "treacherous police and army"
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants stated that they were targeting the "wretched American forces".
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants stole weapons.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants vowed to destroy all Iraqi oil pipelines.  In addition, military representatives note that the location of the blast is a critical point.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants were chanting "God is great" in Arabic at the time of the attack.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assailants were chanting "where is our money, where are they, we will kill them today".
Specific motive is unknown; however, the assault occurred on the first day of a two-day bandh that was calling for the withdrawal of security forces from the region.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack destroyed talks of a cease-fire.  Israeli broke all ties with Arafat following the attack.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack did occur the day before President Joseph Estrada was scheduled to speak in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack illustrates the vulnerability of Iraq as US troops withdraw
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack is typical of Al Shabaab as it tries to overthrow the government
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack may have been sectarian in nature or may have been targeting the cleric who runs the school.  The cleric is a parliamentary candidate.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred a day after the government troops reclaimed a portion of land in the Jaffna peninsula from the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred a week after the Algerian military killed 100 Muslim guerrillas.  In addition, forces are engaged in an active search for rebels leading up to elections in June.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred during a strike called by the Maoist Communist Center (MCC) in protest of the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO)
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred during a time of increased fighting between the ELN and government forces
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred during a time of increased violence between tribals and Bengalis
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred during escalated violence the day after the Maoists celebrated the fifth anniversary of their insurgency
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred during escalating violence in the area. In addition, Hamas had just released a statement that it was ready to start a suicide bombing campaign against Israel.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred during increased violence between Israelis and Palestinians.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred during increased violence directed at political candidates during the lead-up to the assembly poll.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred during increased violence for Ramadan.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred during the lead-up to elections.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred during voting for municipal councils.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred hours before the beginning of a trial of a group of suspected bombers.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred in an area that is held by Armed Islamic Group (GIA) who want to see an Islamic government in power
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred in the same area as the Armed Islamic Group (GIA) stronghold, who want an Islamic government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred just hours before Egypt's first free election.  In addition, the pipeline has been targeted nine times since the beginning of the year; the last attack was just a few days prior.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred just over a week away from elections.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred on the day of the presidential election and targeted police officers who were responsible for monitoring polling stations.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred on the first day of Eidul Adha, a celebration of sacrifice.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred on the ten-year anniversary of the U.S.-led bombing campaign in Afghanistan.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred one day after security forces launched Operation Prahar and a day before Union home minister P. Chidambaram was scheduled to visit the area
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred several hours before polls opened for the second election since apartheid had ended.  Some citizens are not happy with new provincial boundaries as well.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred shortly after Kenya launched an offensive against Al-Shabaab.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred shortly after the death of a key Maoist leader.  Police believe the attack may have been perpetrated with the intention of pushing people to observe Telangana bandh in protest of the death.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred the day after FARC's leader was killed.  Such attacks demonstrate that FARC maintains military capabilities.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred the day before a general strike, called for by Maoists, went into effect.  The Maoists are demanding that the constitution be redrafted.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack occurred two days after the Thai Prime Minister had handed over evidence in response to a corruption indictment directed at him.  He has received several death threats in the past.  Sources speculate that the attack may have been perpetrated by drug-smuggling rings.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack was a typical attack targeting civilians in a key area for transportation that is commonly used by guerrillas.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack was part of an ongoing insurgency.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack was perpetrated by Muslims and it targeted Christians.  Authorities are identifying the incident as sectarian.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attack was the latest in a string of bombings following controversial elections.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the attacks followed the announcement that the militant group was banning 16 aid agencies, including UNICEF.  The ban was in response to the "illegal acts" perpetrated by the agencies, such as exaggerating the caliber of the problems within Somalia for financial and political gain.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the AUC typically kills civilians that they believe are collaborating with the rebels.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Awami League claims that the opposition orchestrated the killing in order to cause political unrest.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the blast occurred the night before the exhumation of a suspected mass grave in the former territory of Albanian guerrillas.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the blast occurred while officials were meeting in New Delhi to discuss territorial disputes regarding the majority Muslim Himalayan region
Specific motive is unknown; however, the bomber was heading a Shiite-dominated area of the city.  Sectarian violence between Shiite and Sunni has prominent in that area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the bombing occurred while the rebels were attacking the city of N'Djamena in an attempt to overthrow President Deby
Specific motive is unknown; however, the boy had been directed to ride towards the military checkpoint.  Rebels have been fighting for control of oil resources in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the bridge was part of a roadbuilding project (East-West highway) that was contracted out to CITIC-CRCC.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the car was in the vicinity of a bus terminal for employees of the Freeport McMoRanCopper & Gold Inc's mine.  Employees are currently on strike and violence has been escalating.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Civic United Front had rejected the previous election results, stating that they were rigged.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the convoy was attacked immediately after escorting a group of construction workers to a building site.  The workers were from CITIC-CRCC, which is contracted to build a section of roadway in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the convoy was on its way to join an anti-terrorist operation
Specific motive is unknown; however, the defense minister stated that it was an assault on freedom of the press.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the equipment being transported by the tractor were going to CRPF personnel.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the ETA had assassinated quite a few senior Spanish service officers
Specific motive is unknown; however, the ETA had been increasing attacks against such groups as the military and police since it called off its ceasefire in the struggle to create a Basque state.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the explosion occurred in an area populated by a majority of ethnic Albanians.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the FSA has increased attacks in their campaign to overthrow the government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the gendarmes were providing security for a Chinese company that was building a road in the region.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the General was openly critical of the government and had declared he was going to form his own political party.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the government had recently decided to re-establish schools in the areas and militants had attacked several of them
Specific motive is unknown; however, the government states that the attack was perpetrated by organized crime representatives as a move to intimidate the new government
Specific motive is unknown; however, the governor was returning in victory from a legal challenge to his earlier election.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the grenade was meant for a military picket, not for civilians
Specific motive is unknown; however, the group often claims responsibility for attacks on U.S.-led activity.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the home belonged to someone involved in the trading business and the United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA) has been opposed to non-Assamese business presence in Assam.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the hospital has been visited by officials as a means to illustrate the humanitarian crisis occurring in the region.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident added to a growing sense of insecurity and fear in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident coincided with the arrival of President Bouteflika to the region.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident did occur on the 22nd anniversary of the Spanish Constitution, which separatist groups want to revise.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident happened on the day that Sunnis recognize as the first day of Eid
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred a few days after there was a crackdown on militant suspects in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred a few days before national elections and sources speculate that it was an intimidation tactic levied at the public to influence voting practices.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred a few days before the beginning of a strike called for by Maoist rebels.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred at a time of increased violence targeting politicians.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred at the same time that the new Northern Secretary was taking on his appointment.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during a rash of bombings in the country.  Authorities believe that the explosion was not intended to hurt anyone but was intended to make "political noise"
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during a resurgence of violent attacks.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during a time of escalated military intervention.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during a time of increasing anti-Western sentiment.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during Eid festival, just days after the Taliban leader asked his fighters to protect against civilian casualties.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during escalated violence following the inauguration of the new government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during escalated violence in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during escalating violence and protests around the issue of removing President Bashar al-Assad from office
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during increased attacks by Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during increased tension over the groundbreaking of a Jewish settlement in East Jerusalem
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during increased violence between Israelis and Palestinians
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during increased violence between Israelis and Palestinians.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during increased violence during Ramadan.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during increased violence leading up to the 2003 elections.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred during the holiday week of National Day, during which time China was on high alert.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred just hours after Al-Shabaab members launched major attacks in the city.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred just hours after Parliament agreed to move forward with outlawing the political party linked to ETA.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred less than two days after FARC's leader was killed.  FARC members stated they would continue their attacks despite the loss of their leader.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred on the day of the presidential election and the convoy had recently returned from transporting ballot boxes.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred on the eve of Eid El Fitr.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred on the eve of the presidential elections
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred on the second day of a five say strike called for by the Maoists.  The strike was in response to a state of emergency that the government had called for several months previously.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred that day after Palestinian militants vowed to retaliate for an attack in the Gaza Strip that killed and injured Palestinians.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred the day after Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) declared a ceasefire.  Government and military have denied that there are peace talks taking place with TTP.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred the day before the President was due to arrive in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred two weeks before state elections and the victim was a member of the ruling party.  Militants believe that the election is rigged in favor of the National Conference party.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred two weeks before state elections.   Militants believe that the election is rigged in favor of the National Conference party.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident occurred while security forces were on a search operation in the area to locate members of the Al-Qa ida in the Lands of the Islamic Maghreb (AQLIM)
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident prompted the police commander to acknowledge that security officers were no longer safe in that area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the incident was the third of its kind in as many weeks and the attack occurred during Ramadan, a traditionally violent period.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the injured soldiers were involved in a combing operation for an emir and his associates that were believed to be hiding in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the intended victim was invested in ongoing peace efforts in Baghlan province.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the judge was involved in a case involving the son of a suspected paramilitary leader
Specific motive is unknown; however, the KCP had called a 72-hour strike that was due to end the day following the explosion.  The strike was in protest of economic roadblocks of national highways.  The attack occurred at a public event, likely with the intention of publicizing the strike.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) often abducts children to use as soldiers and sexual slaves
Specific motive is unknown; however, the loya jirga was scheduled to discuss peace negotiations with insurgents and partnership with the United States.  Taliban members had threatened to disrupt these discussions.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the mayor had been implementing strict policies regarding Muslim separatists
Specific motive is unknown; however, the mayor had reported receiving threats from paramilitary groups operating in the area; it used to be a neutral zone between rebels and the government but was recently reclaimed by the government and military
Specific motive is unknown; however, the military believes that the target of the attack was troops from the Reveiz Pizarro Battalion who were in the area protecting repair work conducted on a pipeline that guerrillas had blown up several days prior.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the military is interpreting the attack as motivated by the desire to prevent the military from conducting medical missions in depressed areas
Specific motive is unknown; however, the mine workers are on strike and are demanding better pay and working conditions.  The strike began on September 15th and they are now threatening to extend it to December 15th.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Minister is involved in a bitter dispute with a pro-Maoist student union.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the minister was the chief negotiator for three rounds of peace talks with the Maoists.  The peace talks failed.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Movement of Democratic Forces of Casamance is opposed to peace talks and the incident occurred just before a new round of talks began.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the newspaper has generally supported President Pervez Musharraf, a staunch supporter of the United States war against the Taliban.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the officials believe that extremists will increase activities leading up to the presidential elections.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the oil sector has been hit hard since the EU banned Syrian oil products and oil consumption has dropped.  Several attacks have been carried out against gas and oil pipelines since then.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the owner of the newspaper believes that it was state-perpetrated and politically motivated.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the packing plant employs members of both B’laan and T’boli tribes.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the passengers were on a fact-finding mission as part of a strategy to defuse hostilities in the area
Specific motive is unknown; however, the pipeline had been bombed eight times in a year
Specific motive is unknown; however, the PKK had recently increased their attacks against civilians, police, and troops.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the PKK has increased attacks against soldiers and police.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the President stated several days earlier that the LRA would be crushed.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the radio station is generally believed to be anti-government and has recently experienced increased scrutiny by the police and the government.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the raid coincided with the arrival of an observer team that was assessing the need for the deployment of regional force.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the raid coincided with the arrival of an observer team that was assessing the need for the deployment of regional force.  In addition, sources speculate that the kidnappings were for the purpose of forced enrollment in the rebel army and for sexual slaves.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the rebel military unit was loyal to George Speight and may have participated in the coup led by Speight.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the rebels are being pushed off of national territory by government forces.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the rebels had tried to recruit villagers previously and had failed.  They had accused the villagers of collaborating with the army.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the rebels looted a large amount of items, money, and food
Specific motive is unknown; however, the rebels moved into the area and began killing civilians after the government stated they were going to reclaim the demilitarized area.  Local people report that some of the killings were related to land disputes.  They also stated that the rebels no longer felt responsible for the well being of the villagers.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the region has experienced an increase in attacks targeting intelligence and security personnel.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the released hostage reported that the militia members mistook the victims for members of a rebel organization
Specific motive is unknown; however, the restaurant was a popular place for police officers and soldiers.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the RRA is opposed to Issak's role in Somalia government.  Issak is a member of the RRA, which is divided.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Sahwa are militiamen that joined with U.S. forces to fight Al-Qa ida.  In addition, the attack serves as a reminder of Iraqi vulnerability as U.S. troops withdraw.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Sahwa played an important role in gaining the advantage over Al-Qa ida
Specific motive is unknown; however, the security team had been deployed several days previous with the intention of finding the location of a Maoist meeting occurring in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the senator had been trying to negotiate the release of Medina's husband, who was also a politician.  Sources also indicate that FARC may have been threatening the Senator, due to her husband's involvement in corruption.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the ship was used to transport government troops.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the site of the attack had been a PLO headquarters until the Israeli invasion.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the soldiers in the area searching for members of Al-Qa ida in the Lands of the Islamic Maghreb (AQLIM)
Specific motive is unknown; however, the soldiers were in the process of tracking bandits when the device exploded.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the soldiers were searching for the assailants of a previous attack when the bombs detonated.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the station had received threats in the past concerning one of their programs that criticizes the Islamic practices of the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).
Specific motive is unknown; however, the station is known as being critical of President Chavez.  In addition, the attack took place after two days of violent demonstrations in the area protesting the military takeover of the local police department.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the suspected militant group has been fighting for more autonomy for the Karbi tribe.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Taliban blame the attack on their northern-based opposition.  They claim that the opposition is responding to defeat by attacking civilians.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Taliban blames the opposition for the attack and claims that the motive was to undermine security.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Taliban claims that the attacks were intended to undermine security.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Taliban claims to have stolen weapons.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Taliban frequently target contractors who work for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Taliban has described music as "un-Islamic"
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Taliban have often attacked the military in that area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Tamils are fighting for an independent homeland.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the tankers were delivering good to NATO troops in Afghanistan.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the target had just finished an exclusive interview with the leader of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC).  In addition, Benoit had been targeted in the past for presenting Colombia in a negative light.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the target marketplace is the largest in North Caucasus and authorities state that the device was crafted for maximum destruction.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the target of the attack is a well-known anti-Taliban leader who led a resistance to the Taliban
Specific motive is unknown; however, the targeted members of parliament are opposed by faction leaders
Specific motive is unknown; however, the targeted military patrol was in the area to "protect the civilian population from…FARC".
Specific motive is unknown; however, the Tuareg rebels stole several vehicles.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim had been shot at in two different occasions, leading the police to believe that he was being targeted by separatists.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim had once been a Protestant paramilitary member.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim had recently filed nominations for panchayat elections.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim was a commander for a pro Iraqi-government militia
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim was an outspoken journalist in opposition to corruption and his coworkers believe that he was killed in order to silence him.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim was bi-racial and the suspects were neo-Nazis.  Authorities believe that the attack was racially motivated.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim was driving an Israeli car and the gunmen were Palestinian.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim was recently elected to parliament and represented the Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF), a group that had refused to take up violent means during Sri Lanka's ethnic conflicts.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim was rumored to be a police informant
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim was the brother of the leader of the National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) and the attack occurred a few hours after government officials stated they expected talks to resume with the guerrilla group.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim was well-known for his position in opposition to corruption.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victim's family claimed that the attack was perpetrated by another sub-clan.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victims had been transporting khat for the transitional government forces.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victims were Jewish and the assailants were suspected Palestinians.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the victims were tribespeople that had broken away from Lashkar-e-Islam and formed a peace alliance with the government
Specific motive is unknown; however, the village is located in an area that was subjected to post-election sectarian violence between Christians and Muslims.  There continues to be sporadic upsurges of violence directed towards Christian communities.
Specific motive is unknown; however, the youths confessed to being involved in a number of attacks.
Specific motive is unknown; however, there had been ongoing clashes between Muslims and Tamils in this area, and a senior police official accused LTTE of trying to instigate further clashes.  LTTE was fighting for an independent Tamil state.
Specific motive is unknown; however, there has been an escalation in attacks against Canadian Jewish facilties as tensions increase in the Middle East.
Specific motive is unknown; however, there has been an escalation in targeted attacks against security and intelligence officials.
Specific motive is unknown; however, there has been an escalation of attacks in the area targeting Afghanistan-bound NATO vehicles and tankers.
Specific motive is unknown; however, there has been increasing violence between Christians and Muslims in the Maluku province.  Sources state that the Christian procession prompted a hostile response from the Muslim group.
Specific motive is unknown; however, there has been increasing violence in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, there have been numerous clashes between Ajuran and Garre communities in the last two months.
Specific motive is unknown; however, there were several affluent business people and politicians that were related to Basque political parties living in the neighborhood.
Specific motive is unknown; however, there were several similar bombs located in similar places in the city that day.
Specific motive is unknown; however, there were tensions between LTTE and the Muslims at this time as well as LTTE  and Sinhalese buddhists as the LTTE was fighting for an independent Tamil state.
Specific motive is unknown; however, there were tensions between LTTE and the Sinhalese as the LTTE was fighting for an independent Tamil state.
Specific motive is unknown; however, this area has been subject to increasing violence.
Specific motive is unknown; however, this attack occurred during an escalation in violence in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, this attack occurred during increased violence.
Specific motive is unknown; however, this is one of several recent attacks carried out by suspected Jewish assailants.
Specific motive is unknown; however, this is the second primary to be targeted with explosives in as many days.
Specific motive is unknown; however, this is the seventh time in nine months that the pipeline has been set on fire.
Specific motive is unknown; however, this school was one of three schools bombed in the same day in the same province.
Specific motive is unknown; however, this was the second attack of it's kind in as many weeks.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Toronto Ventures has been identified as perpetrating human rights abuses and environmentally unsound practices.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Turbay was leading the commission that sought to facilitate dialogue between the Colombian government and the rebels.
Specific motive is unknown; however, two of the stores sold musical compact discs.
Specific motive is unknown; however, UNITA has been engaging in hit-and-run attacks since they lost some key strongholds to the government two years prior.
Specific motive is unknown; however, UNITA has been staging attacks in the region for several months.  That region is seen as the heartland of support for the MPLA party.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Villamizar received numerous death threats from right-wing paramilitary groups, likely stemming from his denouncement of their tactics.
Specific motive is unknown; however, violence between Palestinians and Israelis has been escalating since 2000.
Specific motive is unknown; however, violence had escalated during the month of Ramadan
Specific motive is unknown; however, violence has been escalating between government supporters and opposition in the area.
Specific motive is unknown; however, violence has been escalating leading up the second round of state elections.
Specific motive is unknown; however, violence in Medellin had escalated in the previous 24 hours.
Specific motive is unknown; however, violence of this kind has been common in Algeria for several years.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Waimulang village is predominantly Christian and Maluku province has been the site of violent conflict between Christians and Muslims for two years.
Specific motive is unknown; however, Waite's was released in exchange for the release of Lebanese prisoners being held in Israel
Specific motive is unknown; however, witnesses state that the attack was prompted by the presence of the United Self Defense Units of Colombia (AUC), a rivalry group.
Specific motive is unknown; however; the area was often traveled by police
Specific motive is unknown; it is possible the assailants were attempting to steal the money or were trying to attack the police
Specific motive is unknown; it is possible the incident was targeting Christians.  However, an employee of the hospital had been fired recently and had been threatening the hospital; the attack may have been linked to the employee.
Specific motive is unknown; the assailants have asked for a ransom, so the incident could be profit-motivated, but government officials believe that the incident was perpetrated with the intention of destabilizing the country.
Specific motive is unknown; the assailants sent an audiotape with their demands but the demands were not made public.
Specific motive is unknown; the assailants stated they would issue their demands in the days following the kidnapping but those demands were not publicized.
Specific motive is unknown; the attack may have been purely criminal in nature (the belongings of the victims were missing) or it may have been politically oriented.
Specific motive is unknown; the authorities blame Free Aceh Movement (GAM), who have threatened council members who refuse to join them.  GAM blames the authorities and claim that it was an attempt to stop GAM in their struggle for independence.
Specific motive is unknown: however, the Guinean border has been the location of increasing violence and attacks on towns.
Specific motive is unknown: however, the incident occurred during escalated violence between Sunni and Shiite communities.  In addition, Jafri had been playing videos of Shiite speeches before he was shot.
Specific motive is unknown.
Specific motive is unknown.  If the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam are responsible, sources state the attack was a move of desperation due to the fact the LTTE had become cornered by the army in the jungle.  If it was the Sri Lankan Army who fired the shells, they may have been targeting the LTTE but miscalculated.
Specific motive unknown; however the LTTE was fighting for an independent Tamil state, and they targeted several buses during this time period
Specific motive unknown; however, it is suspected that LTTE was stepping up attacks to incite panic in civilians, as the LTTE was fighting for an independent Tamil state. The government believed that not only was the LTTE attempting to eliminate political leaders, but also the group wanted bring the functions of the government to a halt. The government was on the verge of introducing a devolution package into law.
Specific motive, is unknown; however, the incident occurred during a series of bombings in the area.
Specific motives for the abductions are unknown; however, the LRA has abducted numerous children in order to turn them into fighters or sex slaves.
Spokesman for Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, Mohmand Agency, Ikramullah Mohmand, said that his men had planted the explosives to target the members of the Khwezai Peace Committee. The specific motive is unknown.
Spread disruption of the April 2 election in southern provinces Thailand
Spying for US soldiers in the case of the killing of al-Qaeda commander Abu Lais Al-Libi and other foreign militants in the South Waziristan on January 29th is the alleged motive for the attack.
Sri Lankan air force jets attacked rebels, causing heavy damage to the LTTE," and frustrating LTTE attempts to dislodge government troops from defending Jaffna
Sri Lankan Defense Affairs Spokesman said this was part of the LTTE's strategy to divert the attention of the international community from their unilateral withdrawal from Oslo talks. LTTE reportedly wanted the family to return to India and they refused, and were associated with the police and Army which may have angered the LTTE.
Sri Lankan Security Forces were engaged in a search and clearing operation to flush out groups of LTTE terrorists from Muttur town when the LTTE started firing mortars and artillery towards the town.
Stealing weapons from the police officers guarding the tsunami aid center
Stop Kalita from keeping his liquor store and 'brothel' open.
Strategy to scare non-Islamic residents from the area
Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the death of a SIMI member by security personnel in 2012.
Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the removal of members of the Muslim community from the targeted train in 2012.
Sudan People's Liberation Movement - North claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent military operations.
Sudar Oli has been accused of supporting the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
Sudhakar, the secretary of the Khammam-Karimnagar-Warangal (KKW) zone of the Maoists, claimed that Ramakrishna was killed for his anti-worker policies. However, police suspected that the attack may have been carried out by the Praja Pratighatana Group (PPG) of the Maoists for extortion.
Sunni insurgents targeting Shi i Muslims
Suoyo Dickson confessed to leading and carrying out the attack, stating that he was retaliating against the Oil and Gas Task Force after they failed to provide him and his men previously promised compensation for relocating a bunkering camp.
Support for an outlawed Kurdish militant group
Support for deposed Pakistani Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, imprisoned in Karachi.
Supporters of the Islamic State in Jerusalem claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of members of armed groups within 72 hours by Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement).
Suqour al-Ahvaz claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Iran's harsh treatment of members of the Arab community in Ahvaz.
Suspected fighting for more autonomy in the Balochistan area
Suspected members of the New People's Army shot and killed the councilor for allegedly being a military spy.
Suspected motive is that the perpetrators believed Tomseth to be a spy for the CIA, and additionally that the Tehran embassy officials were guilty of espionage and imperialism
Suspected motive is to protest against the Vietnam War
Suspected motive was to intimidate the African American community of New Castle Pennsylvania.
Suspected motive was to protest school integration.
Suspected motive was to protest the Vietnam War.
Suspected motives were to protest the Vietnam War and/or show support for the Black Panther Party and/or show support for the Young Lords.
Suspected New People's Army rebels killed the retired sergeant because of his former work as a soldier.
Suspected to be anti-sprawl; anti-development
Suspected to be because white supremacist group, Aryan Nation, was tired of being harassed by law enforcement agencies
Suspected to be opposition towards Lam Ton's public call for the Vietnamese community in the U.S. to negotiate political and social issues with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
Suspected to be racial; the fire occurred hours before a voting rights hearing was set to take place
Suspected to be religious
Suspected to be the opposition of construction in order to preserve the open space.
Suspected to be to protest killing of animals.
Suspected: political
Suspected: Political independence
Symbolic protest of the murder of two JTMM cadres by Belha locals
Syrian intelligence services had a hand in destabilizing actions in Lebanon.
Ta'ang National Liberation Army (TNLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the outpost was being used for narcotics.
Tablighis are known to be pro-government. Taliban might be responsible for the attack.
Take into custody those fishing illegally in Somali waters; also possibly to collect ransom
Taliban aimed to disrupt US supply lines in Afghanistan.
Taliban militants are trying to overtake the Swat Valley region of Pakistan.
Taliban militants oppose the elections of local officials and often targeted politicians in an attempt to regain power.
Taliban spokesman Zabihollah Mojahed claimed the attack was to terrify government employees to leave their jobs in the country.
Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahed claimed that the murders took place because they were operating a prostitution ring for American soldiers and foreign contractors and that they had also been working for the crime department with the Ghazni police.
Taliban spokesperson Qari Muhammad Yousaf Ahmadi claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that Jillani Khan was killed because he worked in the National Directorate of Security (NDS).
Taliban spokesperson Qari Muhammad Yousaf Ahmadi stated that Kakar Khan was shot and killed because he was an intelligence worker.
Taliban spokesperson Qari Yousuf Ahmadi claimed responsibility for the attack on behalf of the group, stating that the soldiers were killed in retaliation for the burning of Qurans by United States (US) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) forces.
Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid claimed responsibility for the attack on Bagram airfield, stating that it was retaliation for the burning of Qurans by American soldiers.
Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the group killed the local police commander because he was providing intelligence to foreign forces.
Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid claimed that the victim was targeted because he was working with United States (US) forces at the Jalalabad Airport.
Tamils are trying to establish a homeland for themselves.
Tanveer Ahmed, an unaffiliated individual, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted Shah because he allegedly "disrespected" Islam.
Tanzeem al-Islami al-Furqan claimed responsibility for the incident and alleged that education for girls is prohibited within Islam.
Target Canadian troops
Targeting of Shi i Citizens
Targeting teachers in Muslim dominated regions of Thailand
Tawhid wal Jihad claimed responsibility for the incident, demanding the release of six of its imprisoned members who were sentenced to death after being convicted for carrying out an attack against police in Sinai in 2011.
Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the bombing of the Shiite mosque was due to ideological differences.
Tehrik al-Mojahedin claimed responsibility for the incident and accused authorities of mistreating local civilians.
Tehrik al-Mojahedin claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for police operations.
Tehrik al-Mojahedin claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF)'s alleged oppression of youth.
Tehrik-e-Taliban Islami (TTI) claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was targeting Shiite community members on account of their anti-TTI activities.
Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesman, Ahmadullah Ahmadi claimed responsibility for the attack claiming it was a reaction to the army’s operation against the militants. TTP Spokesman, Ehsanullah Ehsan, also made a second claim of responsibility to Reuters via telephone from an undisclosed location stating “Our men carried out these attacks and we will carry out more in retaliation for government operations against our people in the northwest.”
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi separately claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of Malik Ishaq, a leader of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi . Additionally, Lashkar-e-Islam (Pakistan) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for military operations against the group.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) attacked the Pakistani Air Force in retaliation for airstrikes against them and the killing of religious leader Mualana Naseeb Khan.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) attacked the van in retaliation for villagers organizing a pro-government militia.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in retaliation for the alleged abuse and torture of TTP members in Pakistani jails.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in retaliation for the recent Pakistani military campaign, Operation Zarb-e-Azb, in North Waziristan.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was intended as a warning for the general secretary of the Awami National Party of what would happen if he did not meet extortion demands and resign his post.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the tribal elder was killed because he was a spy for the armed forces.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the attack on the Shalobar Amn Lashkar members, stating that the lashkar's leaders were targeted for leading armed resistance against the TTP.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was in response to the imprisonment of Dr. Aafia Siddiqi in the United States.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and sources believe the attack is part of TTP's violent campaign against Pakistan's secular political parties.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Malik Gul Akbar was targeted for his involvement in activities against the TTP.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Rao Anwar was targeted in retaliation for torture he had conducted on imprisoned members of the TTP.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Shanzada was targeted because the TTP believed he was a spy.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that such attacks would continue unless an Islamic system was established in Pakistan.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Tanoli was targeted due to his involvement in killing TTP members.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to military operations in North Waziristan.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to operations against the TTP.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to security forces killing members of the TTP.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the death of Hakimullah Mehsud, the former TTP leader, in an air strike as well as recent military operations in North Waziristan.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for an attack against Shiites in Rawalpindi on November 15, 2013. Other sources reported the TTP as saying that the attack was carried out in revenge for a United States (US) drone attack in Pakistan's Hangu district on November 21, 2013. (Note: Inconsistency in spelling of Tehrik-i-Taliban between the perp variables and the incident summary.)
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in retaliation to the killing of detained members of the TTP.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was out of revenge for the deaths of members of the TTP. Sources also speculated that the attack, which targeted a Shiite neighborhood, may be part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's majority Sunni and minority Shiite communities.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Pakistani judiciary prevents the establishment of an Islamic legal system.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they would continue to attack Iranian installations and members of the Shiite community.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated the attack was carried out in revenge for TTP members killed by Karachi police.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident as part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's majority Sunni and minority Shia communities.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted Yousafzai because she was critical of the TTP and promoted Western ideals in the region.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they were targeting political parties and organizations because of their secular political agendas and support for military operations in Pakistan's tribal areas.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility for the killing of a Chinese woman in Peshawar, stating that the attack was meant to avenge "atrocities" carried out against Muslims in Xinjiang Province in China.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility, stating that the attack was in retaliation for a crackdown against an Al-Qa ida allied group, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) claimed responsibility, stating that the police official had been targeted for his use of torture tactics against Taliban members during interrogations.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) commander Maulana Faqir Mohammad claimed responsibility for the cross-border attacks and threatened more attacks because of the Pakistani government's continued alliance with the United States. He also stated that while the recent government action to reopen the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) supply corridor through Pakistan had angered the group, it was not the immediate cause of the attack.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson Ehsanullah Ehsan claimed responsibility for attack, stating that attacks would continue until democracy was ended and Sharia law implemented in Pakistan.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson Ehsanullah Ehsan claimed responsibility for attack, stating that the attackers targeted police officers because TTP inmates were being tortured in prisons in the northwest.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson Ihsanullah Ihsan claimed responsibility for the explosion at the tribal elder meeting, stating that the elders were targeted because they had set up anti-Taliban groups.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesperson Mohammed Afridi claimed responsibility for attack, stating that the 14 victims were targeted because they were Shiites and thus enemies of Islam.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) stated that it carried out the attack in order to kill a local chief and deputy of a tribal police force.  Spokesperson Ehsanullah Ehsan also stated that attacks like this one would continue until United States (US) drone strikes ended.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) stated that Mir was working against Islam and they would continue to target those who spoke out against jihad.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) stated that Shiite community members were blasphemous and would not be spared.
Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) view Shiite community members as heretics.
Telangana Separatists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they were attempting to attract media attention to the cause of a free and independent Telangana state.
Telangana Separatists claimed responsibility in pamphlets left at the scene and stated that the attack was carried out to commemorate Telagnana martyrs.
Tepi Youth claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the alleged harassment of villagers by security forces.
Tepi Youth claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they would release the abducted police officers in exchange for their imprisoned associates.
Terrorism of foreign actors in Iraq
Thakur did not withdraw his candidacy, despite JTMM's request
Thanthai Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam (TPDK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated in a note left at the scene, "If Tamils are attacked continuously in Karnataka, Kannadiga workplaces here (in Tamil Nadu) will be attacked. Kannadigas live here too. Beware."
That the bombing took place just after Rice's visit suggests it was intended to derail political progress following the pullout of Syrian troops from Lebanon.
The  naxalites believed them to be police informers.
The 11 trucks in the convoy were bringing 120 tons of supplies to uncleared areas.  Sources note that the LTTE was trying to control civilians who were trying to cross the checkpoint into government-controlled lands, and were not allowing any NGO individuals or vehicles into government-controlled lands.
The abduction and assassination were results of a political conflict. They stemmed from a rally Chief Aruku attended earlier in the day to support his ACD party and promote his qualifications for a gubernatorial position. Members of the PDP that attended the rally were attacking anyone on sight with opposing political views. It is assumed that they ultimately decided to assassinate the gubernatorial aspirant on the basis of his differing political perspectives.
The abduction was in response to the arrest of a ringleader of the band
The abductors demanded 12 million dollars in ransom and a variety of political demands, including the release of 51 prisoners
The abductors demanded that 120 Albanians be released from Serbian jails within three days.
The abductors wanted the journalist to publish articles that favored their political and religious views.
The Abdullah Azzam Brigades claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted Hezbollah's convoy because of the Shiite group's intervention in the ongoing conflict in neighboring Syria.
The Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for James Patrick Almodavar.
The Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the hostages.
The Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the release of Jurgen Kantner.
The Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the victims.
The Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom.
The Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion.
The Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that Germany retract its support for United States (US) airstrikes against the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), in addition to making a ransom demand.
The Achik Matgrik Army (AMA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the wine shop was targeted for selling alcohol and cigarettes to individuals who were underage.
The Achik National Cooperative Army (ANCA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the alleged harassment of the families of ANCA members by authorities.
The act was carried out in an attempt to create panic in the city.
The act was committed in the name of saving animals and the environment.
The action appeared designed to persuade President Andres Pastrana to take the ELN more seriously in negotiations to end the 35-year conflict.
The Adan-Abyan Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded gender segregation, a ban on music, and students to carry out collective prayers at the targeted university.
The Afghan civilians admitted to being spies for US-led forces in Afghanistan. They also admitted to being paid for their jobs in assisting in directing the drones to fire missiles on accurate targets.
The Afghan Health and Development Services workers were taken hostage by mistake.
The Afghan Revolutionary Front planted the bomb as a warning to France that they need to withdraw from Afghanistan.
The aim was to destroy the private property of an individual with relations to the Socialist Party of the Basque Country.
The aim was, according to the perpetrators, to weaken the military potential of the Macedonian authorities.
The Aksa Martyrs Brigade claimed the attack was a response to the killing of one of its group leaders.
The Al-Asqa Brigades claimed the attacks on Israeli towns are "retaliation for Israeli atrocities."
The Al-Karb tribe demanded that 50 tribesmen become employed in exchange for the safe release of the captive.  Unemployment is high in Yemen.
The Al-Shamlan tribe demanded schools and development projects in exchange for the safe release of the hostages
The All Nepal National Free Student Union-Revolutionary claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Doctor Sudha Tripathi not taking the group's demands regarding the Free Student Union elections seriously.
The alleged terrorists were targeting former religious affairs minister Ejaz-ul-Haq while he was campaigning.
The Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) claimed responsibility for the incident and declared that a portion of the Beni Territory forest was ADF territory.
The Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) wanted to inform the government that they had a presence in Kasese .
The Ambazonia Defense Forces (ADF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to prevent security forces from arresting members of the Ambazonian community.
The ambush was an attempt to assassinate Helmand's provincial governor.
The ambush was in retaliation to the police seizure of almost three tons of cocaine over the past few weeks.
The American Indian movement hoped to raise worldwide awareness of the plight of Native Americans in the United States.  Specifically, AIM hoped to 1) Force the federal government to investigate corruption on Indian reservations.  2) Force a senate investigation of broken treaties between the United States government and Native Americans.  3) Force the dismissal of Dick Wilson, the tribal chair of the Pine Ridge Reservation.
The Anarchist Anti-Capitalist Action Group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of unfair labor laws in Greece.
The Anarchist Collective of Kallithea-Moschato claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in opposition to recent foreclosures.
The Anarchist Squad claimed they were protesting the actions of the police against demonstrators at the G-8 summit in Italy.
The Animal Liberation Front (ALF) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the closure of the German Fox Terrier Association clubhouse.
The Animal Liberation Front (ALF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of the targeted company's ill treatment of ducks for foie gras.
The Animal Liberation Front (ALF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Pohjolan Matka's engagement with Saga Furs, a fur auction company.
The Animal Liberation Front (ALF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the profiting from animal abuse.
The Animal Liberation Front (ALF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group targeted Harlan Laboratories because it supplied animals for laboratory research.
The Animal Liberation Front (ALF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted for owning a fur store.
The ANLA is asking for more rights and recognition for its community.
The anonymous caller claimed that this was another attack by the Hizballah Palestine organization in a continuation of the Palestinian uprising against Israel.
The Ansarullah Bangla Team claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted for criticizing the Quran.
The Antagonistic Nuclei of the New Urban Guerrilla claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in support for current detainees.
The Anti-Balaka Militia claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of Rodrigue Nagibona in exchange for the victims. Nagibona, an Anti-Balaka militia general, had recently been arrested by UN peacekeepers.
The Anti-Gentrification Front claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they were protesting development and wanted to create fear among developers.
The Arab Movement of Azawad (MAA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the presence of a military official, who was requesting unity, in the area.
The Arakan Liberation Party (ALP) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the victims.
The Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to actions taken by government forces in Rakhine, including killing and sexually assaulting members of the community. Sources also posited that the attack coincided with the publication of the Advisory Commission on Rakhine State report and United Nations (UN) meetings. Moreover, sources also suspected that the attack was part of a larger trend of violence between Myanmar's Muslim minority and Buddhist majority.
The armed men attacked the security post in an attempt to free a prisoner.
The armed men reportedly introduced themselves as members of the New People’s Army (NPA) and that they burned the tractor because of the owner's refusal to pay revolutionary taxes.
The Armenian American owner of the store refused to pay a $150,000 contribution to ASALA to help finance the group's cause of liberating their enslaved land and giving their people its national honor and dignity.
The arson attack took place during a 24 hour strike by the  Budapest Transport Company's (BKV) employees.
The arson attack was carried out to protest accused arsonists Marios Tsourapas and Chrissostomos Kontorevithakis and convicted arsonist Vaggelis Botzatzis who are being jailed and imprisoned.
The arson attack was suspected to be hate motivated.
The arson attack was suspected to be hate-motivated (xenophobic motive).
The Aryan Republican Army robbed banks to simultaneously dispose the state of capital and to provide logistical support for their revolutionary war to overthrow the United States  government.  The money from the bank robberies was used to purchase guns, vehicles, and safehouses.  A portion of the money was also donated to various right-wing extremist causes.
The Aryan Republican Army robbed banks to simultaneously dispose the state of capital and to provide logistical support for their revolutionary war to overthrow the United States  government.  The money from the bank robberies was used to purchase guns, vehicles, and safehouses.  A portion of the money was also donated to various right-wing extremist causes.  This incident also commemorated the Oklahoma City Bombing.
The assailant claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he was paid to carry out the attack.
The assailant claimed responsibility for the incident, citing a deeply held grudge against the Kita police station for its mistreatment of people and its mishandling of cases.
The assailant clamed he was, "fighting against evil, in other words, Judaism."
The assailant stated that he was purging the city of filth and that he had taken his inspiration from the Bible
The assailant stated that the attack was in retribution for the death of Muslims at the hands of United States military
The assailant, identified as Abdul Malik, stated that the attack was carried out in response to the government's recent ban on beef.
The assailant, identified as an Israeli extremist, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he targeted the civilians because he believed "all Arabs are terrorists."
The assailant, Sanjay Gurung, claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that he was paid for "carrying out anti-poll elements."
The assailant's confession indicated that the victim was targeted because he was 'writing against the [JMB].'
The assailants  sought to avenge the death of five of its members who were killed by the security forces in the so-called Boumehir forest between Boghni and Draa El-Mizan (Tizi Ouzou).
The assailants accused the captives of collaborating with guerrillas
The assailants accused the citizens of acting in support of guerillas.
The assailants accused the hostages of collaborating with right-wing paramilitaries.  They stated that the captives would now work for the assailants.
The assailants accused the victim of having ties with a rival guerrilla group.  They stated they were putting him on trial for his crimes and asked for a meeting with the government.
The assailants accused the victims of being Palestinian informers who helped Israel locate a Fatah leader
The assailants accused the victims of collaborating with rebels before they executed them.
The assailants accused the victims of collaborating with the rival group, United Self Defense Units of Colombia (AUC)
The assailants accused the victims of immoral activity
The assailants accused the victims' of providing police with information on Maoist movements in the region
The assailants asked to be taken to Cologne and demanded the release of Mehmet Ali Agca, a Turkish man who was in prison in Italy for attempting to assassinate Pope John Paul in 1981
The assailants charged the victim with helping the government and foreign forces.
The assailants claimed that the attack was in retaliation for the death of a suspected cattle rustler, who had been killed by youths from Maitsaba.
The assailants claimed that the contractor had failed to get permission to begin the road-building project.  They also claimed that the contractor had failed to pay a levy.
The assailants claimed that the victim was an Israeli intelligence officer.
The assailants claimed the victims were police informers
The assailants demanded that Mendonca apologize for the killings of 25 Hindu nationalists killed in Tripura state in 1999, saying they had been organized by local Catholic groups.
The assailants demanded the demilitarization of five cities in Norte de Santander Department.
The assailants demanded the release of incarcerated tribal members in exchange for the safe return of the hostages.  They accused the government of mistreating the tribe.
The assailants demanded the release of ten of their own people in exchange for the safe return of the minister and his delegation
The assailants left a letter explaining the site was burned due to the company's failure to pay revolutionary taxes.
The assailants left a note at the bar demanding that it stop selling alcohol.
The assailants left a note for the victim's father demanding that he kill a paramilitary warlord in return for the safe return of his daughter.
The assailants left behind a banner stating that the homes were not made using eco-friendly practices.  In addition, the housing development was near a headwaters housing endangered salmon.  The project had been criticized for the potential impact it may have on this area.
The assailants left behind a pamphlet calling for support of their bandh (strike).
The assailants left leaflets in the area calling on the public to fight against the state for bauxite mining
The assailants left posters and a letter with the body stating that the victim had been killed because he was a police informer.
The assailants looted the mission and surrounding settlements, then kidnapped several people, forcing them to carry the rebels' loot.  However, only two of the hostages were later released.  Sources note that the rebels often kidnap civilians to use as soldiers or sex slaves.
The assailants released a statement claiming that they were "going to clear that area of highway robbers, car thieves, private armies and other organizations using the ELN's name to perpetrate all kinds of crimes against the civilian population."  Authorities state that the ELN is trying to gain control of the highway.
The assailants released a statement indicating that they believed the victim was a spy for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
The assailants released a video urging Turkish companies to withdraw from Iraq.  In addition, they said that they were executing the hostage because Ankara had not ceased support of the U.S.
The assailants sent a letter to the police stating that the attack was in response to a Swiss Army exhibition opening in Basel the same week.
The assailants state that they were only trying to rob the victim; however, authorities believe that the assailants had other motives and imposed section 7 of the Anti Terrorism Act
The assailants stated in a letter that the attack was in retaliation for attacks that the Border Security Forces (BSF) had perpetrated on tribal members.
The assailants stated in a post-incident call that the explosion was intended to protest the exploitation of impoverished people by the Land Reform office.
The assailants stated on their website that they are in a "war to exhaust the capabilities of the apostates".  However, they did not state why they targeted the housing compound at the electricity dam.
The assailants stated that the attack was intended for the oligarchy.  Sources believed that the attack was intended to intimidate business people living in the area to pay a ransom or "revolutionary tax" to the ETA.  It is possible the assailants were targeting one family, the Delclaux, who had failed to pay full ransom for their son.
The assailants stated that the bomb was intended as a message to Barak and others "whose hands are soaked in Palestinian blood."
The assailants stated that the executed the officer because the army was preparing to attack them
The assailants stated that the incident was in response to the killing of "our brothers in Gaza" and that it was a warning to other western tourists
The assailants stated that the victim was a government spy and that residents of the town would face a similar fate if they cooperated with the government.
The assailants stated that the victim was killed as a warning to others not to collaborate with Israel
The assailants stated that the victims were guerrilla collaborators
The assailants stated that they had been sent by the Haqqani Network to carry out attack in order to disrupt the presidential election campaigns.
The assailants stated that they were responding to the arrest of Albanians who, they believed, were unjustly arrested based on their origin
The assailants stated that they were retaliating against the prefect; they believed he was getting local officials to report on residents who were supporting the rebels.
The assailants stated that they were sent by God to cleanse the Catholic church of corruption.
The assailants stated they would behead the victims unless Turkey pulled all Turkish firms out of Iraq that were working with occupation forces.  They also wanted people to protest Bush's presence at the NATO summit
The assailants suspected one of the family members of being an informant
The assailants suspected that the victim was a police informant.
The assailants warned the victim to halt the road building project; when he failed to do so, they set his equipment on fire.
The assailants went from house to house looking for villagers they suspected had cooperated with a rival group.
The assailants were attempting to steal a transport of explosives to aid in their campaign
The assailants were looking for suspected communist sympathizers
The assailants were partially motivated by economic gain (they looted 13 shops).  In addition, they abducted 40 people; abduction is a popular recruitment tactic for the Lord's Resistance Army.
The assailants were punishing the boys for drug activity and using the punishment to intimidate onlookers.
The assailants wrote a note stating that Tracy was a spy for the CIA
The assailants, Jerad Miller and Amanda Miller, claimed responsibility for the incident and proclaimed that the shooting had provoked a revolution against authority figures.  Additionally, the assailants' social media posts indicated that they believed authority figures, including police officers, were akin to the Nazis and were suppressing the people.
The assassination of a former member who was possibly collaborating with the police.
The assassination of Ayodeji Daramola was one of many high-profile murders of political candidates of south-west origin beginning in 2002. Although the killers are unknown, murders are suggestive of political motives because the victims were leading politicians of their parties. It is assumed that Daramola was specifically targeted because his political viewpoints conflicted with those of Fayose's government.
The assassination of Chieftain Funsho Williams was one of many high-profile murders of political candidates of south-west origin beginning in 2002. Murders are suggestive of political motives because the victims were leading politicians of their parties.
The assassination of Colonel 'Aqil Hashim.
The assassination of Javed Qadri, a leader of the Sunni Tehrik party, was attributed to religious rivalry.
The assassination was possible due to Mainassara's refusal to resign from the presidency and the difficult elections in February 1999.
The assault was retribution for police crackdown on the Mungiki Sect.
The assault was suspected of being the result of a failed extortion.
The attack appeared to have been carried out to avenge the killing of more than 250 militants in the Poonch and Rajouri districts during the past three months.
The attack appeared to have robbery as a motive.
The attack by Hamas was in retaliation for IDF troops (Israeli Defense Forces) killing three Palestinian young civilians in Rafah, Gaza, as well as in retaliation for the breaking of a cease fire Israel had agreed to.. Although, in this case HAMAS has not claimed responsibility; it is just strongly implicated.
The attack by Hamas was in retaliation for IDF troops (Israeli Defense Forces) killing three Palestinian young civilians in Rafah, Gaza.
The attack by the military wing of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine was in retaliation for IDF troops (Israeli Defense Forces) killing three Palestinian young civilians in Rafah, Gaza. It was also in retaliation for the breaking of a cease fire agreement that Israel had agreed to.
The attack came a day before a visit by top ministers and security officials to Aceh Province.
The attack came a few hours after the ELN announced it would no longer negotiate with President Andres Pastrana's government.
The attack came after FARC rebels warned truck drivers not to travel along the road.
The attack came after the government gave verbal instructions not to publish stories related to civilian casualties in Vanni or reproduce contents of interviews given by LTTE officials to news agencies and media. The paper published photos of children killed inside a "safety zone" in Vanni.
The attack came after the owner refused to pay a "revolutionary tax" to the rebels.
The attack came as the Iraqi cabinet approved a draft oil law crucial to regulating how wealth from the country's vast oil reserves will be shared by its ethnic and sectarian groups.
The attack came in retaliation for ongoing Israeli crimes acts against the Palestinian people in the West Bank of the Gaza Strip.
The attack comes days after the LTTE warned the government of "serious repercussions" following an air force raid on 1/2/2007 allegedly killed 16 ethnic Tamil civilians in the northwestern Mannar district.
The attack comes two days after the LTTE warned the government of "serious repercussions" following an air force raid on 1/2/2007 allegedly killed 16 ethnic Tamil civilians in the northwestern Mannar district.
The attack could have been a terrorist attack marking Adolf Hitler's birthday.
The attack could have been religiously motivated.
The attack followed the death of two TMVP members who were gunned down by unknown perpetrators.
The attack happened prior to a 24 hour strike by the company’s workers.
The attack is believed to have been aimed at allowing a prisoner escape from custody; possibly a 'noted underworld criminal figure' or 'notorious gangsters' who were in the building.
The attack is believed to have been carried out because villagers allegedly killed eight CPI-M militants at the beginning of February.
The attack is connected to the insurgency against US and Iraqi forces in Iraq.
The attack is in connection with cultural and religious tensions in southern Thailand.
The attack is in connection with lawlessness in the Nandigram state.
The attack is in retaliation for a statement calling for the stopping of rocket fire at Israeli towns.
The attack is linked with the insurgency in and around Mogadishu.
The attack is suspected to be carried out because the Maoists had given a bandh call in protest against the alleged police excesses against tribal’s, particularly the police firing in Narayanpatna block of Koraput last month that led to the death of two tribal’s.
The attack likely occurred because Channel-D announced it would no longer report on any "terrorist" attacks.
The attack may be in response to upcoming elections, and may have been perpetrated by an opposing political party.
The attack may have been a reprisal against the RCD (rebel Congolese Rally for Democracy) as residents of Uvira, Burundi sympathetic to the Mayi Mayi were complaining of the arbitrary imprisonment of members of their families by the RCD.
The attack may have been carried out in retaliation for a series of articles published in the Rattana's newspaper, which blamed King Sihanouk for partially causing Cambodia's long-running civil war.
The attack may have been related to the fact that Filanbanco had been recently shut down due to bankruptcy.
The attack may have been related to upcoming commune and precinct elections.
The attack may have been targeting the visit of Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi who was due to arrive in Venice after the blast.
The attack may have been to distract the military from rescuing 27 hostages that ASG took in a previous attack.
The attack may have had something to do with the political tension around the Kurds in Turkey.
The attack occurred a few hours after Tokyo's board of education voted to use a textbook in certain schools produced the Japanese Society for History Textbook Reform that had been criticized as too nationalistic.
The attack occurred because Jan was accused of spying for the United States.
The attack occurred because of a local family dispute.
The attack occurred because of acts being done against the residents of the town.
The attack occurred because Prakash was accused of being spies.
The attack occurred because Rakesh, 30, and Rajuram, 25, were accussed of being spies.
The attack occurred because Sadar was accused of being a police spy.
The attack occurred because the driver defied the bandh called by the Communist Party of India-Maoists.
The attack occurred because the family refused to pay taxes of their farmland to militants.
The attack occurred because the Sardar and Mahato were accused of being police informers by the Maoists.
The attack occurred because the Taliban vowed to disrupt the coming Afghan presidential election, which will be held on August 20, 2009.
The attack occurred because the victim was accused of being a police informer by the Maoists.
The attack occurred because the victim was allegedly spying on Taliban militants for the United States.
The attack occurred because the woman was allegedly spying on the Taliban for US-led forces.
The attack occurred because workers continued to expand the road.
The attack occurred during several weeks of tribal conflict and uprising following the Presidential election.
The attack occurred during the trail of suspected Al Qaida terrorists.
The attack occurred during the violent Iowa Beef Packers strike in South Sioux City.
The attack occurred during the violent Iowa Beef Packers strike.
The attack occurred hours after Al-Shabaab al-Islamiya issued a statement about these offices saying that they were working against the benefit of the Somali Muslim population and against the establishment of an Islamic state in Somalia
The attack occurred in accordance with threats made by the group earlier in the month.
The attack occurred outside of a Shiite shrine during one of the major holidays celebrated.  The group that has claimed responsibility (although those claims are unconfirmed), has been known to carry out similar attacks against Shiites in Pakistan.
The attack occurred when militants attempted to kidnap a shopkeepers son.
The attack occurred while worshippers were at morning prayers, a day after Muslims defied a Tamil boycott on presidential elections.  As the Muslims voted and the Tamils did not, the Muslim candidate was thought to have received more votes and thus be the more likely candidate to win the election.
The attack on the building of the financial police was linked to attempts to "cover up evidence" of financial scams.
The attack on the convoy may have been a reaction to the shooting death of a Sunni man in Shalozan Tangi on 06/17/2008.
The attack on the pipeline was blamed on militants believed to be responding to JTF arrest of a vessel, MT Akuada, laden with 12, 000 metric tonnes of stolen crude oil, with 22 Filipinos on board.
The attack served as a warning to police officers and others who were carrying out operations against Islamic guerrilla fighters on American instructions.
The attack targeted district chief Dionisio Villaver because he had supported a military offensive against the rebels.
The attack that occurred on the 59th anniversary of Israel and after Israeli raids in the northern West Bank and a rare Israeli missile strike in Gaza killed nine, including two civilians.
The attack took place a day after the police had arrested police arrested six people from Shah Tora Takhtikhel and Tarkha Bazikhel at a check post.
The attack took place as part of regional operations to rid the region of all foreign influence.
The attack took place because an irate mob ransacked and set on fire the ceasefire monitoring office of NSCN(IM).
The attack took place because Sukura Oram was branded as a police informer.
The attack took place because the civilians were charged with spying for foreigners.
The attack took place because the victim, Shyam Shah, was accused of spying against the group. However, Shah claimed that the Terai Mukti Morcha (JTMM) demanded Rs 1 lakh (2147. 31 USD) from him and threatened physical action if he did not pay the demand.
The attack took place before important elections in Nepal, and are assumed to be in relation to the political violence increasing in the region.
The attack took place during a protest against polling called by militants.
The attack was a carried out against transportation agencies that did not pay extortion.
The attack was a plan devised six months ago that hoped to kill 5,000 people, targeting whites who were preferably Americans or British.
The attack was a protest against portrayals of the Prophet Mohammed published in Danish cartoons
The attack was a reprisal against collaborators with the former Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon.
The attack was a reprisal attack after Indian forces killed a top militant leader.
The attack was a response to attacks from the Sri Lankan Army
The attack was a response to Israeli aggression against the Palestinian people.
The attack was a response to Maoist suspicions that Baragadawa villagers had supported a local anti-Maoist group.
The attack was a response to ongoing Israeli attacks against the Palestinian people.
The attack was a response to recent murders of Palestinians in Tulkarm and Nablus.
The attack was a response to the assassinations of Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade leaders, Shadi Muhana and Majid Natat.
The attack was a response to the Israeli occupation crimes against Palestinian people in the West Bank and Gaza Strip
The attack was a response to the victim's critical reporting of the perpetrator's group.
The attack was a threat in order to get the United Nations to recognize their right to liberation.
The attack was a warning to the AKP Government to not isolate Kurdish civilians via the promotion of ongoing military operations.
The attack was a warning to those campaigning for Constituent Assembly elections.
The attack was a warning to Village Development Committee (VDC) secretaries to resign or have their houses and land seized. The SJMM also accused the VDC secretaries of corruption.
The attack was aimed at disrupting fuel supplies for US forces along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border
The attack was aimed at inciting social fear and panic among People's Alliance for Democracy (PAD) supporters.
The attack was aimed to intimidate tribal competitors against cooperation with the government in hopes of brokering a peace in the region.
The attack was allegedly a warning to the Deputy Inspector General for monetary demands.
The attack was allegedly because the civilians also worked at defense volunteers.
The attack was allegedly carried out as a means of retaliation for the military operation that killed 12 Black Widow militants on 05/10/2008 in the same location.
The attack was allegedly carried out to enforce a day-long bandh in Bihar to protest against the alleged atrocities by authorities on its top leaders in the Bhagalpur Central Jail.
The attack was allegedly carried out to fan the flames of the intra-Palestinian rivalry in order to throw off the Egyptian-sponsored reconciliation effort.
The attack was allegedly due to sectarian-related violence.
The attack was allegedly in response to either extortion demands or the delay in peace talks between the government and the militant group.
The attack was an act of defiance against the Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmud Abbas, who had declared at the Aqaba Summit, that he intended to try to stop the armed Intifada uprising.
The attack was an apparent attempt to undermine New Delhi's recent offer of a ceasefire in the Kashmir region.
The attack was an attempt to disrupt the peace accord signed in December 2002 by both Muslims and Christians in South Sulawesi province; it was also to avenge Sukirman's assassination.
The attack was an attempt to get the federal government to allow them to create their own local government.
The attack was an attempt to intimidate police before President Uribe was sworn into office.
The attack was an effort to free militants being held by law enforcement.
The attack was an expression of solidarity with the Spanish underground organization, Grapo.
The attack was anti-Semitic.
The attack was because the civilian was allegedly spying on Baloch interests.
The attack was believed aimed at destabilizing the situation in nearby Chechnya
The attack was believed to be a response to the Popular party and the Socialist party's anti-terrorist agreement.
The attack was believed to be in retaliation to the sentencing to death of three Kashmiri men in New Delhi for their role in an attack on the Indian parliament in December of 2001.
The attack was believed to be racially motivated.
The attack was believed to have been motivated by Muxanga's role in mobilizing people to attend a rally in Inhaminga that was addressed by President Joaquim Chissano, during his recent visit to the region, as well as by Muxanga's efforts to persuade RENAMO members to join the ruling Mozambique Liberation Front Party (FRELIMO).
The attack was believed to have been organized because of an assault on the former Democratic Society Party (DTP) leader Ahmet Türk who was punched in the face on Monday in Samsun.
The attack was carried on because the Maoists suspected that the five victims were police informants.
The attack was carried out  in retaliation for the June 8, 2009 attack on a mosque in Cho Ai Rong, Narathiwat, Thailand, which killed 10 Muslims and wounded 12 others.
The attack was carried out  to protest the visit of President of India, Pratibha Devi Singh Patil, to Manipur and also that it was carried out to expose alleged covert agenda of the Central Government to push in non-locals into Manipur. The release also stated that the outfit will carry on with the operation clear cut to drive away foreigners on schedule.
The attack was carried out after Black Widow militants alleged that Indian soldiers had attacked one of their camps and killed twelve Black Widow fighters on the week of 05/04/2008.
The attack was carried out against a polling party for the third phase of panchayat elections.
The attack was carried out against police officials as they conducted a raid on a militant gathering.
The attack was carried out as a last warning to Yumnamcha Dilip, president of United Committee Manipur (UCM).
The attack was carried out as a punishment for the police commander's support to the government.
The attack was carried out as a warning to the state.
The attack was carried out as an act of revenge for the killing of the Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) leader.
The attack was carried out as an offensive against operation greenhunt.
The attack was carried out as punishment per strict Islamic Law for the victim allegedly stealing electrical wires.
The attack was carried out as revenge for the killing of the perpetrator's brother.
The attack was carried out as the militants tried to flee from police.
The attack was carried out becasue Benigno was trying to press the government for a quicker return of land to its rightful owners,
The attack was carried out because an extortion payment was not made to the militants.
The attack was carried out because Baijnath Prasad, the machine owner, had refused to pay levy demanded by the militants.
The attack was carried out because banks have agreements with the multinational companies which threaten the ecosystem.
The attack was carried out because it was suspected that Ramlal was a police informer.
The attack was carried out because M. Komaraiah was accused of being a police informer.
The attack was carried out because of a dispute over the distribution of extortion money between cadres.
The attack was carried out because of the alleged collection of bribes at the forest gates.
The attack was carried out because Sailen Mahato was accused by the militants of being a police informer.
The attack was carried out because Shatrughan Ghosh was accused of being a police informer.
The attack was carried out because state Health and Family Welfare Minister Ph Parijat refused to appoint two persons proposed by the militant outfit in the health department and also failed to give money demanded by them.
The attack was carried out because Tamil civilians were escaping the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) area of Kilinochchi and seeking security forces.
The attack was carried out because the Asian Tigers had abducted and killed former Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) official Khalid Khawaja on 4/30/2010, and the TTP had taken revenge of his murder by killing the Asian Tigers’ chief.
The attack was carried out because the cell phone tower failed to stop its operations for a specific time during the day despite repeated calls from the Taliban.
The attack was carried out because the cinema's owner was showing American and Indian films containing nudity and that suposedly pornographic movies were also being shown at night.
The attack was carried out because the duo was accused of being brokers and indulging in theft.
The attack was carried out because the factory chief and staffers were spying against the militant group. However, police suspect the attack was carried out because the factory did not pay the full sum demanded by the group.
The attack was carried out because the forest rangers were warned against working on coffee plantations.
The attack was carried out because the man was believed to be an army informant.
The attack was carried out because the men were allegedly spying for the United States.
The attack was carried out because the militants called for a poll boycott.
The attack was carried out because the militants claimed that despite several warnings to the Public Works Department, the department did not perform their development works.
The attack was carried out because the non-profit organization Serving Emergency Relief and Vocational Enterprises (SERVE) was allegdly spreading Christianity according to the Taliban.
The attack was carried out because the party defied the general shut-down called in the District.
The attack was carried out because the perpetrators accused Kumar as being a police informant and for helping the government in solving land disputes.
The attack was carried out because the perpetrators accused the victim of spying.
The attack was carried out because the rebels alleged that Mahadeo Sahu was a police informer.
The attack was carried out because the rebels alleged that Rajendra Sahu was a police informer.
The attack was carried out because the Taliban accused the victims of being spies.
The attack was carried out because the Taliban alleged that the Afghan individuals were American spies, suposedly having done reconnaissance for an American missile strike that killed 14 people in a border village in June 2008 and thus deserved to die.
The attack was carried out because the Taliban militants suspected the victims of being army soldiers traveling in civilian clothes.
The attack was carried out because the tribesman were suspected of spying for U.S. forces in neighboring Afghanistan.
The attack was carried out because the victim donated land to police officials to set up a picket.
The attack was carried out because the victim had been negotiating a ceasefire with the government on behalf of his village.
The attack was carried out because the victim had torn down Communist Party of India-Maoists posters and had villagers resisting Maoists in the past few months.
The attack was carried out because the victim refused to join the militant outfit.
The attack was carried out because the victim refused to join the militants.
The attack was carried out because the victim sells Khat.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of abusing the villagers after drinking liquor and selling liquor in the locality.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of acting as a police informer.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of allegedly spying for coalition forces
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a military informant.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a military informer and for his crimes against the people as a result.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a military spy.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a police informer and accused of being involved in the arrest of two Santrash Birodhi Janasadharaner Committee (PSBJC) activists.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a police informer and being a corrupt Communist Party of India-Marxist worker.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a police informer and for having applied for Special Police Officer positions.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a police informer and to demand that Operation Greenhunt be stopped.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a police informer.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a police spy.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a spy for the United States and Afghanistan.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a spy for the United States.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being connected to the rival Kuki National Liberation Front (KNLF) faction.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being involved in corruption and the attack was a warning to him.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of corruption.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of not paying wages to his laborers and exploiting the tribals. He was also accused of working against the Maoist backed Chasi Muliya Adivasi Sangh.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of spying against the militants.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of spying.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused of working for the government.
The attack was carried out because the victim was accused seeking extortion in the militants’ name.
The attack was carried out because the victim was against the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and had written anti-Taliban books.
The attack was carried out because the victim was allegedly branded as a police informer.
The attack was carried out because the victim was allegedly working as a police informer.
The attack was carried out because the victim was branded as a supporter of the reactionary forces at a jan adalat staged by the guerrillas on 11/10/2010.
The attack was carried out because the victim was mistaken as being a police officer.
The attack was carried out because the victim was spearheading the Mamond Lashkar anti-militant group.
The attack was carried out because the victim was suspected of being a police informer and to warn other potential police informers. The attack was also carried out to ask the state government to immediately stop the proposed anti-Maoist operations.
The attack was carried out because the victim was suspected of being in contact with security forces.
The attack was carried out because the victim's were spies for the Military.
The attack was carried out because the victims refused to join the militants.
The attack was carried out because the victims refused to stop at the roadblock and resisted being searched.
The attack was carried out because the victims were accused of being corrupt and were leading an anti-Maoist movement in the region.
The attack was carried out because the victims were accused of being involved in anti-social activities and extorting money in the name of the Maoists.
The attack was carried out because the victims were accused of being involved in dishonest practices and being hired criminals of the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M).
The attack was carried out because the victims were accused of being police informers and for being involved in exploitation of local tribals.
The attack was carried out because the victims were accused of being police informers.
The attack was carried out because the victims were accused of committing rape and robbery after quitting their ranks to Jharkhand Janmukti Parishad (JJP), a CPI-Maoist splinter group.
The attack was carried out because the victims were accused of leaking vital information about the Maoists to the local police.
The attack was carried out because the victims were accused of spying for the government.
The attack was carried out because the victims were attempting to leave the militant group and start their own outfits or join another group.
The attack was carried out because the victims were found guilty of carrying on with the liquor trade despite warnings to stop the business.
The attack was carried out because the victims were in violation of Sharia law.
The attack was carried out because the victims were supporters of the Tritiya Prastuti Committee (TPC), a breakaway faction of the Maoists and also that two men were police informers.
The attack was carried out because the victims were suspected of being spies for the United States and Pakistan.
The attack was carried out because the victims’ family member was not home when the militants came to kill him for acting as a police informer.
The attack was carried out because the village defied the bandh called to demand the release of its activist Amarendra Goit, who was arrested by police few days ago.
The attack was carried out due to a drug transaction dispute.
The attack was carried out during the first phase of the Bihar panchayat (local self-government institution) polls.
The attack was carried out for extortion purposes.
The attack was carried out for revenge for Osama's martyrdom and to threaten for bigger attacks in Pakistan and Afghanistan.
The attack was carried out for the state government failing to meet the demands made by rebels for the release of then Malkangiri Collector R V Krishna, who had been abducted by Maoists in February.
The attack was carried out in a suspected attempt to create tension and chaos in the country and thereby influence voters ahead of the June 12, 2011 general elections.
The attack was carried out in an attempt to assassinate the chief of Al Dour local council member.
The attack was carried out in an attempt to intimidate voters during West Bengal polling.
The attack was carried out in celebration of "Black Tiger's Day," the anniversary of the first suicide bomb attack in 1987.
The attack was carried out in order to coerce people to join the group's rally.
The attack was carried out in order to exchange the victim for the release of at least five imprisoned Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) cadres.
The attack was carried out in order to force the hostages to attend a propaganda meeting by the National Liberation Army.
The attack was carried out in order to gain the release of Al Qaeda prisoners.
The attack was carried out in order to obliterate the police force.
The attack was carried out in protest against the camp of Border Security Force (BSF) at Sikhapalli near Materu.
The attack was carried out in protest for the arrest of senior Maoist leader Ramparvesh Baitha during a day long strike.
The attack was carried out in protest of  the CA's term extension.
The attack was carried out in protest of the decision by the Islamic Salvation Army to accept a truce.
The attack was carried out in protest of the French Minister of Justice's visit.
The attack was carried out in response to the death of innocent civilians allegedly caused by ANISOM forces.
The attack was carried out in response to the upcoming military operations in Afghanistan by General Stanley McChrysal.
The attack was carried out in response to the visit of Indian Home Minister P Chidambaram to Manipur.
The attack was carried out in retaliation against security forces continuing to target United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA) cadres.
The attack was carried out in retaliation for "genocides against Sunnis."
The attack was carried out in retaliation for Iran's execution in June of the group's leader, Abdolmalek Rigi.
The attack was carried out in retaliation for ongoing military and police operations against the militant group during the month of June, 2010.
The attack was carried out in retaliation for the 'atrocities' by the ruling Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) cadres on villagers at Chunapara area on 11/04/2010 and to protest the killing of two People's Committee against Police Atrocities (PCPA) activists.
The attack was carried out in retaliation for the "Zionist massacres against our men of resistance and against our people in the Gaza Strip."
The attack was carried out in retaliation for the arrest and torture of their comrades at the Crime Investigation Department.
The attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of 10 colleagues in a gun-battle with criminals near the Ganga-Gandak River in Munger on 11/29/2010.
The attack was carried out in retaliation for the killing of four Arab Israelis on August 4, 2005 in Sfhfar'am by a former IDF soldier (cf. 200508040007).
The attack was carried out in retaliation to the killing of Sashadhar Mahato and that they would not spare anyone involved in the killing of Mahato, be it the Police, Security Force personnel or informers.
The attack was carried out in retaliation to the police action that was taken against them in Singavaram on 01/08/2009.
The attack was carried out to avenge four comrades who allegedly disappeared in police custody earlier in the week.
The attack was carried out to avenge Osama's martyrdom; as well as, threaten larger attacks in the future.
The attack was carried out to avenge the deaths attack the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) elements sustained during the attack on an Indian military camp in Kashmir from the previous day (cf 199911030004).
The attack was carried out to avenge the killing of six of their members in the area four months ago.
The attack was carried out to bring attention to an anti-immigration platform.
The attack was carried out to call attention to a 24-hour strike in Jharkhand and Bihar made by the Maoist militants to protest the killing of eight rebels by security forces in Garwah District earlier in April 2008.
The attack was carried out to call Indian authorities to overturn the death sentence of a man convicted in connection with an attack on the Indian Parliament in 2001.
The attack was carried out to demand more strict adherence to Islamic practice at the University.
The attack was carried out to demand that the government order a judicial inquiry by a sitting judge of the Supreme Court into the Azad encounter case in the Adilabad forests.
The attack was carried out to demand that the Government stop killing their cadres in the name of Operation Green Hunt and withdraw the Border Security Forces (BSF) from the district.
The attack was carried out to demand the ESSAR Company quit and to oppose the Operation Green Hunt.
The attack was carried out to enforce people to pay the group protection money.
The attack was carried out to express support for a strike called by the United Naga Council (UNC).
The attack was carried out to force authorities to set free several local people who were in Police custody after reportedly being labeled as Maoists.
The attack was carried out to force EnCana and other local energy companies to leave town.
The attack was carried out to force police to release 68 "innocent" tribals arrested in Mayurbhanj, Keonjhar and Jajour districts.
The attack was carried out to force the civilians to act as porters for the militants.
The attack was carried out to force the police to release their detained cadres.
The attack was carried out to force the release of two of their cadres.
The attack was carried out to make sure the Bangladeshis had not come to Afghanistan for any destructive activities or were involved in any misleading religious programs or in any activity which might benefit Americans in Afghanistan.
The attack was carried out to obstruct the Border Security Force (BSF) troopers deployed in the area.
The attack was carried out to obtain a list of sub-contractors of tenders announced by the government.
The attack was carried out to oppose teaching English in the schools.
The attack was carried out to oppose the anti-Maoist Operation Green Hunt and the harassment of innocent tribals in the area; as well as to demand the release Dr. Binayak Sen.
The attack was carried out to persuade Mr. Uduaghan that the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta still exists and still acts.
The attack was carried out to pressure businesses to remove any non-Arabic writing from their business signs.
The attack was carried out to protest against road construction in the area.
The attack was carried out to protest against the government
The attack was carried out to protest against the Government machinery for using the school buildings and other installations to house Security Forces for anti-Maoist operations.
The attack was carried out to protest against the injustice meted out to tribes displaced by the local irrigation project.
The attack was carried out to protest against the provincial government's construction work in the area.
The attack was carried out to protest and avenge  the arrest of a CPI-M leader identified as Jagdish Master (Jagdish Yadav) in Gaya.
The attack was carried out to protest and avenge the arrest of a CPI-M leader identified as Jagdish Master (Jagdish Yadav) in Gaya.
The attack was carried out to protest Obama's visit to India.
The attack was carried out to protest Operation Green Hunt and to carry out the bandh (shut down) called by the militants.
The attack was carried out to protest primate vivisection.
The attack was carried out to protest the building of an industrial slaughterhouse that was scheduled to open in Jalisco, Mexico.
The attack was carried out to protest the extension of the CA tenure, growing unemployment and to press the government to form a national consensus government.
The attack was carried out to provoke the government in the escalating war against drugs between the government and cartel members.
The attack was carried out to punish the victim for allegedly stealing and committing armed robbery.
The attack was carried out to show that the workers of the MLA Brajabidhu could be targeted at anytime and that if the misconducts of his party workers continue, that he could not guarantee that future attacks will not occur.
The attack was carried out to spur sectarian violence in the region
The attack was carried out to target a high ranking Yemeni Intelligence officer.
The attack was carried out to target a military patrol.
The attack was carried out to target an oil pipeline.
The attack was carried out to target people participating in the Independence Day celebrations for Pakistan.
The attack was carried out to target pro-government elders because they were helping the security forces.
The attack was carried out to target security forces headquarters.
The attack was carried out to target Syrian military.
The attack was carried out to target the Army checkpoint.
The attack was carried out to target the chief of police for the district of Ab Band in Ghazni province.
The attack was carried out to target the commander of the Presidential Republican Guard.
The attack was carried out to target the convoy of a defense minister.
The attack was carried out to target the governor of Sherzad.
The attack was carried out to target the Governor.
The attack was carried out to target the house of Hameed al-Zoubaie, leader of the local Sahwa council.
The attack was carried out to target the office of the district police chief.
The attack was carried out to target the presidential palace.
The attack was carried out to target top regional security leaders.
The attack was carried out to target Yemeni Military.
The attack was carried out to threaten anyone helping the Communist Party of India-Marxist with death.
The attack was carried out to threaten employees working on Patil Construction in Palamau.
The attack was carried out to threaten police and Rapid Action Battalion agents of revenge for the killing of its leaders.
The attack was carried out to threaten the contractor into paying the group extortion money.
The attack was carried out to threaten the contractor to stop construction in Pidhapal, as well as to call for a shutdown Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha, West Bengal, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and Chhattisgarh for 05/21/2011 and 05/22/2011 and to criticize the recent arrest of three central committee members in Bihar.
The attack was carried out to threaten the victim to quit the police force.
The attack was carried out to threaten voters during the third phase of panchayat elections.
The attack was carried out to warn others away from supporting the police.
The attack was carried out to warn the government of dire consequences for anti-Maoist operations in the area.
The attack was carried out when a trooper of the 26th Battalion in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) removed a Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) flag spotted during a search operation.
The attack was carried out when police went to the investigate the Dole plantation.
The attack was carried out while the militants seized the town of Rowda.
The attack was claimed as revenge for an Israeli helicopter raid the previous week that killed eight people in Nablus, including two HAMAS leaders.
The attack was connected to ongoing cultural and religious tensions in southern Thailand.
The attack was connected to religious and cultural tensions in Southern Thailand.
The attack was connected to the insurgency against Coalition forces in Afghanistan.
The attack was connected to the insurgency in Iraq against US and Iraqi forces.
The attack was connected to the ongoing insurgency against coalition forces in Afghanistan
The attack was dedicated to Luciano Pitronello, an ELF militant who was injured in an attempt to detonate a Santander Bank in Chile on 06/01/2011.
The attack was described as a "contract-hit" by local news organizations.
The attack was described as an apparent response to the shooting and injury of a member of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's elite Force 17.
The attack was designed to disrupt President Uribe's inauguration.
The attack was directed at an Iraqi Army checkpoint. Similar to the incident earlier in the day, recruits were killed.
The attack was directed at stopping the process of return of displaced Serbs from Kosovo-Metohija.
The attack was directed towards potential Iraqi Army Recruits. It was conducted as a deterrent to those signing up.
The attack was directed towards Thai policemen who were to escort teachers to school.
The attack was either carried out because the victims were accused of being police informers, or because the two victims were accused of being Jharkhand Liberation Tigers (another militant group).
The attack was hate-motivated.
The attack was in connection to the insurgency in Iraq against US Forces.
The attack was in connection with ongoing tension between Israel and the Occupied areas of Palestine.
The attack was in connection with the insurgency against Coalition forces in Afghanistan.
The attack was in connection with the insurgency against U.S. and Iraqi forces in Iraq.
The attack was in connection with the insurgency against U.S. forces in Iraq.
The attack was in connection with the insurgency against US forces in Iraq.
The attack was in connection with the insurgency in and around Mogadishu
The attack was in connection with the insurgency in Iraq.
The attack was in connection with the Islamic insurgency in and around Mogadishu
The attack was in connection with the ongoing insurgency against coalition forces in Afghanistan.
The attack was in protest of a directive aimed at widening the tax base by targeting unregistered and incompliant taxpayers.
The attack was in protest of Abdullah Ocalan's recent sentencing in a Turkish court.
The attack was in protest of F-type prisons.
The attack was in protest of President Clinton's upcoming visit.
The attack was in protest to recent operations by government security forces.
The attack was in protest to Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar's support for the war in Iraq.
The attack was in response to a raid by the Israel Air Force on a deserted house north of the security zone
The attack was in response to an anti-Maoist speech given by the district member.
The attack was in response to comments made by a Buddhist community leader.
The attack was in response to fishing.
The attack was in response to Israel's invasion of the city of Rafa.
The attack was in response to ongoing Israeli aggression against the Palestinian people.
The attack was in response to President Gloria Arroyo's order to redeploy troops to counter the communist insurgency.
The attack was in response to the alleged systematic killing of Palestinians at the hands of Israeli authorities in the Gaza Strip and West Bank.
The attack was in response to the arrest of PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan.
The attack was in response to the arrests of 16 members of the Albanian National Army.
The attack was in response to the Attendance of Hezbollah at the ceremony
The attack was in response to the BLA attempting to rid Balochistan of all Punjabi citizens.
The attack was in response to the book publishing company buying the rights to an American book about the prophet Mohammad.
The attack was in response to the civilian allegedly spying for security forces.
The attack was in response to the execution of five members of Liberia's ruling People's Redemption Council, who were also political opponents of Liberia's military leader.
The attack was in response to the firm refusing to pay a tax to the rebels.
The attack was in response to the frequent Israeli army raids in the West Bank.
The attack was in response to the military operation in Bajaur that has been attacking Taliban militants.
The attack was in response to the recent suspension of peace talks between the ELN and the Colombian government.
The attack was in response to the victims anti-Communist Party of India-Maoist views.
The attack was in retaliation for a rape a year earlier.
The attack was in retaliation for dozens of arrests of Palestinian citizens.
The attack was in retaliation for Israeli killings and the imprisonment of Palestinians.
The attack was in retaliation for murder of Al-Quds Brigades' leader.
The attack was in retaliation for ongoing Israeli atrocities against Palestinians.
The attack was in retaliation for operations against the Israeli people.
The attack was in retaliation for the assassination of HAMAS leader Abdul Aziz Rantisi.
The attack was in retaliation for the assassination of the group's leader, Kishan Da.
The attack was in retaliation for the assassination of the group's leader, Kishan Da.  The bomb was not targeting Inder Singh Namdhari, his convoy just happened to pass at the wrong time.
The attack was in retaliation for the capture of PKK member Cevat Soysal by Turkish forces.
The attack was in retaliation for the death of two Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade members and another Palestinian in recent Israeli raids in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The attack was in retaliation for the deaths of 85 Muslim rioters at the hands of Thai police the week before.
The attack was in retaliation for the deaths of dozens of Thai Muslims who died in police custody the week before.
The attack was in retaliation for the deaths of eight Palestinians during Israeli raids.
The attack was in retaliation for the government's actions in Bajaur.
The attack was in retaliation for the Israeli aggression against the Al-Aqsa Mosque.
The attack was in retaliation for the killing of one of their members.
The attack was in retaliation for the killing of two Baloch women in Quetta and Pasni as well as the torture of female political workers in Mand and Tump.
The attack was in retaliation to a raid on a Hizb ul Mujahideen suspected hideout.
The attack was in retaliation to an Israeli military raid into the Gaza Strip on February 18, 2003.
The attack was in retaliation to the election of Sinn Fein members to a local council.
The attack was in retaliation to the Thai Army offensive to stop drug trafficking in the border area with Myanmar.
The attack was in retribution for the government failing to meet the perpetrator's demands.
The attack was in revenge of a prominent Somali clan leader's murder in a nearby town.
The attack was in solidarity of the workers for the state-owned tobacco company Seita, who were campaigning against possible layoffs.
The attack was intended to assassinate Eduard Emin-zade.
The attack was intended to derail the upcoming peace talks.
The attack was intended to incite a sectarian conflict.  It was aimed at two priests whom the perpetrators accused of engaging in propaganda to stigmatize Muslims.
The attack was intended to prevent any investigation of the Bumi Flora palm oil plantation massacre that happened August 9, 2001.
The attack was likely a reprisal for Abdul Rashid Malik's helping the Indian security forces in Jammu and Kashmir.
The attack was likely a response to the Israeli missile strike against a convoy of Palestinian cars, which wounded Mohammed Abu Halaweh, a member of the Force 17 presidential guard of Yassir Arafat that occurred August 4, 2001.
The attack was likely in response to an Israeli missile attack on Amr Hassan Hudeiri, a HAMAS member, the same day.
The attack was likely in response to an Israeli missile attack on HAMAS offices that killed eight people, including two children on July 31, 2001.
The attack was likely in response to the recent suspension of peace talks between the ELN and the Colombian government.
The attack was likely related to upcoming Indian Independence Day celebrations on August 15, 2001.
The attack was linked to cultural tensions in southern Thailand.
The attack was linked to the groups ongoing campaign for a Tamil homeland in Sri Lanka.
The attack was linked to the insurgency against Coalition forces in Afghanistan.
The attack was linked to the insurgency against US and Coalition forces in Afghanistan.
The attack was linked to the insurgency against US and Iraqi forces in Iraq.
The attack was linked to the insurgency in Afghanistan against coalition forces.
The attack was linked to the insurgency in and around Mogadishu
The attack was linked to the insurgency in Iraq
The attack was linked to the insurgency in Iraq against the US and Afghanistan.
The attack was linked to the insurgency in Iraq against US and Iraqi forces.
The attack was linked to the insurgency in Iraq against US and Iraqi Forces.
The attack was linked to the insurgency in Iraq.
The attack was linked to the Taliban insurgency against Coalition forces in Afghanistan.
The attack was linked with the insurgency in Iraq against US and Iraqi Forces.
The attack was meant as punishment for Soumakis' history of corruption.
The attack was meant to assassinate the governor of Ninawa.
The attack was meant to assassinate the mayor of the Al Shaab region.
The attack was meant to be a message for new Chief Minister, Ghulam Nabi Azad, that the group would be targeting him in the future.
The attack was meant to be in memory of the Puerto Rican Revolutionary, Juan Antonio Corretjer, who had died the week earlier, but as a poet and advocate of Puerto Rican Independence, he spent much of his life fighting against "Yankee Imperialism."  The groups were fighting for Puerto Rican Independence.
The attack was meant to demonstrate the perpetrators' opposition to war and US involvement in Iraq.
The attack was meant to free the prisoners in the jail.
The attack was meant to insure the success of the general strike called for by JTMM-B
The attack was meant to provoke Kenya into withdrawing its troops from Somalia.
The attack was most likely a sectarian attack.
The attack was most likely carried out for religious motives.
The attack was motivated by Islamic fundamentalists who oppose female education.
The attack was motivated by Israel's attack on Lebanese power stations.
The attack was motivated from opposition to the registration of Romanies in the upcoming local elections.
The attack was part of a campaign by the GAM to enforce a transportation stoppage in the run up to Indonesia's Independence Day on August 17, 2001.
The attack was part of a strategy by the rebels to destroy buildings being used to accommodate Central paramilitary forces for carrying out anti-Maoist operations in the region.
The attack was part of an effort to disrupt Indian Independence Day celebrations.
The attack was part of the group's plan to defend Puerto Rico's natural resources.
The attack was part of the insurgency against Coalition and Afghan forces in Afghanistan.
The attack was part of the insurgency against Israel in regard to the Gaza Strip
The attack was part of the insurgency against Somali and Ethiopian forces in Mogadishu
The attack was part of the insurgency against the Somali and Ethiopian government in Mogadishu
The attack was part of the insurgency against US and Iraqi forces in Iraq.
The attack was part of the IRA campaign to drive the British out of Northern Ireland.The group draws support from a working-class Catholic minority, discriminated against by Protestant majority. They are fighting for a unified and independent Ireland.
The attack was part of the militant offensive on India's Independence Day.
The attack was part of the ongoing insurgency in Iraq.
The attack was part of the ongoing insurgency in Kashmir, India.
The attack was part of the ongoing religious and cultural conflict in southern Thailand.
The attack was performed to highlight Jabali's history of corruption.
The attack was perpetrated because Kalivarapa was accused of being a police informer.
The attack was perpetrated because Rajo Hansda was suspected of being a police informer.
The attack was perpetrated because Singh was believed to be involved with the murder of social activist Lalit Kumar Mehta.
The attack was perpetrated because the victim was suspected of being a police informer.
The attack was perpetrated because the victim, a journalist, had conveyed anti-Taliban messages in his reporting.
The attack was perpetrated because the victims were suspected of being police informers.
The attack was perpetrated by an Italian anarchist group known as CCCCC.  The group is fighting for the release of Italian prisoners being held in Spain and for the abolition of FIES (Ficheros Internos de Especial Seguimento), Spain's anti-terrorism legislation.
The attack was possibly a reprisal by Shi i militants
The attack was possibly linked to the local drug trade
The attack was possibly motivated by revenge.
The attack was possibly related to the conflict between Russia and Chechnya
The attack was probably gang-related.
The attack was probably related to loyalist in-fighting.
The attack was protesting against setting up armed police camps in Bhojpur.
The attack was protesting the expansion of the Narita Airport.
The attack was racially-motivated.
The attack was reported to be carried out in retaliation for the killing of three fellow rebels by police.
The attack was reported to be politically motivated.
The attack was reportedly carried out against the villagers for working against the militant group.
The attack was reportedly carried out because the Communist Party of India-Maoists (CPI-M) wanted unemployed villagers to be given the task under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA), instead of using machines for the purpose.
The attack was reportedly carried out for his involvement with the Tritiya Prastuti Committee (TPC), a break-away faction of the Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M).
The attack was reportedly carried out in order to enforce a 72-hour bandh declared by Communist Party of India-Maoists.
The attack was reportedly in response to Israel's recent killing of the founder of the HAMAS, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, and his successor, Abdel Aziz Rantisi.
The attack was retaliation against supposed Israel Defense Force attacks on Palestinian civilians.
The attack was retaliation for a previous incident in which IDF forces killed five Palestinians in Tulkarem.
The attack was retaliation for the killing of four Arab Israelis on August 4, 2005 in Sfhfar'am by a former IDF soldier (cf. 200508040007).
The attack was retaliation for the killing of two top leaders, Sheik Ahmed Yassin and Abdel Aziz Rantisi.
The attack was retaliation for the Sialkot bombing six days before.
The attack was retribution for arrests that the police had made.
The attack was revenge for a drone attack that claimed the life of TTP commander Taj Gul.
The attack was seen as a response to the death of a Greek immigrant from Georgia who was in police custody.
The attack was suspected of being motivated by a desire to intimidate the upcoming state elections.
The attack was suspected to be carried out in response to a meeting between Afghan officials and U.S. troops who were advising a police training program.
The attack was suspected to be in retaliation for the ruling by the British court that determined Augusto Pinochet's extradition to Spain.
The attack was suspected to have been carried out by Abu Sayyaf guerrillas avenging the recent death of its chieftain in a clash with authorities.
The attack was thought to be a retaliation for the killing of an alleged member.
The attack was thought to be revenge for the earlier death of local Al-Aqsa leader Marwan Zalloum.
The attack was thought to have been carried out in protest of the firing of Pascal Lissouba.
The attack was to avenge the death of Haider Ali, who was killed by Indian troops two weeks before this incident.
The attack was to avenge the deaths of prisoners on a yearlong hunger strike that were protesting Turkey's new maximum security prisons.
The attack was to be a reprisal for Israeli actions against HAMAS militants and other Palestinians.
The attack was to create fear amongst the Shiite population in Iraq.
The attack was to influence the discussions at the upcoming Khartoum summit where Chad and CAR were to discuss security borders issues.
The attack was to obtain the release of 173 militants arrested by the Yemeni government during an anti-terrorism crackdown.
The attack was to prevent Northeastern Indians from celebrating the Indian Independence Day .
The attack was to protest "American imperialism" and globalization.
The attack was to protest the arrest of PKK leader Abdallah Ocalan by Turkish forces.
The attack was to protest the government not making a Sadar Hills district.
The attack was to protest the lack of progress in the investigation into the assassination of Jean-Michel Rossi, a Corsican nationalist.
The attack was to protest the Russian war in the Caucasus.
The attack was to punish the local population for helping the government.
The attack was to punish the Tamlang Valley Agricultural Development Corporation for promoting and planting jathropa and cassava.
The attack was to sway the results of the elections in Georgia.
The attack was to threaten Kashmiri separatist parties from getting involved with the Indian government.
The attack was to warn officials to stop the flow of immigration into Russia.
The attack was to warn others not to cooperate with the government against the Tehrik-e-Taliban.
The attack was within the framework of the continued resistance and in retaliation for the Israeli attacks in the West Bank and Gaza Strip
The attack, which coincided with a visit by US President George W Bush, was believed to be carried out to oppose the Good Friday agreement.
The attacker wanted to be able to speak to Peru's president Allen Garcia.
The attacker was angered by the presence of loyalists in an Irish Republican Army controlled neighborhood.
The attacker was reportedly opposed to the Foreign Minister's Kosovo war policies.
The attackers accused Abdul Gani of using a radio to tip off Indian military forces.
The attackers accused the victims of collaborating with guerrillas
The attackers asked for a ransom for the adbuctee.  Sources state that the attackers are stepping up pressure on the tea garden management.
The attackers believed that the victims were providing support to Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)
The attackers claimed that they were avenging crimes against the loyalist people.
The attackers issued a 28-page manifesto to local papers explaining their reasons for killing Massimo D'Antona.  Some of their reasons included opposition to "a neocorporate policy" sought by "the imperialist bourgeoisie" and a protest of the Italian government's policies regarding the Kosovo conflict.
The attackers left a handwritten leaflet saying that they would carry out more attacks in the coming month of Ramadan if the sanctity of the holy month was not being maintained.
The attackers stated they carried out the attack because the buses were not registered by the "people's government."
The attackers wanted to prevent Ghandi from testifying in court against a member of their group.
The attackers wanted to scare Mr. Sharad Yadav to withdraw from the election.
The attackers were carrying out their own death sentence after Mohammed Rafiq Abdel Razek confessed to collaborating with Israel and abusing his daughters.
The attackers were demanding a national convention to discuss the country's problems
The attackers were initially targeting U.S. installations in Samarra.
The attackers were targeting Central Reserve Police Force personnel in the area.
The attacks came a few hours after the government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) panel parties initialed in Kuala Lumpur the final draft of the Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain.
The attacks in Derry came after the loyalist Red Hand Defenders - a cover name used by the UDA and LVF - said they would continue targeting nationalist homes.
The attacks marked the formation of the Ber Satu terrorist organization.
The attacks occurred on the anniversary of the 2004 suppression of an anti-government protest in Tak Bai in neighboring Narathiwat province.
The attacks took place on May 28 to remember the underground nuclear testing by the Pakistan government on the Balochistan soil.
The attacks were carried out as "resistance to the criminal NATO alliance."
The attacks were carried out because the villagers began harvesting their crops.
The attacks were carried out in an effort to distract the army against operations on their bases in the Rwenzori Mountain range.
The attacks were in connection with ongoing cultural and religious tension in the area
The attacks were in protest the relocation of a Nepalese Army camp to the area.
The attacks were in response to the G-8 summit and the recent arrests of other arsonists.
The attacks were meant to bring attention to the perpetrator's antigovernment sentiment.
The attacks were perpetuated in order to punish the villagers for aiding rebels.
The attacks were probably gang-related.
The attacks were retribution for abuses in the  latest perceived offensive by the military.
The attempted abduction was for conscription
The attempted bombing was allegedly in response to the set execution of three of the Bali bombers.
The attempted coup was staged by Bangledeshi rebel army officers who were supporters of the Awami League and veterans of the Mukti Bahini [1971 Freedom Fighters]. They were angered by Rahman's despotic and authoritarian rule, and his ruthless treatment of those holding political opposition.
The attempted kidnapping was carried out in order to force the medical team to treat wounded FARC militants.
The AUC claimed that they were investigating all of the workers under suspicion of spying.
The Azawad National Liberation Movement (MNLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order "to protect and progressively re-occupy Azawad territory and also respond to Bamako's provocation..."
The Azawad National Liberation Movement (MNLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the government's lack of commitment to the peace talks.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed in a letter found on the body of the victim, Dr. Haider Ali, that he had been killed for working with military intelligence.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Najibullah Rind of being a spy.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of working with the government.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Anwar Asa was targeted because they believed he was an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Fayaz Ahmed was targeted because the BLA believed he was a spy.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to prevent mobile phone networks from expanding.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for a military operation in Bolan.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for a recent military operation in the area.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the death of Zaman Marri.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the BLA targeted the civilians for allegedly working with security personnel.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the family was targeted because the BLA believed they were informants.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the targeted civilian was working with the government.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted because the BLA believed he was an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were working on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project in Balochistan.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and warned tribal elders against supporting the government.
The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed responsibility, stating that they executed half of the bus passengers because they were identified as being members of the military or other security institutions.
The Baloch Liberation Army's spokesman Beebargh Baloch claimed responsibility for the assassination.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) and the Baloch Republican Army (BRA) separately claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mohammad Waleed was targeted for being a state informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Abdul Rashid of being a government informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Asif of being a member of a government-sponsored death squad.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Fateh Muhammad of supporting the Pakistani government.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Master Rehmatullah Sajidi of being a state agent.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Muhammad Niaz of being affiliated with the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Sabzal Khan Umrani of being an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the Balochistan National Party (BNP) of conspiring with the Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victim of being an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of being members of a government "death squad."
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Umar Jan of working with the government.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and promised to prevent China from carrying out anti-Baloch projects in the region.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Abdul Hameed was targeted because they believed he was a state agent.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Abdusamad was targeted because the BLF believed he was a "pro-state actor."
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ali Sher was targeted because they believed he was a state agent.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Eid Muhammad was targeted because the BLF believed he was an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Id Muhammad was targeted because they believed he was a state agent.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mir Yaqub Balkatari was targeted because they believed he was a state agent.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mohammad Asghar was targeted because the BLF believed he was an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Muhammad IIyas was targeted because the BLF believed he was an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mullazai was targeted because they believed he was an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Nur Bakhsh was targeted because the BLF believed he was an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sanaullah was targeted because the BLF believed he was a member of a state-backed militia.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Syed Akhtar was targeted because the BLF believed he was an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because the shop was a hideout for intelligence officials.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations in the area.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to deter Arab dignitaries from hunting endangered bustards in Pakistan.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the BLF believed Kher Bakhsh was an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the district chairs were abducted due to their involvement in elections.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the National Party participated in "Pakistan's genocidal policies in Balochistan."
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the targeted security forces were engaged in espionage against Baloch fighters and tortured locals in the area.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was accused of being an informant.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were released because they were Baloch nationals.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because the BLF believed they were working in intelligence.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they believed the victim was a state agent.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and warned people to distance themselves from the local government elections.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident via mobile phone messaging, stating that they executed the attack because the victims worked for secret agencies.
The Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it targeted Mir Abdul Qadoos Bezinjo because he "was working against the interests of Baloch people."
The Baloch Liberation Tigers (BLT) claimed responsibility and stated that the victims were targeted because they were suspected of being involved in anti-Balochi activities.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that they targeted the police because they were responsible for the deaths of Baluch people.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ghulam Baloch was targeted because the BRA believed he was an informant.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ijaz Ahmed was targeted for his involvement in criminal activities.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that investments must be approved by Balochistan province before moving forward.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of 23 Balochi civilians in security operations.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the killing of Baloch people in the area.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the recent discovery of several deceased Baloch activists.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in retaliation for continuous military operations.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the BRA would continue to carry out attacks against railways until the military operation in Balochistan is called off.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted for participating in government projects.
The Baloch Republican Army (BRA) stated that the MP was targeted for his anti-Baloch actions.
The Baloch Republican Army claimed responsibility for the attack. "We carried out the attack," Sarbaz Baluch, a spokesman for the rebel group told local media. "It is in retaliation for extrajudicial killings on our youth by the intelligence agencies,
The Baloch Republican Army claimed responsibility for the explosion.
The Baloch Waja Liberation Army (BWLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to operations by security forces in Sui.
The Baloch Young Tigers (BYT) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Qazi Abdul Wahid was targeted for allegedly detaining Baloch citizens.
The Baloch Young Tigers (BYT) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the alleged abduction of civilians during a military operation in Bolan.
The Balochistan Liberation Army claimed responsibility for the attack.
The Balochistan Liberation Army spokesman said that the Chinese were aiding the Pakistani government in exploiting Balochistan's natural resources.
The Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Qasim was an alleged informer.
The Balochistan Liberation United Front (BLUF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the owner of the house was "anti-Balochi."
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in opposition to projects taking place in the BIFM's area of operation.
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to prove that the group was still active in the area.
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to an upcoming military operation against the BIFM.
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the death of Tamharin Esmael, a BIFM member.
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the military's close proximity to the BIFM's area of operation.
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations in Mamasapano.
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations in Mamasapano. The BIFM also stated that the hostages were taken in order to protect the people during the battle.
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations the previous two weeks.
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to a proposal that would create Bangsamoro as an autonomous region.
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the alleged abduction of a farmer and his son by the military.
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they were targeting a military unit stationed at the plantation in retaliation to the alleged abduction of a BIFM member and his son by the military.
The Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was carried out in retaliation for an incident in which soldiers had harassed Muslim farmers in the area.
The bank manager was killed for spying for intelligence agencies.
The Barqa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sheikh Faraj al-'Obeidi was targeted because the group believed he was an apostate.
The Barqa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for airstrikes in Derna district.
The Barqa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations in Derna.
The Barqa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the nurses were targeted for working with the military.
The Barqa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and warned people not to sell cigarettes.
The Base Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for alleged ill treatment of Muslims.
The Base Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for ill treatment of Muslim detainees.
The Black Liberation Army stole money in order to support their armed struggle.  BLA members believed that armed struggle was the only means by which the Black Nationalist movement could break the psychological-class chains of 20th century enslavement.
The blast came a week after a local religious group warned NGOs to stop recruiting women.
The blast came just hours after the SLMM asked the Colombo government to disarm anti-LTTE paramilitary units operating in the east, including Batticaloa, and they also criticized the LTTE for the upsurge in violence.
The blast was designed to draw attention to the "security strategy" of the Swiss authorities during the upcoming G8 summit.
The blasts were meant to be a warning for the leader of the Communist Party of Nepal - Unified Marxist Leninist, who was visiting the area.
The blasts were revenge for an Israeli helicopter strike the day before.
The bomb exploded near an area that is under Tamil control.
The bomb may have been connected to the impending trial of a Chechen who killed an Ingush citizen.
The bomb may have been placed to protest US support of Israel.
The bomb targeted a police and army patrol
The bomb was an attempted assassination and meant to intimidate the police division tasked with stopping organized crime.
The bomb was intended to kill Chief Constable Hugh Orde.
The bomb was likely a bid to disrupt the British-Irish deal that had just been announced to disarm the Provisional Irish Republican Army.
The bomb was meant to detonate on the 70th birthday anniversary of the late first president.
The bomber wanted to killing as many policemen as possible.
The bomber was racially motivated.
The bombing against police targets, including this attack, may have been conducted in retaliation for a police attack on the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) headquarters.
The bombing attack was carried out for extortion purposes.
The bombing attack was carried out to avenge the 2002 anti-Muslim violence in Gujarat.
The bombing attack was carried out to demand a separate state for the ethnic Madhesi community.
The bombing attack was meant to threaten Meera Shahib Mohammed Junaid, director of the Department of Muslim Religious and Cultural Affairs.
The bombing attack was thought to be carried out against El Correo printing plant because of its hard-line stance against separatist violence.
The bombing may have targeted owners who did not participate in a strike.
The bombing targeted men trying to join Iraqi security forces.
The bombing was a response to a wave of executions and sentences passed on young people by the mullahs criminal judiciary. Another statement issued by Mujahedeen-e-Khalq spokesman, Ali Safavi, stated that the court was targeted because of its sanctioning of ''repressive policies, arrests, executions and torture."
The bombing was a response to the assassination of Sarhan Sarhan by Israeli forces.
The bombing was carried out as part of the natural response to the occupation's crimes in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The bombing was in connection with the insurgency in Iraq.
The bombing was in response to the real estate office selling Basque land.
The bombing was in retaliation for participating in operations against militants who follow Maulana Fazlullah, a pro-Taliban militant cleric.
The bombing was intended to intimidate the family and other black families in the area, and infringe upon the family's housing rights.  Though authorities believe that this incident had no involvement from the Ku Klux Klan, it occurred three weeks after the  Klan held its first public rally in the state in more than 70 years.
The bombing was retaliation against the assassination of Lu'ay al-Sa'di, leader of the Islamic Jihad's military wing in the West Bank.
The bombing was retaliation for Kurdish cooperation with US forces in Iraq and a response to allegations of prisoner torture in US military run prisons.
The bombings targeted Sinhalese shopowners who refused to close their shops when Tamil citizens called for a strike following the erection of a Buddhist statue in the center of the city.
The Brigade considered the recent increase in oil prices to be a crime.
The Brigade of al-Mukhtar al-Thaqafi claimed responsibility, stating that the purpose of the abduction was to secure the release of 11 Lebanese pilgrims being held by Syrian opposition groups.
The Brigades of Imprisoned Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the lack of Islamic affiliation was the motivating factor, identifying the offices of the Red Cross as a "Christianization castle."
The Brigades of the Imprisoned Sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman claimed responsibility in pamphlets left at the scene, stating that the attack was in retaliation for the killing of Al-Qa'ida leader Abu Yahya al Libi in a drone strike in Pakistan.  In addition, they claimed to be protesting the presence of United States drones in Libya.
The Brigades of the Martyrs of al-Aqsa contacted the Agence France-Presse and claimed responsibility for one of the two bombings on Herzl Street, claiming it was a response to Israeli actions towards Palestinians.
The Brigades of the Martyrs of al-Aqsa contacted the Agence France-Presse and stated they were responsible for one of the two bombings on Herzl Street, saying it was a response to Israeli actions towards Palestinians.
The brigades said in a joint statement that the shelling was a natural response to the Israeli atrocities against the Palestinian people.
The brother of a former lawmaker who was opposed to the SLDF was found among the dead.
The brothers were allegedly kidnapped for being suspected members of a rival Maoist outfit.
The Bru National Liberation Front (BNLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the hostages were released because the government agreed to pay for the education of 100 girls from the Reang tribe. Sources also stated that the assailants demanded that the government grant tribal status to a community in the Barak Valley.
The buildings were being used for researching the genetic engineering of plants, which Wallace believed was detrimental to the environment, and he wanted to deter government agencies and others from supporting this type of research.
The burning was related to DOLE’s refusal to give in to the extortion demands of the communist rebels.
The bus defied the bandh (strike) called by the JTMM-J
The bus had defied a strike that was called for by Trincomalee District Tamil Association.  The strike was in protest to the "inaction of the authorities to allow Tigers to hold their Heroes Week ceremonies without trouble".
The bus line has allegedly been the target of attacks by extortionist groups but the specific motive is unknown.
The bus was defying the group's banda (strike) in the area.
The caller from the People's Revolutionary command claimed that the bombing was in response to the U.S. navy presence in Viegues, an island off of Puerto Rico's Coast, where island residents claimed that American Navy target practice was damaging the environment and endangering the livelihood of the residents.
The callers threatened to attack and burn down the Secretariat if the UPC continued with a plan to unveil malfeasance on the disbursement of the safety net fund later that afternoon.
The captors wanted "assurance from the Afenifere and Egbe Omo Oduduwa that Ijaw citizens in Lagos would no longer be killed"
The captors wanted to "make a point about security concerns in the area and its willingness to launch talks with the government"
The captors wanted to negotiate land claims
The Caucasus Emirate claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the repression of female members of the Muslim community.
The CDs are perceived by militants to do damage to Islamic culture.
The cell targeted Professor Bradshaw at the Horticulture Center because of his research on the genetic engineering of poplar trees.
The Christian Knights of the Ku Klux Klan believed that African Americans were attempting to destroy the United States and plotted to overthrow the government in their churches.  Moreover, the perpetrators hoped that by burning down Black Baptist churches they would initiate a race war.
The Chukakuha Revolutionary Army states that the attack is in opposition of the building of a new runway at Narita airport
The Civil Defense Force attacked the village because it was the home of a prominent member of the Revolutionary United Front (RUF); the two groups were involved in a series of retaliatory attacks
The civilian was accused of being a hired assassin.
The civilian was accused of spying for the United States.
The civilian was alleged to have been a spy.
The civilian was believed to have been a spy.
The civilian was kidnapped because he was believed to have been a spy.
The civilian was killed because he was believed to have been a spy.
The civilian was killed for allegedly spying for the United States.
The civilian was killed for spying for the United States.
The civilian was shot for allegedly spying for Pakistani security forces.
The civilians were killed for allegedly being spies for the United States.
The civilians were killed for allegedly spying for the United States.
The civilians were suspected spies.
The civilians were targeted for allegedly being police informers.
The claim by the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq stated that the attack was aimed at the Iraqi government, and the actions they had taken in the country.
The claim of responsibility stated that the attack was in retaliation for Israel's occupation of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
The closure of the Emirati embassy in Baghdad and of the television station Al-Fayhah.
The co-op was targeted because it ships feed to mink ranchers throughout the country, and the perpetrators were against the mink fur trade.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-M) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the two victims were accused of being police informants.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-M) were opposed to Union Rural Development minister, Jairam Ramesh, visiting the area. They associated him with a plan to expand roads into the rural areas and believed that the introduction of roads would lead to an increased military presence in the area.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Basant Bhatt of being a police informant. The CPI-Maoist stated that the attack was also carried out in response to the Odisha state government's mistreatment of farmers and lack of response to the abuse of women. The CPI-Maoist also expressed that the attack was in response to barrage construction projects, which the group opposed because it took water away from local farmers.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Birwal Murmu of being a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Charku Yadav of being an informant for Jharkhand Jan Mukti Parishad and the police.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Chhannuram Mandavi of being a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused former members of the United Revolutionary Front of using intoxicants and harassing civilians.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused G. Apparao of being a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Hari Pradhani of being a police informant and producing homemade liquor.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Jagannath Khara of being a police informant and taking advantage of tribal members in the area.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Jeevan Singh Munda of being a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Jotra Lohra of being a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Kalicharan Mahto of being a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused local journalists of supporting authorities.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused of Banamali Naik of assisting the police in an operation in which a CPI-Maoist member was arrested, in addition to producing homemade liquor.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Sandeep Kumar Rathore of being a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused security personnel of harassing civilians in alleged anti-Maoist operations.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Sharwan Yadav of being a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Sugambar Oraon of being a police informant and a member of Jharkhand Janmukti Parishad (JJP).
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Sunil Pawar of being a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of being police informants.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of being police informants. Sources also noted that the attack occurred on the final day of the People's Liberation Guerilla Army (PLGA) week.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of being police informants. Sources also suspected that the attack may have been carried out in retaliation for the killing of two CPI-Maoist members by authorities on June 18, 2017.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion, specifically 20% of a government welfare grant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that "podu lands" be granted to tribe members. Sources also noted that the incident took place during a 24-hour bandh called by Maoists in response to the death of three members.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that a nearby dam construction project be halted and evicted locals allowed to return to the area.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that Central Coalfields Limited (CCL) employ local residents and halt its construction project. The group also accused the company of working with capitalists.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that citizens boycott India's upcoming elections in Bolangir district, which began on February 13, 2017.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that road work be ceased. Sources also suspected that the attack may have been related to an extortion demand.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the alleged harassment of Adivasis stop.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the government cease operations against Maoists, release Maoist detainees, and stop supposed "fake encounters."
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the road construction project be halted. The group also demanded that citizens boycott India's upcoming elections.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the targeted construction company halt its construction in the area.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the workers cease their construction on the road.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that train services be suspended in the area. Sources also stated that the attack was carried out in order to enforce a 24-hour bandh called by CPI-Maoist in Bihar and Jharkhand states protesting "Operation Greenhunt," which was a security operation targeting the group.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the destruction of the Kone, Oreya, and Saryu police checkpoints in Latehar district. They also demanded the withdrawal of security members engaged in anti-Maoist operations in Jharkhand.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and indicated that the victim was targeted due to his work in assisting the government relocate tribes people.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and insisted on higher wages for workers and a stop to pollution.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated a warning to schools not to allow security forces to use their facilities and demanded that security members be removed from schools in the district.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Alex Paul Menon was targeted for his alleged silence regarding the mistreatment of tribal members in the area. The group also demanded the release of 17 Maoists being held in prison.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Amit Singh was targeted for his alleged involvement in a recent abduction.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Bapi Samant was targeted because the group believed he was a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Dinesh Tanti was targeted because the group believed he was a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Duma Sisa was targeted because the group believed he was a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Gampa Lova Srinu was targeted because the group believed he was a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Gurumurti Madhi was targeted because the group believed he was a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Hidma was targeted because the group believed he was a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Jayaram Khara was targeted because the group believed he was a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Jayaram Pangi was targeted for smuggling drugs.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Jeevan Patnaik was targeted because they believed he was a police informant and had committed crimes against tribal members.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Krishna Miniaka was targeted because the group believed he was an informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Prasanna Majhi was targeted because he participated in a police operation in which a CPI-Maoist member was arrested.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ravindra Sunki was targeted because they believed he was a "traitor."
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Reddy was a police informant and had participated in anti-Maoist activities.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sagina Venkatramana was targeted for falsifying signatures in order to pass a mining resolution.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sanjay Pandey was targeted for not responding to an extortion demand. The group also warned others against engaging in government projects without receiving permission from the Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist).
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sudhram Brijia was a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the abduction was carried out in opposition to a mining project in the area.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in opposition to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's planned visit to Odisha for April 15 and 16, 2017. The group also stated that the attack was in response to the appointment of people who are not Odia to high positions within Odisha.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of a proposal to establish a Border Security Force (BSF) camp in the area.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of recent road construction.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of United States President Barack Obama's upcoming trip to India for Republic Day.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of United States President Barack Obama's upcoming visit to India for Republic Day celebrations, scheduled for January 26, 2015.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in relation to an extortion demand.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to alterations made to the Chotanagpur and Santhal Pargana Tenancy Acts.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to alterations made to the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act (CNT) and the Santhal Pargana Tenancy Act (SPT).
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to alterations to tenancy acts in Chotanagpur Santhal Pargana and the memorandum of understandings between investors and the Jharkhand state government signed at the Global Investors' Summit.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to operations against the group.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the death of four CPI-Maoist members.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the illegal removal of sand from the Darliput river.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for an alleged "encounter" in which three Maoists were killed.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations against the group.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the arrest of Bhima Singh, a Maoist leader.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) members in Aurangabad district.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the deaths of nine Maoists recently.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to recent operations by authorities.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the deaths of Maoists by authorities. They also demanded that the government stop installing new police stations in Visakha agency.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the killing of two people by authorities earlier in the month.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the forest outpost was targeted for its policies against tribal members and farmers.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group targeted Bira Basant in retaliation for raids and extortion activities.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group was opposed to the construction project.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the police officers were targeted for their alleged mistreatment of civilians.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the unit was targeted for brewing liquor.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were police informants and were involved in extortion activities.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident and urged people not to join authorities or support the construction project. CPI-Maoist also stated that the government would use the roads being created to harm local tribes.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident in pamphlets left at the scene and urged people to boycott the Lok Sabha elections.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident in pamphlets left at the scene, which demanded that the company's officials obtain permission from the group prior to conducting mining operations in the area.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the abduction was in retaliation for the village's support of police officers during an exchange of gunfire on March 4, 2014 that led to the death of two group members.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted the victim because he was a police informant.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they were attempting to procure firearms for the purpose of arming the "common man" and continuing the fight against Operation Greenhunt, an anti-Maoist offensive campaign.
The Communist Party of India - Maoist (CPI-Maoist) left a note with the victim's body, stating that she was killed because they believed that she was a police informant.
The Communist Party of India (Maoist) claimed responsibility for the attack in leaflets, stating that they killed the victim because the group believed that he was a police spy.
The Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that they targeted the victim, Bapu Gonda Talandi, because they were unhappy with his work in the region.
The Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) claimed responsibility, leaving a poster near his body stating that he was a police informer.
The Communist Party of Nepal - Maoist (CPN-Maoist-Chand) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Bir Bahadur Ghartimagar was abducted because he had "forcefully tried to enforce the parliamentary system" in Thawang municipality. Sources also suspected that the attack was meant to disrupt the 1st Village Assembly, which was scheduled for September 16th, 2017.
The Communist Party of Nepal - Maoist (CPN-Maoist-Chand) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Pappu Construction Company was targeted in retaliation for the contractor's mediocre construction work.
The Communist Party of Nepal - Maoist (CPN-Maoist-Chand) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack targeted Save the Children for their lack of transparency in earthquake funds.
The Communist Party of Nepal - Maoist (CPN-Maoist-Chand) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was abducted in opposition to Nepal's upcoming federal elections, scheduled for November 26, 2017.
The Communist Party of Nepal - Maoist (CPN-Maoist-Chand) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted for taking over land illegally through the use of fake documentation.
The Communist Party of Nepal - Maoist (CPN-Maoist-Chand) claimed responsibility for the incident through the assailant, who stated that (CPN-Maoist-Chand) ordered him to carry out the attack in order to "show his commitment" to the group.
The company made cages and other animal equipment for use in animal laboratory experiments.
The company the car owner works for trades shares for the British company Huntingdon Life Sciences, which is the suspected reason behind the attack.
The company was a large corporation involved in timber sales, and the perpetrators were against logging.
The company was targeted due to its involvement in timber sales.
The Conspiracy of Cells of Fire claimed responsibility for sending an explosive device to a judicial official, stating that the attack was revenge for the arrest of two people accused of sending another letter bomb. The group also stated that the attack was part of "efforts to revive urban guerrilla war."
The Conspiracy of Cells of Fire claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Georgia Tsatani was targeted for his alleged corruption.
The Conspiracy of Cells of Fire claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the police station was targeted because they had tortured an Albanian prisoner there.
The Conspiracy of the Cells of Fire claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the targeted shopping center is a "a shopping mall for the bourgeoisie."
The Conspiracy of Vengeful Arsonists claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the security vehicles were targeted in retaliation for Securitas' protection of refugees.
The construction firm received an extortion letter from the suspected NPA rebels, demanding P4 million. The construction firm refused to give in to the alleged NPAs' demand.
The Continuity Irish Republican Army (CIRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that CIRA targeted drug dealers in the attack.
The Coordination Committee (CORCOM) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the bombing was part of a boycott of India's Independence Day celebrations designed to protest the merger of Manipur into India in October 1949.
The Coordination Committee (CORCOM) claimed responsibility for the bombing in a press release and stated that the attack was part of an organized boycott by multiple revolutionary groups of Republic Day celebrations.  Sources note that revolutionary groups had also called for a general strike on January 26th in response to Republic Day celebrations.
The Coordination Committee (CORCOM) claimed responsibility for the bombing in a press release and stated that the attack was part of an organized boycott by multiple revolutionary groups of Republic Day celebrations.  Sources note that revolutionary groups have also called for a general strike on January 26th in response to Republic Day celebrations.
The Coordination of Azawad Movements (CMA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for CMA being expelled from a town on April 27, 2015.
The country was heading into its tourist season.
The couple was killed because they allegedly broke Islamic laws.
The crime was committed to avenge putative crimes by "the Zionists".
The Dashmesh Regiment claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Brigadier Jagdish Gagneja was targeted due to his alleged mistreatment of members of the Sikh community. Sources also suspected that the attack may have been part of a larger trend of violence related to Assembly elections.
The Defenders of the Nation's Sovereignty claimed responsibility for the attack on the hotel, warning foreigners not to become involved in Madagascar's election process.
The Democratic Front of the Central African People (FDPC) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of FDPC leader, Abdoulaye Miskine, in exchange for the victims.
The Democratic Front of the Central African People (FDPC) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the abduction was carried out in order to exchange the victim for Abdoulaye Miskine, the FDPC leader.
The dissidents wanted to destabilize the political process in Northern Ireland.
The doctor was blamed for spying for foreign Afghan forces.
The Donetsk People's Republic claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that they were attempting to recover bodies from a previous attack on the airport.
The Donetsk People's Republic claimed responsibility for the incident and published a poster of Simon Ostrovsky stating that he was wanted for having distorted the reality of the local conflict.
The Donetsk People's Republic claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ihor Kozlovskyy was abducted because the group believed he was a spy.
The Donetsk People's Republic claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Liliya Kots was allegedly planning to abduct a Donetsk People's Republic member.
The Donetsk People's Republic claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the abduction was carried out in response to Krat's involvement in the abuse of riot police officers and a Russian journalist during protests.
The Donetsk People's Republic claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the International Rescue Committee (IRC) was targeted in retaliation for spying on the group's activities and not paying taxes.
The Donetsk People's Republic claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they were attempting to recover bodies from a previous attack on the airport.
The Donetsk People's Republic claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Valentyna Buchok was targeted because the group believed she was a spy.
The Donetsk People's Republic previously warned the government to halt its rail blockade or else the group would attack businesses in the area.
The Earth Liberation Front (ELF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in solidarity with detainees being held in Greece, who were on hunger strikes.
The Eelam Peoples Revolutionary Liberation Front opposed the LTTE.  The two were rival groups.
The elders were killed because it was believed they were helping the government.
The ELN claimed to have kidnapped the persons because the ELN was starting a sabotage campaign against Occidental for their pillaging of the Indian people in the area.
The EPDP is a paramilitary group thought to be working with the Sri Lankan government against the LTTE.  Also, peace talks had begun between the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE.
The escaped captives reported that the rebels had abducted the refugees with the intention of forcing them to join the rebels in fighting the Burundian government.  The one fatality occurred because the victim had refused to join the rebels.
The ETA claimed responsibility for the bombing of the Socialist Party offices.
The ETA wanted to prove its capabilities to carry out an attack and to fracture a planned relationship between the Spanish government and Basque authorities.
The European Union was in the process of blacklisting the LTTE as a terrorist organization and the LTTE warned that the ban would lead to war.
The exact motive is unknown; however this occurred during a meeting held to discuss Latino-American relations, especially between the police and the Mexican-American residents in the community
The exact motives of the perpetrator are unclear, however there was some suspicion that this incident was part of a terrorist strategy to gauge the abilities of the Algerian security agencies to respond to a suicide bomber.
The explicit motive was to pressure the Jordanian government to remove its contractors from Iraq.
The explicit motive was to pressure the US and coalition governments to withdraw their troops from Iraq.
The explosion came during a time of racial tensions in Colorado, especially in Denver and Boulder, where at least 10 bombings had occurred within the last year, primarily directed at public buildings such as schools, police stations, and courthouses.
The explosion was an attempt to step up attacks prior to the Colombian presidential inauguration ceremony.
The explosion was likely in protest to the trial of anti-Syrian activists that was occurring at the judiciary.
The explosions were part of an effort to disrupt Independence Day celebrations.
The explosive may have been hurled by party members concerned with upcoming elections.
The facility was targeted because it slaughtered horses for foreign dinner plates.
The factory was defying the group's three-dah Madesh banda (strike)
The family of the abductee report that the abductors made a ransom demand.  However, authorities believe that the attack was orchestrated by another group that has been clashing with government forces.
The family of Thiyagachandran claimed the break-away Karuna faction was responsible for this attack.  They noted that the Karuna faction had targeted his parliamentarian brother, who represented the Tamil rebels in the Tamil National Alliance, and his family with a rocket-propelled grenade at his home the previous year.  Sources also note that government forces claimed to have rid the whole area of LTTE, but that the Karuna faction (who fought with the government against the LTTE) was still in the area and were allowed to carry weapons for security.
The FARC kidnapped the medicine healer in order to force him to attend to wounded FARC members back at their camp.
The FARC said the traffic ban was partly to protest the re-election bid of President Alvaro Uribe.
The farm harvested trees used in the manufacture of paper-trees which the perpetrators believed were an "ecological nightmare threatening native biodiversity in the ecosystem."
The farmers were accused of aiding leftist rebels.
The February 14th Movement claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack because they were in opposition to the Formula One race that was scheduled for the following week.
The female suicide bomber intended to hit the headquaters of the Awakening Council, a government-supported paramilitary group tasked with fighting Al Qaeda and other insurgents.
The Fire and Flame for the Police (FFdP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for alleged violent threats by authorities regarding potential demonstrations during the G20 summit.
The firebombing came as response to US District Court Judge W. Arthur Garrity Jr.'s decision to place South Boston High School under federal court supervision and implement desegregation.  His decision was met with fights between black and white students at the high school, and opposition and anger from many school officials and political leaders in Boston who denounced his orders and his lack of acknowledgement of faculty efforts to implement his desegregation requirements.
The firing on Gilo was in response to an Israeli military incursion into Beit Jalla, the West Bank.
The fishing trawler was used by the assailants to reach Mumbai to perpetrate eight other attacks.
The FLNC indicated that the aim of the attack was to dissuade the Accor group from setting up in business on the island.
The followers of the Sufi sect were unhappy about cultural actions in the mosque.
The four men allegedly asked the children at the village the whereabouts of their parents; when the children asked them who they were, they allegedly started firing shots in the air.
The Fourth Reich Skinheads hoped to ignite a race war
The Fred Hampton Unit of the People's Forces was a political group devoted to ending imperialism, racism, capitalism and what they believed to be a facist judicial-prison system in the United States; they attempted to target courthouses that sentenced people to prison.
The Free and Democratic Society of Eastern Kurdistan (KODAR) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations against the group.
The Free Papua Movement (OPM-Organisasi Papua Merdeka) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of two detainees in exchange for the victims.
The Free Papua Movement (OPM-Organisasi Papua Merdeka) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to disrupt operations at the Freeport Grasberg mine and revive the group's independence negotiations.
The Free Papua Movement (OPM-Organisasi Papua Merdeka) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to disrupt operations at the Freeport Grasberg mine. The Free Papua Movement (OPM-Organisasi Papua Merdeka) also stated that the attack aimed to reopen Papua independence and peace talks, hoping to include the United Nations (UN) and the United States (US) in the negotiations.
The Free Papua Movement (OPM-Organisasi Papua Merdeka) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to stop the development of Jalan Trans Papua.
The Free Syrian Army claimed responsibility and said that the attack was meant to send a message to Russia's prime minister. The rebel who claimed the attack said, "Putin and his weapons are now under my feet."
The Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC)believed that Alan Jara had been a right-wing paramilitary leader.
The gang apparently wanted to rob the armored truck in order to obtain funds for future actions.
The Garo National Liberation Army claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Olget R. Marak of being a police informant.
The Garo National Liberation Army claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the victim.
The Garo National Liberation Army claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion.
The Garo National Liberation Army claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the government halt its ongoing operations against the group in exchange for the release of Jude Rangku T Sangma.
The Garo National Liberation Army claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Madison Ch Marak was targeted because the group believed that Marak was working with authorities.
The Garo National Liberation Army claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in relation to an extortion demand.
The Garo National Liberation Army claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the arrest of Salsam Marak, the All A'chik Youth Federation (AAYF) president.
The Garo National Liberation Army left a letter stating that they carried out the attack because the government had not met their demands.
The George Jackson Brigade believed that Safeway was a corporation that represented everything wrong with capitalism.  They argued that Safeway monopolized all facets of the food industry on west coast, severely damaging small businesses and oppressing farm workers.
The goal was to disrupt the parade and cause mass panic among the population.
The goal was to extort 5 million pesos from the friends and family of the victim, Wilfredo Marasigan.
The Gorkha Liberation Army (GLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a separate state.
The Gorkha Liberation Army (GLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a separate state. Sources also noted that the attack occurred during a bandh calling for a separate Gorkhaland state.
The Gorkha Liberation Army (GLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a separate state. Sources also noted that the attack occurred two hours before peace talks between Darjeeling parties and the state government.
The Gorkha Liberation Army (GLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a separate state. Sources also posited that the attack was part of a larger trend of violence related to Gorkha Janmukti Morcha (GJM)'s call for a separate state.
The government believed the incident was intended to create political chaos prior to the censure debate against the cabinet of Prime Minister Chuan Leekpai, scheduled for Jan. 27-28, 1999.
The government official was kidnapped in an attempt to get other Taliban members released.
The group advocated for the independence of Puerto Rico
The group claimed on its website that it had carried out "God's justice on the apostate" Karim.
The group claimed that the attack was carried out as "a protest against the Annapolis conference and a response to Israel's crimes against the Palestinians."
The group claimed that the attack was in retaliation for the imprisonment in the US of Omar Abdel Rahman.
The group claimed that the attack was retaliation for aggression by Israeli forces.
The group claimed that the attack,  "which marked 40 days to the assassination of military commander Muhammad Abu-Srur, were carried out in response to the targeting of the group's members in the Gaza Strip."
The group claimed that this attack was in response to ‘the occupation’s continuing crimes against the Palestinian people.’
The group claimed the attack came as a "reception" for the Vice President, urging him to deliver a message to President Barack Obama to pull US forces out of Iraq.
The group claimed the attack stating that: "the state machine and everything comprising it, from politicians, diplomats, uniformed and non-uniformed guards, journalists and other snitches, will find us firmly in the opposite camp. In the narrow margins remaining to us, we respond with street insurrection until its toppling."
The group claimed the attack was in response to crimes committed by Israel in the Gaza Strip and West Bank
The group claimed the bomb blasts were a response to Greek's participation in the "anti- terrorist" war and a warning against the country's imminent " humanitarian" involvement in Iraq by sending troops to the country. The group also stated that the attack was a response to the new "anti-terrorist law" expected to be passed in Greece.
The group claimed to have attacked the peacekeepers because they allegedly were not keeping the peace, but instead standing by while innocent people had been killed in the previous days.
The group claiming responsibility states that they were targeting insurgents
The group demanded the legalization of the Communist Party, respect for Russian speakers, equal standing for the Russian language, and the release of three men charged with war crimes
The group demanded the release of all Palestinian prisoners in Egypt.
The group demanded the release of their leader, Salih Haydara al-Atwi, and an end to sanctions on Iraq.
The group demanded the resignation of the President, the Armed Forces chief, and other military officials allegedly involved in the Hello Garci controversy
The group had a list of demands related to the Thai-Burma border, refugees, and actions of the Thai Army.
The group intended to mark Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon one year earlier.
The group is seeking an independent state for the region.
The group is suspected of perpetrating this attack in retribution for the shooting death of a senior Sadrist Party official in An Najaf on 04/08/2008.
The group kidnapped the victim in an attempt to bargain the release of their imprisoned leader.
The Group of Carlo Giuliani appeared to be responding to the death of a protester at the G-8 summit in Italy.
The Group of Popular Fighters claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in order to express solidarity with those whose living standards have been negatively affected by austerity measures. The group also stated that the attack was carried out in memory of Dimitris Christoulas, a pensioner who shot himself in April 2012 to protest the austerity measures.
The Group of Popular Fighters claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the "judicial system is not blind, but serves the interests of capitalists."
The Group of Popular Fighters claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of German capitalism.
The Group of the Fatima Church Attack claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the victims.
The group resorted to taking hostages in response to the forced disarmament of some of their men.
The group said his kidnapping was "to teach him a lesson" for his role in the last kidnapping in the area.
The group said in a statement that the attack was in response to "Israel's continuous aggression against the Palestinian people."
The group said in its statement that the blast was the beginning of a series of explosive protests that would continue until President Gloria Arroyo resigned.
The group said it carried out the actions "against drug trafficking and illegal immigration".
The group said it killed Arafat to punish him for alleged corruption and cooperation with Israel. They also kidnapped his son Manhal Arafat, and said they would execute him if they decide he was also implicated in corruption.
The group said it was avenging the killing of three unarmed Palestinian youths by Israel Defense Forces troops in Rafah several days ago, and of a militant during a raid in a refugee camp in the West Bank city of Nablus last Thursday.
The group said that the attack was a "preliminary retaliation to Israeli occupation's crimes in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip."
The group said that the attack was a preemptive strike against the United States.
The group said that the attack was a warning for the government to stop pursuing policies against Kurds.
The group said that the attack was to avenge the arrest of two of its members last week.
The group said the attack was retaliation for what it views as atrocities committed by Israel against the Palestinian people in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The group said the operation was in retaliation for Israeli atrocities against the Palestinian people.
The group said the shooting was in retaliation for the Israeli Army's March 14th operation in Jenin's refugee camp that killed five Palestinian militants, including the group's leader, Yousef Masharka.
The group stated that the attack was to coincide with the 35th anniversary of the 1967 War.
The group stated that the incident was designed to instill a sense of insecurity in journalists and police.  They also stated that the incident was simple to plan and execute, implying that it would be easy to do again.
The group stated that they committed the bombing to protest the presence of German troops in Afghanistan.
The group stated that they killed the lawmaker "because he was involved in the oppression of the people in the Terai region.
The group states that they "will make life impossible and there will be no place to hide because [they] will continue destroying cars and doors to houses…"
The group wanted an end to the vivisection industry and the cessation of the use of primates for lab testing and research
The group wanted Italy to withdraw its military forces from Iraq in exchange for the victim's life.
The group wanted more of the share of the oil revenue extracted from the Balochistan Province.
The group wanted reductions in gasoline prices.
The group wanted the government to free war prisoners.
The group wants to reclaim their "ancestral lands."
The group was against operation and profit from "Mother Earth and Her sentient beings;"  protest of the meat and dairy industry's treatment of cows.
The group was against research and experiments conducted on animals.
The group was attempting to assassinate a tribal elder.
The group was made up of Tuareg rebels who are fighting for greater inclusion in the army, civil service, and mining sector.
The group was protesting Mcdonald's negative impact on US lifestyle and the use of animals for food.
The group was protesting the continued growth of I-69
The group was protesting the on going assault on the Russian town of Pervomayskaya.  They demanded that the Russian government stop shelling the town.
The group was retaliating for the public naming by the congressman of group members, which resulted in their arrests.
The group was using the incident to publicize its efforts to remove the United States and U.S. allies from Iraq.
The group, which had last been heard from in the 1970s, demanded the release of Greek anarchist Nikos Maziotis, who had been sentenced to fifteen years in prison by an Athens court in July 1999 for attempted bombings in Greece.
The group's spokesman said that the attack was in response to the Israeli assassinations of the PIJ's commanders in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
The group's website stated the target was 'renegades who work at the Green Zone.'
The groups claimed that the attack came from retaliation for ongoing Israeli attacks against the Palestinian people.
The groups claimed that the attacks came to stress that resistance continues, and in response to occupation's crimes in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The guerillas took the government employees hostage for allegedly defying a "civil strike" they had imposed.
The guerillas want the private schools in the area to close down.
The guerillas were fighting for the rights of neglected tribes people and landless farmers.
The guerrillas were attempting to take over the San Andres Municipality.
The gunmen are suspected of setting fire to the school and ballot boxes for a mayoral candidate with a low ballot count.
The gunmen attacked Idrus Jeumpa and his family after he refused to pay 20 million rupiah ($2,439) in overdue "taxes" to the Free Aceh Movement (GAM).
The gunmen claimed that Khazal was a member of the al-Badr Brigades.
The gunmen demanded the release of all political prisoners in Myanmar, a meaningful dialogue between pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi and the military government, and the convening of an elected parliament.
The gunmen were seeking to secure the release of their comrades, who had been arrested for banditry and hostage-taking.
The Hadramawt Tribes Alliance claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the soldiers would not be released until military camps in Hadramawt were closed and military responsibilities were transferred to soldiers residing in Hadramawt.
The Hafiz Gul Bahadur Group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the military setting up checkposts in North Waziristan.
The Haftar Militia claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the militia wanted a transfer of power in which a new constitution could be constructed.
The Haftar Militia claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the militia was trying to take the city back from Muslim fundamentalists.
The Haftar militia claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they abducted the two subcontractors because the militia believed the two were spies.
The Haftar Militia claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they attacked the warehouse because it was used to store weapons.
The Haqqani Network claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a stop to the execution of members of the Taliban. Sources also posited that the video was intended to coerce the government not to carry out the execution of Anas Haqqani, the son of a leader of the Haqqani Network.
The Haqqani Network claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sushmita Banerjee was targeted because of her disrespectful depiction of the Taliban in her book, which was also made into a film. Mahaz Fedai Tahrik Islami Afghanistan claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Banerjee was targeted because the group believed she was a spy for India.
The Haqqani Network clamed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was part of a larger pattern of violence designed to mark the start of the group's spring offensive.  Mujahid claimed that the 18-hour offensive was in revenge for actions by American military forces, including the murder of 17 civilians by a United States (US) soldier and the burning of Korans at a military base.  The spokesperson also claimed the attacks were designed to be a message in direct response to foreign commanders who claimed that the group had lost momentum.
The Hasam Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Gamal al-Deeb of abducted and torturing civilians.
The Hasam Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sheikh Ali Gomaa was targeted for supporting the government.
The Hasam Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Myanmar's poor treatment of Rohingya Muslims.
The Hasam Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to unjust prison sentences.
The Hasam Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for police operations.
The Hasam Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the Egyptian government transferring ownership of two islands to Saudi Arabia.
The Hasam Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was retaliation for the mistreatment of prisoners and their families by the Egyptian security forces in Tanta.
The headmaster was taken hostage in order to force the government to release six villagers that were arrested for the killing of Sarenga police station in-charge Rabi Lochan Mitra on February 25. They were going to release the headmaster in exchange for the release of the villagers.
The hijacker stated that he wanted to be taken to a different location, but the reason for this demand is unknown.
The hijacker wanted to direct the plane to Baghdad International Airport to show his support for Saddam Hussein and his government.
The hijackers claimed they wanted asylum in Sudan, as the social and economic conditions in Ethiopia were very bad.  They said they wanted everyone to see just how bad those conditions were.
The hijackers demanded a halt to the Russian genocide Chechnya.
The hijackers demanded that 17 Arab convicted bombers that were being held in Kuwaiti prisons be released in exchange for the safe release of the passengers
The hijackers demanded the release of 500 Palestinian prisoners
The hijackers demanded the release of jailed Chechen separatists.
The hijackers first demanded the freeing of just one prisoner in Kashmir, a Pakistani Islamic cleric and guerrilla leader named Maulana Masood Azhar.
The Hindu priest had recently garlanded the Sri Lanka president, Mahinda Rajapaksa.  Sources cite this event as a probable motive, as the LTTE is known for targeting individuals they perceive as working against them.
The Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) stated that they would not celebrate independence day while their people were being killed, the females were being sexually assaulted, and property was being destroyed.  They called on other people in the region to boycott independence day activities.
The home was targeted because it is within the Lake Monroe watershed and supposedly posed a threat to Bloomington's water supply.
The hostage takers wanted four of their comrades, arrested for their connections to an assassination the occurred several months earlier, released.
The hostage taking attack took place to negotiate the exchange of an Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) leader
The hostage-takers were responding to the arrest of their coup leader.  They did not make any specific demands.
The hostages were being used as human shields against pursuing troops and police
The hostages were believed be to be military and police informants, which authorities believed was the motive behind the kidnapping attack.
The hostages were taken in order to negotiate the release of tribesmen in custody
The HPC(D) in a statement said the ongoing drilling work at the site is against the interest of the Hmar people as it involved their land, right and dignity.
The huts belonged to a suspected anti-Maoist group.
The Hynniewtrep National Liberation Council (HNLC) claimed responsibility for the incident and warned non-natives of Shillong city to stop intervening in Hynniewtrep affairs.
The Ijaw militants reportedly sought to disrupt local elections.
The Imam Shamil Battalion claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Russia's violent actions in Muslim countries.
The immediate motive is likely the financial gain from the robbery; however, authorities speculate that it might have been the work of separatist rebels, implying that the attack may have had broader motives.
The implicated Nepal Communist Party (Maoists) injured the tourists due to their violation of the transportation blockade the rebels put into effect earlier in the month, in order to disrupt the country's economy.
The implicit motivation for the attack was to discourage Iraqis from aiding soldiers working with the coalition forces.
The implicit motive was to draw attention to the Israeli occupation of Gaza prior to Israel's unilateral withdrawl from the territory.
The incident came after the Serbian government announced the previous week that it had adopted an "action plan" for Kosovo, in a bid to secure improvement for conditions of the Serb community living in the province.
The incident followed a "call" to "Indianise" churches within the country.  It is not certain if the attack was linked to this statement.
The incident may have been related to a round of polling in local elections.
The incident occurred in the midst of battle between the Sri Lankan military and the LTTE as the Tamil Tigers were fighting for an independent Tamil state.
The incident occurred to protest upcoming visit of President Bill Clinton to Athens.
The incident occurred when Communist Party of India-Maoist militants and pro CPI-M tribal militiamen protested the stepped-up patrols in the area.
The incident reportedly was in retaliation for Indonesian police sweeps into local villages during the month.
The incident took place during disturbances between the Black Student Union and the university.
The incident took place during heightened antiwar sentiments in Seattle Washington.
The incident took place to warn the government officials against negotiating with the National Liberation Army (ELN).
The incident was carried out in response to the assassination of Iyad Sawalihah in Janin on November 9, 2002.
The incident was carried out to eliminate witnesses to the Hajdari assassination.
The incident was carried out to protest the expansion of Tokyo's Narita Airport.
The incident was carried out to retaliate against an earlier explosion in the West Bank refugee camp of Jenin.
The incident was carried out to retaliate for several Palestinians killed by Israel in the first 4 days of November, 2002.
The incident was cited as revenge for Israel's killing on August 27, 2001 of Abu Ali Mustafa, head of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.
The incident was cited by and official as an act of provocation aimed at dragging Georgia into fresh hostilities with Abkhaz separatists.
The incident was claimed to be a symbolic act intended to demonstrate to United States and British government's that "Palestinian blood will not be spilled without the American and British people paying the price."
The incident was designed to disrupt a memorial service
The incident was in retaliation for the assassination of its leader Mahmoud Abu Hannoud by Israeli troops as well as the killing of five Palestinian boys in an Israeli explosion in the Gaza Strip.
The incident was likely profit-motivated, but there is some suspicion that the incident was politically-motivated
The incident was meant as a protest of harvesting animals for their furs
The incident was meant to take back a strategic town.
The incident was part of an upswing in violence in Jammu and Kashmir leading up to Indian Independence Day on August 15.
The incident was part of an upswing in violence in Jammu and Kashmir prior to Indian Independence Day on August 15.
The incident was part of the GAM campaign prior to Indonesian Independence Day.
The incident was part of the offensive the ELN was carrying out as a reaction to the arrival of troops in southern Bolivar Department.
The incident was part the Free Aceh Movement's bombing campaign in protest of  Indonesia's Independence Day.
The incident was part the Free Aceh Movement's campaign in protest of Indonesia's Independence Day.
The incident was staged by Chechen militants to demonstrate opposition to an election campaign to the State Duma on August 20, 2000.
The incident was targeting Americans and Jews in Yemen.
The incident was the result of an effort to intimidate witnesses.
The Independent Military Wing of the Syrian Revolution Abroad claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was the "beginning of coming operations targeting all Iranian and Russian interests." Sources also noted that the assailant yelled "Don't forget Aleppo! Don't forget Syria!" during the attack.
The Indian Mujahideen claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of an Indian Mujahideen affiliate, Qatil Siddiqi, at Yerawada Jail.
The Indian Mujahideen claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the killing of Abu Dujana, a Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) member.
The indicent was said to be a fallout of the killing of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) chief, V. Prabakaran.
The Informal Anarchist Federation and the International Revolutionary Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Costas Laliotis was targeted for his alleged corruption.
The Informal Anarchist Federation claimed responsibility for the attack, stating in a letter mailed to the media that it had targeted Roberto Adinolfi because it blamed him for reintroducing nuclear power into Italy.
The Informal Anarchist Federation claimed responsibility for the incident and criticized the military's recruitment strategies.
The Informal Anarchist Federation claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to injustice.
The Informal Anarchist Federation claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was to disprove the notion of social peace and to "instensify the hostilities."  The group also stated reasons why they attacked each car.  They attacked a media vehicle for attempting to provide supplies to keep the world in a modern society.  They attacked another vehicle because it supported hunting.  They attacked a third vehicle because it purportedly insulted those who do not own property and was hazardous to the earth.  They attacked the last two vehicles, which provided home security, because the vehicles help to further separate the haves from the have-nots.
The Informal Anarchist Federation claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the judicial institution was targeted for its general role in surpressing attempts to mount insurrections on ruling governments.
The Informal Feminist Commando for Anti-authoritarian Action claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "No god, no master! For every torture and assassination in the name of your god! For every child abused by the pedophile priests! In the tension of insurrectionary anarchy!"
The Institute for Historical Review was a revisionist organization hat denied the occurrence of the Holocaust and the actions of the Nazis during WWII, stating that there was no proof that the atrocities occurred.
The insurgents attacked Bujumbura to "show the army that we are able to come to Bujumbura and we can stay there as long as we want," said rebel spokesman Pasteur Habimana.
The insurgents were inciting sectarian strife in Iraq
The intent of the attack was to disrupt the special session of the ruling National Conference.
The intent of the attack was to intimidate the Christian presence in India.
The intent was to bomb the businesses in order to intimidate them into giving the FARC protection money.
The intent was to disrupt election process by intimidating voters.
The intent was to disrupt the election through intimidation.
The intent was to disrupt the election.
The intent was to intimidate Iraqi men from joining the army or police forces.
The internet claim indicated that the attackers targeted sites in Jordan in retaliation for Amman's cooperation with western powers.
The internet statement indicated that the attack was revenge on behalf of the Sunni population of Qaim, Iraq.  The statement also indicated that the restaurant was targeted because many of its customers were "infidels" as well as Iraqi policemen.
The intimidation of other religious leaders, as well as the population at large, so as to prevent their collaboration with Coalition Forces.
The Islamic Front (Syria) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent airstrikes.
The Islamic Front (Syria) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to Syrian forces dropping barrel bombs on civilian areas.
The Islamic Front (Syria) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to deter the regime from carrying out attacks.
The Islamic Front (Syria) claimed responsibility incident and stated that the attack was intended to deter the regime from carrying out attacks.
The Islamic State in Bangladesh claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Abdul Razzaq was targeted because the group believed he had committed apostasy.
The Islamic State in Bangladesh claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ananda Kumar Ganguly was targeted in order to "cleanse Bangladesh from the wrath of polytheism."
The Islamic State in Bangladesh claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Hossain Ali was targeted as a "lesson to others."
The Islamic State in Bangladesh claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Nikhil Chandra Joardar was targeted for committing blasphemy.
The Islamic State in Bangladesh claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Rezaul Karim Siddiquee was targeted for supporting atheism.
The Islamic State in Bangladesh claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Samir al-Din was targeted for converting to Christianity.
The Islamic State in Bangladesh claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Sanaur Rahman was targeted for advocating Christianity.
The Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Syrian and Russian airstrikes.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility and stated that the attacks were in revenge for the killing of ISIL leader Abdul-Rahman al-Beilawy.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility and stated that the incident was in response to remarks made by the president of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region, Massoud Barzani, who offered support to the Shiite-led government in Baghdad and to Kurdish militias in Syria.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the attack and accused the victims of spying for the Peshmerga.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victims were executed because they provided information about ISIL to security personnel.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused one of the victims of being a spy.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of assisting people in leaving the area.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of being police personnel.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for Hussein Ezzeddine. Sources also suspected that ISIL may have carried out the abduction in retaliation for the victim's family killing an ISIL member prior to the attack.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for Ole Johan Grimsgaard-Ofstad.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the victims. Sources also suspected that the attack may have been carried out in retaliation for recent Kurdish operations. Sources also noted that the attack, which targeted Assyrian Christians, may have been part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Syria's majority Muslim and minority Christian communities.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that Fahd Faraj, an ISIL member, be released in Kuwait.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ibrahim Abdulkadir and Firaz Hamadi were targeted for working against ISIL.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that ISIL viewed shrines as idolatry.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Nahla Yunis Al Badrani, a government official, was targeted because she supported the Iraqi government.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Raad Mohammed al-Azzawi was targeted because he refused to work with ISIL.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ruqia Hassan Mohammed was accused of spying.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Suca Gennem was targeted because ISIL believed he was a spy.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the aircraft was in engaged in airstrikes at the time of the attack.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out as "revenge operations."
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because they believed the victim was a military informant.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to free ISIL members from the prison.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Russian air strikes in Iraq and Syria.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for airstrikes in Iraq.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for attacks on displaced Sunni civilians.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for attacks on displaced Sunni civilians. Additionally, sources stated that the attack, which targeted a predominately Shiite neighborhood, may have been part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Iraq's Sunni minority and Shiite majority communities.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Belgium's participation in a coalition against ISIL.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for France's participation in the United States-led coalition that carried out airstrikes on ISIL targets in Iraq and Syria.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent military operations in Fallujah city.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent military operations in Manbij.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent military operations.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of a prominent ISIL member.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Turkish airstrikes against ISIL.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to Hezbollah's military involvement in Yabrud city, Syria.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the deaths of members of the Sunni Muslim community in Hawija.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out to "save" Ben Gardane from the "tyrant army."
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in retaliation to the deaths of Sunnis and the forced removal of them from their residences.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was meant to draw attention away from the Mosul offensive.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the civilian was executed because he filmed the group's headquarters for monetary compensation.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the civilian was targeted for assisting the government in air strikes.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the civilians were targeted because they did not support ISIL.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the civilians were targeted because they worked with the Iraqi military.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the execution was carried out because they believed the victims were spies of the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the journalists were targeted because they worked for a television station that was anti-Islamic.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the mosque contained tombs, which ISIL believed were un-Islamic.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the prison was targeted in order to free detainees.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was accused of providing information to security personnel.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were accused of blasphemy.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were accused of theft and corruption.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were intended for "jihad's marriage."
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because they believed the victims were "collaborators and renegades."
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted for not fasting during Ramadan.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident, and stated that the victim, Kenji Goto, was killed because of Japan's support of Western operations in the area.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it kidnapped al-Ammatouri in order to gain information regarding the movements of Lebanese military forces in Arsal town.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the incident was part of its newly launched offensive campaign called "Harvesting the Soldiers".
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the professors' teachings were counter to Islam and that they were training the students to fight Sunni Muslims. Additionally, a United Nations (UN) representative stated that the attack on the Shiite college was part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Iraq's majority Shiite and minority Sunni communities.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) claimed responsibility for the kidnapping, stating that they wanted the United States to halt airstrikes in Iraq.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) stated that the group executed James Foley in retaliation for airstrikes carried out by the United States in Iraq.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the Salaheddin TV station was targeted because it distorted the image of Iraq's Sunni community.
The Islamic Youth Shura Council claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because the two civilians had stolen from Muslim citizens.
The Islamists recently vowed to step up attacks against the government which it accuses of colluding with the United States and Western states against the people of Algeria.
The Izz-al-Din al-Qassam Brigades said that the attack was to avenge the assassination of Salah Shihadah and the massacre of Al-Daraj neighborhood.
The Izz-al-Din al-Qassam Brigades said that the attack was to avenge the Israeli air raid in Gaza on July 22, 2002.
The Jammu Daily Excelsior said that the militant targeted the Muharram procession in an attempt to kill the civilians and police and to stir up trouble in Poonch.
The Janatantrik Terai Mukti Morcha (JTMM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out to observe "200 years of servileness."
The Janatantrik Terai Mukti Morcha (JTMM) claimed responsibility for this incident. Abhay Singh, the outfit's leader claimed that the bus was targeted for defying a shutdown called on 02/23/2011.
The Janatantrik Terai Mukti Morcha- Goit (JTMM-G) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the school was targeted for disregarding the Tarai bandh on December 8, 2016.
The jeep violated JTMM-J's ban on all cars belonging to pahade (people from the hilly regions, not Terai)
The Jewish Defense League (JDL) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the employee was being punished for performing the quenelle, an anti-Semitic gesture.
The Jewish Defense League (JDL) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the victim was being punished for performing the quenelle, an anti-Semitic gesture.
The Jharkhand Janmukti Parishad (JJP) claimed responsibility for the incident and threatened the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) to compensate local people for their land.
The Jharkhand Liberation Tigers (JLT) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to threaten contractors who refused to respond to extortion demands by the group.
The Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the peacekeepers were taken hostage for entering their territories without permission. Furthermore, they asserted that the JEM suspected the soldiers worked for Sudan's intelligence and security service.
The Justicieros de la Frontera claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the abduction was a warning to the Paraguayan People's Army (EPP).
The Kachin Independence Army (KIA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the civilians were abducted because the KIA believed they were peddling drugs.
The Kangleipak Communist Party (KCP) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Sorokhaibam Rameshore of failing to meet the demands of the group. Sources also noted that the group demanded a ransom in exchange for his release.
The Kangleipak Communist Party (KCP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Indian Oil Corporation was marketing fuel illegally and that the fuel was poor in quality.
The Kangleipak Communist Party (KCP) claimed responsibility for the incident and threatened people not to partake in fairs and carnivals. Sources also noted that the KCP had previously threatened people not to gamble at fairs.
The Kazakhstan Liberation Army claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in support for democratization and against President Nursultan Nazarbayev.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that Shamshad TV station was targeted because it broadcasted anti-Islamic views.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Bakht Buland Khan of being a spy.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of apostasy and assisting the Taliban.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of being spies.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of spying for foreign governments.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom and full control of the area in exchange for the victims.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that ARY News Digital Network was targeted in retaliation for the station's alleged pro-government coverage of recent military operations.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Express Media Group was targeted due to its opposition of the group.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that supporters of Atta Mohammad Noor were targeted for Noor's anti-Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) comments.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was a warning to the media that they must cover the group's activities in the region.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the mosque's imam promoting the defeat of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in Mosul. Additionally, sources posited that the victims, who were predominantly members of the Shia Muslim community, may have been targeted as part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Afghanistan's majority Sunni and minority Shia communities.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the deaths of five of their members.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the killing of people in both Syria and Iraq. Sources also suspected that the attack, which targeted Shiite civilians, may have been part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's majority Sunni and minority Shiite communities.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group believed Abdul Wahab Momand was an apostate.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Zahid Ali was targeted for advocating education that went against Islamic law.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and threatened other government supporters.
The Khorasan Chapter of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and threatened women against going shopping without a male relative.
The Khorasan Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for an alleged American airstrike on a religious school in Nangarhar province.
The kiddnapping was an effort to force the Kuwaiti company from continuing to help with the reconstruction effort in Iraq.  Also, the kidnappers wanted to force the governments of India, Kenya and Egypt to remove all their workers from Iraq.
The kidnappers demanded $200,000 in ransom for their victim's release.
The kidnappers demanded a private meeting with Emzar Kvitsiani, the deputy representative of the Georgian president in the Kodori gorge, and Tengiz Gazdeliani, the Georgian Minister of Social Protection, Labour and Employment.
The kidnappers demanded the release of Filiz Gelowicz, also known as Umm Sayf Allah Al-Ansariy.
The kidnappers demanded the release of five relatives who were jailed for a suspected role in terrorist incidents in South Sinai between the years 2004 and 2006.
The kidnappers were protesting President Patsrana's policy of negotiating with guerrillas, in general, and the plan to trade leftist rebel prisoners for captured troops and police, in particular.   They demanded a face-to-face meeting in order to have their views heard.
The kidnappers were trying to force Italy to withdraw its troops from Iraq.
The kidnapping appeared to financially motivated, according to Bolivian authorities
The kidnapping of the Polish man was an attempt to get the Polish government to release 61 of their comrades.
The kidnapping was believed to be a response to the publishing of cartoons of the prophet Mohammed in European newspapers the previous week. Palestinian militant groups had threatened to kidnap Europeans in protest of the cartoons.
The kidnapping was carried out in order to obtain the release of 50 Taliban prisoners from government jails.
The kidnapping was carried out in retaliation for a suspected U.S. airstrike against a supposed Al Qaeda training camp in Al-Majala district of Abyan in late 2009.
The kidnapping was done in retaliation for the kidnapping of Jihad Abid, a Palestinian Authority Intelligence officer kidnapped by the Janin Martyrs Brigade.  Abid's family was responsible for the retaliatory act.
The kidnapping was intended to inflict ''punishment'' on Italy for basing troops in Iraq in support of the American-led forces.
The kidnapping was likely a part of the GAM campaign prior to Indonesia's Independence Day on August 17, 2001.
The kidnapping was likely in reprisal for the killing by Macedonian police of five people they said were ethnic Albanian terrorists and the arrest of five other ethnic Albanians in a dawn raid on a house in Skopje, Macedonia that had occurred a few hours previously.
The kidnapping was meant to pressure the government into allowing only native Terai residents to participate in the Constitutional Assembly elections in Terai constituencies.
The kidnapping was perpetrated to demand the release of fellow rebels members in prison.
The kidnappings were thought to be revenge for the death of four Ossetians in a clash with Georgian security forces.
The killing was a direct challenge to Fatah's authority in the West Bank, which announced a halt to anti-Israeli attacks a day earlier. Fatah was the parent organization of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades.
The killing was allegedly a political assassination, sponsored by ruling members of the PDP, aimed at keeping Ige from quitting the cabinet and going home to provide leadership for the Alliance for Democracy. If this were the case, the PDP may not have won the South West states in the 2003 general election, which the AD party had then controlled.
The killing was apparently in retaliation for the killing of three PWG supporters on August 6, 2001.
The killing was to stop politicians in the Bolivar Department from supporting demilitarization of the region.
The killings were in response to the slaughter of 14 Shi i construction workers.
The Klansmen intentionally intended to interrupt the march due to the fact that the marchers were protesting the conviction, by an all-white jury, of a mentally disabled black man for the rape of a white woman.
The KNA militants carried out the attack after Lengkham refused to pay 20000 Indian Rupees (423.05 USD) demanded by Touthang for wood the villagers sold.
The Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group did not not adhere to the Ohrid Framework Agreement because they did not agree with its application.
The Kouweikhat Group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that Badr Eid, whose family had posted pictures supporting President Bashar Assad, leave Akkar district.
The Ku Klux Klan  stated that Whitfield had no business being in Alabama and that the beating will teach him to stay out; the motive was that Whitfield had denounced the rape conviction of black man Tommy Lee Hines, for raping a white woman.
The Kuki Independent Organization (KIO/KIA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that DK Thangboi was targeted for allegedly insulting the group.
The Kuki National Front (KNF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Anou Kabui refused to pay an extortion demand.
The Kuki National Front (KNF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in relation to the group's boycott of Independence Day festivities.
The Kunming blasts came less than three weeks prior to the Beijing Olympics and two days after Yunnan police opened fire and killed two rubber farmers in the Menglian province during a clash that also saw 41 police officers injured.
The Kurdistan Free Life Party claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the deaths of the group's members.
The Kurdistan Freedom Hawks (TAK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations in Kurdish areas.
The Kurdistan Freedom Hawks (TAK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for operations in Kurdish areas.
The Kurdistan Freedom Hawks (TAK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent military operations.
The Kurdistan Freedom Hawks (TAK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the Turkish government's imprisonment of Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) leader, Abdullah Ocalan and for military operations against members of the Kurdish community.
The Kurdistan Freedom Hawks (TAK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Turkish military operations in Cizre district.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of plotting to kill a PKK leader.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Aydin Mustu was targeted for supporting operations against the PKK.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Deryan Aktert was targeted for supporting operations against the PKK.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ethem Turkben was targeted because the PKK believed he was an Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) supporter.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that it was carried out in retaliation for events in Cizre.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mehmet Paksoy was targeted for his actions against members of the Kurdish community.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Mursel Gul was targeted because the PKK believed he was an Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) member.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out as a warning to Kurdish members of the Justice and Development Party (AKP).
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to recent airstrikes by the Turkish military on the PKK in northern Iraq.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent Turkish military operations.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the deaths of innocent civilians by the government.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the detainment of PKK leader, Abdullah Ocalan.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the dismissal of many mayors in Kurdish-run districts and for the killing of Kurdish civilians by authorities.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the ill treatment of Kurdish citizens by the Turkish authorities.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the two police officers' alleged involvement in a suicide bombing attack in Suruc on July 20, 2015.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for the death of a PKK member and military operations against the group.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and wrote anti-Turkish graffiti on the mosque.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retaliation for the death of a Kurdish man, who was killed during a protest demonstration on June 28, 2013.
The Kurdistan Workers' Party is fighting for a separate Kurdish state between Iraq, Turkey, and Iran.
The Kurds were protesting the capture of Ocalan.
The landmines were contained in steel boxes along the patrol route knowing the military would be in the area.
The leaflets that claimed the attacks stated that "the resistance against the occupation would never stop" and that "the attacks are the natural response to the daily crimes of Israel."
The leftist group aimed to make a statement against the current government's social stance.  It did not aim to harm anyone, only to damage the ministry building.
The letter stated that they were sent to threaten retribution if there were an invasion of Iraq by the United States, Britain and Australia.
The letters were sent during the trial of 23 suspected Al-Qaida members in Brussels, Belgium.
The LI claimed responsibility for the attack stating the reason for the attack was because the victims were kidnappers and murderers.
The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam are suspected of detonating the bomb.
The likely motive was to break detained militants out of custody. The insurgents were unsuccessful in this regard.
The likely motive was to disrupt the abilities of the newly formed Irai government to function.
The liquidation of soldiers to avenge the deaths of comrades.
The logging companys were operating illegally.
The Loyalist Volunteer Force said in a statement that they had targeted the victim because he was an arms smuggler, but acquaintances said the man had no connection with any terrorist groups.
The LTTE rebels had been fighting for a war against the government since 1983 for a separate state in the north and east of the country.
The LTTE rebels were fighting for a separate state for minority Tamils in the country's north and east
The LTTE rebels were fighting for a separate state for minority Tamils in the country's north and east;  specifically, this incident may have been a revenge killing for recent air attacks by the government on LTTE training camps.
The LTTE said in their claim of responsibility that they were unaware of who was onboard, and that they had thought they were retaliating against Sri Lankan forces who were presumed to be in the area.  However, multiple sources refute the LTTE claims that they were unaware of who was onboard the helicopters.
The LTTE said that the attack was in retaliation to the October 2, 2001, Sri Lankan Navy attack on a Sea Tiger Base.
The LTTE was waging a war for an independent Tamil state and was attempting to kill leaders of rival Tamil groups and other officials; Shanmuganathan represented PLOTE
The LTTE were fighting for an independent Tamil state.
The Magahat Militia claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Emerito Samarca was targeted for educating students with a specific ideology.
The Mai Mai Yakutumba Militia claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group was carrying out a "liberation war."
The mainstream LTTE rebel group accused the EPDP of backing the renegade faction.
The major had conducted successful campaigns infiltrating LTTE operations, and had become a primary target for the Tigers.
The male who claimed responsibility said that the bombing was in protest of the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
The man was accused of cooperating with the Akakhel peace committee
The man was killed on suspicions that he was a government informer.
The man was shot because he was accused of robbery
The man who claimed responsibility for setting fire to the mosque said he did so because he wanted to scare the Shiite community, whom he saw as responsible for the violence in Syria.
The Manipur Naga People's Army (MNPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because the Naga People's Front (NPF) was not serving the interests of members of the Naga community. Moreover, the MNPA demanded that the NPF stop utilizing the National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Isak-Muivah (NSCN-IM) as a strategy to intimidate members of the Naga community.
The Manipur Naga People's Army (MNPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to alleged Naga People's Front operations.
The Maoist Communist Party (MKP) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they planted the explosives to warn the doctors of the Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) against establishing private practices.
The Maoist Communist Party of Manipur claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in relation to President Pranab Mukherjee's visit to the area.
The Maoist insurgents claim to fight for the rights of the rural poor and tribal people.
The Maoists accused the teacher of being a police informer.
The Maoists accused the tribesmen of aiding the police in anti-insurgency operations.
The Maoists accused the villagers of supporting the police and their anti-Maoist campaign.
The Maoists branded them as Police informers.
The Maoists had reportedly demanded $111,334 (INR five million) as levy along with other demands.
The Maoists have given a call for a shutdown in five east Bihar districts - Jamui, Munger, Bhagalpur, Lakhisarai and Banka - to protest the arrest and alleged custodial torture of a self-styled ‘area commander’ Kamlesh alias Deepa on 07/06/2008.
The Maoists might have sought to undermine the Indian state efforts to bring peace to the state of Chattisgarh, East India.
The Maoists viewed the killings as "rightful punishment."
The Maoists went on a bombing spree in various districts to intimidate candidates into withdrawing their candidature and prevent people from voting in nationwide municipal elections that were held on February 8, 2006.
The Maoists went on a bombing spree in various districts to intimidate candidates into withdrawing their candidature and prevent people from voting in the nationwide municipal elections held on February 8, 2006.
The Maoists were against Sanskrit studies and high fees at boarding schools.
The Maoists were protesting against the deployment of forces in the district.
The Mapuche Ancestral Resistance (RAM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the imprisonment of political detainees.
The Mapuche Ancestral Resistance (RAM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Juan Javier Neumeyer mountain refuge was targeted because it "represents the interests of the bourgeoisie and local fascism through the Andean bariloche club colluded with national parks, while the place borders the oil investment area of the basin of the Niriwau."
The Martyr al-Nimr Battalion claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for police personnel allegedly concealing Shiite symbols during Shiite celebrations.
The Maute Group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to distract security personnel from military operations against the group.
The Maute Group claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims had "betrayed their faith."
The May 19 Communist Order consisted of Revolutionary Leftists attempting to "expropriate" funds from the establishment in order to improve to the conditions of the poor.  The armed robberies were viewed as a way to procure weapons and safe houses that would be used in the armed struggle against those in power.
The Mayi-Mayi claimed they wanted all government troops to leave the Congo, as the government and tribal militias were engaged in ongoing conflict.
The Mayi-Mayi kidnapped the workers to demand the withdrawal of Ugandan, Rwandan and Burundian troops from Congo.
The mayor believed that the attack was in connection with his pronouncement during the flag-raising ceremony at the town hall that same morning where he stated that he would go after former town officials who had ransacked the town coffers.
The mayor was supposedly captured in order to be a spokesman for a message to the public about the electoral campaign.
The men burned eleven people suspected of being witches or wizards.
The men demanded that the police release detained members of their group and a Latvian interior minister.
The men kidnapped the prisoners in order to exact revenge for their crimes.
The men killed the boy because he was teaching English to other Afghans.
The men were believed to have been adulterers.
The men were kidnapped because of allegedly bad policies by the German government.
The men were targeted for being alleged spies.
The MEND wanted that workers left the oilfields in the Niger Delta.
The MILF commander of the attack accused village residents of being military sympathizers and told reporters that their sympathy was the reason he raided the village.
The militant group intended to mark Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon a year ago
The militant killed her because she was not observing the Islamic code of dress and she was also campaigning for emancipation of women.
The Militant People's Revolutionary Forces claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that it was in retaliation to the increased attacks of Golden Dawn against immigrants and leftist groups.
The militants accused the civilians as being informers for the Indian army.
The militants accused the men of being police informe
The militants accused the victims, Man Bahadur Bista, Balaram Rai, Rajendra Katuwal and Ram Bahadur Katuwal, of trading timber from the district without procuring their permission.
The militants are fighting against Russian rule.
The militants are loyal to a former general.
The militants are sympathetic to the Taliban and al-Qaida.
The militants are sympathetic to the Taliban and al-Qaida.  Also, they target internet cafes, music and video shops because of the anti-Islamic ideals they put forward
The militants believed the civilian was an informer.
The militants blamed the network for revealing their movements to the police.
The militants carried out the attack in order to loot arms and ammunition from the Government Railway Police office.
The militants claimed the victim was being punished for being a police informer.
The militants claimed to be protesting the neglect of the Niger Delta people.
The militants demanded $446 (INR 20,000) from each truck driver, and also beat up some of the truckers for refusing to pay the demand.
The militants demanded money from the owner of the company.
The militants gave security forces a two-day deadline to get out of the area before attacks ensued.  The military did not meet the deadline.
The militants had demanded that the oil company do clean up efforts in the community and the company did not comply.
The militants in the impoverished south often target teachers, deeming them a symbol of the Bangkok government's efforts to impose Buddhist culture on the predominantly Muslim region.
The militants over-ran the police station in order to free suspected militants.
The militants want to create fear and terrify the residents.
The militants were followers of Maulana Fazlullah, a militant cleric who is sympathetic to the Taliban and al-Qaida.
The militants were opposed to the Ecuadorian government of President Lucio Gutierrez for its "fascist" methods and for yielding to the International Monetary Fund.
The militants were possibly reacting to Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's cease fire, which they perceived as propaganda.
The militants were sympathetic to the Taliban and al-Qaida.
The militants were unhappy with the efforts of the tribal elders to recover stolen official vehicles.
The military pointed to extortion as possible motive for the attack.
The Misanthropic Division claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Vladislav Ryazantsev was targeted for "his active public activities."
The Misrata Brigades claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the assault was carried out in retaliation for attacks targeting an air base.
The MNLF started the attacks to prevent the holding of elections in a Muslim self-rule area on November 26, 2001.
The Mojahedin of Temir-Khan-Shurinskiy (Buynaksk) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they targeted "a gang of apostates" who were involved in attacks against Muslims.
The Molotov cocktail was thrown to get police attention.
The money was used to finance a race war and revolution against the U.S. government; some of the money was sent to a racial leader and some to another white supremacist group, the Aryan Nation.
The money was used to finance a race war and revolution against the U.S. government; some of the money was sent to a racist groups, and much was used to finance the group's activities.
The money was used to finance the groups operations towards a revolution against the US government, which they believed to be occupied by Zionists; the money was used as incentive for new recruits, a printing press for counterfeiting scams, computers to access Aryan Nation literature, and firearms; additionally, some money was used to fund their race war via donation to the Aryan Nation.
The Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the attack was intended to free two MILF members who had been arrested by police. The group also stated that the arrest was in violation of an agreement between the organization and the government.
The Moro Islamic Liberation Front took the two hostages when they would not give them a rifle and a bolo.
The Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and declared that an international intervention was necessary now that the group possessed a prisoner of war. Sources also noted that the incident occurred amidst an ongoing crisis in Zamboanga City between security forces and members of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF).
The Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that it was intended to embarrass Rodrigo Duterte, the Mayor of Davao.
The mother had been summonsed to speak to security authorities and may have been killed to prevent her from giving information to them.
The motivation behind this attack was to send a message to the Media. The group sent the message that they did not appreciate their portrayal in the press.
The motivation for the attack was likely revenge for the killing of a Shiite cleric a day prior.
The motive behind the attack is a suspected political squabble.
The motive behind this attack is unknown and may be considered a hate crime.
The motive behind this attack was to target those who supported the government.
The motive for kidnapping the musicians was the Taliban accused the musicians of ignoring a ban on music. There is no specific motive for the kidnapping for the election worker.
The motive for the arson attack was unknown.
The motive for the assassination was a response to the 1974 Tamil conference incident for which Tamil radicals blamed Duraiappah for supporting the Sri Lanka Freedom Party, implicated in the violence.
The motive for the attack is believe to be non-payment of extortion.
The motive for the attack is unknown but authorities suspected the attack to be an attempt to free Islamist fighters being held on murder charges.
The motive for the attack is unknown, although one victim believes that they were mistaken for Afghan National Army personnel, and that was the reason for their kidnapping.
The motive for the attack is unknown; however, Manan was against the militants and supported security forces in the war against terrorism and has also destroyed houses of the absconding militants in different areas of Mamond with security forces.
The motive for the attack is unknown; however, the father of the boy was Rajen Engti, a local congress leader.
The motive for the attack is unknown.
The motive for the attack was aimed at avenging police atrocities.
The motive for the attack was believed to be political.
The motive for the attack was punishment for refusal to pay extortion money.
The motive for the attack was that she was involved in Communist Party of Nepal-Unified Marxist Leninist.
The motive for the attack was the assailants' belief that the victims were spying for North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces.
The motive for the attack was the civilian was believed to have been a spy.
The motive for the attack was the election of Barack Obama.
The motive for the attack was the father and son's involvement with the anti-insurgent Awakening Council movement.
The motive for the attack was to block the road to a religious fountain of prayer.
The motive for the attack was to commit a robbery to fund an anti-illegal immigration vigilante group.
The motive for the attack was to protest United States involvement in Nicaragua.
The motive for this attack for the ongoing military operation of forcing militants out of the Swat valley.
The motive for this attack is unknown, however it was the 10th such attack in recent months.
The motive for this attack is unknown.  However, in the months proceeding this event, the British embassy in Iran had been ransacked.
The motive for this attack is unknown.  However, there had been a number of similar attacks in the area.
The motive for this attack is unknown.  However, there had been an effort by the government to remove Islamist extremist from the area the week before.
The motive for this attack is unknown.  However, there has been an effort over the past few decades for independence for Casamance.  Attacks on soldiers are common.
The motive for this attack is unknown.  However, there were 2 similar attacks in the months proceeding this one.
The motive for this attack is unknown.  Over 130 individuals have claimed responsibility, but none of the claims have been deemed credible.
The motive for this specific attack is unknown.  However, there were a series of similar attacks perpetrated by left wings groups around this time.
The motive for Uprety's kidnapping is unknown; the motive for Neupane's killing was revenge for him aiding in the killing of a JTMM cadre.
The motive is believed to be an attempt to destabilize the peace process.
The motive is believed to be retaliation for the death of eight rebels the previous Monday.
The motive is most likely related to refusal to pay "revolutionary taxes," or extortion.
The motive is ostensibly to acquire greater proportions of oil revenue for Nigeria.
The motive is retaliation for the death of a Palestinian school girl.
The motive is unclear, as there is little detail and no identification of suspects.
The motive is unknown.
The motive may have been a land dispute.
The motive of the attack was punishment for being part of the pro-government Lashkar. The Taliban warned that "all those joining such anti-militants Lashkar would not be spared as they were government agents and opposed to enforcement of Shariat-e-Muhammadi in Swat and Malakand division."
The motive of the attack was retaliation for spying for the United States.
The motive of the attack was seemingly to prepare the site for a later bombing.
The motive of the attack was that the men were accused spies for the United States.
The motive of the attack was to convince Iraqis not to cooperate with U.S. forces
The motive of the attack was to disrupt a state-owned television station that had been transmitting anti-guerrilla broadcasts.
The motive of the attack was to disrupt Iraqi elections.
The motive of the attack was to disrupt the general election taking place.
The motive of the attack was to harm foreigners in Afghanistan
The motive of the attack was to kill new and former police officers, and to discourage others from joining the police force.
The motive of the attack was to prevent the African American community of West Point Mississippi from organizing.
The motive of the hijacking was purely financial.
The motive to abducted these people was to avenge their defeat in the clash with the police.
The motive to pressure the Aceh Police to withdraw its Mobile Brigade units from tracking down GAM guerrillas and the activities of GAM headquarters.
The motive was alleged to be retaliation for the killing of one of their commanders the day before.
The motive was most likely a revenge killing for the arrest of a Muslim student the previous week.
The motive was retaliation for killings by the authorities.
The motive was revenge for previous attacks, as well as for the overall political goal of destroying Israel.
The motive was that members of the pro-Indonesian militia were demonstrating to protest the murder of a militia leader the previous day, accusing the UN peacekeeping force of involvement in that murder.
The motive was that the blast was part of the group's campaign to disrupt the Constituent Assembly election.
The motive was that the nun was assisting with the evacuation of civilians from Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam controlled land.
The motive was that the people were leaving the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam controlled area.
The motive was the civilians were fleeing their village in the area held by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) to go to another location not under LTTE control.
The motive was the man was a suspected police informant.
The motive was the men were suspected of being spies for the United States.
The motive was the People's Alliance for Democracy taking control of the Government House.
The motive was the victims were suspected spies for the United States.
The motive was to assassinate Mr. Rekalde.
The motive was to assassinate Mr. Theron, who was handling at least one PAGAD criminal case.
The motive was to assassinate the police chief.
The motive was to avenge the deaths of the Muslims in the recent bombing of the mosque in Hutae Bongor
The motive was to cause Muslims to quit their jobs with Western (primarily US) charities
The motive was to commit violence due to the arrest of the insurgents' leader. The motive is also economic in nature for attacking owners of a rubber plantation.
The motive was to destroy a special reconstruction train of Railway Troops.
The motive was to disrupt the peace process.
The motive was to disrupt the upcoming elections in Kashmir by assassinating a candidate for State Assembly.
The motive was to eliminate those that have become part of the Anbar Salvation Council which has turned against al-Qaeda (and other religious extremists) in the Anbar province.
The motive was to end Indian rule in Kashmir.
The motive was to have an influence upon the upcoming election.
The motive was to indoctrinate students in the Nepalese Maoist ideology.
The motive was to induce terror among Sunni Muslims.
The motive was to protest American involvement in the Colombian oil industry and US monetary aid to Colombia's anti-drug and anti-rebel campaigns.
The motive was to protest the presence of German forces in Afghanistan.
The motive was to remove the target from his political position to favor the interests of the perpetrators.
The motive was to respond to the military's heavyhanded response to a previous incident at a mosque.
The motive was to stop mistreatment of animals by the Mondao Circus.
The motive was twofold: first, to send the message that pornography would not be tolerated, and second to use the bombing as a diversionary tactic in order to carry out the group's armored car robbery the next day.
The motive was unknown, but the Press Times of India speculated that the kidnapping may have been related to the Maoists' demands for improved welfare for the company's workers.
The mountain peaks on which the ski resort sat, were considered sacred to the Navajo and Hopi Indian tribes, and the perpetrators criticized the US Forest Service for allowing the ski area to be built there back in the 1970s.
The Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) and Al-Mua'qi'oon Biddam Brigade (Those who Sign with Blood) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was part of a number of attacks targeting "invaders."
The Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) claimed responsibility for the attack in a video and demanded that Algeria pay a ransom of 15 million euros and free prisoners in exchange for the release of the kidnapped diplomats.
The Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it targeted the Malian army because they "let the enemies of Islam come to Gao."
The Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because they believed those in the town were working with French military personnel.
The Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it was targeting Malian soldiers because of their alleged support for the enemies of Islam.
The Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack in order to open a new battle front in Timbuktu against Malian forces.
The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the two American sailors were targeted to express MEND's disdain for joint exercises conducted with foreign navies in the Delta. Note: "km" shouldn't be capitalized in the incident summary.
The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that attacks would continue as long as multinational oil companies operated in the Niger Delta.
The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack served as a reminder of the group's presence in the area and that by 2015 they will have driven away all oil companies in the country.
The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the ex-militant leader being escorted was a traitor.
The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they were at war with Nigerian security forces and accordingly would attack police whenever the chance presented itself.
The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) claimed the incident in a statement, demanding that the group's members be included in an amnesty program or it would continue to attack oil infrastructure.  The statement, issued by General Owei Paboh, also gave Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan a seven-day ultimatum to include the group in a program which pays former fighters for laying down their arms.
The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta claimed responsibility for the attack and demanded $200,000 in ransom.
The Mujahadeen Brigades wanted to force the removal of Japanese troops from Southern Iraq.
The Mujahedeen Shura Council claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack in retaliation for "the Israeli army's attack on protestors demonstrating over the death of a Palestinian prisoner."
The Mujahedeen Shura Council in the Environs of Jerusalem claimed responsibility for incident, stating that it was simply demonstrating that Israel's air defenses were incapable of preventing rocket assaults during United States (US) President Barack Obama's visit to the country.
The Mujahideen-I-Khalq group was opposed to the Iranian regime at the time, and seized the Iranian Mission as a protest of the bombing of the base of the military wing of their group, stationed in Iraq.
The Mujahidin Indonesia Timur (MIT) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Fadli was targeted because they believed he was an informant for Indonesian authorities.
The Mukhtar Army claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in response to the government's refusal to expel the Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK) from Iraq. The Mukhtar Army further accused the MEK of colluding with politicians linked to Al-Qai'da.
The Mukhtar Army claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims refused to leave the Iraqi region.
The murder took place because the man was accused of spying for U.S. Forces.
The murders were to serve as a warning against working for the government.
The Muttahida Qaumi Movement reported that the attack intended to divert the attention of the Pakistani government and army from their pursuit of Al-Qaida.
The Najd Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended as a message to imprisoned members of armed groups that the Najd Province of the Islamic State was working toward their release.
The Najd Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the mosque was targeted for spreading Shiite teachings among Sunnis.
The National Army for the Liberation of Uganda expressed the view in leaflets that "we now have enough personnel in Kampala capable of bringing the city to its knees."  Further details regarding the group's motives were unknown.
The National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) claimed responsibility for the attack, claiming that the attack was to express the militants’ objection against the treatment that their leader Ranjan Daimary received while in police custody.
The National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion from Teg Bahadur Rai.
The National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) militants had imposed a ban on wood felling in the Bodo areas where the killed woodcutters were working.
The National Democratic Front-Bicol (NDF-Bicol) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted for crimes he committed against civilians in 1986.
The National Democratic Front-Southern Mindanao (NDF-Southern Mindanao), an affiliate of the New People's Army (NPA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the NPA carried out the attack because they accused Maula (Mike) Tato Ali of "obstruction of justice" regarding the murder of an Italian priest in October 2011.
The National Liberation Army (NLA) (Macedonia) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group did not observe the Ohrid Framework Agreement.
The National Liberation Army (NLA) (Macedonia) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they did not observe the Ohrid Framework Agreement.
The National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion.
The National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated "ELN present, death to the snitches and paramilitary collaborators."
The National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Arsen Voskanyan was targeted for "catching poisonous frogs to sell on the international drug market."
The National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Aulio Isarama Forastero was targeted because of his alleged connection to Colombian military intelligence.
The National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Salud Hernandez was targeted because the ELN believed he was a "security threat."
The National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the repressive actions of the anti-disturbance police.
The National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the construction company refused to respond to an extortion demand by the ELN.
The National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN) claimed responsibility for the kidnapping, stating that the Germans were targeted for being suspected intelligence agents.
The National Liberation Council of Taniland (NLCT) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it carried out the attack in response to illegal evictions and to the Assamese people's encroachment onto Arunachal territory.
The National Liberation Front (Ecuador) claimed responsibility for the incident and criticized President Rafael Correa and his government.
The National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion.
The National Liberation Front of Tripura (NLFT) demanded a ransom in return for the kidnapped workers. Additionally, sources suspected that the NLFT may have kidnapped the victims because the fences they were building would have disrupted the NLFT's mobility.
The National Resistance Brigades, the military wing of the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine claimed responsibility for launching a rocket-propelled grenade at an armored Israeli bulldozer in the Ash-Shajaiyeh of Gaza City.
The National Socialist Council of Nagaland claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Solomon L. Awomi was abducted due to his involvement in anti-Naga policies.
The National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Isak-Muivah (NSCN-IM) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion.
The National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Isak-Muivah (NSCN-IM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Lova Yekar was abducted because he failed to pay an extortion.
The National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Khaplang (NSCN-K) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion.
The National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Khaplang (NSCN-K) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Deputy Commissioner was targeted for not responding to the group's demands.
The National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Khaplang (NSCN-K) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group stole the taxi for a financial gain.
The National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Reformation (NSCN-R) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was targeted because he had demanded an extortion in the name of NSCN-R.
The Naxalites claim they want to obtain greater social and economic rights for indigenous tribes and landless farmers.
The NDFB militants were planning to plant explosives at the market to mark the first anniversary of deadly serial blasts that occured in the city last October.
The Nepalbad Party claimed responsibility for the incident in a pamphlet left at the scene and stated that the Supreme Court justice was targeted due to "corruption in the judiciary."
The New Irish Republican Army claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Dan Murray was targeted because the group believed he was a drug dealer.
The New Irish Republican Army claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Joe Reilly was targeted because the group believed he was a drug dealer.
The New People's Army (NPA) Cesar Cayon command claimed responsibility for this incident, alleging that the two police officers were corrupt and cooperating with illegal loggers.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility and accused Michael Grande of terrorizing civilians and profiting from illegal gambling.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility and stated that the attack was meant as revenge against the mining company. The group also wanted to demonstrate their support for the people of Mankayan and other districts against mining operations.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the attack and accused Reynaldo Dinampo of supporting military operations and participating in weapons trade.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was retribution for the Philippine Army's abuse of civilians.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the attack on the Standard Rubber Development Corporation (SRDC), stating that they targeted the firm because it had failed to pay "taxes" to the group.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was "a 'punitive action' against the presence of multinational companies in the area."
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that the Sola family was targeted in response to the Solas' mistreatment of their employees.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the execution and stated that Lloyd Canamo was targeted because he did not concede with the group's demand to report to an NPA camp after being suspected of selling illegal drugs. Sources also suspected that the attacks were an attempt to "discredit" authorities.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the execution and stated that Peneto Pascheco Sr. was targeted because he did not concede with the group's demand to report to an NPA camp after being suspected of selling illegal drugs. Sources also suspected that the attacks were an attempt to "discredit" authorities.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the execution and stated that Ramon de Gracia was targeted because he did not concede with the group's demand to report to an NPA camp after being suspected of selling illegal drugs. Sources also suspected that the attacks were an attempt to "discredit" authorities.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the execution and stated that Relmo Aguilar was targeted because he did not concede with the group's demand to report to an NPA camp after being suspected of selling illegal drugs. Sources also suspected that the attacks were an attempt to "discredit" authorities.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Angelo Luis of being a military informant.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Arman Matutina of working with politicians and sabotaging agriculture reform. Sources also noted that Matutina was a former member of the NPA.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Caleb Sinaca of being involved in illegal activities, including drug trafficking, log trading, and extortion.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Crispin Posadas Jr. of being a military informant and being involved in illegal activities.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused George Canete Rupinta of engaging in "anti-people activities."
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Geovani Tan Lim of allegedly stealing land.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Junney Cabugnason of being an intelligence operative for the government.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Mark Ernest Southworth of various "abuses." The NPA also stated that they carried out the attack in order to steal the victim's weapons.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Richard Yu Jr. of participating in drug trafficking.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Ronaldo Lucas of not adhering to the NPA's campaign instructions.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the military of utilizing the government's "war on drugs" to gather information from civilians about the NPA.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the Philippine National Police (PNP) of extorting money from civilians, participating in the illegal drug trade, and torturing innocent people.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victim of providing intelligence on the NPA to the government.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victim of providing the military with information that led to the killing of an NPA leader.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims illegally acquiring land and plotting to kill four people.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of mistreating agricultural laborers.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded an extortion. Sources also noted that the NPA attempted to convince Omengan Construction and Development Corporation employees to join the NPA.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the military stop its operations in exchange for the release of the two soldiers.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Arnold Panisan was released because he promised to sever his ties with the military. Sources also stated that Panisan was accused of being a military informant.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Bantoto was targeted due to his involvement in activities against the NPA. The victim's wife also speculated that the attack may have been carried in retaliation for Bantoto leaving the NPA.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Bernabe Abanilla was targeted for his involvement in several alleged murders.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Bitche Navales was targeted because the NPA believed she was an informant.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Carl Michael Pangilinan was abducted because they believed he committed abuses against low-income individuals and engaged in illicit activities as mayor.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Carzon Lademora was targeted because he and his family exploited smaller mining companies and participated in acquiring land illegally.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Crispin Maguelang was targeted for his participation in illegal activities along with his alleged involvement in military intelligence. Sources also suspected that he may have been targeted for not paying a campaign fee to the NPA.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Datu Benjamin Omao was targeted for allegedly stealing land.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Datu Ruben Labawan had allegedly committed an array of "crimes against the people."
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Davao Security and Investigation Agency (DASIA) was targeted for enabling capitalism.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Dexter Remodaro's residence was targeted because it was used by the military for intelligence operations.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Domingo Ranola was targeted because they believed he was a military informant.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Francisco Baguiz was targeted because he had allegedly stolen land and targeted tribal leaders.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Melborn Tan was targeted because he was involved in the illegal drug trade.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Nelson Marino was targeted for using drugs and gambling.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Pulsar Construction was targeted because it failed to respond to an extortion demand.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Renomar Lopes Merando was targeted because the group believed he was a military informant.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Rey Guradian was targeted because the NPA believed he was a police and military informant.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ronnie Habitan was targeted for his involvement in illegal activities.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the abducted officers were accused of war crimes.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the aerial sprayer was targeted because of its harmful effects on the environment.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack targeted Marlon Lomantas, who the NPA accused of spying and dealing drugs.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was a warning to former members of armed groups who intended to assist security forces.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because the construction company did not pay an extortion.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because the contractor refused to pay an extortion demand.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because the NPA believed the military had breached the law of war.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out due to the victim's misuse of his position with the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA).
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in opposition to the Sumifru Corporation's use of pesticides.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to prevent the expansion of Davao Ventures Corporation into the area and to stop the use of chemicals in the area that are harmful to the environment.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in relation to an extortion demand and because the construction firm disrespected the NPA.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in relation to an extortion demand.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to an operation in Sugbongcogong town that occurred in August 2017 and Philippine President Duterte's measures to restrict the activities of "legal progressive groups."
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to environment and health violations committed by the Brostan Company through their mining operations.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Hydro-Electric Development Corporation (Hedcor) stealing the "land and water rights" of residents.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Manuel Brillantes, Jr.'s alleged involvement in illegal activities.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to military operations against the NPA.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to military operations carried out in the area. The NPA accused military personnel of taking civilian hostages and intimidating people, and stated that security personnel were responsible for the deaths of four civilians in Capiz.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to military operations in Brookes Point and Bataraza.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to Sumifro Corporation's environmental degradation, acquiring land illegally, and unfair wages paid to its workers.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the Communist Party of the Philippines' (CPP) call for increased attacks against the Duterte regime. The NPA also stated that the attack was in retaliation for military operations in Labo, Camarines Norte.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the construction contractors' failure to respond to an extortion demand.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the destruction of the environment at the hands of the company.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the locals' alleged opposition to a proposed power plant.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the military allowing David Consunji, the owner of David M. Consunji, Inc., to engage in acquiring land illegally.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the military assisting mining companies in the area.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the military's protection of mining companies.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the mining company's environmentally harmful activities.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the targeted construction company's activities, which harmed the environment. Sources also suspected that the attack was in response to the company's failure to make an extortion payment.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for a military operation in Barangay Salat the previous day.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for alleged military operations in the area.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for large companies spreading to NPA areas of operation. Sources also suspected that the attack was carried out in relation to an extortion demand.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations against the NPA.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for security forces' response to a demonstration by farmers on April 1, 2016.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the alleged death of a civilian by the military.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the company's quarry project because it was harmful to local people. The NPA also stated that the attack was related to an extortion demand.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of an NPA commander. Additionally, the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a halt to military operations against the group.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the harassment of civilians by the military.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the mining site's precarious activities and the company's refusal to pay an extortion.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Wilfredo Degay's participation in operations against the NPA.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to DDP Construction Company's quarrying in the area because it led to the destruction of a large amount of rice farm irrigation systems.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to military operations.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to unfair treatment of Del Monte workers as well as alleged land grabbing attempts.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out to demonstrate against the continuance of martial law in Mindanao.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out to demonstrate against the continuance of martial law in Mindanao. The NPA also stated that Dole-Stanfilco was targeted because the company acquired land illegally, utilized chemicals which were harmful for the environment, and did not provide benefits for its workers.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out to demonstrate against the continuance of martial law in Mindanao. The NPA also stated that Oning Lumacang was targeted because he left the group without permission and had participated in military operations.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out to prevent mining operations from damaging the environment.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out with the intention of disrupting the military's second phase of  Oplan Bayanihan.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended as a warning to contractors conducting irresponsible quarry operations.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to be a warning to multinational companies from operating in the area. Sources also suspected that the NPA may have carried out the attack in relation to an extortion demand.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to ensure the application of NPA policies during the upcoming elections.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to hinder the government's ability to carry out its Oplan Kapayapaan plan, which the group believed was intended to bring foreign companies into Palawan.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to punish the mining company because its activities were harmful to the environment. The NPA also stated that the attack was carried out in response to the military's protection of mining companies.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was related to an extortion demand.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Brostan Construction and Development Corporation was targeted because it failed to respond to an extortion demand.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group intended to "conduct peace lectures."
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group targeted Charlie Boliboli for participating in illegal activities.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the hostages would be released if the government halted military and police operations.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the local tourism agenda displaced many families for the sake of development in the area
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the ore processing plant was targeted because it was built on land that was illegally acquired and because citizens believed that the plant's use of cyanide would contaminate their water.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the police station was targeted because police officers were extorting money from small businesses. The NPA also accused the police of allowing illegal drug trade and gambling to take place.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the police station was targeted due to police officers' alleged mistreatment of civilians in the area during operations and for not respecting native political structures.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the soldiers were targeted for their alleged ill treatment of civilians.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim "committed a big sin."
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was a former member of the NPA and was targeted for surrendering to authorities.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victim was allegedly involved in illegal operations.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted in retaliation for their alleged human rights violations.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they carried out the abduction because the contractors were conducting surveillance in the area.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Valeriano Bundo was targeted for his work against Front 72 of the NPA. Sources also noted that Bundo was a supporter of the peace and development program run by the military in North Cotabato.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that Arnel Genita Recta was targeted for collaboration with military operations.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it targeted James Joyce Jr. as punishment for his actions against the NPA's activities. Additionally, the group stated that the mayor's personal army was being used to attack civilians.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that it targeted Tisoy, because he was involved in the killing of an NPA courier on May 9, 2014, and an NPA officer on June 15, 2008.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the abduction was in retaliation for the security forces' protection of logging companies involved in deforestation in the Davao del Norte, Compostela Valley, and Agusan del Sur provinces.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the group targeted the victim for his "crimes against the people." Authorities speculated that the NPA carried out the attack due to the victim's cooperation with security forces.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the mayor was targeted for espionage and for his role in a raid on an NPA camp in Tapal village in 2010. The group also accused the mayor of involvement in black sand mining in the area.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the Saint Augustine Gold and Copper Limited company had violated environmental protection laws and workers' welfare policies.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they abducted Allan Pansoy, a senior police officer and security escort for the Compostela Valley governor, because the governor's coterie did not coordinate their activities with the NPA while they were in alleged "rebel territory".
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they abducted the police officers because of their involvement in "anti-people activities."
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they abducted the soldiers because they thought the soldiers had committed human rights violations.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they executed the attack because of the abuses of the farm owner and its security guards.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed responsibility, stating that the attack was intended to punish an "abusive" police unit that forcibly conscripted people.
The New People's Army (NPA) claimed that the armed soldiers encountered a checkpoint staffed by the NPA and they died as a result of a legitimate exchange.
The New People's Army (NPA) spokesperson claime responsibility and said that they thought the mining company had been stockpiling weapons, which they had been asked not to do, because the weapons could be used by security forces to attack villagers.
The New People's Army (NPA) stated that the incident was in response to the extrajudicial killings of two individuals by the Armed Forces of the Philippines.
The New People's Army claimed responsibility for shooting Patrick Winegar, stating that it was because of his involvement in the military's anti-communist activities.
The New People's Army claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of mistreating civilians during police operations in the region.
The New People's Army claimed that, due to Aguinaldo's crimes against the citizens in the area, he deserved to die.
The New People's Army's (NPA) Mt. Kitanglad Sub-Regional Command spokesperson, Mamerto Bagani, claimed responsibility, stating that the Sumifru Corporation warehouse was targeted in response to Sumifru's anti-people policies and damaging business practices.
The NGO and Colombian military speculated that the ELN abducted the doctors to treat rebels wounded in clashes with the Colombian government near the Venezuelan border.
The Niger Delta Avengers (NDA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the government of "intimidation and blackmail."
The Niger Delta Avengers (NDA) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that international oil companies delay repairing damaged pipelines during ongoing negotiations.
The Niger Delta Avengers (NDA) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that oil companies delay fixing damaged pipelines.
The Niger Delta Avengers (NDA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because Chief Government Ekpemupolo did not apologize to the group.
The Niger Delta Avengers (NDA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the repairs of the oil pipeline in defiance of the NDA's demands.
The Niger Delta Avengers (NDA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent military operations and the government's failure to respond to local demands.
The Niger Delta Avengers (NDA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to "show the whole world that the Nigeria military is good in harassing innocent Nigerians."
The Niger Delta Avengers (NDA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group was enforcing their word that oil production in Nigeria would reach zero unless the NDA's demands were met.
The Niger Delta Forest Army (NDFA) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded inclusion within the government's amnesty program. Sources also posited that the assailants demanded a ransom in exchange for the victims.
The Niger Delta Greenland Justice Mandate (NDGJM) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that multinational companies leave the area.
The Niger Delta Greenland Justice Mandate (NDGJM) claimed responsibility for the incident and refused to negotiate with the Pan-Niger Delta Forum led by Chief Edwin Clark, citing the group's lack of trust in the Forum's members.
The Niger Delta Greenland Justice Mandate (NDGJM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that such attacks would continue if the government failed to hold substantive negotiations.
The Niger Delta Greenland Justice Mandate (NDGJM) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended "to prove to the wicked and ungrateful multinational oil companies and their Nigerian military allies…that we own our lands."
The Niger Delta Greenland Justice Mandate (NDGJM) clamed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to alleged mistreatment of locals.
The Niger Delta Justice Defense Group (NDJDG) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out due to the pipeline's environmental hazards for the surrounding community.
The Niger Delta Volunteers (NDV) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the government extend the current conversation between fighters in the Niger Delta and the government to Akwa Ibom state.
The Nigerian militants stated that they had come to "burn down Senator Ladoja's house and deal with whoever they found inside."
The NLFT demanded that the candidates withdraw from the elections in return for the safety of their family members.
The NLFT states that it wants all tribespeople in Tripura to convert to Christianity.
The Nocturnals and the Anarchist Revolt Against Exiled Gendarmes separately claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in support of those currently at trial.
The Northern Storm Brigade, a division of the Free Syrian Army (FSA), claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that they held Fidaa Itani in order to safeguard their secret revolutionary tactics.
The NPA burned the buses because of the refusal of Vallacar Transit Inc. to make public transportation affordable to the masses.
The NPA has stated that it would attack corporations that were responsible for environmental destruction and worker abuse.
The NPA were alleged to have raided the farm because its owners refused to pay protection money.
The NPA-HAC, through its spokesman Arnel Sandoval, admitted to the arson. In its website, the group said it torched the warehouse and equipment as punitive action against the firm’s alleged exploitation of natural resources in the village. It also alleged that the UCI owner supported the election campaign of Mayor Carlito Pentecostes Jr., whom the rebels claimed was a warlord. The rebel spokesman said that UCI’s continuous quarrying of black sand was contributing to the rapid siltation of the Wangag river, which causes its banks to overflow during rains.
The Odessa Underground claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that U Angelovykh restaurant was targeted because the group believed it was a gathering location for Ukrainian nationalists.
The operation came in response to the Israeli crimes against the Palestinian resistance
The operation came in retaliation for the occupation's crimes in the West Bank and Gaza Strip
The operation was a part of their 'ongoing battle with occupation,' and a response to Israel's 'crimes' in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
The operation was carried out to avenge Abu-Ali Mustafa, secretary general of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) who had recently been killed by Israeli forces.
The operation was carried out with in the framework of the Palestinian people's right to resist and retaliate for the enemy's ongoing crime. It was also carried on the 30th day for the martyrdom of commander Wadi Haddad
The opposition party wanted to overthrow the existing government.
The Order (Silent Brotherhood) was a white supremacist group that was anti-government, against Jews and other minorities, and sought to start a race war and overthrow the government.  In particular, they used the robbery money to finance their revolution by buying equipment, literature, and as incentive for recruits for their cause, as well as to secure loyalty from members. The money from this robbery in particular was also donated to Identity preachers, KKK members, other neo-Nazis, the White Aryan Resistance, a racist college professor, and used to establish a surrogate mother program to support a sperm bank for the future of Aryan warriors.
The Order (Silent Brotherhood) was a white supremacist group that was anti-government, against Jews and other minorities, and sought to start a race war and overthrow the government.  In particular, they were also against pornography, and used the money from their subsequent robberies to finance their revolution.
The Organization for Revolutionary Self Defense claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out due to France's interference in the Middle East and its treatment of refugees.
The Organization for Revolutionary Self Defense claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) party's policies.
The Organization for Revolutionary Self Defense claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Mexican embassy was targeted due to Mexico's totalitarianism policies.
The Organization for Revolutionary Self Defense claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the police personnel were targeted because the group believed they were "the armed protectors of exploitation."
The organization said the attack was designed to halt "massacres" in Turkey, Kurdish areas and Palestine.
The owner had allegedly resisted an extortion attempt by an armed group before the attack.
The owners of the supermarket were communists.
The Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) claimed responsibility and stated that the mortar attack was to prevent Israeli Army soldiers from entering Khan Yunis.
The Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the recent deaths of three group members.
The Pamed police station is the last remaining government installation in the area.  The police were probably attacked in a bid to remove government forces from the area altogether.
The pamphlets urged the public to stop supporting the economic policies of President Gutierrez.
The Paraguayan People's Army (EPP) claimed responsibility for the attack and demanded a ransom payment in exchange for the victims.
The Paraguayan People's Army (EPP) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the family deliver $25,000 of food to certain communities in exchange for the release of Franz Wiebe Boschman.
The Paraguayan People's Army (EPP) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the farmers adhere to the group's demands regarding the harvesting of crops.
The Paraguayan People's Army (EPP) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the Santa Marta ranch owner provide four animals to the indigenous community.
The Paraguayan People's Army (EPP) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that the targeted laborer not trespass on the land again.
The Paraguayan People's Army (EPP) claimed responsibility for the incident and had previously warned Alejandro Ramos to leave the area.
The Paraguayan People's Army (EPP) claimed responsibility for the incident and had previously warned members of the Mennonite community to cease anti-environmental activities or they would be targeted.
The Paraguayan People's Army (EPP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Braulio Davalos was targeted because the EPP believed he was a "thug" and deserved "revolutionary justice."
The Partido Marxista-Leninista ng Pilipinas (PMLP) claimed responsibility and, in a letter, stated that the attack was due to the National Housing Authority's failure to address the problems of demolitions in Manila, particularly in the North Triangle Area.
The Partido Marxista-Leninista ng Pilipinas (PMLP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated Merlin Manalac was targeted in retaliation for the death of a former New People's Army (NPA) member in 2010.
The Patriotic Ginbot 7 Movement for Unity and Democracy (PGMUD) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the ammunition depot was targeted because it was allegedly being used to torture political prisoners.
The Peace at Home Council claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that individuals who "have betrayed the country" would stand trial. Sources also noted that the attack was part of an attempted military coup in Turkey.
The peasants were accused of serving as stool pigeons for the Army.
The peasants were taken until it could be proven that they had no connections to the leftist guerrilla groups.
The People's Defense Unit (Turkey) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they attacked Adimlar Magazine in retaliation for their justification of mass murders.
The People's Liberation Army (India) attacked India's spy agency because it worked to locate the People's Liberation Army's group members.
The People's Liberation Army (India) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to weaken "enemy" positions.
The People's Liberation Army (India) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of India's Republic Day celebrations, scheduled for January 26, 2015.
The People's Liberation Army (India) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest of India's Republic day celebrations, which were being held on January 26, 2015.
The People's Liberation Army (India) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in protest to India's Republic Day celebrations, scheduled for January 26, 2015.
The People's Liberation Army (India) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the government's treatment of citizens.
The People's Liberation Army (India) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the harassment of civilians by military personnel.
The People's Liberation Army (India) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to "teach a lesson."
The People's Liberation Army (India) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Border Security Force (BSF) personnel were targeted for their alleged ill treatment of civilians.
The People's Liberation Army of Manipur said that the attack was intended to disrupt the Republic Day festivities.
The People's Liberation Front of India claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the victims had been killed because they were police informers.
The People's Liberation Front of India claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of being police informants.
The People's Liberation Front of India claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the shut down of crusher units, workers to be paid fairly, and for female employees not to work at night.
The People's Liberation Front of India claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Manoj Nageshia was targeted because he was a police informant and had previously threatened a People's Liberation Front of India leader.
The People's Liberation Front of India claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out due to a failure to pay an extortion.
The People's Liberation Front of India claimed responsibility for the incident and threatened the workers not to work on the road construction project until they gained permission to do so from the group.
The People's Revolutionary Militias (MRP) said the attack was to condemn the UK and US for invading Iraq.
The People's Revolutionary Movement (MRP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in opposition to tax reform which would harm average Colombians.
The People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak (PREPAK) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victims of making extortion demands under PREPAK.
The People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak (PREPAK) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused Thounaojam Bishambor Singh of embezzlement.
The People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak (PREPAK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack targeted Ajay Kumar, the owner of the pharmacy, because he failed to follow rules enforced by the group and did not provide PREPAK with information.
The People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak (PREPAK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to AnilKumar Sahu's arrogant actions.
The People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak-Progressive (PREPAK-P) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that the night club was targeted because it served alcohol, sold drugs, and allowed for immoral activities. The group further stated that they felt they needed to take action in order to save the society from degenerating.
The People's Revolutionary Party of Kangleipak-Progressive (PREPAK-P) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the owner of the showroom had confronted the group.
The perpertrators said in a statement that the shelling came in retaliation for ongoing Israeli atrocities against the Palestinian people in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.
The perpetators wanted the liberation of Kostas Kalaremas and Nikolaos Maziotis.
The perpetrator admitted that he had carried out this action "in support of Iraq and as an act of revenge against the forces that will carry out a military operation against it, including British forces."
The perpetrator demanded that an appeal he had recently filed be reviewed by the parliament.
The perpetrator espoused anti-Israeli views.
The perpetrator wanted $100,000.
The perpetrator wanted to show support for Palestinians and for Al-Qaida.
The perpetrator was angry at JCO Co, the company that owned the uranium processing plant that had a nuclear accident
The perpetrator was motivated by anti-government sentiment.
The perpetrator was sympathetic to the Taliban and al-Qaida.
The perpetrator's letter read "Do not be sad for me, the south must be liberated."
The perpetrators accused Kamati as being a spy and assisting the police for establishing a police station in the Village Development Committee.
The perpetrators are followers of Maulana Fazlullah, a cleric leading militants who are sympathetic to the Taliban.
The perpetrators attacked the post as a warning to 100 Battalion troops who were operating in villages in Krueng Pase.
The perpetrators attacked the Shaklee facility because the company refused to stop doing busines with Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS).
The perpetrators believed that life would be better without Black people.  They hoped that their actions would initiate a race war that would incite others to kill Black people.
The perpetrators believed the farm to be a "polluter" and "animal exploiter."
The perpetrators believed the pipeline was a main feeder of gas from the fields in the Gulf of Mexico to the Chicago metropolitan arteries, and wanted to leave the African American and Latino populations to freeze in the winter without heat, in attempts to ultimately start a holy war.
The perpetrators believed the police substation would be a popular target with activists in the community, especially after police reaction to recent protests.
The perpetrators blamed Jewish media leaders for the war in Kosovo.
The perpetrators called on the government to change its pro-US policy.
The perpetrators carried out the attack to deter the extension of Narita airport.
The perpetrators cited "France's increasing persecution of Muslims around the world, its opressive anti-Islam policies at home, French military operations in ... Afghanistan and, most recently in Mali" as the motive for the attack.
The perpetrators claimed that the President had been sentenced to death for the genocide of Chechens and Ingush civilians under his watch.
The perpetrators claimed to be carrying out the attack in retribution for the death of Ramzi Nahra on December 6, 2002.
The perpetrators claimed to have acted to protest a new anti-terrorism law in Greece.
The perpetrators committed the incident on "behalf of more than a half-million chickens imprisoned and in forced labor at the factory farm.''
The perpetrators demanded from the U.S. government the release of three Islamic extremists held in the U.S., including Ramzi Yousef, found guilty of masterminding the 1993 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York.
The perpetrators demanded payment of 260 million in Nigerian dollars to their firm. They also demanded compensation for oil spillages that allegedly had occurred in the area.
The perpetrators demanded safe passage to Uzbekistan and the release of some 50,000 Moslem prisoners in exchange for the hostages.
The perpetrators demanded that the victims give them money.
The perpetrators demanded the immediate removal of Italian forces within Iraq.
The perpetrators demanded the removal of US troops in the region.
The perpetrators gave victims lectures and training in Maoist People's Education for eight hours on the second and final day of their captivity. They were also made to participate in an interactive program on Maoist activity.
The perpetrators had been recruited to destroy and siphon oil off of the pipeline.
The perpetrators motives were indoctrination of the victims and the spread of Maoist propaganda.
The perpetrators needed to use the victims' van for a car bomb attack.
The perpetrators probably wanted to warn French Prime Minister, Sarkozy, as he was visiting Ajaccio the following day.
The perpetrators reportedly sought to disrupt local elections. Itoo was seeking re-election from Noorabad constituency of the district at the time of the attack.
The perpetrators said that the "shelling comes in the framework of the continued retaliation for the occupation's crimes in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and in affirmation of our adherence to the option of resistance and jihad all the way to the full liberation of Palestine.
The perpetrators say they intended for the shots to call attention to the burning crosses a few blacks away; the incident occurred during a time of racial tensions.
The perpetrators stated that the kidnappings were in response to "the transgression and atrocities done to the religion of Allah by the European countries in many places such as Afghanistan and Mali…" and to send a message to western countries that they should be wary of the type of advice they give to the Nigerian government. Additionally a source speculates that the hostages were killed because the perpetrators believed that western countries had launched a rescue mission when they witnessed planes arriving close to the location of the hostages.
The perpetrators stated that they wanted Italian police to pull out of certain city districts and voiced support for members of the Red Brigade being tried for the murders of two government aides in 1999 and 2002.
The perpetrators stated that they wanted to attack Black people out of revenge for being jumped by a group of Blacks previously.  However, they shot Blacks at random, not specifically the people who attacked them.  This attack occurred at a time when racial tensions were volatile in Youngstown, and violence against blacks across the nation in general was increasing, as was activity by the Ku Klux Klan, which lead to the perception of a conspiracy against blacks.  This attack caused hysteria within the Black community.
The perpetrators stated that they were provoked by a police on the part of the French government to eradicate the Corsican community
The perpetrators targeted Nguyen Thanh Hoang due to his anti-communist beliefs and writings.
The perpetrators told Bautista that they disagreed with certain guilty sentences that had been handed down. It was also suspected that the group was upset with Judge Bautista's recent acquittal of 14 oil union members charged with terrorism. The unionists had allegedly provided information about a pipeline to the National Liberation army, which supposedly led to several dynamite attacks. This information proved to be unfounded during the court proceedings and the workers were acquitted.
The perpetrators wanted infrastructure improvements and job opportunities.
The perpetrators wanted the government and the ICRC to find them new homes.
The perpetrators wanted the Royal Saudi Family to leave power.
The perpetrators wanted to "remove the profit motive from the killing of the natural environment."
The perpetrators wanted to avenge the deaths of two GSPC leaders, Nouredine Skodarli and Lyes Saadaoui.  They had died two days prior to this incident on the heights of Beni Amrane, during a skirmish with municipal guards.
The perpetrators wanted to demonstrate their opposition to the destruction of forested areas, wetlands and other areas of environmental concern across North America.
The perpetrators wanted to expose Philippine government corruption.
The perpetrators wanted to lynch a spiritual leader who was promoting a convention on elimination of all forms of discrimination against women in Niger.
The perpetrators wanted to punish Sims Poultry for the company's supposed abuse of animals.
The perpetrators wanted to stop developers from constructing new homes in San Diego's Carmel Valley.
The perpetrators wanted to stop progress on a genetically modified food project.
The perpetrators were against the slaughter of wild horses and the BLM policies towards the horses.
The perpetrators were attempting to force a Turkish company operating in Iraq to leave the country.
The perpetrators were attempting to secure the release of a member of the tribe who had been detained on charges of being affiliated with al Qa'ida.
The perpetrators were followers of a renegade ex-general.
The perpetrators were heeding the call of Osama bin Laden on an Islamic website ordering his supporters to sabotage oil facilities in Iraq and the Gulf.  Al-Qaida wanted to undermine U.S. state building measures in Iraq to diminish overall American influence in the Islamic world.
The perpetrators were opposing the slaughter of animals for fur.
The perpetrators were pro-Taliban Militants
The perpetrators were pro-Taliban militants.
The perpetrators were pro-Taliban militants.  They often target music and video shops because they believe they put forth anti-Islam ideals.
The perpetrators were protesting corporate involvement with the Amendment 24 campaign.
The perpetrators were protesting Nike's exploitation of overseas labor.
The perpetrators were protesting perceived corruption in the District Education Office.
The perpetrators were protesting the company's mining of a 40-acre site in the Columbia River Gorge.
The perpetrators were protesting the eating of meat at the restaurant.
The perpetrators were protesting the killing of cows, chickens and pigs.
The perpetrators were protesting the Perrier Company's "stealing" of water.
The perpetrators were protesting the use of transgenic cotton.
The perpetrators were said be 'anti-government.'
The perpetrators were trying to free comrades arrested at the beginning of August 2001.
The PFLP issued a statement that the attack was in retaliation for Israeli crimes against Palestinians
The PFLP said that they carried out the attack to show that Yasser Arafat's illness would not stop the fight against the Israeli occupiers and as a warning to those who talked of reducing the resistance movement.
The Philippine military believed that the attackers wanted to relieve pressure from the main body of the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG), which was feeling the all-out military operations against them. The main body was composed of the hostages and the top ASG leaders including, Khaddafy Janjalani and Abu Sabaya. It is also believed that the ASG seized more civilians to be used as human shields by pursuing government troops.
The PIJ claimed that the ambush was carried out in retaliation for an Israeli army killing of one of its members, Iyad Sawalha, in Jenin.
The pilot had been previously warned to cease transporting Nepal soldiers.
The PKK is fighting in Turkey with the goal of gaining a separate Kurdish state from Kurdish areas that are split among several countries in the Middle East.
The plane was attacked because the Chechens believed it was going to bomb them.
The PLFI wanted to resolve some public interest issue with Hindalco, but Hindalco did not come forward to resolve the issue. The incident is the outcome of the indifferent attitude of Hindalco towards PLFI demands. Superintendent of Police Narendra Kumar Singh believes the attack was due to denial of Hindalco to pay a levy to the PLFI.
The police called the shooting a targeted killing but did not give a motive.
The police said Mr. Mahato had been receiving frequent threats from the Maoists for the last few months.
The police said the bomb was believed to have been planted by a dissident group of the IRA opposed to the peace process in the mostly Protestant town of Lisburn.
The police said the kidnappers probably thought the male students were police officers or recruits.
The police spokesman said the attacks appeared to be linked to a general strike called for against alleged "police repression" of guerrillas belonging to the MCC, which was campaigning against the exploitation of the poor by feudal landlords in Bihar.
The police suspect that the attack was an attempt to destroy the infrastructure which would likely be used by security forces during anti-Maoist operations in the region. A pamphlet left behind at the scene, stated that the attack was the consequence for the killing of Maoist leader ‘Azad’.
The police vehicle was targeted in the attack becuase the assailants were trying to escape the police.
The police were on their way to carry out anti-drug operations in the region.
The Popular Army Front-Return Battalions said the bomb was a reply to "Sharon's policy and his bloody council of ministers, and a message to the US administration which has supported and tried to justify this policy of assassination and terrorism." The group said it was acting in the name of 32-year-old Fatah activist Samir Abu El Az Zeid, who was killed in an explosion in the Gaza Strip town of Rafah on August 19, 2001.
The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the imprisonment of PFLP member, Bilal Kayid.
The Popular Liberation Army (EPL) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded to be recognized by the Colombian national government as a guerrilla fighting force and be included in peace processes.
The Popular Resistance Movement (Egypt) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in resistance to an economic conference, scheduled for March 2015 in Egypt. The Popular Resistance Movement (Egypt) also stated that the attack coincided with the visit of Ginni Rommetty, the president of IBM, to Egypt.
The Popular Resistance Movement (Egypt) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Vodafone's announcement that it would participate in an upcoming conference, focusing on investment in Egypt.
The Popular Resistance Movement (Egypt) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was intended to disrupt an upcoming conference, focusing on investment in Egypt.
The Popular Resistance Movement (Egypt) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the Emirates National Bank was targeted in retaliation for the United Arab Emirates' support of Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.
The Popular Resistance Movement (Egypt) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the United Arab Emirates (UAE)-owned company, Etisalat, was targeted in retaliation for the United Arab Emirates' support of Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.
The PRC in a leaflet claimed the attacks were in response to the killing of four militants in Gaza the killing five Palestinians in the West Bank
The presence of Shia Muslims at the camp was the reason for the attack.
The pro-Indonesia attackers were answering the call of the Aitarak Militia for help in suppressing pro-Independence East Timorese civilians.
The probable motive for the attack was in revenge for the Pakistan army's offensive against Taliban fighters in South Waziristan.
The professor had been working for intelligence agencies and had been warned by militants.
The Proletarian Solidarity claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out to draw attention to the anarchist prisoners who have been jailed for their views.
The proposed motive was to hunt down UN and international NGO workers in the light of the murder of the pro-Indonesian militia leader in East Timor on 09/06/2000.
The protestors wanted to free 23 members of the Akramia religious group who were in prison in Andijon.
The protestors wanted to keep a nuclear waste dump out of their area.
The publication was not giving priority to news related to JTMM-J
The Punjabi Taliban claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that a large sum of money was stolen during the attack.
The purpose behind the kidnapping was to bargain for the release of prisoners held by the government.
The purpose of the attack was aimed at disrupting the Bingol local elections.
The purpose of the attack was to disrupt telecommunication system in the district.
The purpose of the attack was to kill suspected leftists and sympathizers, in order to gain the upper hand in the struggle to control certain geographical areas.
The purpose of the TV station's seizure was to broadcast a report on the establishment of an Islamic state or government on CIS territory. The gunmen specially timed the action to coincide with the Sochi presidential summit and Islamic news centers in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and countries of the Persian Gulf were ready to pick up their broadcast.
The Raia Mutomboki Militia claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded a ransom in exchange for the hostages.
The raid was a successful effort to steal weapons and to undermine the government's security presence in the region. Maoists also had recently called for strikes in three cities in opposition to rising oil prices; the attack may have been part of this protest as well.
The raid was aimed at gaining the release of armed robbery suspects.
The Real IRA is trying to frighten fellow Catholics that have dedicated themselves to the peace process between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland.
The rebel group claims that the military attacked them, although sources state that the rebel group occupied the village before the military responded.  There had been issues in the past of the military encroaching on territory held by the rebel group.
The rebels accused the civilians of being MPLA informants.
The rebels accused the journalist of working against the Nepal Communist Party (Maoists).
The rebels accused the villagers of helping the police combat the Maoist movement.
The rebels attacked because the villagers refused to join them.  Those villagers that were not killed or did not flee were forced to join the rebels.
The rebels believed that the villagers had been collaborating with right-wing paramilitaries
The rebels carried out the attack, calling an impromptu strike to protest against the recent arrest of some of their leaders, distributed leaflets in villages and rural towns, saying civilians with no ties to the movement were being tortured by the police
The rebels claimed the targeted company was continuing work despite the shutdown call given by the outfit in protest against the killing of one of its leaders.
The rebels had asked the police to lay down their arms and when they didn't, the rebels attacked.
The rebels in the area frequently kill politicians because they oppose elections held under Indian rule.
The rebels killed Jose Rodriguez after trying him on corruption charges in a revolutionary court.
The rebels killed themselves by blowing up their vessel in order to avoid inspection and capture.
The rebels reportedly targeted the family because two of their sons, who were earlier NLFT cadres, surrendered to authorities.
The rebels said that the attack was in retaliation for refusal to submit to their declared armed shutdown the day before.
The rebels said that the attack was to protest the arrest of People's War Group activists in the area.
The rebels stated that the Singh family, the victims, were guilty of sexually and financially exploiting local girls, and failing to pay fair wages to laborers.
The rebels wanted to take medicine and medical personnel to tend to their wounded, as well as to show a sign of strength.
The rebels warned the villagers of grave consequences if they informed the police, which was why the attack was carried out.
The rebels were going hungry due to the fact that their main food suppliers (farmers and villagers) had fled the area
The rebels were trying to topple President Idriss Deby.
The Red Egbesu Water Lions claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded the release of two people being held by authorities.
The Red Hand Defenders (RHD) said that they killed Stobie for "crimes against the loyalist community."
The release of a indigenous men was the suspected motive for this attack.
The release of Alhaji Mujahid Asari-Dokubo, leader of the NDPVF.
The release of imprisoned Abida tribesmen.
The removal of five infantry battalions and two army special forces units from four southern provinces.
The removal of government forces from Garo Hills
The renegade soldiers did not believe that the President had been legitimately elected by the people.  They demanded that the President be ousted from government and that his former intelligence chief be imprisoned.
The Republican Action Against Drugs (RAAD) claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was in response to an increase in attacks on members of the group and their families by security forces.
The Revolution's Brigade claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of Mohammed Kamal, a Muslim Brotherhood leader.
The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Harley Lopez would be released in exchange for the suspension of military operations in the area for six days.
The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the battalion was targeted because FARC is opposed to military installments in the middle of civilian populations.
The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) demanded a ransom of $150,000.  They had several other demands, including that they not be considered terrorists any longer by the government.  They were in the midst of peace talks with the government at the time of the kidnapping.
The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) is asking for a ransom for the safe return of Chikao Muramatsu.
The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia (FARC) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was in response to alleged government offensives on the FARC during a declared ceasefire.
The Revolutionary Army claimed responsibility for the incident and denounced recent initiatives to strengthen United States (US) and Japanese relations.
The Revolutionary Cells claimed responsibility in a letter, which stated that the hotel was chosen because it was hosting an economic conference entitled "Universalization: Invitation for Greece and Europe.
The Revolutionary Cells Network (SRN) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for police operations in April 2015.
The Revolutionary Punishment Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the victim of working with Egyptian security forces and filling out reports against the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Revolutionary Punishment Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Al-Abd was responsible for killing members of the group.
The Revolutionary Punishment Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to media outlets' alleged fabrication of the news.
The Revolutionary Punishment Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for security operations and alleged ill treatment of prisoners.
The Revolutionary Struggle claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the attack was in retribution for the "predatory pro-memoranda policies" affecting the Greek people.
The Rugovasit Group claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that Mentor Shala leave his job.
The Runda Kumpulan Kecil (RKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out due to a lack of progress in peace negotiations between the government and armed groups in southern Thailand.
The Runda Kumpulan Kecil (RKK) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out due to a lack of progress in peace negotiations between the Thai government and armed groups in southern Thailand.
The Salah el Dein Brigades, an armed wing of the Popular Resistance Committee, committed the attacks in retaliation for IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) troops killing three Palestinian teens. They were also in retaliation for the breaking of a cease fire that Isreal had agreed to.
The Sanaa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Huthi operations.
The Sanaa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent operations by Huthis.
The Sanaa Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to Huthi support.
The scholar was accused of inciting youth to indulge in immoral activities.
The school girls were attacked for being unveiled.
The school teachers were attacked for being unveiled in public.
The Self-Defense Group of Imghad Tuaregs and Allies (GATIA) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for violence against GATIA supporters.
The seventeen residents were accused of cooperation with leftist guerillas.
The Shabelle Valley Administration claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that they killed the victims because they were suspected Al-Shabaab members, as part of a larger operation to secure the town from unwanted groups.
The shooting is in connection with the unrest of the region between Muslims and Buddhists.
The shooting was claimed as retaliation for the murder of settler Hillel Lieberman in Nablus 10 months prior to this incident.
The shooting was in response to the Israeli assassination of Abu Ali Mustafa, leader of the PFLP.
The shootout and kidnapping resulted from an altercation with police on the night of February 28, 2005 in Matribugh village.
The Shura Council of Benghazi Revolutionaries claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the death of Bouka Al-Araibi, leader of the Brega Martyr's Brigade.
The Shura Council of Mujahideen in Derna claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent airstrikes.
The Shura Council of Mujahideen in Derna claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted for their alleged affiliation with Operation Dignity.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and accused the Tarabeen tribe of working with Egyptian military personnel.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Abdelsalam Mohamed Hemdan was targeted because the group believed he was working with security personnel.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Ayman Mohamed Salama was targeted because they believed he was working with security personnel.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Rady Soliman Abu Sabie and Soliman were targeted because the group believed they were spies.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Rafael Moussa was targeted for allegedly "combating Islam."
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the assailants wanted to target individuals working with security personnel.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out "in order to teach the Jews and the crusaders a proxy war will not avail them of anything."
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out because the military was beginning operations against the group in the area.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in order to arrest individuals who collaborated with authorities.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to authorities detaining a local woman and the Egyptian Army's ill treatment of civilians.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the "humiliation" of female members of the Muslim community at checkpoints.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the government's extension of both the state of emergency and curfew in Arish city.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the killing of Muslims allegedly by the military.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for Jordan's involvement against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the detainment of female members of the Muslim community by the military.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the execution of six of its members in May 2015.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the government's arrest of tribal women in the Sinai Peninsula.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the military killing six of its members a year prior to the attack.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for women being held prisoner by Egyptian authorities. Separately, the Popular Resistance Movement (Egypt) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that it was carried out in memory of those killed at a demonstration in Rabaa in August 2013.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group targeted the pipeline in order to prevent gas from reaching Jordan.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the group was enforcing Islamic law by warning female government employees to begin wearing veils and travel with male guardians.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the victims were targeted because they believed they were military informants.
The Sinai Province of the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that Tomislav Salopek would be released in exchange for the release of Muslim women, who were currently imprisoned in Egyptian jails.
The Sindhu Desh Liberation Army (SDLA) claimed responsibility for the attack and said it was in response to the murder of Muzafar Bhutto, a leader of the Jeay Sindh Muttahida Mahaz (JSMM) party.
The Sindhu Desh Liberation Army (SDLA) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that they were struggling to achieve Sindhi rights. A note left at the scene asserted that Sindh province faced issues similar to Balochistan province; however, relatively little attention was paid to Sindh province.
The Sindhu Desh Liberation Army (SDLA) claimed responsibility for the attack and stated that this was part of a struggle for Baloch independence. In a letter left at the scene, SDLA claimed that people were fighting nationally and internationally for independence and that the province's people were suppressed and deprived.
The Sindhu Desh Liberation Army (SDLA) claimed responsibility for the incident and warned Pakistani military personnel to leave the Sindh region.
The Sindhudesh Revolutionary Army (SRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and accused security personnel of targeting youth.
The Sindhudesh Revolutionary Army (SRA) claimed responsibility for the incident and demanded that oil resources stop being exploited.
The site was attacked for not making extortion payments to the militants.
The site was chosen as a “statement of defiance,” in honor of Jeffrey Luers, another environmentalist, who had been charged for an earlier arson at the same location; to speak out against the prison system
The SLDF militia is fighting for ancestral land belonging to the Sabaot community.
The soldier claimed that he shot the French troops because of a video of United States Marines urinating on dead bodies.
The soldier strayed into a "no-go" zone.
The Songbijit Faction of the National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) abducted Anil Kumar Agarwal in order to collect a ransom.
The Sons of Jesus Movement claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in revenge for attacks targeting members of the Christian community.
The South Moluccans wanted the Netherlands to support their efforts to gain independence for their islands (Moluccan or Spice Islands) from Indonesia.  Both sets of islands were former Dutch colonies.
The Southern Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in response to the mobilization of pro-government militias in the area.
The Southern Front claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the attack was carried out in retaliation for military operations.
The Southern Mobility Movement (Yemen) claimed responsibility for the incident and stated that the hostages would be released if the military evacuated the military camp in Lahij province.
The Southern Mobility Movement (Yemen) claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the kidnapping was carried out to pressure the government into releasing Faris al-Dhalee.
The specfic motive is unknown; however, sources posited that the attack was related to an extortion demand.
The specific motivation was to halt the presentation of a film about Jesus Christ.
The specific motive behind the attack is unknown; however, the bus stand was located near to an election rally.  Violence in the area has been escalating leading up to the state elections.
The specific motive behind the hijacking is unknown; however, sources note that the sea of Marmara is where PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan is being held on an island.
The specific motive for the attack "is retribution for all the acts by the United States and its lackeys against Muslims and Muslim holy warriors."
The specific motive for the attack appeared to be aimed at disrupting supplies to NATO forces in Afghanistan
The specific motive for the attack appeared to be aimed at disrupting supplies to NATO forces in Afghanistan.
The specific motive for the attack appears to be religious.
The specific motive for the attack came from previous threats to step down from his government position as well as tribal leader.
The specific motive for the attack came from the targets listening to music and they were advised to not listen to music ever again.
The specific motive for the attack could possibly be religiously motivated.
The specific motive for the attack is  to intimidate Kirkuk law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is "retribution for all the acts by the United States and its lackeys against Muslims and Muslim holy warriors."
The specific motive for the attack is allegedly for the violation of the strike called by the Madhesh Rastriya Janatantrik Party (MRJP).
The specific motive for the attack is because Kapadi charged a high interest rate on loans to poor villagers.
The specific motive for the attack is believed to be a diversion to distract from the location of a kidnap victim.
The specific motive for the attack is believed to be that the attack was in response to the residents promise not to support the insurgency during a mass prayer.
The specific motive for the attack is believed to be that the company refused to give into demands to pay protection money.
The specific motive for the attack is believed to be that the company refused to pay revolutionary taxes.
The specific motive for the attack is believed to be that the owner did not pay revolutionary taxes.
The specific motive for the attack is believed to be the company's failure to pay revolutionary taxes.
The specific motive for the attack is believed to be to cause tension between Buddhists and Muslims.
The specific motive for the attack is believed to be to frighten Buddhist residents into leaving the area.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the group wanting the British out of Ireland.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the market dealing in "obscene" ring tones.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the shop owners having anti-Shariah busniesses.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the shop selling locally made alcohol.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the Taliban accusing the two students of spying for the US.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the target allegedly being a spy.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the target allegedly being involved in embezzlement of donations collected for Mujahideen.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the target being a police informant.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the target being accused of spying for the US and Afghan Forces.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the target being an abortion doctor.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the target being suspected of spying.
The specific motive for the attack is due to the targets being accused of spying for NATO forces.
The specific motive for the attack is economic in nature.
The specific motive for the attack is for Adhikary's connection with the police.
The specific motive for the attack is for Marandi raiding the village after calling for a shutdown of the city and protesting against rising prices of essential commodities.
The specific motive for the attack is for spying for the United States.
The specific motive for the attack is in retailiation against the authorities for destroying a religious school in Zabol.
The specific motive for the attack is in retaliation to the death of Mapuche activist on 20080103, who was killed by police.
The specific motive for the attack is intimidate Sunni Muslims.
The specific motive for the attack is political in nature.
The specific motive for the attack is political.
The specific motive for the attack is prevent women from running for government,
The specific motive for the attack is punishment for allegedly spying for American forces.
The specific motive for the attack is punishment for allegedly spying for military forces.
The specific motive for the attack is punishment for allegedly spying for the United States.
The specific motive for the attack is punishment for killing Ely Cumawas in 2007 and his involvement in several beatings in his village.
The specific motive for the attack is punishment for supporting the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) in the agency
The specific motive for the attack is punishment over alleged non-payment of the extortion amount by the contractors constructing them in the district.
The specific motive for the attack is religious in nature.
The specific motive for the attack is religious intimidation against Sunni Islam.
The specific motive for the attack is religious.
The specific motive for the attack is retaliation for the rescue of two Chinese nationals a few hours before that the militants were holding captive.
The specific motive for the attack is revenge for non- payment of extortion money by the contractors constructing them in the district.
The specific motive for the attack is suspected to be extortion related.
The specific motive for the attack is suspected to be retaliation from supporters of defeated barangay (village) candidates.
The specific motive for the attack is that Lan Chile Airlines is a symbol of exploitation and social control, disguised as a service for material well being.
The specific motive for the attack is that the warehouse was allegedly spying on the Terai Army Dal.
The specific motive for the attack is the belief that gold, silver, or platinum teeth contravene strict religious law.
The specific motive for the attack is the civilian was accused of spying for coalition foces.
The specific motive for the attack is the civilian was allegedly supporting local NGOs.
The specific motive for the attack is the man wanted his unpaid wages and was turned down.
The specific motive for the attack is the Maoist militants were trying to extort money from the villagers.
The specific motive for the attack is the men are being held on kidnapping charges.
The specific motive for the attack is the men were suspected of being spies for the United States.
The specific motive for the attack is the NDFB is fighting for an independent homeland for the Bodo tribe in Assam.
The specific motive for the attack is the suspicion that the farmers were police informers.
The specific motive for the attack is the victim is believed to have defrauded his employees of salaries and other benefits.
The specific motive for the attack is the victims husband being a Hagrama-led BPF party supporter.
The specific motive for the attack is the victims' alleged actions of spying for the Kenyan and Somali governments.
The specific motive for the attack is the victims' alleged support of the Kenyan government.
The specific motive for the attack is the victims' alleged support of the Somali government.
The specific motive for the attack is to avenge the two recent US missile strikes in North Warziristan in which several militants belonging to the Punjab were killed.
The specific motive for the attack is to demand the release of a relative held by the police.
The specific motive for the attack is to destroy the school because it is often used to house security forces.
The specific motive for the attack is to discourage and prevent female education.
The specific motive for the attack is to disrupt voting.
The specific motive for the attack is to disturb oil production in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to indimidate Pol-e 'Alam district law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Al Amiriyah law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Al Anbar law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate and deter civilians from spying for security forces.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate and prevent Iranian Shiite pilgrims from travelling to the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate and prevent people from informing police.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate and prevent people from voting.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate and set back Baghdad law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate and weaken the local Sahwa Council.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate and weaken the Ramadi Law Enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Andar district law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Babil law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Baghdad government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Baghdad law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Calicut law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Christians in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Christians in the local area.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate County Armagh law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate County Tyrone law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Dagestan law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Fallujah law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate foreign governments working in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Frontier Corps personnel and deter spying.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Herat law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Herat province law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Ingushetian law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Iraqi government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Iraqi law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Iraqi Law Enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Israeli government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Kabul law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Kandahar district government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Kandahar law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Khasadar Force personnel.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Khyber Pakhtunkhwa law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Kirkuk law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Kurdish civilians in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate law enforcement in Chhattisgarh.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate law enforcement in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate local Dowlatabad government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate local government personnel.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate local law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate local military and law enforcement personnel.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate locals from supporting the government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Malgobek law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Nangarhar government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Nangarhar province law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate non-governmental organizations.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Orissa law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate pilgrims from travelling in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Salah ad Din government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Salah ad Din Law Enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Sarkani government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Shia Muslims.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Shia pilgrims in Baghdad.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Shia pilgrims in Iraq.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Shia pilgrims in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Shia pilgrims.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Shiite pilgrims.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Afghan National Directorate of Security.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Afghan Public Protection Program.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the al Iraqiyah political party.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Arab Democratic Party.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Awami National Party.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Babil government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Baghdad government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Baizai Peace Committee.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Bajaur Levies.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Balochistan National Party - Mengal.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Chittagong government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Communist Party of India - Maoist party.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Communist Party of India - Marxist.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Communist Party of India-Marxist group.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the County Armagh law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the County Down government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the FSB and the government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Ghazni government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the government-backed Sahwa Council.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Iraqi government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Kandahar government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Khasavyurt Police Department.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Khost government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Kurdistan Democratic Party.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the local government from sweeping for explosives.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the local government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the local Imphal West district government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the local Jamui government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the local law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the local Nad Ali government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Mohajir Qaumi Movement-Haqiqi (MQM-H).
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Mosul government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Operational-Search Bureau.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Pakistan Peoples Party (Sherpao).
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Paktia government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan party.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Rashid municipality government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Sahwa Council and Al Iskandariyah law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Sahwa Council.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Sahwa militia.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate the Shia pilgrims.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate those running for Councilor in Parang.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate those who support the government.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Western companies working in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate western journalists by attacking the hotels they most often stay at.
The specific motive for the attack is to intimidate Yemeni army and security forces.
The specific motive for the attack is to mark the first anniversary of the death of Mapuche Indian activist gunned down by police on 20080103.
The specific motive for the attack is to overturn the Sahwa councils that rose to power during the U.S. counterinsurgency campaign in Iraq.
The specific motive for the attack is to prevent development in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to prevent education in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to prevent female education.
The specific motive for the attack is to prevent females' education.
The specific motive for the attack is to prevent road development in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to prevent security forces from staying in schools during anti-Maoist operations.
The specific motive for the attack is to prevent security forces from staying in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to prevent usage of the railways.
The specific motive for the attack is to protest the 145 candidates that were banned from participating in Iraq's March 7 parliamentary elections.
The specific motive for the attack is to protest the conduct of the elections in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao.
The specific motive for the attack is to punish an individual for  being a police informant and posing as a rebel leader.
The specific motive for the attack is to punish and deter civilians from cooperating with the Afghan government.
The specific motive for the attack is to punish and deter civilians from spying for security forces.
The specific motive for the attack is to punish and deter civilians from spying for the International Security Assistance Force.
The specific motive for the attack is to punish and deter civilians from spying.
The specific motive for the attack is to punish and intimidate civilians from cooperating with police.
The specific motive for the attack is to punish and prevent people from assisting foreign forces.
The specific motive for the attack is to punish and prevent people from extorting money in the name of the ultras.
The specific motive for the attack is to punish the construction company for not paying extortion money.
The specific motive for the attack is to punish the couple for committing adultery.
The specific motive for the attack is to push the Central Reserve Police Force out of Chhattisgarh.
The specific motive for the attack is to put a stop to Operation Green Hunt.
The specific motive for the attack is to stop developmental projects from aid and relief organizations.
The specific motive for the attack is to stop road development in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to stop the sale of alcohol in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to stop the sheepskin business in Colorado.
The specific motive for the attack is to trigger sectarian violence in Pakistan.
The specific motive for the attack is to weaken and intimidate law enforcement in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is to weaken and intimidate the Iraqi Army.
The specific motive for the attack is to weaken and intimidate the Kirkuk law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack is to weaken and intimidate the Mosul government.
The specific motive for the attack is uknown.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown
The specific motive for the attack is unknown although the town has a history of violence between Hindus and Muslims.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown and the contractor and his staff denied receiving any extortion demands.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but a letter purportedly written by the head of the Basadhara division of the Maoists, left at the spot said the ultras opposed road construction work in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but a pamphlet left at the incident site stated 19 reasons for the attack, mentioning issues of Sindh and targeting what it called Punjabi imperialism.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but authorities believed it was an attempt to disrupt the upcoming multi-party democracy election as the office was being used by the local election commission.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but authorities claim the blast was meant to scare the local residents.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but it is suspected that the victims were police informers.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but Noor Malik had already been receiving threats from local Taliban militants against his efforts for establishing peace in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but the attack could be related to his filing of candidacy for chair of Barangay Rempes where he owns some 100 hectares of coconut and corn fields.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but the elders had formed a lashkar (tribal militia) against militants in Neka Ziarat area three months ago.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LJ) - Pakistan group claimed it "was made in revenge over the killing of their leaders by Shiites.”
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but the mobile markets had been warned in the past by unidentified militants to stop selling "vulgar videos.”
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but the rebels warned of the continuing illegal logging operations in the area before fleeing.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but the victim had received threats prior to his death after turning down repeated offers from people interested in buying his plantations. His family was also targeted in previous attacks when two explosions killed their dog and injured a family member.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown but Uy earlier claimed that he had been receiving death threats since before the 2010 elections prompting him to hire a lot of bodyguards..
The specific motive for the attack is unknown for according to police, Kumar was a confidante of the Maoists and had been their attending doctor for several years. Some police sources however suspect that the attack was carried out over extortion demands; while the North Bihar West Zonal Committee of the CPI-M claimed responsibility, alleging that the doctor was a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown however, police believe that the attack was carried out by a rival group.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown or was not reported.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, but one source indicates that the attack was carried out when he refused to join the Maoist faction. According to police, however, the attack was carried out by the militants for allegedly collecting money in the name of red rebels and that he was warned to stay from his activity about five days prior to the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, but sources said that Al-Haaj group had been receiving threats from militants since long for supplying fuel to NATO forces in Afghanistan.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, but the MJF activists were protesting against favoritism in the party, and they were also dissatisfied with the leadership’s attempt to promote Pradip Yadav. No group claimed responsibility for the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, however before the show, some activists of IJT and Jel organized a protest demanding to stop the show.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, however it was suspected that the attack was carried out for political motives and political unrest.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, however Nachika was suspected of being a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, however police suspect it may have been done by extremists due to the shop owners selling alcohol.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, however Shi'ite Mosque was targeted in the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, however Shimray was known and respected in the village and was a clerk in the local church and teacher, and was involved in the work of National Rural Employment Generation Scheme (NREGS).
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, however the prosecutor did have enemies, who the Taliban helped in the attacked.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, however, the attack is believed to have been carried out in response to military action in the SWAT area that has left 2,000 militants dead.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown, however, the blast came days after the OLJ and Democrats for Strong Bulgaria parties launched a no-confidence motion against the cabinet of Boyko Borisov.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; but it is the latest in a string of killings of respected tribal elders who have allied with the government against the Islamist extremists.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however according to police, the attack may have been carried out to interfere with a health and awareness camp which was scheduled to be held by the BSF personnel deployed in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however it is suspected that the attack was carried out to enforce the shutdown called by militants in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however Markam was brother of a former CPI-M militant.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however police suspect dissident republicans were responsible.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however the tribal elder was considered to be a staunch supporter of the government.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however,  Provincial education minister Sardar Hussain Babak blamed the attack on the Taliban claiming they were opposed to girls' education.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however,  Sayed Hakim, a senior police officer and head of the intelligence department in the neighboring Pachir Wa Agam district.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however,  the attack took place during a 48-hour bandh called by Maoists in Jharkhand, Bihar, Orissa, West Bengal, Chhatisgarh, Andhra Pradesh and three districts of Maharashtra to protest against the stepped up anti-Maoist operations, price rise and arrests of some of their cadres.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however,  the attack took place near a local police chief's office, government offices, and a bakery that supplied bread to police.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however,  the Maoist had alleged that the Janajagaran Manch, an anti-Maoist platform set up by the TC, has been thwarting the democratic rights of the tribes.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however,  the vehicles were coming from Imphal and carrying artists and musical instruments for a function which was scheduled to be held at a public school complex.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however,  the victim reportedly served as the spokesman for the Iraqi High Tribunal, established to prosecute the former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and his aides.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, 70 other tribal elders received threatening letters warning them to leave the country within five days.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a 48-hour bandh had been called by the Maoists in West Bengal, Jharkhand and Orissa in support of the demand to produce four of their arrested cadres at a court.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a bank was targeted while police officers were collecting their check.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a government vehicle was targeted in the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a Janata Dal-United (JD-U) candidate from the Tekari Assembly seat was targeted.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a meeting of a local peace committee was targeted.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a militant outfit had earlier demanded Rs 10 million (220,669 USD) from the official.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a number of scattered pamphlets were recovered at the incident site denouncing repression of the Qom indigenous community.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a polling station was targeted and an election representative was taken.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a polling station was targeted in the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a ransom demand was made for the hostage’s release.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a ransom demand was made for the victims’ release.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a ransom was demanded for the safe release of both employees.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, a Taliban spokesman claimed they were targeted for working as police officers.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to officials, the victim was killed over personal enmity.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police officials, Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) cadres who were opposed to construction of road from Korka to Dodori, had threatened the contractor to stop the work.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police the suicide bomber was planning to attack some public gathering on the time of Friday prayer in a mosque.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, in the past, indiscriminate and random attacks targeting Thai Buddhist locals have been experienced.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, it is possible the Maoists wanted to avenge the deaths of eight cadres who were lynched by the villagers recently.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, Mahato had earlier received threats from Maoists who accused him of being a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, Rao’s house was targeted possibly because the Maoists thought that Rao’s younger son was working as an informant for the Andhra Pradesh police.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, the assailants accused Hedo of being a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, the building was being used as a Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) camp.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, the Maoists allegedly targeted the construction company for levies.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, the Maoists fired on the vehicle believing it to be carrying police personnel.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, the Maoists resorted to the violence apparently to avenge the killing of a Maoist cadre, Virendra Bhagat. Bhagat's body was found in the village a fortnight back, and the Maoists suspected involvement of the five villagers in the killing.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, the militants issued extortion notices to the villagers a few days ago.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, the NLFT served the villagers a “tax” notice in which they refused to pay.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to police, the villagers were abducted and killed on suspicion of being police informers.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to State Police spokesperson SN Pradhan, the motive for the attack was not looting the bank, but rather looting the firearms of the security personnel.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to the police, the construction company was targeted to extort money.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to the police, the Maoists are claiming to be resorting to these attacks protesting the Green Hunt operation when their actual intention is to carry out an ambush as well as to show their presence.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, according to top official sources, the Maoists targeted Vijay after he was named in a police report for leading a group that assaulted Swami Agnivesh when he was on his way to Tametla where policemen were accused of burning down nearly 300 huts.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, after attacking the building, the assailants raised anti-Government slogans.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, allegedly the Communist Party of India-Maoists (CPI-M) used to take money from him and he refused to pay in the last two months because business had not been good.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Amrendra Kumar was killed for allegedly being involved in extortion.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, an Independent candidate from Guruwa Assembly constituency was targeted.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, authorities believe the attack could have been in retaliation for the killing of Osama Bin Laden.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, authorities said that Amputuan had been receiving death threats from the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Fighters (BIFF), the group created by former Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) leader Ameril Ombra Kato.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, authorities say the attack was aimed at economic sabotage.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Bara was disconnected with Tira valley, Darra Adam Khel and other areas.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, before leaving the incident site, the assailants raised slogans in favor of the Maoist ideology and organization.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Buddhist civilians are regularly targeted by separatists.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, but police speculated that the bomber might have been trying to create panic or mistakenly thought the bank was foreign owned.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, but Taliban militants regularly plant roadside bombs to target Afghan forces and the Unites States-led foreign presence in the country.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Chaitanya was reportedly cautioned by some of his relatives working for the Maoists in Bastar region.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Chandani's husband, Dambar Chand works for the army and is currently posted at Damauli. Police suspect Dambar might have brought the explosives while he was posted in Dolpa nine months ago.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, close relatives told police probers that the victims had been receiving death threats a few months ago allegedly coming from their former comrades.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, company was involved in providing security to NATO convoys.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, eyewitnesses say that they heard the militants saying that if one more of their cadres were killed, they would kill 20. On 11/01/2010, the NDFB warned the Center and state governments of retaliation if any of its cadres were killed in fake encounters.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, eyewitnesses say that they heard the militants saying that if one more of their cadres were killed, they would kill 20. On 11/01/2010, the NDFB warned the Center and state governments of retaliation if any of its cadres were killed in fake encounters. No group claimed responsibility for the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, five employees of the same Pakistani construction firm were targeted in an armed assault in Kandahar.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, is suspected that the infrastructure was targeted because the revels believed it could serve as temporary camps for security personnel.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is believed that the attack was carried out by supporters of the bandh (shutdown) called against the Autonomous District Council (ADC) polls in Senapati, Ukhrul, and Tamenglong.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is believed that the attack was carried out in an attempt to scare away contractors and to thwart the attempts by the government agencies to take up road construction under the integrated development plan for Left wing extremism-affected areas.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is possible that Kodium was targeted under suspicion of being a supporter of their opponents.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is possible that the victim was killed either for being a police informer or for being an active member of the Maoist breakaway faction, the Sanjay Yadav 'Splendor' group.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is possible the attack was carried out against culture that is perceived as immoral.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is possible the victim was identified as an infidel and that was the reason for the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is reported that the attack occurred as the road construction company failed to meet an extortion demand.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is reported that the organization targeted the employees for carrying out their activities without permission by the Maoist outfit.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that Ali was targeted because his joined the police as an assistant inspector in Howrah.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that Rashbehari was targeted for being a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that Sandhyarani was targeted because her son was working for the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) in Jharkhand,
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out because of a fall-out of the political rivalry between MIM and a local group, led by Mohammed Pehlwan.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out because of unmet extortion demands against the business.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out because the road construction company failed to meet an extortion demand.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out by Communist Party of India-Maoists (CPI-M) in an effort to disrupt polling for the by-election to Bastar Lok Sabha constituency.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out by Naga militants to protest against the Okram Ibobi Singh government’s decision not to allow National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Isak Muivah faction (NSCN-IM) general secretary Thuingaleng Muivah to enter the state.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out by suspected Communist Party of India-Maoists (CPI-M) in an effort to disrupt polling for the by-election to Bastar Lok Sabha constituency.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out for monetary reasons.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out in protest against the recent arrest of a Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) commander, Nakulji.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the construction firm not paying a levy of INR 10 million (224,265 USD) to the militants.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out to enforce a two-day general shut down.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out to incite fear. Other sources indicate that robbery was the motive for the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out to intimidate local construction companies.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out to protest the arrest of three Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) leaders in Bihar.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out to take revenge for the continuous crackdown by the police on the militants.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the attack was carried out with the intention to cause fear and intimidation among the general public.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the hostages are being held in exchange calling for the release of prisoners held by authorities in Aden.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it is suspected that the office building was targeted because it was suspected to have been used to provide shelter to security forces.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it occurred as the United States put increasing pressure on Islamabad to root out terror groups believed to be running training camps in North Waziristan.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was believed the bombing was in protest against the killing of six Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) cadres on 02/26/2011.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was believed the bombing was to protest the ongoing operation against militants in Saranda forest.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was reported that Communist Party of India-Maoists (CPI-M) had demanded the immediate release of their colleagues that were arrested in the area on 08/03/2010.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was reported that on 03/12/2011 around 1600, an unidentified youth demanded Rs 3 lakh (6629 USD). Then on 03/22/2011, another demand of Rs 6 lakh (13259 USD) was made.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was reported that Saha is a top contractor involved with government work.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was reported that the militants were looking for the victim's father whom they accused of being a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was reported that the victim was suspected of being a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was suspected that rebels were planting landmines in different locations to target the security personnel ahead of the proposed bandh called by the Communist Party of India-Maoists on Monday.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was suspected that the attack was carried out because the militants believed Sing to be a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was suspected that the attack was carried out because the victim was accused of being a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was suspected that the attack was carried out because the victim was extracting money in the name of the Communist Party of India-Maoists (CPI-M).
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was suspected that the attack was carried out in an attempt to control movement along the Pan-American Highway.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was suspected that the attack was carried out to disrupt communications.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was suspected that the attack was carried out to loot explosives from the complex.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, it was suspected that the bomb was targeting security forces carrying ballot boxes after a village election.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Kazakh prosecutors said it appeared that the bomber had ties to organized crime but not too radical Islamic groups and that  Makatov could have blown himself up to avoid responsibility for a number of crimes he had committed as a member of an organized criminal group. Other sources indicate that radical religious motive was the reason for the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Kumar is the husband of newly elected Sarpanch Mamata Devi, and a close political aide of the assembly speaker and local Legislative Member (MLA), Udai Narain Chaudhary.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, leaflets left by the group listed five demands, including the formation of an ethnical government.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, local authorities suspected that the explosives were targeting North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) oil tankers that were to stop by the area.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Madi had been threatened by the Maoists to quit his job.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Maoists have in the past kidnapped civilians on the pretext of being police informers and killing some of them.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, militants had called a boycott panchayat election in Jhumra and its surrounding areas.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, militants were angry that the man’s two daughters had joined the Chhattisgarh police force and that he had refused to budge under ultras pressure asking him to force his daughters to quit the force.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, military reports indicated that the attack was related to the peace talks between the government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, non-payment of extortion demanded was said to be the reason behind the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, officials said the attack may have been related to a turf battle with the Naxalites over "levy collection".
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, officials suspect that the shop owner was being extorted by the militants.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, one intelligence official indicates the attack may have been due to sectarian violence.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, one of the victims was killed for allegedly being a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, one source indicates that Ghulam was suspected of being a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, one source reported that police suspected personal enmity might be the reason for the attack and another source reported that the attack was the result of target killing.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police believe it may have been politically motivated.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police believe that the attack was carried out to cut off road links between the rest of India and Manipur as a mark of protest.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police believe that the Maoists were trying to create panic in the area to make it easier for them to extort money.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police have blamed the attacks on ethnic Baloch militants fighting for more autonomy and control over the natural resources of the strategic region on the border with Iran and Afghanistan.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police official, Kamruzzaman, said that earlier a group of local miscreants demanded a money from him.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police officials claim that Mahato was branded as a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police officials claim the attack occurred on the second day of a weeklong bandh against Operation Green Hunt called by the Maoists.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police officials claimed that the militants planned to carry out the attack during their 24 hour shutdown in Jharkhand, Bihar and North Chhattisgarh, but security forces foiled their attempt on that day.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police officials said that the Maoists raided Belsand bazaar and ordered shopkeepers to observe a shutdown in response to their 48-hour bandh in seven states, including Bihar.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police said that the incident occurred during the CPI-Maoists' two-day shutdown and that it is believed they targeted the building anticipating that paramilitary forces would use it for anti-Maoist operations.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect it was a case of extortion.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that a business rivalry was the reason for the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that Kanai Dutta, a supporter of the ruling Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPM) was targeted in the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that monetary demand could be one of the reasons for the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the attack was carried out because Rabindranath had stopped a group of Maoists from forcing the students of his school to take part of a rally on 07/20/2010.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the attack was carried out because the coal businessmen refused to meet the extortion demands of the militants.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the attack was carried out by militants because Lt. Col. Oglaq coordinated an operation in which a senior militant leader was killed.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the attack was carried out due to non-fulfillment of monetary demands.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the attack was carried out due to personal enmity.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the attack was carried out due to rivalry of Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) groups as Surendra is said to be a supporter of PLFI’s rival group.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the attack was carried out in revenge for the killing of three cadres in Saranda forest in Sundargarh.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the attack was carried out to enforce their two-day shutdown to protest the arrest of two of their comrades.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the attack was carried out to protest against the arrest of the zonal commander of the Tritiya Prastuti Committee (TPC), Mohammad Irfan.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the bus was targeted because the bus continued to run during the time of the bandh that was called by the Communist
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the company refused paying levy to the rebels.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the explosion may have occurred from explosives that were being stored at the residence.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect that the incident was the outcome of rivalry among militant groups.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect the attack was carried out to cause fear and extort money.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspect the attack was carried out to extort money from the bus operators.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspected that his rivals might have killed him following internal feud.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspected that Rafique was killed by rivals of the Purbo Banglar Communist Party (PBCP)-Lal-Potaka faction due to internal party conflict.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspected that the attack was carried out to distract security forces while another group of rebels attacked a Congress leader’s house.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspected that the attack was the result of a targeted killing because he was an active member of the MQM.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, police suspected that the incident was an act of retaliation for the recent killing of a Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) leader in the district.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Pro-Taliban militants claimed responsibility for such attacks in the past, arguing that the assaults are in retaliation for the non-UN-sanctioned US airstrikes on Pakistan's tribal regions.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, provincial officials claim that the Taliban have been hindering the construction work at the Sargardan and Bakhshabad dams.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Ranabir said that he had been threatened by militants for not meeting their monetary demands.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, reportedly  the local administration planned to set up a police camp in the school building to launch an operation against the Maoists.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, reportedly the militants demanded money from one of the victims.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, reportedly, militants target mobile phone towers because they are used to pinpoint their hideouts.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, reportedly, the attack was aimed to stall the installation of barbed wire fencing along the Chowmanu-Govindabari border in Dhalai district.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, reportedly, the victims defied an edict by the militants to appear at the kangaroo court held to settle land disputes.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, reportedly, these Salwa Judum camps now act as camps for security forces.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Sinha was allegedly being targeted by the Maoists for not paying the extortion money demanded.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, some police officials believe the men were killed because the Taliban said they were spying for the government or working for the government. Another police official claimed that the men were killed for being ethnic Hazaras and [Shia] Muslims, who are facing a widespread oppression from the Taliban.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, sources believe that extortion could be the reason for the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, sources claimed that the attack may have been carried out because the Maoists believed Bahirwar was a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, sources indicated that the attack was carried out apparent retaliation for his helping authorities hunt down insurgents.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, sources indicated that this was the third grenade attack against Chandrajit, a former Nationalist Congress (NC) party candidate.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, sources said some militants had already served extortion notices to the office which was not met by the officials.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, southern separatists often target domestic and foreign resources.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, southern separatists often target foreign and domestic.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Sukhcahand had been threatened several times by Communist Party of India-Maoists (CPI-M) for working with the CPM and as a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Taliban fighters regularly target pro-government tribesmen.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Taliban militants frequently target pro-government elders.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Taliban militants regularly target civilians seen as allied with the government or international forces.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Taliban militants regularly target members of the peace committee at Mattani.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid claimed responsibility for the attack, saying that two important French nationals were the main targets of the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, Taliban spokesman, Zabihullah Muhagud, denied their involvement in burning the schools, saying they support education and that the attack was carried out to defame the Taliban.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the  Maoists had earlier warned that it would kill Congress leaders if the operation is not stopped against them.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the  wife of the engineer alleged that a gunman, who claimed to be a cadre of Puranthaba Meiraba faction of the KCP, came to their house on February 27 and wanted to know why the engineer could not pay INR five lakh as demanded by them through a letter delivered on an unspecified date in the January and was warned that the amount must be paid.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the assailants warned the store owners to give up the profession of selling liquor.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack attack occurred during the 48-hour bandh called by Communist Party of India-Maoists in seven states to protest anti-Maoist operations.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack came days after the some local leaders of fundamentalist Jamaat-e-Islami issued threats that the ruling Awami League would be exposed to danger unless their several stalwarts, faced with trial for crimes against humanity during 1971 Liberation War were not released.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack came during a bandh (shut down) called by the Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) backed People's Committee against Police Atrocities (PCPA). Asit Mahato of the PCAPA said the Maoists and PCAPA activists have jointly called for an indefinite blockade in the area to protest against the CPM cadres camping in many villages of Lalgarh and Belpahari. No casualties were reported in the attack and no group claimed responsibility.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack came during a protest called by the Maoists to protest the sweeping crackdown on them.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack came during a shutdown called by militants to protest Obama’s visit to India.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack came during the second day of a two-day bandh called by the Maoists in Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand, Orissa, Chhattisgarh and Andhra Pradesh to protest Operation Green Hunt.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack came during the two-day five-state bandh (shutdown) called by the Maoists.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack came hours after Israeli security forces destroyed three illegally constructed buildings,
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack came in the early hours of polling for 42 Assembly constituencies in Bihar.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack coincided with the second day of a 48-hour shutdown called by the Maoists.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack followed threats by militants groups and Al Qaeda to avenge Bin Laden’s death.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack is said to be part of the continuing weeklong bandh (shut down) called by Maoists in Orissa on 04/24/2010.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack may have been carried out due to a militant shutdown imposed in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack may have been carried out for a political motive because the victim was reportedly a People’s Democratic Party (PDP) activist.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack may have been carried out in connection with monetary demands.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack may have been carried out over an issue of $2,252 (RS 1 lakh) levy demanded by militants.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack may have been the result of not paying a levy demanded.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack occurred during a bandh (shutdown) called by Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) cadres to pro
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack occurred during on the second day of the week –long shutdown called by the militants to observe the memory of their fallen leaders.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack occurred during the 48-hour bandh called by CPI-Maoists in seven states to protest anti-Maoist operations.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack occurred during the first day of their Revolutionary week and also Maoist posters left at the site warned people to stay away from security forces.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack occurred during the second day shutdown called by the militants to protest the killing of one of their top leaders ‘Azad’.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack occurred on the second day of a five-state shutdown called by militants.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack occurred on the second day of a shutdown called by rebels to protest the killing of one of their top leaders.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack occurred on the second day of a two-day shutdown called by the Maoists to protest the anti-people policies of the Central Government, referring to the disinvestment policies and recent price rise in Jharkhand, Bengal, Orissa, Bihar and Chhattisgarh.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack occurred while the two victims were campaigning for local Trinamool Congress (TC) candidates.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place a few kilometers from where Assam governor Janaki Ballabh Patnaik was inaugurating an international tourism festival at the famous Jatinga village. Furthermore, it is possible that the attack was carried out by the Dilip Nunisa faction of the Dima Halom Daoga (DHD) which had called an indefinite bandh in the hill district on Tuesday night, complaining of harassment by the police.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place a week before the local government elections.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place as Afghan citizens began voting for a new parliament.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place at a liquor store.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place at a private residence of a social activist, Paonam Brojen, who is preparing to contest the upcoming Assembly election.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place at the home of the chairman of the Afghan High Peace Council and former president of Afghanistan, as a meeting was due to take place between Rabbani and a delegation representing the Taliban group.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place at the US Embassy compound which allegedly includes a CIA compound.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place during a 24 hour shutdown called by Maoists to protest the arrest of cadres from Saranda forest a week earlier.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place during a 48-hour shutdown called in Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal and Orissa.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place during a day-long strike in three states of Jharkhand, Bihar and Orissa by Maoists in protest against corruption and inflation.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place during a shutdown called by Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) militants in several states to protest the rising prices of essential commodities and corruption.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place during a two day shutdown called by the Maoists to protest the arrest of their central committee leaders.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place during a two-day shut down called by Maoists to press for a probe into the death of top Naxal leader Cherakuri Rajkumar alias Azad on 07/02/2010 in Adilabad.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place during a two-day shutdown called by militants to protest the killing of their leader Cherukuri Rajkumar alias Azad in Andhra Pradesh.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place during the second day of a two day shutdown called by Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) militants.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place hours after a memorial service for hostages and officers killed in a church attack two days prior. Furthermore, the militants claimed that the attacks were the beginning of more attacks to come against Shiite Muslims.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place just a day after the visit of U.S. Vice President Joe Biden to Afghanistan and his meeting with President Hamid Karzai wherein he reassured Washington's long-term commitment to the militancy-plagued nation.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place on Army forces while conducting military operations.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack took place when hundreds of people, many of them foreigners, gathered at the ritual bathing ghats for a daily Hindu prayer.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack was carried out as militants called for a shutdown to protest United States Barack Obama’s visit to India.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack was carried out on a butcher shop which supplied meat to Afghan troops.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack was reportedly carried out because the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPM) was planning to set up an armed camp at the party office.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the attack was seen as an attempt to make the NDFB's presence felt ahead of Wednesday's scheduled visit by union Home Secretary G.K. Pillai to Kokrajhar to review the law and order situation in the Bodo tribal heartland.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the Awami National Party has faced terror threats due to its policy against terrorism.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the blast took place under the Chenari constituency which is going to polls in the sixth and final phase of Assembly elections on 11/20/2010 and it is possible that the attack was carried out to create panic in order to enforce a poll boycott called by the Maoists.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the blasts come as CIA chief Leon Panetta is in Pakistan to mend ties between Washington and Islamabad.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the bomb was planted at a government agency building.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the buildings were used by security forces engaged in counter-insurgency operations.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the civilians were traveling in a 407 van which is typically associated with police vans, and it is possible that the militants triggered the landmine targeting what they thought was a police vehicle.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the CPI-Maoists called for a bandh in North Bihar for 05/06/2010 and 05/07/2010 to protest the alleged police atrocities and price rise of essentials.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the device was dropped only a few meters away from the residence of Sulu Governor Sakur Tan. Police could not immediately confirm if Tan was the target of the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the family received a demand letter of $22,524 (Rs 10 lakhs) one month prior to the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the fuel was being transported for American-led forces in Afghanistan.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the Garo National Liberation Army (GNLA) blamed the attack was carried out by its rival group the A chik National Volunteers Council (ANCV) claiming that they fired on the police vehicle suspecting the police to be GLNA militants.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the headmaster of the school, Abdol Shakur, blamed the attack on militants involved in anti-education acts.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the Kangleipak Communist Party (KCP) are suspected to have placed the grenade there as a response to their failed attempt to extort money from the hospital.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the militant that carried out the attack was identified as the outfits finance keeper.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the militants had warned the drivers not to venture into the area.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the militants have made similar attempts to disrupt the ongoing road construction.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the militants targeted the houses of their rivals.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the militants vowed to continue such attacks in the future.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the multi-phased Panchayat elections will be held in State over the next six weeks after a gap of 10 years.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the municipal council building was targeted.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the oil tankers transporting fuel for the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the one of the victims was believed to be involved in political activities.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the police believe that the attack was the result of revenge.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the police claim that the attack may have been due to intra-party feuding. However, villagers claim that the attack was carried out over a land dispute. No group claimed responsibility for the incident.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the police convoy was escorting Resubelpara Civil Sub Divisional Officer, Ram Singh, who was investigating the alleged fake encounter in which a villager, Washington Marak, was killed at Rongrekgre village in East Garo Hills.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the police convoy was transporting ballot boxes.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the police personnel were deployed to provide security during the elections.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the police suspect that Hazrat was killed by a rival faction.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the police suspect the attacks were carried out in order to collect levy from the owner of the construction firm.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the residence that was attacked belonged to the sitting Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) of Udalguri constituency.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the school was an area proposed for use as a polling station.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the sister of the deceased claimed that members of the PLFI demanded money from the victims. However, according to police, there was a land dispute between a local landlord, Binde Singh and his nephew who is associated with PLFI militants was annoyed over its sale to the Badai brothers, and that may be the reason for the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the son-in-law of Social Welfare and Minor Irrigation Minister, N Loken was targeted.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the suicide bomber belongs to a rival militant group of the targeted group, Ansar-ul-Islam.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the suspected Maoists threatened the local laborers to refrain from getting involved in similar road construction work.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the suspected motive for the attack is retaliation against arrests made on Sunday in which 20 suspected Communist Party of India-Maoists (CPI-M) were arrested on suspicion of involvement in an encounter with police that killed 16 officers in May 2009.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the Taliban spokesman, Zabihullah Muhagud, denied their involvement in burning the schools, saying they support education and that the attack was carried out to defame the Taliban.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the target of the attack was a member of the Afghan Parliament.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the target of the attack was the Chief Security Officer of President Asif Ali Zardari.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the target of the attack was the family of a village official.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the trader was believed to have been targeted as he had opposed activities of Maoist-backed Chasi Mulia Adivasi Sangh (CMAS) in several areas of the District.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the TTP claimed that tribal elders from Khyber Agency were the targets of the bombings.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the van was carrying police personnel from Antagarh and Kodagaon to provide security for the Bastar polls.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the vehicle belonged to Mavlavi Abdul Aziz Khairkhwa, a parliamentary election candidate.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the vehicles were carrying groceries meant for Paramilitary Forces camping at various places in Bhairamgarh tehsil.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim of the attack is a former People’s United Liberation Front (PULF) militant that turned politician.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was a district council member.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was a functionary attached to a local organization campaigning for the rights of laborers.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was a government employee.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was a key leader in a movement against the militants.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was a member of the local Awakening Council member.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was a state government employee and a former activist of the ruling Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPM).
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was on patrol at a polling center.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was released on bail after being arrested in connection with over 50-Maoist related cases.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was the assistant to  local village council member Ban Toh Bala.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was the head of the district counsel of Khan Abad.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was the leader of an anti-Maoist vigilante group.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was the nephew of a former provincial minister and national party leader.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was the police chief of the anti-terrorism department.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victim was the relative of the Communist Party of India-Marxist's (CPM) Binpur zonal committee secretary Anuj Pandey.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victims belonged to a mine clearing agency.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victims were Afghani citizens who were employed by the United States and Afghan governments.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victims were former cadres of the militant outfit believed to be responsible for the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victims were former militants who had surrendered to the government.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victims were identified as two ruling party officials from al-Baath Arab Socialist Party Branch.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victims were questioned about their alleged application to work for the Special Police Officer (SPO).
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the victims were said to be Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) sympathizers.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the village was reportedly attacked because the villagers disobeyed the Taliban.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, the West Bengal police claim that the Maoists wanted the school student to join the movement. However, Kartik's parents were against his joining the Maoists.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, themilitants reportedly were aiming to enforce a 48 hour "bandh" or shutdown in the state. A few railway tracks were damaged as a result of the attack.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, this was the third attack on the company in Kandahar.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, ULFA militants sent an email on 02/19/2011 warning the Congress of dire consequences ahead of the elections for the alleged divisive tactics adopted by the party to divide the ULFA.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however, unconfirmed reports indicated that the attack was aimed at targeting patrolling police and military forces in the area.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown; however; police suspect that the attack was carried out because Mahato was a member of the Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPM) local committee in Jhargram.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown. but ransom is suspected.
The specific motive for the attack is unknown..
The specific motive for the attack is victim was  accused of being a "spy" for Ethiopian troops and militia opposed to them. A local spokesman for al Shabaab said Ahmed had been warned several times to break ties with the Ethiopians and local militias who previously controlled Kismayu.
The specific motive for the attack is yet to be identified; however, according to Presidential spokesman Edwin Lacierda, the attack took place during a time when peace process and efforts to achieve justice for the victims of the Maguindanao Massacre were moving forward.
The specific motive for the attack isbelieved to be sectarian.
The specific motive for the attack occurred from the target being accused of spying for the US.
The specific motive for the attack punishment for spying.
The specific motive for the attack shows the rejection to the ceasefire while Israeli aggression continues.
The specific motive for the attack was  to disrupt transportation on the rail line.
The specific motive for the attack was a final attempt to target police and security forces in Iraq just days before the United States Military ends its combat mission.
The specific motive for the attack was a punishment for breaking Sharia law.
The specific motive for the attack was a punishment for the victim's alleged crimes of theft.
The specific motive for the attack was Al Shabaab believed that the Advancement for Small Enterprise Programme (ASEP) was spying for western governments.
The specific motive for the attack was an attempt to destroy the homes of anti Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan lashkar (tribal militia) members.
The specific motive for the attack was an attempt to disrupt the Somali peace process.
The specific motive for the attack was Anders Breivik’s belief that Labor Party is Marxist-oriented and encourages multiculturalism.
The specific motive for the attack was animal rights.
The specific motive for the attack was based on the victim's refusal to pay money to al-Shabaab.
The specific motive for the attack was based on the victims allegedly being spies for the Somali government.
The specific motive for the attack was based on the victims allegedly passing secrets of al-Shabaab leaders.
The specific motive for the attack was based on victim allegedly being a spy for Israeli security forces.
The specific motive for the attack was based on violations of Sharia law that the civilians had committed.
The specific motive for the attack was because parents whose teenage children had consumed legal highs at the store wanted to send an anti-drug message across Ireland.
The specific motive for the attack was because the locals did not allow the Taliban to enter their village.
The specific motive for the attack was because the Marxist member had allegedly informed the Police about the PCPA.
The specific motive for the attack was believed to be due to the store remaining open after the Taliban said to close.
The specific motive for the attack was believed to be in objection to the elections that were being held at the time.
The specific motive for the attack was due to Danish Refugee Council’s employment of new staff without notifying the suspected al-Shabaab militants.
The specific motive for the attack was due to disagreement between the victim and officials of al-Shabab in Afgooye over the victim’s organization's distribution of humanitarian aid to internally displaced people.
The specific motive for the attack was due to oil fields operated by the Greater Nile Petroleum Operating Company.
The specific motive for the attack was due to spying allegations against the victim.
The specific motive for the attack was due to spying allegations against the victims.
The specific motive for the attack was due to the accusation that the target was spying for the US.
The specific motive for the attack was due to the civilian’s actions of not fasting during Ramadan.
The specific motive for the attack was due to the hostility of the Crusaders against Islam and its people.
The specific motive for the attack was due to the Imam's stance against violence and the killing of innocent people.
The specific motive for the attack was due to the musicians playing music at a wedding party.
The specific motive for the attack was due to the police officers allegedly being "spies" supporting the president's internationally backed government.
The specific motive for the attack was due to the tanker ignoring a warning to industry tankers to stay away from the Niger Delta.
The specific motive for the attack was due to the victim’s failure to pay money to al-Shabaab.
The specific motive for the attack was expression of anger and protest of the people against the [establishment] of the coconut dwarf plantation because of the absence of public consultation, displacement of residents and renewed concentration of 137 hectares of plains to the control of the Angaras.
The specific motive for the attack was FARC's belief that the Awas collaborated with the army.
The specific motive for the attack was for ransom.
The specific motive for the attack was for the reintroduction of bus service to Bejingwada area in the District.
The specific motive for the attack was government intimidation.
The specific motive for the attack was in retaliation for the arrest of one Maoist militant.
The specific motive for the attack was in retaliation for the crimes committed by the Italian government in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The specific motive for the attack was in retaliation to a recent government crackdown on armed groups in southern Nigeria.
The specific motive for the attack was intimidation.
The specific motive for the attack was likely linked to Al Shabaab's claim to strike within Uganda in retaliation for civilian deaths allegedly caused by the African Union Mission in Somalia.
The specific motive for the attack was McDonald’s “killing” of animals their “capitalist” position in society.
The specific motive for the attack was not known, but Corzo was an official in the government.
The specific motive for the attack was not known.  Authorities claimed the AUC could be responsible as they were active in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was not reported.
The specific motive for the attack was personal enmity.
The specific motive for the attack was personal.
The specific motive for the attack was political opposition.
The specific motive for the attack was political.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment  for having an active role in the formation of the laskhars (tribal militias) or peace committees against the militants in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment against people working against the Taliban.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment because the men worked for kidnappers in the district. .
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for  raising an armed militia against the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for alleged spying.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for allegedly spying for government forces.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for allegedly spying for the government and security forces.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for allegedly spying for U.S. forces.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for an alleged murder.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for Aqal Mohammad's alleged involvement in the January 2011 drone attacks in Tirah valley in which At least 26 militants, including an important Taliban commander from Swat, were killed in the three consecutive attacks.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for being a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for being a spy.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for being alleged police informants.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for being alleged U.S. spies.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for being an alleged police informer.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for being involved in theft and kidnapping for ransom and posing as a Taliban member.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for being members of lashkars (tribal militias) against Tehrik-e-Taliban-Pakistan.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for being police informers.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for failure to pay extortion demands.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for not ferrying the PCPA activists to Trinamul Congress rally at Lalgarh.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for spying for the United States.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for spying on militants and desecrating worship places.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for stealing from a shop on December 23, 2010.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment for violation of Islamic law.
The specific motive for the attack was punishment on suspicion of being police informers.
The specific motive for the attack was religious intimidation.
The specific motive for the attack was religious; al-Shabaab has banned soccer due to its roots in Christianity.
The specific motive for the attack was religious.
The specific motive for the attack was retaliation for a Black Widow attack.
The specific motive for the attack was retaliation for the 11/23/2011 bombing which killed a PIJ cadre.
The specific motive for the attack was retaliation for the murder of four Tehrik-e-Taliban militants by the Momin Afridi faction.
The specific motive for the attack was retalioation for United States raid into Somalia.
The specific motive for the attack was revenge for the United States missile attack that had occurred a few days prior.
The specific motive for the attack was that couple killed allegedly had illicit relations.
The specific motive for the attack was that the store sells alcohol.
The specific motive for the attack was that the two civilians were suspected of being US and ISI spies.
The specific motive for the attack was the accusation against the victims of spying.
The specific motive for the attack was the accusation against the victims of using drugs.
The specific motive for the attack was the accusation of rape against the victim.
The specific motive for the attack was the accusation of spying for the Somalia government against the victims.
The specific motive for the attack was the assailants' belief that the victim was spying for the U.S.
The specific motive for the attack was the assailants' belief that the victim was spying for the US.
The specific motive for the attack was the construction site not paying levy to the Maoists.
The specific motive for the attack was the deeds against the Islamic religion committed by the victims.
The specific motive for the attack was the desire by the perpetrator to be killed by American non-Muslims.
The specific motive for the attack was the haras and drive out Christians, and ease the pressure of the hunt against them.
The specific motive for the attack was the herders' refusal to give up their animals.
The specific motive for the attack was the local contractor failing to pay levy taxes.
The specific motive for the attack was the Maoist demanding the release of two of their leaders.
The specific motive for the attack was the militants believed the United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS) of spying for western countries.
The specific motive for the attack was the nationalists' opposition to the name of their country.
The specific motive for the attack was the officer was accused of spying.
The specific motive for the attack was the perpetrator's belief that the elder was spying for government intelligence agencies and therein undermining Balochi interests.
The specific motive for the attack was the perpetrators' beliefs that the victims were involved with illegal drugs.
The specific motive for the attack was the radio station had defied Al Shabaab’s order to not play songs and music.
The specific motive for the attack was the rebels fight to overthrow President Francois Bozize.
The specific motive for the attack was the result of a land dispute.
The specific motive for the attack was the Taliban accused the person of being a spy for foreign forces.
The specific motive for the attack was the victim's actions of encouraging students not to go to the mosque and not allowing girls to wear hijabs.
The specific motive for the attack was the victim's alleged actions of raping and murdering a woman.
The specific motive for the attack was the victim's allegiance to the Sahwa Council.
The specific motive for the attack was the victim's distribution of alcohol.
The specific motive for the attack was the victims' possession of Somali currency.
The specific motive for the attack was the violation of selling Khat by the victims.
The specific motive for the attack was thought to be because of Novartis work with animal research labs.
The specific motive for the attack was thought to create division between Georgia and South Ossetia.
The specific motive for the attack was thought to have been rising election tensions between the National Congress Party and Sudan People's Liberation Movement.
The specific motive for the attack was to  indimidate the government.
The specific motive for the attack was to allegedly divert the attention of the troops' in which the assailants were fleeing.
The specific motive for the attack was to arrest the police officer for his crimes against the people.
The specific motive for the attack was to assassinate Obaidullah Yousafzai and intimidate the Awami National Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to assassinate the Abkhazia vice-president.
The specific motive for the attack was to assassinate the President, Ramzan Kadyrov.
The specific motive for the attack was to attack the family and relatives of a policeman that was killed a few days ago.
The specific motive for the attack was to attack the rescue vehicle responding to a previous bombing in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was to avenge the killing of two students of a seminary by the Lashkar four months prior.
The specific motive for the attack was to avenge Vilks' decision to draw a controversial caricature of Mohammed.
The specific motive for the attack was to be able to attack the tower.
The specific motive for the attack was to coerce the civilians into supporting rebel-backed candidates in the upcoming village elections.
The specific motive for the attack was to coincide with America's Independence Day on July 4.
The specific motive for the attack was to control the town of Wabxo.
The specific motive for the attack was to create fear and panic in the city.
The specific motive for the attack was to cut off the water supply for the Central Reserve Police Force.
The specific motive for the attack was to demand a cessation of work in Sorsogon's second district as well as to demand revolutionary taxes.
The specific motive for the attack was to demand the release of one of their tribesmen from a prison in southeast Yemen.
The specific motive for the attack was to deter civilians from wearing foreign clothing or having foreign hair styles.
The specific motive for the attack was to discourage female education.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt balloting at a polling booth.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt communications in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt communications.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt mobile phone communications.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt oil business.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt oil supplies in Nigeria.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt operations at the Caño Limón - Coveñas oil refinery.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt production at the cement factory.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the Central African Republic government.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the continuing peace process in the Darfur.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the European Union legislatures.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the Greek Government.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the meeting and intimidate the Somali government.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the oil pipeline.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the Pakistani government.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the peace process and  the Somali Government.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the power supply to the nearby area.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the railroad.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the Somali government.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the Spanish government.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the supply of water to Security Forces.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt the transportation of coal by the train.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt transportation on the railroad line.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt transportation on the railway line.
The specific motive for the attack was to disrupt use of the cable car system in Priyelburs.
The specific motive for the attack was to expand control and establish Islamic law.
The specific motive for the attack was to force the Mali government to release four militant members from prison.
The specific motive for the attack was to free prisoners.
The specific motive for the attack was to gain leverage against the Nigerian government.
The specific motive for the attack was to get back at the Marxist for the murdering of two woman villagers.
The specific motive for the attack was to get revenge on Chaudhry Aslam for arresting and killing many Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan militants.
The specific motive for the attack was to get the government release their relatives who were seized in the last Ramadan.
The specific motive for the attack was to get the government to fulfill "the ordinary demands made by Mujahideen."
The specific motive for the attack was to harass residents for not voting for the rebels’ candidate in the recent elections.
The specific motive for the attack was to in intimidate Afghan law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to indimidate Christianity in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was to intensify border talks between Chad and Sudan.
The specific motive for the attack was to intensify the pressure for the release of 30 people branded as Maoist.
The specific motive for the attack was to interfere with transportaion on the railroad lines.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate a rival militant group.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Afghan law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate and prevent civilians from attending the Communist Party of India - Marxist rallies.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate and prevent civilians from passing information to pro-government authorities.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate and prevent people from helping refugees.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate and prevent people from joining the Communist Party of India - Marxist.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate and prevent people from spying for the government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate and prevent people from voting.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate and prevent pilgrims from travelling into the area.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate and stop people from supporting insurgents.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Baghdad law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Baksan district law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Biu city law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate business.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Charcheno district law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Chegemskiy District law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Chegemsky law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Cherekskiy district law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Christianity in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Christians in Baghdad.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Christians in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Christians living in Baghdad.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate civilians from joining the military.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Colombian law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Craigavon law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Dagestan law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Dagestan Law Enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Dur Baba district government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Greek law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Gurboz law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Hibhib district law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Indian law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Indian lawn enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Indian security forces.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Iranian law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Iraqi government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Iraqi law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Ivoirian law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Izberbash law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Kabul city law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Kandahar city government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Kandahar city law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Kenyan law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Khost provincial law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Kizlyar law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Konduz provincial law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Kurdistan Alliance supporters.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate local government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Maiduguri law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Makhachkala law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Mandera law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Mogadishu law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Mosul district law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Nalchik district law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Nalchik law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Nalchik Law Enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Nalcik district law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Nigeria's People's Democratic Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Nigerian law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Pakistani law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate people from participating in anti-Maoist campaigns.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Rastriya Jana Morcha activists.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Russian government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Russian law enforcement
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Russian law enforcement and military.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Russian law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Shia pilgrims.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Shiite pilgrims.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Shindand law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Somali law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Spain's ruling Socialist Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate supporters of Tim Alaibe.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Tarmiyah district law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate teachers from educating.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Afghan government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Al Anbar provincial government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Albu Duwaib tribe.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the All Nigeria Peoples Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the All Nigerian People's Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the American government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Arbaki.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Assam Rifles.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Athens government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Awami National Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Ba'quba district government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Baghdad provincial government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Borno state government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the British government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Central Reserve Police Force.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Chardara district government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Chilean government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Communist Party of India - Marxist.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Communist Party of India-Marxist party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Communist Party of India-Marxist.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Darazo law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Department of Hajj and Religious Affairs.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Diyala province government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the educational system.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Ethiopian government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the farmers loyal to Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Federal Security Service.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the French embassy in Mali.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Frontier Corps.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Galgala district government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Gergebilski district government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the German government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Greek government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Hasanya village administration.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the human rights' group, Memorial.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Indian government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Indian military.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Iraqi government as the responsibility of protecting the presidential palace was recently handed over to Iraqi troops.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Iraqi government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Islamic Courts Union.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Islamic party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Jharkhand Vikas Morcha-Prajatantric.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Khan Dari city council.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Khash Rud district government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Khost government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Khwaja Umari district government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the KLM company and stop the transport of animals to biomedical research laboratories.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Kurdistan Democratic Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Labour Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the local government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the local village government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Mauritanian government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the militant group Al Shabaab.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Muttahida Qaumi Movement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Nangarhar provincial government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the National Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Nigerian government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Nigerian Labor Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Nigerian Labour Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Pakistan People's Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Pakistani government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Parvan provincial government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Peoples Democratic Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the police.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the presidential candidate Alassane Ouattara.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the pro-government peace committee.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Right Popular Orthodox Party.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Russian Federal Security Service.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Russian government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Russian military.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Sahwa Council.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Senegalese military.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Shia Muslim community.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Shindhand government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Somali government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Somali military.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Sovetsky district government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Sudanese government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Sunni Sahwa Council.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Swiss government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Turkish government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Turkmen parties.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the U.N. Operation in Cote D'ivoire.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Ukrainian government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Unified Communist Party of Nepal - Maoist.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the United Nations Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the United Nations.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Untsukulsky District government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Yangi Qala district government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Yemeni government and military.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Yemeni government.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate the Yemeni military.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate those observing the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Trarza law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Turkish law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Tyrnyauz district law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Ukrainian law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate US embassy workers in Yemen.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate voters.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Yemeni law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Yemeni military and law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to intimidate Yemeni security.
The specific motive for the attack was to kidnap the journalist.
The specific motive for the attack was to kill Abdul Salam, a former Taliban commander.
The specific motive for the attack was to kill Irina Patrusheva and intimidate Russian law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to leave a mark to tell the population to stop talking about the Lord's Resistance Army.
The specific motive for the attack was to mark Afghanistan's independence from Great Britain.
The specific motive for the attack was to oppose the dam project.
The specific motive for the attack was to overthrow the fragile Somali government.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent 14 members of Afghan President Hamid Karzai's Cabinet from being sworn in.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent Afghans from joining the military.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent development in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent education in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent food from reaching the police checkpoint.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent people from voting.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent road construction in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent spying.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent the Al-Salam refugee camp from participating in the Darfur peace talks.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent the fuel tankers from reaching International Security Assistance Force units in Afghanistan.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent the NATO trucks from reaching NATO forces and to intimidate Attock law enforcement.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent the oil tankers from reaching NATO forces in Afghanistan.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent villagers from supporting the Communist Party of India - Marxist.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent voting.
The specific motive for the attack was to prevent women's education.
The specific motive for the attack was to procure the release of 12 comrades.
The specific motive for the attack was to procure the release of eight of their commanders.
The specific motive for the attack was to protest against the arrest of tribal leader Chhatradhar Mahato.
The specific motive for the attack was to protest the recent arrest of several Conspiracy of Fire Nuclei's members.
The specific motive for the attack was to publicize the inauguration of newly elected Colombian president Juan Manuel Santos and to intimidate the new government administration.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish a girl and a boy for an "honor-related case."
The specific motive for the attack was to punish and deter people from buying and selling tobacco.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish and prevent anyone from spying.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish and prevent civilians from spying for the Somali government.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish and prevent people from working for the Somali government.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the boy and prevent others from stealing.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the boy for stealing and deter others from doing the same.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the boys and deter others from committing the same acts.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the civilians for breaking Islamic law.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the displaced persons for not leaving the Lafole University.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the employee and prevent others from spying for foreign forces.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the farmers for not obeying orders.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the man and deter others from being police informers.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the man and prevent others from spying for the government.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the man for being a police informer and prevent others from doing the same.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the man for being a police informer.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the man for collaborating with the Colombian Army.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the man for stealing and prevent others from doing the same.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the man for theft and prevent others from doing the same.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the man for working for the U.S.' Federal Bureau of Investigation and prevent others from doing the same.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the men for stealing, being secretly engaged and using narcotics.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the teenagers and deter others from committing the same act.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the victim and deter others from being police informers.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the victim for theft and prevent others from doing the same.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the victims for eloping and prevent others from doing the same.
The specific motive for the attack was to punish the women for not wearing hijabs in public.
The specific motive for the attack was to release suspected Islamic State of Iraq prisoners.
The specific motive for the attack was to resist being arrested.
The specific motive for the attack was to retaliate for the 08/23/2011 bombing that killed a PIJ cadre.
The specific motive for the attack was to retaliate for the 11/23/2011 bombing that killed a PIJ militant.
The specific motive for the attack was to sabotage the gas pipeline.
The specific motive for the attack was to seek revenve on state officials.
The specific motive for the attack was to seize the city.
The specific motive for the attack was to send a message to the authorities to release four members that had been arrested a few days earlier.
The specific motive for the attack was to send a message to those that are against Wahabbi activities.
The specific motive for the attack was to send an anti-drug message to Ireland.
The specific motive for the attack was to show Kremlin businessmen that the war is not over.
The specific motive for the attack was to show opposition to highway signs that urge motorists to report suspicious activity.
The specific motive for the attack was to show protest against the destruction of the Khimki forest for the building of a highway.
The specific motive for the attack was to stop testing on animals.
The specific motive for the attack was to stop the killing of animals for their fur.
The specific motive for the attack was to stop the store from selling alcoholic drinks, which is forbidden by Islamic law.
The specific motive for the attack was to stop the United Democratic Front from taking over congress.
The specific motive for the attack was to stop voting in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was to take over the Lubumbashi Airport.
The specific motive for the attack was to target the educational building.
The specific motive for the attack was to terrorize traders.
The specific motive for the attack was to the Diyala government.
The specific motive for the attack was to threaten the construction company.
The specific motive for the attack was to train the elders for combat.
The specific motive for the attack was unknown; however, it was suspected the attack may have been carried out for monetary reasons.
The specific motive for the attack was unknown; however, police suspected that Horo was killed for being a sympathizer of the rival Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-M) militant group.
The specific motive for the attack was unknown; however, the Maoists had called a boycott to the elections in the area.
The specific motive for the attack was unknown.
The specific motive for the attack was unkown.
The specific motive for the attack; however, police suspect that the attack was carried out to protest the killing of eight militants in an encounter with the police and locals on 01/30/2011.
The specific motive for the attack; however, Taliban militants have been warning the local contractors not to cooperate with Afghan and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)-led forces.
The specific motive for the attackcame from numerous death threats against the target.
The specific motive for the attacks is unknown; however, officials are looking into two possible explanations. Philippine National Police provincial director Senior Superintendent Orlando Benas said that he received a text message suggesting that an alleged spokesperson for the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) rogue Commander Bravo, identified as Jamal, was asking for a "revolutionary tax." Meanwhile, two rival militant groups had been known to meet in Maranding Village, where the blasts happened, indicating that the incidents could have stemmed from rivalry
The specific motive for the attacks is unknown; however, officials are looking into two possible explanations. Philippine National Police provincial director Senior Superintendent Orlando Benas said that he received a text message suggesting that an alleged spokesperson for the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) rogue Commander Bravo, identified as Jamal, was asking for a "revolutionary tax." Meanwhile, two rival militant groups had been known to meet in Maranding Village, where the blasts happened, indicating that the incidents could have stemmed from rivalry.
The specific motive for the attackwas to create publicity.
The specific motive for the hostage taking of seven of the villagers is unknown. The specific motive for the attack on Gokuli Panda was because Panda was accused of being a corrupt man and a police informer.
The specific motive for the kidnapping was to force the Pakistani government to release Baloch political activist prisoners.
The specific motive for this attack deals with the Globe sites  owners' refusal to pay revolutionary taxes.
The specific motive for this attack is unknown
The specific motive for this attack is unknown.
The specific motive for this attack was unknown.
The specific motive for this incident is unknown; however, Kurbegovic's views stemmed from an agenda against a judge and commissioners who prevented him from opening up a business, specifically a hall for “taxi dancers,” where women were paid to slow-dance with men.  Additionally, the motivations for his attacks were to repeal immigration and naturalization laws as well as laws about sex.
The specific motive for this incident was unknown.  Some suggested that the attack was politically motivated, but the President of Georgia claimed that this was not the case.
The specific motive is due to the target being accussed of spying.
The specific motive is unclear; however the incident occurred in conjunction with strikes against the Aqueduct and Sewers Authority, a government-owned water company.  According to sources, the striking Aqueduct and Sewers Authority Workers Union was receiving support from Puerto Rican socialists who were attempting to obtain independence from the United States and the United Labor Movement.
The specific motive is unclear; however, it is suspected that the attempted bombing was in an effort to protest the visits of Vice President Rockefeller and Secretary of State Kissinger by Puerto Rican Nationalists.
The specific motive is unclear; however, it is suspected that the bombing was in an effort to protest the visits of Vice President Rockefeller and Secretary of State Kissinger by Puerto Rican Nationalists.
The specific motive is unclear; however, The Order II was a group that arose after The Order collapsed, and the group was started by David Dorr, a former Aryan Nation member.  The group included other Aryan Nations members and its goal was to carry out the white supremacist mission of the first version of The Order. The Order II was also against the government, which the group believed was unrighteous.
The specific motive is unknown, but contextual evidence suggests a retaliatory or simply sectarian motivation.
The specific motive is unknown, but it is believed that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) were attempting to conscript the victim's son.
The specific motive is unknown, but one source states "the attack was believed targeted at the security forces who the Tigers accuse of colluding with paramilitaries"
The specific motive is unknown, but suspected to be in protest of logging practices
The specific motive is unknown, but the group is against logging
The specific motive is unknown, but the victim had been investigating the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) for ten years
The specific motive is unknown, but the victim was believed to be involved with a breakaway faction.
The specific motive is unknown, however, sources posited that Maoists targeted Hadma Ram because they believed he was a police informant.
The specific motive is unknown; but it appears that it was racially driven, but also to send a message to other black families in the area.
The specific motive is unknown; but it is suspected that the reason for the bombing was because the targets were Chinese
The specific motive is unknown; but the Rajneeshee group was not received well from the beginning of its presence in the US from India and the teachings of the sect stirred controversy; their request for permanent residency in the United States was met with much resistance.
The specific motive is unknown; but, suspected to be in the name of animal rights
The specific motive is unknown; however a group of dissatisfied groups had formed CorCom, a committee that vowed dire consequences on people who were contesting elections in Manipur.
The specific motive is unknown; however a military spokesperson speculated that the attack was aimed at disrupting the peace negotiation process between the government and insurgent groups.
The specific motive is unknown; however Al-Qa'ida in Iraq has a general goal of threatening Sahwa militia members into rejoining Al-Qa'ida by killing their top leaders.
The specific motive is unknown; however it is believed there is a connection between the explosions and the visit of Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs, William D. Rogers, who was scheduled to give a speech the next day at the Greater Miami Chamber of Commerce.  Additionally, there had been about 60 bombings in Miami over the course of 18 months, all attributed by police to Cuban exiles, who opposed the re-establishment of diplomatic relations between the United States and Cuba.
The specific motive is unknown; however Nikolai Alexeyev, a Russian gay rights leader, stated that the attack was intended to emphasize that sexual minorities are not tolerated in Russia, as they are in the Netherlands.
The specific motive is unknown; however police sources noted the Maoist group claimed the victims were informants.
The specific motive is unknown; however some sources speculate that the victim was an LTTE supporter and was killed by Karuna loyalists.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources noted that the attack occurred on the fifth anniversary of the Azawad National Liberation Movement (MNLA).
The specific motive is unknown; however sources noted that the attack occurred shortly after the arrival of 30 heads of state, including United States (US) President Barack Obama, for the Summit of the Americas.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources noted that the incident occurred amidst an ongoing crisis in Zamboanga City between security forces and members of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF).
The specific motive is unknown; however sources noted that the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) stole a number of goods during the attack.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources noted that the New People's Army (NPA) demanded an extortion from Romeo Masiguil.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources noted that the truck owner had refused to pay the New People's Army (NPA)'s extortion demands.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources noted that the victim of the attack had previously received extortion demands from the New People's Army (NPA).
The specific motive is unknown; however sources noted that the victim, Mohan Acharya, was a Nepali Congress Party (NC) candidate for the House of Representatives in Nepal's upcoming elections, scheduled to begin November 26, 2017.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources noted that there had been a spate of recent attacks against Ifugao province residents in Nueva Vizacaya province.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources posited that the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) targeted the Arch of Triumph because ISIL believed it resulted in idolatry.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources speculate that the victim, Erlinda Domingo, was targeted because she was running for re-election as Mayor of Maconacon.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources speculated that Mahmud Ubaydi was released in a deal with his kidnappers.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources speculated that the attack was work-related.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources speculated that the attack, which targeted a government police patrol, is part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Bahrain's Shiite majority and ruling Sunni minority communities.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources speculated the attack was related to extortion while others suggested the incident was motivated by sectarian disputes.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources suspected that Ahmed Gamal Ziada was targeted due to his criticism of the government.
The specific motive is unknown; however sources suspected that the incident was related to an extortion demand.
The specific motive is unknown; however the incident occurred during a series of events which became known as the "Seven Weeks Revolt," held by local activists.
The specific motive is unknown; however the incident occurred in the midst of several fire bombings of mosques on the West Coast
The specific motive is unknown; however there was much conflict between the Karuna faction of the LTTE and the main LTTE group;  though, the perpetrators are unknown
The specific motive is unknown; however this group is responsible for multiple incidents of sabotage against power lines and ski equipment
The specific motive is unknown; however this group is responsible for multiple incidents of sabotage against power lines and ski equipment; additionally, this particular incident was in preparation for 3 other planned attacks of nuclear facilities, which never came to fruition due to the arrests
The specific motive is unknown; however, a banner was found near the site that warned city officials not to cooperate with the Zetas cartel.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Barisan Nasional (BN) party candidate claims that the assailants were attempting to deter people from attending BN ceramahs (political rallies).
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Barisan Nasional (BN) party candidate posits that the assailants carried out the attack in order to deter people from attending BN "ceramahs" (political rallies).
The specific motive is unknown; however, a British foreign service official posits that incident is part of a larger campaign to stoke sectarian strife between Iraq's Sunni minority and Shiite majority communities.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a committee of dissatisfied groups had called for a boycott of political functions and celebration of Republic Day.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Coordinating Committee of seven groups had banned the Congress Party and launched several attacks on Congress workers and candidates.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Filipino military official posited that the New People's Army (NPA) executed the attack in order to disrupt the government's peace and development efforts in the area.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Filipino military official posits that the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) executed the attack in retaliation for the death of several BIFM members, who were killed during clashes with government forces the previous weekend.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Filipino military official posits that the New People's Army (NPA) executed the attack in order to disrupt the government's peace and economic development projects in the area.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Filipino military official posits that the New People's Army (NPA) executed the attack in retaliation for a raid of an NPA camp in Magpet town on July 14, 2013, which resulted in heavy NPA casualties.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Filipino military official posits that the New People's Army (NPA) was retaliating for the death of eight NPA members, who were killed during a clash with government forces on July 4, 2013.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Filipino military official states that the New People's Army (NPA) demanded the suspension of current military operations in two specific locales in exchange for the safe release of the two abducted Citizen Armed Forces Geographical Unit (CAFGU) members.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Filipino military source speculated that the victims were targeted because of their community development work within impoverished communities.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government official speculated that the intelligence officer may have been abducted by Al-Qa ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) in response to arrests in Hadramout earlier in the week.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government source speculated that Kazbek Gekkiyev, a journalist, may have been targeted due to his reporting on violent non-state actors.  Moreover, sources noted that, according to witnesses, the assailants asked the victim if he was a television presenter and shot him after he answered in the affirmative.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government source speculated that the attack could have been in retaliation for the killing of Al-Qa'ida leader Abu Yahya al Libi in a drone strike in Pakistan. An intelligence source further speculated that the attack could have been in response to military operations against the Taliban in tribal areas.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government source speculated that the attack on the pipeline may have been in response to raids conducted against the group.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government source speculated that the attack was designed to provoke a violent reaction by Shiites against Sunnis.  Sources further speculated that the attack is part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Iraq's minority Sunni and majority Shiite communities.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government source speculated that the device was planted in an attempt to hurt the city's economy. A hotel association head noted that many Malaysian tourists checked out of hotels and went home following the attack.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government source speculated that the mosque may have been targeted because its imam had agreed to pray for a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) soldier who had been killed.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government source speculated that this incident may have been part of a larger trend in violence designed to disrupt peace talks between the Thai government and the Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN).
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government source speculated that this incident was part of a series of attacks designed to disrupt peace talks between the Thai government and the Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN).
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government source speculates that the attack may have been intended to disrupt the final phase of the local election process.  However, a military source speculates that the attack may have been in response to the military's move to establish a district command post and several other posts in the Puncak Jaya area.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government source speculates that the attack was intended to derail upcoming peace talks scheduled to be held March 28th.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government source speculates that the killing of Laz Anyanwu, the Protocol Officer for the Imo Deputy Governor, may have been politically motivated.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government spokesperson speculated that the attack may have been designed to disrupt national elections being held that day.  A source also noted that the targeted media group was a supporter of austerity measures and had previously received a threatening phone call.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government spokesperson speculated that the attack was inspired by resentment of the state's Christian political leadership. Sources noted that two of the dead were Christian Berom politicians. Nigeria's middle belt has previously been the site of ethnic violence between Muslim Fulani and Christian Beroms.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a government spokesperson speculated that the attackers wanted to force the government to release prisoners.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a joint committee of seven groups had threatened to attack homes of Indian National Congress workers.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a joint committee of seven groups had threatened to attack the homes of Indian National Congress workers.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a journalist with the newspaper speculated that the attempted attack may have been in response to reports by the newspaper.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Lashkar-e-Jhangvi spokesperson stated that the bus was targeted because the passengers consisted of Shiites. Authorities stated that the bus was also carrying people of other religions and ethnic groups.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a law enforcement source speculated that sectarian violence could have been a motive, noting the bus was carrying mostly Hazara Shiite students.  Sources further suggested that the attack may be part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's majority Sunni and minority Shiite communities.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a leader of the Southern Mobility Movement (Yemen) stated that recent clashes were a result of military shelling in Dali.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a letter left at the scene of the incident accused the victim of responsibility for the deaths and injuries of hundreds in Ramadi and Fallujah and called upon him to resign.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Libyan security official speculated that the assailants may have targeted Abdel-Latif Amdawi el-Mazeeni because he worked for the deposed Muammar Gaddafi regime.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a local government source stated that the victims were all family members of a police officer who had been warned by the Taliban several times to quit his job.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a local military official noted that two high-ranking army officers had visited the base shortly before the rocket attack began.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a local police source speculated that the landmines were planted to target police forces engaged in anti-poppy operations.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a local resident suspected that Abdul Rahman was targeted because he had recently began combating the Taliban.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a local source notes that the bombing occurred at a gas station that had recently been the site of clashes between citizens and a militia loyal to President al-Assad.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a local source speculates that the attack was designed to free several inmates from a Nigerian Prison Services Farm Center.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a local sources speculates that the attack, which targeted members of the Tarok tribe, was in revenge for the killing of nine Fulani tribe members in January.  However, other local sources speculated that that the killing was part of a personal misunderstanding.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a media source noted that the targeted police commander led operations in Mogadishu to arrest suspects and seize weapons.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a member of the victim's tribe speculated that the attack was in retaliation for the tribe driving Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) out of the town of Mudia.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military official claimed that the New People's Army (NPA) executed the attack in order to disrupt the Filipino government's peace and development efforts.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military official indicated that, at the time of the incident, the targeted Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA) convoy was investigating reported sightings of David Yau Yau, the leader of a dissident Murle tribal faction.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military official posits that two Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) commanders led and executed the attack in retaliation for the death of a high school teenager, who was killed by two Dale Bong residents on July 1, 2013.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military official suspected that the attack was carried out in retaliation for recent military operations against the Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM).
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military official suspected that the attack was carried out in retaliation for the recent capture of a Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Movement (BIFM) camp by security personnel.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military official suspected that the attack was related to an extortion demand by the New People's Army (NPA).
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military official suspected that the explosive device was intended to distract military forces from their operations against Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG).
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military source noted that the hostage takers demanded an end to military and police operations in exchange for the release of the barangay councilman.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military source speculated that the attack may have been related to a clash between government forces and the New People's Army (NPA) several days earlier, which left six dead.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military source speculated that the attack was an attempt by the New People's Army (NPA) to harass the re-election campaign of Efren Pinol, mayor of Magpet town, who canceled a campaign rally scheduled for later that day and had not paid the NPA a demanded extortion.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military source speculated that the attack was designed to prevent the targeted troops from carrying out peace and development programs.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military source speculated that the attack was in response to earlier military offensives against New People's Army (NPA) camps and logistical caches.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military source speculated that the attack was in retaliation for government attacks on hilltop enclaves in southern Maguindanao province two days earlier.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military source speculated that the hotel bombing was part of a trend in increased violent attacks during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military source speculated that the New People's Army (NPA) planted the device as revenge for the death of five NPA members in a police station attack on May 20, 2014.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military source speculates that the attack was designed to hinder the search for Leopoldo Rosero, a merchant allegedly kidnapped by the National Liberation Army of Colombia (ELN).
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military source states that New People's Army (NPA) perpetrated the attack to reaffirm their presence in the area.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a military spokesman speculated that attack was in response to the farm's owner refusal to pay the New People's Army's (NPA) revolutionary tax.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Nepali Congress meeting was scheduled to take place at the location of the attempted incident that day.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a note left at the scene indicated that the attack was carried out in retaliation to the death of three Muslim brothers earlier in the month.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a note left at the scene of the incident stated that the attack was "in revenge for the innocents." Sources speculated that this may refer to an incident three months ago when 16 assailants were killed in an attack on a Thai military base.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a note left at the scene of the recovered bodies stated that those working alongside Afghan security forces would meet the same fate.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a note left by the attackers read, "You play games with tokens, but I will play with [your] lives."
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Pakistani official speculated that the attack may have been in retaliation for recent military operations in North Waziristan.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a Pakistani police official noted that the attack was part of a recent string of attacks targeting police officials from the same ethnic background.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police officer speculated that the attack was in revenge for the police recently arresting a group of wanted assailants.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police official noted that at the time of the incident, the targeted convoy was traveling to Barangay Depore to implement an official order against illegal miners.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police official notes that the incident occurred amid a recent string of attacks against retired government employees in Pakistan.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police official posited that "anti-social elements" were targeting the minority Bohra community in order to undermine "the peace of the city" during the Eid festivities.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police official posited that an armed organization executed the attack in order to "establish its power" after one of its demands was unfulfilled.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police official posits that the assailant was targeting Malik Habibullah Khan because of his support for Pakistan's counter-insurgency efforts.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police official posits that the incident is part of a larger pattern of sectarian violence against Pakistan's Shiite minority population.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police official posits that the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) executed the attack in retaliation for the detention of FARC leader Caicedo on June 27, 2013.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police official speculates that the assailants planted the device at the hospital because they mistook it as a polio vaccination office.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source admitted that the victim had been working as a police informant.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source attributed the beheadings to sectarian violence as Balochistan has a history of violence between Shiite and Sunni. A source notes both of the victims were Shiite Muslims.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source noted that the victim, Kifayat Hussain, had recently received threats due to his support for local police forces.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that Maoists targeted the government buildings because the group was afraid they could be used to house anti-Maoist security forces.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that Muslim fundamentalists targeted the hotel's nightclub because they opposed the serving of alcoholic beverages, live music, and dancing that occured there.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attack may have been due to local anger at Total Oil Company over corruption allegations.  Other sources speculated that Al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) was attempting to disrupt oil production.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attack may have been related to the murder of an Islami Jamiat-e-Talaba (IJT) group member five days earlier.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attack on the home of Najmudeen Uma may have been intended as a warning regarding his role as an advisor for the South Border Province Administrative Centre.  Another source noted that Uma had recently changed political parties for an upcoming election in July and speculated that the attack may have been politically motivated.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attack was an attempt by Maoists to boost morale within the group after recent failed attacks.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attack was designed to increase border tensions between Sudan and South Sudan.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attack was in retaliation for a previous attack on Shiite students.  Sources further speculated that the attack may be part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's majority Sunni and minority Shiite communities.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attack was in retaliation for the alleged killing of a village chief by authorities on June 5, 2012.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attack was meant to increase awareness of the existence of the New People's Army (NPA) in the area and shame the security forces in the eyes of civilians.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attack was motivated by revenge, as the Special Police Officer had been involved in a number of operations against banned groups in the area.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attack, which targeted the home of Councilor Paul de Jesus, may have been politically motivated.  The source notes that de Jesus had filed paperwork in October to run for the office of vice mayor.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attackers wanted to steal the victim's pickup truck for later use as an explosive device.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the attempted bombing of power pylons may have been designed to damage the transmission line and disrupt power to hundreds of villages.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the Garo National Liberation Army suspected the victim of being a police informant.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) was attempting to sabotage commercial activity in the area.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the motivation may have been ethnic in nature. A source also noted one of the targeted shops was owned by a Muttahida Qaumi Movement activist, while the other was owned by a member of the Pakistan People's Party.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the murder may have been motivated by the victim's participation in the Karachi Operation during the 1990s.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the victim may have been abducted because he opened a business during the Oro festival in defiance of tradition and then was killed for recognizing one of his abductors.  Another source speculated that the motive may have been political and related to the victim's role as a grassroots politician.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the victim was targeted because he was a military informant.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculated that the victim's work as a judge may have motivated his killers.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculates that the bomb may have been in response to the arrests of the sons of a Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) commander.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source speculates that the victim may have been targeted as part of a larger trend of sectarian violence between Pakistan's majority Sunni and minority Shiite communities.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source stated that the attack on the general marketplace was aimed at increasing fear among the population.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police source stated that the attack was in retaliation for the arrest of two militant commanders.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police spokesperson indicates that the targeted truck's owner had received threats following his refusal to accede to a New People's Army (NPA) extortion demand.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police spokesperson stated that the attack was retribution for the killing of two assailants on Saturday night.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a police spokesperson stated the attack was designed to frighten voters away from the upcoming polls.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a radio station official, Suhbatullah Intizar, noted the station had previously been threatened with violence if did not move its office location.
The specific motive is unknown; however, a ransom ($82,000) was requested but not paid.